World Council for the Cedar's Revolution
Freedom and Democracy in Lebanon-WarFacts
|A ceasefire in the latest Middle East conflict in Lebanon and northern Israel came into force on 14 August. During five weeks of fighting hundreds of people died and thousands were made homeless.|
Here is an estimate of the impact of the crisis on Lebanon and Israel up to 14 August, 2006 (unless otherwise stated).
(Israeli Defence Force)
28 Lebanese soldiers (not in conflict with Israelis)
Hezbollah - there are no reliable figures
Serious - 32
Moderate - 44
Light - 614
Treated for shock - 1,985
500,000 approx (50% of population in the north of Israel)
(Human Rights Watch)
915,762 (approx 25% of Lebanese population)
More than 300 buildings, including houses and factories.
900 factories, markets, farms and other commercial buildings
29 airports, ports, water- and sewage-treatment plants, dams and electrical plants
23 fuel stations
145 bridges and over-passes
600km of roads
Environment - It is estimated that the initial clean up of a huge oil spill caused by the Israeli bombing of a power plant will cost $64m (£34m)
3,699 Hezbollah rockets have landed in Israel
7,000 air strike targets hit
70% of businesses closed in northern Israel
(Federation of Israeli Chambers of Commerce)
Tourism - expected to reach NIS 1bn ($230m)
Total cost of war (includes military spending and lost GDP) - up to NIS 23bn ($4.8bn)
Direct and indirect damage - NIS 5 billion (US$1.1bn)
Repairs to buildings and infrastructure and rebuilding expected to reach $4bn
Tourism - Lebanon's tourist industry has been decimated. Tourist is estimated to earn Lebanon $2.5bn (£1.3bn)
Middle East crisis: In maps (BBC)
|The people of Lebanon and northern Israel endured five weeks of fighting between Hezbollah and the Israeli military. Israel launched strikes from land, sea and air on targets in Lebanon, while Hezbollah fired rockets into northern Israel.
Here we map the main areas targeted during the conflict between 12 July and 14 August.
Southern Lebanon and northern Israel have borne the brunt of the fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah. Thousands of families in the heavily populated area were forced to leave their homes.
Here we show some of the towns and villages caught up in the conflict.
Lebanon damage report
|Summary of the main Lebanese infrastructure damaged by Israeli bombing in the two weeks since the conflict began on 12 July, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Social Affairs.
Hezbollah's rocket force (BBC)
|The mainstay of Hezbollah's rocket force are small 122mm artillery rockets known by the generic term "Katyusha". The name - which means "little Katy" in Russian - was coined more than 60 years ago by Soviet Red Army troops who fired them at the invading German army. |
During World War II the Katyushas' distinctive screech cast a powerful psychological spell over the enemy. In northern Israel today, later versions of the rocket remain crude, yet often effective, weapons.
Hezbollah's Katyushas are thought to derive mainly from former Soviet and Chinese stockpiles. A typical example is the Soviet BM-21 Grad missile, which was first deployed in 1963 and has a maximum range of about 25km.
Because of their lack of a guidance system, Katyushas have the greatest effect when launched in concentrated numbers.
Since 2001, Hezbollah is believed to have acquired a number of truck-mounted Multi-Barrel Rocket Launchers [MRBL], enabling them to fire such multiple barrages.
Images broadcast recently by Hezbollah's TV station appeared to show what the group described as a Ra-ad 1 missile being fired. Military analysts believe this missile was an Iranian-built Shahin I missile, which has a range of about 13km.
Recent missile strikes on Israel's northern port city of Haifa indicate that Hezbollah may also have acquired longer-range missiles.
Most of these are believed to be Iranian-manufactured systems like the Fajr-3, with a 45-km range; the Fajr-5, with a range of some 75km.
Some analysts believe that Hezbollah also has the more potent Zelzal-2 which has a claimed range of 200-400km and can be fitted with a 600kg high-explosive warhead. Its solid fuel system means that it can be more easily transported and prepared for firing.
Most analysts believe a more realistic range to be about 100km, but this would still bring much of Tel Aviv - Israel's largest population centre - within its range.
None of these are guided or accurate systems, but often accuracy is not important if the target is an urban area.
Mid-East conflict: Who stands where (BBC)
Israel sees this war as another part of its long effort to establish itself in the region. It has treaties with Egypt and Jordan and would like one with Lebanon.
However this war has put that prospect off, possibly for many years given the level of casualties in Lebanon. In the meantime, Israel wants Hezbollah removed as a threat since Hezbollah is hostile to Israel's existence.
Israel says the Lebanese government should do this but it is prepared to enforce what it identifies as its own interests anyway.
Israel sees the hand of mainly Iran but also Syria behind Hezbollah, especially in the supply of the thousands of rockets Hezbollah has acquired. One strategic Israeli aim in the war and one shared by the United States is to weaken those links and so weaken the influence of Iran and Syria in Lebanon and the region.
