Measure Papers‎ > ‎

(Williams + 2016)

A psychometric appraisal of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy using law students

Authors 
  • Williams B, 
  • Sifris A, 
  • Lynch M

Abstract

Background: A growing body of literature indicates that empathic behaviors are positively linked, in several ways, with the professional performance and mental well-being of lawyers and law students. It is therefore important to assess empathy levels among law students using psychometrically sound tools that are suitable for this cohort.

Participants and methods: The 20-item Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Health Profession Students Version was adapted for a law context (eg, the word “health care” became “legal”), and the new Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Law Students (JSE-L-S) version was completed by 275 students at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Data were subjected to principal component analysis.

Results: Four factors emerged from the principal component analysis (“understanding the client’s perspective”, “responding to clients’ experiences and emotions”, “responding to clients’ cues and behaviors”, and “standing in clients’ shoes”), which accounted for 46.7% of the total variance. The reliability of the factors varied, but the overall 18-item JSE-L-S yielded a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.80. Several patterns among the item loadings were similar to those reported in studies using other versions of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.

Conclusion: The JSE-L-S appears to be a reliable measure of empathy among undergraduate law students, which could help provide insights into law student welfare and future performance as legal practitioners. Additional evaluation of the JSE-L-S is required to disambiguate some of the minor findings explored. Adjustments may improve the psychometric properties.



References

1. Price V, Archbold J. What’s it all about, empathy? Nurse Educ Today. 1997;17(2):106–110.

2. Daicoff SS. Expanding the lawyer’s toolkit of skills and intelligence, conflict resolution, and comprehensive law. Santa Clara Law Rev. 2012;52:795–874.

3. Bennett MJ. Basic Concepts of Intercultural Communication. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd; 2013. 

4. Gerdes KE, Segal EA, Jackson KF, Mullins JL. Teaching empathy: a framework rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. J Soc Work Educ. 2011;47(1):109–131. 

5. Gallacher I. Thinking Like Non-Lawyers: Why Empathy is a Core Lawyering Skill and Why Legal Education Should Change to Reflect its Importance. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Surface, Collge of Law; 2012. 

6. Daicoff SS. Asking leopards to change their spots: can lawyers change? A critique of solutions to professionalism by reference to empiricallyderived attributes. Georget J Leg Ethics. 1998;11:546–595. 

7. Barkai JLF, Fine VO. Empathy training for lawyers and law students. Southwest Univ Law Rev. 1983;13:505–529. 

8. Elbers NA, van Wees KA, Akkermans AJ, Cuijpers P, Bruinvels DJ. Exploring lawyer-client interaction: a qualitative study of positive lawyer characteristics. Psychol Inj Law. 2012;5(1):89–94. 

9. Brown J. Deeply contacting the inner world of another: practicing empathy in values-based negotiation role plays. Wash Univ J Law Policy. 2012;39:189–230. 

10. Nussbaum MC. Cultivating humanity in legal education. Univ Chic Law Rev. 2003;70(1):265–279. 

11. Duffy J. Empathy, neutrality and emotional intelligence: a balancing act for the emotional Einstein. Queensland Univ Tech Law Justice J. 2010;10(1):44–61. 

12. Daicoff SS. Making law therapeutic for lawyers: therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and the psychology of lawyers. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1999;5(4):811–848. 

13. Carrera P, Oceja L, Caballero A, Muñoz D, López-Pérez B, Ambrona T. I feel so sorry! Tapping the joint influence of empathy and personal distress on helping behavior. Motiv Emot. 2013;37(2):335–345. 

14. Christian RC, Alm J. Empathy, sympathy, and tax compliance. J Econ Psychol. 2014;40:62–82. 

15. Silver MA. Emotional intelligence and legal education. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1999;5(4):1173–1203.

16. Ogletree CJ. Beyond justifications: seeking motivations to sustain public defenders. Harv Law Rev. 1993;106(6):1239–1294.

17. Benjamin G, Darling EJ, Sales B. The prevalence of depression, alcohol abuse, and cocaine abuse among United States lawyers. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1990;13(3):233–246.

