Wednesday, April 6, 2016
(Updated June 27, 2016)

The Zika Virus Scare: An Anatomy Of How Diseases

Are Manufactured For Political Objectives


In 2014, under a non-reporting requirement regime, Brazilian physicians reported a fraction of microcephaly cases for that year; 147 cases to be exact. Under the new reporting regime that took over for 2015, the number of cases naturally increased massively, the numbers representing what would be expected under a reporting regime. Then using the artificially low 2014 numbers as the baseline, Brazil and the global political/medical community (though not all within the medical community) declared an epidemic of microcephaly in Brazil based on the higher, though expected, numbers under the new reporting requirement regime.

"It's a global scandal. Brazil has created a worldwide panic." - Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, professor of epidemiology at the University of Sao Paulo.

The small number of microcephaly cases reported in Brazil before 2015 is being used to set the stage for a blatantly orchestrated 'epidemic' not only in Brazil but around the globe. Pre-2015, cases of microcephaly in Brazil were massively undercounted, as inadvertently confirmed by the World Health Organization's (WHO) statistics... 

Using the one baby in several thousand criteria WHO provides for the occurrence of microcephaly every year, then Brazil should have been reporting at least 1,000 cases per year (3 million/3000 = 1,000), not 150 cases. This explains why under closer examination the numbers in Brazil are declining from the truly high count of 4,180 cases of microcephaly initially reported,2 where of the more than 700 cases under review only 270 cases confirm microcephaly, ruling out the 462 other cases. 

If one uses the United States' statistics of one baby in 1,600 born with microcephaly per year (4 million/2,500), Brazil should be reporting approximately 1,875 cases (3 million/1600) of microcephaly every year, a number that is showing up with the new Brazil count, where 0.3857% of the 700 cases under examination were shown to have microcephaly. So let's do the math:

    0.3857 x 4,180 = 1,612 

1,612 is only 263 less than the 1,875 cases of microcephaly one would expect to see every year in Brazil if the American incidence of the disease (1 in 1600) were also true in Brazil. This undercounting in Brazil has been observed by experts in the medical community, and termed a scandal, "It's a global scandal. Brazil has created a worldwide panic," said Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Sao Paulo, one of the most-respected universities in Latin America. "I'm not saying that Zika is not causing microcephaly, but I am saying that the ministry has yet to present any scientifically credible evidence to support that conclusion." Ganeshwaran H. Mochida, a pediatric neurologist and researcher at Boston Children's Hospital, also sounds the alarm, "It is possible that the baseline number in Brazil includes a lot of underreporting."

Firstly, it's the global community, not just Brazil, that's playing fast and loose with the fake Zika virus epidemic, and secondly, there never was a reason to believe that Brazil was suffering an epidemic of microcephaly in the first place, since it was well known that pre-2015 Brazilian doctors only reported a small fraction of such cases to the central government; pre-2015 there existed no reporting requirement for microcephaly in Brazil. The sudden emergence in 2015 of an 'epidemic' of microcephaly in Brazil actually represents numbers that would be expected given a comprehensive reporting requirement. 

So why the scare, you ask? To create public pressure to scale back restrictive abortion laws in central and south America, and undo state restrictions on abortion in the United States, as inadvertently admitted to by Georgetown University professors and Planned Parenthood and Newsweek.

This news item illustrates the extent of the lies the Marxist co-opted media regurgitates each and every week, if not every day. How numerous are fraudulent news items when compared against truthful news items? My blog has proven that until one has verified  the news for oneself, one must assume all news to be lies. Of course most persons have actual lives to live, where the demands of family and employment preclude close examination of the news. For those too pressed for independent research, this blog fills the gap.

Notice too the 'alternative' media's spin on the news item. Every imaginable conspiracy theory is offered, leaving unmentioned the easily discernible conspiracy facts. This false opposition tactic is what Marxists call the ‘Scissors Strategy’ in which the blades represent the two falsely opposed sides that converge on the confused victims, neutralizing true opposition to socialism, thereby allowing the advancement of socialism to the bewilderment of the true opposition.

The Lancet's French Polynesia Study

The Lancet study’s research design lacks alternative time periods to compare with the time period the study uses (the study uses a twenty-three month period, Sept 1, 2013 to July 31, 2015).3 That means that any conclusions the study makes are useless, since we don’t know the microcephaly incidence for alternative twenty-three month time periods. What we have then is a research study that tells us nothing regarding the incidence of microcephaly in French Polynesia circa 2014. 

The Abortion Agenda's Purpose

Thanks to the blatant lies the CDC has advanced regarding the Zika virus and microcephaly, we now have further empirical proof for the Marxist co-option of the West (globe actually, the West leaving behind Marxist regimes in their former colonies), where abortion is used to destroy the Christian underpinnings of Western Civilization. As Marx said in the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right(1843)4...

The West cannot remain Christian for long when abortion is tolerated, since Christian dogma teaches us that human life is but a continuation of a previous non-corporeal existence...

To destroy what's in the womb is a must for Marxists, since with abortion on demand no one can long continue to believe in a God who knew us before we were born into the physical realm. 


4. The 'War on Religion' as set out in Karl Marx's Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right