On the other hand, Israel itself will suffer a loss of power and prestige if it cannot show a clear victory.
The government fears that the Israeli onslaught will put all the progress Lebanon has made in recent years at risk and that there could be a return to civil war and strife and a return of Syrian influence.
Lebanon therefore wants an immediate end to the fighting and says that a political agreement should come afterwards, based on Security Council resolution 1559. Passed in September 2004, this called on all militias in Lebanon to be disbanded and the authority of the government extended to the border. Easier said than done, has proved to be the experience.
The Lebanese coalition government was formed after the Cedar Revolution of 2004 which led to the removal of Syrian forces from the country. Hezbollah has two seats in the cabinet even though it opposed the Cedar Revolution. However, Hezbollah feels it can act unilaterally, hence its cross-border raid to capture two Israeli solders. The conflict will help determine its future status in Lebanon.
Hezbollah, the Shia 'Party of God' in Lebanon, is determined to come out of the conflict in a stronger position. It also seeks wider support in Lebanon, which will make it harder for the Lebanese government to bring it under closer control afterwards.
Hezbollah sees itself as in the vanguard of the opposition to the state of Israel, which it regards as a Zionist intrusion into Muslim lands. It was instrumental in making Israel withdraw from southern Lebanon in 2000 and sees in this war a chance for it to diminish Israeli power.
Hezbollah's fate will affect the future influence of Iran and Syria in Lebanon and the region. It is closely supported by Iran, which holds similar views about Israel and which has supplied missiles to its Shia brethren. Syria's interests are more to do with trying to maintain an influence in Lebanon and in supporting an opponent of Israel.
Iran's President Ahmadinejad has said that the "elimination" of Israel is the solution to the Middle East's problems so clearly Iran would like to see Israel (and through Israel, the United States) diminished by the conflict and Hezbollah strengthened.
In that way, its own influence would grow not just in Lebanon but also in the region and among the Middle East's Shia population. Some think that Iran sees in the conflict a welcome distraction from its own nuclear programme. However that issue will return.
Equally, if Hezbollah's power is eventually reduced, so too will Iran's, since Iran is Hezbollah's principal backer.
Syria lost out in Lebanon during the Cedar Revolution and probably knows that it cannot return to its former position, even though at heart it regards Lebanon, for historical reasons, as basically part of Syria and certainly part of its sphere of influence. However it probably sees an opportunity to regain some influence through Hezbollah if Hezbollah emerged intact.
It would like the US to recognise it as a power-broker in the area but so far Washington has refused to do so.
Syria does not want to get drawn into a war, even a limited encounter with Israel. It could not win. It prefers to play a very long game.
The Palestinians never quite know how Israel's battles and deals with others will affect them. Over the years they have concluded that they will have to make their own arrangements so when the dust has settled from this war, their own struggle will come to the fore again though of course it has not gone away.
A key issue for them is whether the Israeli Prime Minister Olmert's plan to leave further parts of the West Bank and consolidate in others will now be abandoned.
The prospect for the Palestinians is that despite the international talk of resolving the fundamental issue of who owns which part of the land, nothing much will be done in practice.
The Bush administration sees the battle against Hezbollah in the wider context of its effort to promote what President Bush called in 2003 a "Forward Strategy of Freedom to Promote Democracy in the Middle East".
This means that it wants Hezbollah to be destroyed as a military force. It would see this as an important milestone in its "war on terror".
The risk for the US is that its efforts are seen as aggressive by some and might be counter-productive in that they could provoke more opposition to US policy.
The US wants to see Iranian and Syrian influence reduced as well. Iran, with its nuclear programme at issue, is seen by the US as a potential threat and anything that undermines Iran is useful in American eyes. However, Israel's own strategic relations with the US might also come under close examination if the conflict ends without Israel achieving its stated aims.
FRANCE AND BRITAIN
France has emerged with increased influence. It has capitalised on its traditional links with Lebanon and has taken a leading role in the negotiations for ceasefire. It has also maintained its philosophical opposition to the Bush administration while forcing the US to take it seriously.
Britain has generally followed US policy. It has thereby attracted criticism but hopes to recoup some of it losses if a long-term agreements can be made. (BBC)
Maps Key Facts and Figures (BBC)
Map of attacks by Hezbollah and Israel from 12 July to 14 August 2006
Druze - 8
Alawite - 2
Shia - 27
Sunni - 27
Total - 64 Seats
Maronites - 34
Greek Orthodox - 14
Greek Catholic - 8
Armenain Catholic - 1
Protestant Catholic - 1
Armenian Orthodox - 1
Minorities - 5
Total - 64 Seats
Total Seats - 128 Seats