18. Eaton WW, Anthony JC, Mandel W, Garrison R. Occupations and the prevalence of major depressive disorder. J Occup Med. 1990;32(11):1079–1087.

19. Kelk N, Medlow S, Hickie I. Distress and depression among Australian law students: incidence, attitudes and the role of universities. Syd Law Rev. 2010;31(1):113–122.

20. Field R. Promoting Law Student Well-Being Through the Curriculum. Sydney: ALTC Teaching Fellowship; 2014.

21. Kelk N. Courting the Blues: Attitudes Towards Depression in Australian Law Students and Legal Practitioners. Sydney: Brain & Mind Research Institute; 2009.

22. Larcombe WF, Fethers K. Schooling the blues? An investigation of factors associated with psychological distress among law students. Univ New South Wales Law J. 2013;36(2):390–436.

23. Leahy CM, Peterson RF, Wilson IG, Newbury JW, Tonkin AL, Turnbull D. Distress levels and self-reported treatment rates for medicine, law, psychology and mechanical engineering tertiary students: crosssectional study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(7):608–615.

24. Benjamin GAH, Kaszniak A, Sales B, Shanfield SB. The role of legal education in producing psychological distress among law students and lawyers. Am Bar Found Res J. 1986;11(2):225–252.

25. Lester AE, England L, Antolak-Saper N. Health and wellbeing in the first year: the law school experience. Altern Law J. 2011;36(1).

26. O’Brien M, Tang S, Hall K. Changing our thinking: empirical research on law student wellbeing, thinking styles and the law curriculum. Legal Ed Rev. 2011;21.

27. Sheldon KM, Krieger LS. Does legal education have undermining effects on law students? Evaluating changes in motivation, values, and well-being. Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(2):261–286.

28. Daicoff SS. Lawyer, be thyself: an empirical investigation of the relationship between the ethic of care, the feeling decisionmaking preference, and lawyer wellbeing. Va J Soc Policy Law. 1997;16(1):87–140.

29. Wilson SE, Prescott J, Becket G. Empathy levels in first- and thirdyear students in health and non-health disciplines. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(2):24.

30. Daicoff SS. Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Psychological Analysis of Personality Strengths and Weaknesses. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.

31. Miller PV. Personality differences and student survival in law school. J Legal Educ. 1967;19(4):460–467.

32. Hafner JL, Fakouri M. Early recollections of individuals preparing for careers in clinical psychology, dentistry, and law. J Vocat Behav. 1984;24(2):236–241.

33. Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multi-dimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):113–126. 

34. Hogan R. Development of an empathy scale. J Consul Clin Psychol. 1969;33(3):307–316. 

35. Mehrabian A, Epstein N. A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers. 1972;40(4):525–543. 

36. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001;61(2):349–365. 

37. Fields SK, Mahan P, Tillman P, Harris J, Maxwell K, Hojat M. Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: health provider – student version. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(4):287–293. 

38. Fjortoft N, Van Winkle LJ, Hojat M. Measuring empathy in pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(6):109. 

39. Kiersma ME, Chen AMH, Yehle KS, Plake KS. Validation of an empathy scale in pharmacy and nursing students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(5):94. 

40. Hsiao CY, Tsai YF, Kao YC. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession students. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013;20(10):866–873. 

41. Ward J, Schaal M, Sullivan J, Bowen ME, Erdmann JB, Hojat M. Reliability and validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy in undergraduate nursing students. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(1):73–88. 

42. Williams B, Brown T, Boyle M, Dousek S. Psychometric testing of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy Health Profession students’ version with Australian paramedic students. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(1):45–50. 

43. DeCosta J [webpage on the Internet]. Overview of Factor Analysis. 1998. Available from: http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html. Accessed October 15, 2015.

44. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Hove: Psychology Press; 2013. 

45. Velicer WF, Fava JL. Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychol Methods. 1998;3:231–251. 

46. deVaus DA. Surveys in Social Science Research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1991.
 
47. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2003. 

48. Kirby E, Broom A, Good P, Wootton J, Adams J. Families and the transition to specialist palliative care. Mortality. 2014;19(4): 323–341. 
Comments