For more: Ian Hirshi Ali Lies and Hypocrisy
Further to Sydney Writers Festival Organisers, Sydney Writers Festival's Response, The New Weapons of Mass Destruction, THE POLITICS OF MUSLIM AND ARAB BASHING, Who really needs "protection" – Ali or her critics? and Nazi Zionists – The Hypocrites Zio-Nazi pied piper Ian Hirshi Ali never spoke about the brutal, violent and ugly Jewish Shariah!
The Caged Virgin (Holland's shameful treatment of Ayaan Hirsi Ali) By Christopher Hitchens was rejected by the ordinary Dutch people as Ian Hirshi Ali lied all the way!
Mishnah: A girl of the age of 3 years and a day may be betrothed, subject to her father's approval, by sexual intercourse.
A "Harlot" (prostitute) is designated in the Torah as any women who is not "a daughter of Israel" or who has sex with a man she is forbidden to marry. According to this interpretation, all non-Jewish women are considered "harlots" under the Jewish religious law.
Rabbis Teachings on sex with infants and animals: Jewish Teachings on sex with infants:
"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister.
"The complete Hebrew text of this saying can be found in "Rabbi Joseph in Talmud: Bammidber raba and Jalkut"
...[in the event of sex between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman] the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman ; she must be executed , even if she was raped by the Jew ." (from: Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, p87)
Re: The Caged Virgin is NOT a Virgin
For more: The Caged Virgin is NOT a Virgin
The Caged Virgin (Holland's shameful treatment of Ayaan Hirsi Ali) By Christopher Hitchens is NOT virgin in the first place!
we all very well know why she lied - she had to, otherwise she would have never made it ...However, she confessed shortly afterwards,as soon as the "danger"was at least a tiny bit over.Anyway, she paid big price for her lies and she necer complained about it.For me, she is someone everyone can look up to - a strong personality who was destined to succeed.Viska
Wednesday, October 06, 2010, 1:11:01 AM
– Flag – Like – Reply – Delete – Edit – Moderate
Mr. Hitchens, Would you care to also mention that Ayaan Hirsi Ali lied in her political asylum application in Holland and that she never ever resided in any refugee camps of the 3 countries her family lived before she stopped over in Holland. Her affluent family had ways to get her into a westren country but she chose to lie in her asylum application to gain resiedency in Holland. Would you care to mention that Mr. Hitchens?
Saturday, June 19, 2010, 11:38:12 AM
– Flag – Like – Reply – Delete – Edit – Moderate
Please, Ms Ayaan Hirsi Ali tell everyone about the cleric who introduced the oxymoron, "holy war" into Islam. His name was Mohammed Ibn al Wahab and he led his followers to murder other Muslims, descrated the Prophet's Tomb in Madinah, tried to destroy the shrine in Makkah. He was a dangerously insane man who established all of the hatefilled theology is now taking over Islam.
I am neither Muslim nor an Islamic scholar but I know the writing of a madman when I see it. His progeny still have a lot of influence in KSA.
Thursday, May 27, 2010, 9:11:16 AM
– Flag – Like – Reply – Delete – Edit – Moderate
Muslim and Arab bashings are the most spectacular sports in the town! That's why the professional liar became an overnight super star and eventually she was elected at the Dutch Parliament. Her main allies were and still are the Zionists and other zionised forces around the world.
Source: Ayaan Hirshi Ali
· Greg Callaghan
· From: The Australian
· May 21, 2010 1:30PM
Author and former Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali, in Australia to address the Sydney Writers' Festival. Photo: Kristi Miller
SOMALIA-born author, feminist and former Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali talks about Western apologists, why moderate Muslims don't speak out and the spread of Saudi-style Islam.
Callaghan: You were a pious Muslim in your teens. You even once supported the
fatwa on writer Salman Rushdie. What, more than anything, was the catalyst for
your dramatic change of opinion on Islam?
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
· The extremes of moderate Islam The Australian, 1 day ago
· Stand up to defend free speech Herald Sun, 6 days ago
· Osama's one size fits all Islamism The Australian, 10 Sep 2010
· Bridging the gulf The Australian, 10 Sep 2010
· Sceptics challenge Hirsi Ali The Australian, 13 Aug 2010
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
In your new book, Nomad, you say that liberals in the West are far more uncomfortable condemning the ill treatment of women under Islam than conservatives. Why do you think this is so?
