CT Heart Scan   a resource for patients and physicians

           Coronary artery disease


 

Introduction 

 Since the main diagnostic reason for performing coronary angiography has always been the identification of significant stenoses, it should not be surprising that the bulk of early clinical research efforts with CT coronary angiography has been to assess its ability to identify significant stenoses. Sometimes the clinical correlation between CT angiography and the catheterization are excellent as in the patient illustrated below:

Most clinical images are less striking and less clearcut. The technical limitations of the current generation of CT scanners, however, should make it clear that CT angiography is not a replacement for invasive angiography. As is discussed elsewhere on this site, the main diagnostic strengths of CT imaging are the identification and characterization of plaque and the ability to produce unlimited cross sectional arterial images.

Below are cross-sectional images of the ostium and mid and distal segments of a left main coronary artery with extensive plaque and significant stenosis. Comparable images from catheterization (cath) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are included:

 

 Technical considerations

The table below shows the relative sizes of the proximal coronary arteries (approximately 3.0 to 4.5 mm in diameter) and the time that they are relatively immobile at end-diastole and end-systole. It also shows both the spatial and temporal resolutions of catheterization and CT angiography, with catheterization angiography being clearly superior.

 Let us consider the optimal spatial resolution of CT angiography (0.4 mm) as a "unit" and assume that we are making measurements in the range of the coronary arterial tree:

A large proximal artery with a diameter of 4 mm would be 10 units across. If our accuracy is +/- 1 "unit," the best we can do is +/- 10% or a range of 20%. For a vessel with a diameter of 2 mm, our accuracy would be proportionately worse.

For this reason, CT angiograms of the coronary arteries should never report stenoses as specific percentages. CT stenoses are usually reported as some variation of mild (0-40%), moderate or borderline (40-70%), severe or significant (>70%), and occluded.

 

Clinical correlations

 Although more studies have appeared since the following table was prepared, the basic conclusion has not changed significantly: CT coronary angiography is the best non-invasive test for accurately detecting significant stenoses, but it is not a replacement for traditional angiography in the catheterization laboratory.

 

 Anomalous coronary arteries

 The  course of anomalous coronary arteries is sometimes difficult to demonstrate  in the catherization laboratory because neighboring structures may not be well visualized. The volumetric imaging formats of CT angiography are unusually well suited to demonstrate such arteries.

The VRT image below shows the course of an anomalous circumflex artery which arises from the right coronary artery and runs posterior to the aorta before entering the left A-V groove.

  

Non-atherosclerotic coronary artery disease

 

                Kawasaki Disease

The following VRT image from a CT angiogram   demonstrates bilateral coronary artery aneurysms from Kawaski disease:

        

               Myocardial Bridge

The following VRT image from a CT angiogram of a middle-aged woman with chest pain demonstrates a very marked myocardial bridge of the LAD artery: 

 The MPR image from CT and the image from catheterization are below:

 


References



On this website

 

      Home


      Patients

General Information

Scheduling and Forms

 

      Physicians 

General Information

Clinical 

CT Images

Case Studies


 

Elsewhere