# PLAYER : RATING POINTS GAMES (%) 1 Stockfish 13 : 3624.6 382.5 440 86.9% 2 Komodo 14.1 : 3476.9 326.5 440 74.2% 3 Houdini 6.03 : 3468.3 322.5 440 73.3% 4 Ethereal 12.75 : 3423.4 300.5 440 68.3% 5 SlowChess 2.3 : 3370.8 272.5 440 61.9% 6 Fire 8 : 3340.4 255.5 440 58.1% 7 Xiphos 0.6 : 3322.9 245.5 440 55.8% 8 rofChade 2.3 : 3319.5 243.5 440 55.3% 9 Booot 6.4 : 3308.2 237.0 440 53.9% 10 Defenchess 2.3 : 3276.5 218.5 440 49.7% 11 RubiChess 2.0.1 : 3268.0 213.5 440 48.5% 12 Laser 1.7 : 3263.7 211.0 440 48.0% 13 Fizbo 2 : 3256.0 206.5 440 46.9% 14 Fritz 17 : 3255.1 206.0 440 46.8% 15 Shredder 13 : 3250.0 203.0 440 46.1% 16 Andscacs 0.95 : 3222.4 187.0 440 42.5% 17 Gull 3 : 3205.0 177.0 440 40.2% 18 Wasp 4.50 : 3192.7 170.0 440 38.6% 19 Arasan 22.2 : 3176.6 161.0 440 36.6% 20 Chiron 4 : 3153.7 148.5 440 33.8% 21 Fritz 16 : 3133.9 138.0 440 31.4% 22 Minic 2.53 : 3107.4 124.5 440 28.3% 23 Nemorino 6.00 : 3076.3 109.5 440 24.9%
• Calculated by Ordo chess program / Shredder 13 engine is fixed to 3250 Elo
Conditions / Details:• 2x E5-2686, HT OFF, LP OFF, 1 Core, Ponder ON, 128 MB Hash, 4 MEN• All of the engines are used to play via Perfect 2021 (Book Learning ON)• The chess engine are played without using any EvalFile (as NON-NNUE)• Target: Testing Top chess engines as far as possible with over 3000+ Elo• Engines with over than 55% in similarity (via Sim tool) are not allowed• Plus those, which are not capable to ponder / to use Sim tool are out too• All played under FritzGUI, exc. Booot 6.4 played under Shredder Classic E.g Booot frequently crashed under Fritz, Andscacs too, but not so much... This bug issue is perhaps related to 'pondering'/ both authors are informed Note also, it seems Fire 8 engine's performance suffers under Fritz GUIs Btw, I'm not sure exactly about the performance of Nemorino and Minic... But both engines, especially Nemorino (NNUE) gains approx. 400 Elo And one of best records that I've ever seen..e.g NON-NNUE vs NNUE However, I have to admit that (according to my experience): For UCI engines, ShredderClassic GUI seems to be as very good choice Sure, mostly of the Top engines play perfectly fine under Fritz GUI too Arena GUI's main disadvantage: Arena does not support book learning... But in stability, for overall engine testings: Arena 3.5.1 seems to be best!• The overall draw percentage (based on 5060 games) is not so high: 49% • Download all the played tournament games (in PGN): SCCT 4m+2s
• Calculated by Ordo chess program / Shredder 13 engine is fixed to 3250 Elo
Conditions / Details:• 2x E5-2686, HT OFF, LP OFF, 1 Core, Ponder ON, 128 MB Hash, 4 MEN• All of the engines are used to play via Perfect 2021 (Book Learning ON)• The chess engine are played without using any EvalFile (as NON-NNUE)• Target: Testing Top chess engines as far as possible with over 3000+ Elo• Engines with over than 55% in similarity (via Sim tool) are not allowed• Plus those, which are not capable to ponder / to use Sim tool are out too• All played under FritzGUI, exc. Booot 6.4 played under Shredder Classic E.g Booot frequently crashed under Fritz, Andscacs too, but not so much... This bug issue is perhaps related to 'pondering'/ both authors are informed Note also, it seems Fire 8 engine's performance suffers under Fritz GUIs Btw, I'm not sure exactly about the performance of Nemorino and Minic... But both engines, especially Nemorino (NNUE) gains approx. 400 Elo And one of best records that I've ever seen..e.g NON-NNUE vs NNUE However, I have to admit that (according to my experience): For UCI engines, ShredderClassic GUI seems to be as very good choice Sure, mostly of the Top engines play perfectly fine under Fritz GUI too Arena GUI's main disadvantage: Arena does not support book learning... But in stability, for overall engine testings: Arena 3.5.1 seems to be best!• The overall draw percentage (based on 5060 games) is not so high: 49% • Download all the played tournament games (in PGN): SCCT 4m+2s