Liberals tend to think collectively about ethnicities, cultural groups and religion. Freedom of the individual tends to be a lesser notion. Thus a liberal might be more reluctant to interfere in the case of a Muslim father physically abusing his daughter out of some misplaced respect for cultural difference. A conservative, being more concerned with individual rights – and perhaps less subject to political correctness – would be more inclined to speak out against the wrongdoing. Liberals too often fall back on the notion that governments can solve all problems and "rescue" people who have been told they are victims of the system. Rather than speak out against totalitarian practices under Islam, they shuffle their feet.
it also the case that journalists, usually to the left of politics, happily
criticise Christianity for its abuses while letting Islam off the hook?
Muslims are instinctively appalled by the violence committed in the name of
Islam. But as to why they don't demonstrate in the streets when a terrorist
strike in their home country – the US, Britain, Spain – occurs, this isn't an
easy question to answer. Whenever a terrorist strike happens, the local Muslim
communities suffer a backlash. Radicals like to present this as Islam under
threat, of course, when it is no such thing. It's not always easy for young
Muslims to speak out. People who do this face a lot of rejection from their
families and their communities. But yes, one of the best things they could do
to defend the image of Islam would be to demonstrate against terrorist attacks.
This would be a big shock to al-Qa'ida.
It is a fallacy that Islam is under siege. The zealots and extremists love instilling this in the minds of young Muslims to unite them in anger, to make them feel victims of discrimination, to be more aggressive in their demands. Most of their parents fled to Europe, the US or Australia to escape hardship and discrimination in their homeland, often sacrificing everything to carve out a better life for their children. In the West they have been offered free health care, programs to learn English, get jobs, and a culture that encourages tolerance, and allows them to express their viewpoints. Most of these young Muslims in the West have no idea what it is to live under an Islamic dictatorship. Zealots tell them to "fight" but they have no real idea what they're fighting for.
The decline of Christianity in Europe has created a vacuum. Christian missionary work missed a historic opportunity among the immigrant populations across the Continent in the postwar period. But what Europeans should take enormous pride in now is their great secular traditions. The European Enlightenment of the 18th century gave birth to schools and universities run on principles of critical thinking. The Enlightenment emancipated Europe from the terrible dogmas of the past and opened the way for a public education system geared towards outward-looking citizens, not those driven by the separateness of tribe. Today, however, many schools and campuses in the West have opted to be more respectful of the faith, customs, and habits of other cultures. This would be fine except it has been used to gloss over fundamentally unjust practices or belief systems. When well-meaning Westerners ignore things like forced marriage or domestic violence in order to "stop society from stigmatising" Muslims they are denying the rights of Muslim girls. They should cast off these self-imposed blinkers.
I think more young Muslim women in the West are waking up to practices like enforced marriage, honour killings and genital mutilations simply because so much publicity has been given to these things. But there are schools across the US, Europe and no doubt Australia where girls are taught all day to believe in male superiority, to lower their eyes, to veil themselves and walk softly into the mosque by a back door. It's important to remember that Muslim schools are different from so-called regular Christian or Jewish schools. By "regular" I mean schools that are Christian or Jewish in identity but have secular curricula. Muslim schools, by contrast, emphasise religion more than anything else. Veiled schoolgirls are one very evident marker of the rise of revivalist, purist Islam, and their numbers are visibly growing. The subjection of women within Islam is the biggest obstacle to the progress of Muslim communities in the West.
So the West needs to be less apologist?
Absolutely. A culture that considers women to be masters of their own lives is better than one that mutilates girls' genitals and confines them behind walls and veils them or flogs them for falling in love with the wrong person. A culture that appoints a woman to the Supreme Court is better than a culture that declares that the testimony of a women is worth half that of a man. The West should not fall into the trap of tolerating intolerance.
The face-covering is like a mask. What's the point of having CCTV cameras for security if your face can't be recognised? People say that it will cause a backlash but the argument is weak. Remember, it's only a ban on the face-covering veil, not the veil itself.
Do you feel any optimism about the fledgling democracies of Iraq and Afghanistan surviving after Western troops withdraw?
I passionately hope their democracies survive. Iran and al-Qa'ida are doing mischief in Iraq and there are powerful groups who want to turn the country into an Islamic state. After the surge in troop numbers there was a stabilisation in law and order but once the troops withdraw the secular forces might be more vulnerable. Regardless of all the bad news streaming out of Afghanistan, girls are going back to school and health care for women has improved. Anything is an improvement after the Taliban. I am actually most optimistic about Iran – despite having a leader who believes the 12th imam is about to return to Earth, young people are tired of living under an Islamic dictatorship and the country has a tradition of vigorous debate and healthy criticism of the government.
Is that what Islam needs, too?
Yes. The Muslim mind needs to be opened. And the first way to do that is to encourage and reward those who ask questions. People need to be free to speak their minds and stand up against abuses.