# PLAYER : RATING POINTS GAMES (%) 1 Komodo 8 w32 : 3248.6 154.0 276 55.8% 2 Houdini 3 Tact w32 : 3247.4 157.0 290 54.1% 3 DON 220214 x64 : 3243.5 142.5 258 55.2% 4 Houdini 2.0 x64 : 3239.4 170.0 306 55.6% 5 Houdini 1.5a S1 x64 : 3236.3 320.0 596 53.7% 6 Ginkgo 1.6 x64 : 3234.4 146.5 268 54.7% 7 Gull 2.3 x64 : 3224.9 146.0 274 53.3% 8 Komodo 5.1 x64 : 3223.8 329.5 624 52.8% 9 Houdini 1.5a T3 x64 : 3220.0 188.0 360 52.2% 10 Critter 1.6a x64 : 3215.6 170.0 327 52.0% 11 Critter 1.4a x64 : 3213.8 315.0 609 51.7% 12 Houdini 2.0Bar x64 : 3213.6 124.5 240 51.9% 13 Equinox 3.20 x64 : 3213.4 254.5 482 52.8% 14 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 3211.7 179.0 348 51.4% 15 Strelka 5.5 x64 : 3210.5 262.5 515 51.0% 16 Gull 3 w32 : 3210.0 358.0 696 51.4% 17 Stockfish 310713 x64 : 3203.7 408.5 826 49.5% 18 Ginkgo 1.5 x64 : 3203.2 338.0 670 50.4% 19 DON 220214 w32 : 3200.1 447.0 882 50.7% 20 Fritz 15 x64 : 3200.0 422.5 846 49.9% 21 Strelka 5.7 x64 : 3200.0 291.0 563 51.7% 22 Komodo 5 x64 : 3199.0 426.5 850 50.2% 23 SugaR SCCT x64 : 3198.0 494.0 1001 49.4% 24 Houdini 1.5a S2 x64 : 3195.6 286.0 579 49.4% 25 Houdini 1.5a x64 : 3191.2 212.5 432 49.2% 26 Twinfish 0.07 x64 : 3188.0 288.5 592 48.7% 27 Fire 4 w32 : 3187.2 425.5 884 48.1% 28 Stockfish 150713 x64 : 3186.4 301.0 610 49.3% 29 Komodo 7a w32 : 3185.7 224.0 469 47.8% 30 Stockfish 240713 x64 : 3183.0 107.0 220 48.6% 31 Mars 1.5 x64 : 3182.9 210.5 451 46.7% 32 Bouquet 1.8 x64 : 3176.0 146.5 306 47.9% 33 Mars 3.35 x64 : 3175.8 130.0 284 45.8% 34 Critter 1.4 x64 : 3174.3 118.5 250 47.4% 35 Equinox 2.02 x64 : 3173.3 109.5 232 47.2% 36 Houdini 2.0c w32 : 3172.7 133.5 292 45.7% 37 DON 1.0b w32 : 3169.3 109.5 241 45.4% 38 Mars 3.38 x64 : 3160.9 127.0 294 43.2% 39 PanChess 00.611 x64 : 3157.0 101.0 232 43.5% 40 Chiron 3 x64 : 3155.2 273.0 621 44.0%
Some Notes (07.05.2016): -All chess engines are played with 1 Core (POPCNT are used where available) -Houdini 1.5a S1/T3 x64 seems to be stronger than Houdini 1.5a x64 default *S1 setting is created by Me, anyone interested (in S1 setting) can Download *My goal was to make slightly stronger than default, but performed much than.. !) *S2 is another Houdini setting, which seems to be more close to 3200 Elo points -All chess engines used Perfect 2016 book, played up to 8 moves (16 halfmove) -Due to Book Learning ON: each player used from different copy of P2016 book -This tour is organized to determine the strength of the used engines: SCCTIX / X *Also the target is to prefer those engines, which are very close to 3200 Elo -Calculated by Ordo / Fritz 15 is fixed to 3200 Elo / Blue Name = Last Update
Some Notes (07.05.2016): -All chess engines are played with 1 Core (POPCNT are used where available) -Houdini 1.5a S1/T3 x64 seems to be stronger than Houdini 1.5a x64 default *S1 setting is created by Me, anyone interested (in S1 setting) can Download *My goal was to make slightly stronger than default, but performed much than.. !) *S2 is another Houdini setting, which seems to be more close to 3200 Elo points -All chess engines used Perfect 2016 book, played up to 8 moves (16 halfmove) -Due to Book Learning ON: each player used from different copy of P2016 book -This tour is organized to determine the strength of the used engines: SCCTIX / X *Also the target is to prefer those engines, which are very close to 3200 Elo -Calculated by Ordo / Fritz 15 is fixed to 3200 Elo / Blue Name = Last Update