Documents‎ > ‎

Anders Behring Breivik Court Statement 2012-04-17 (Opening Statement)

Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen: We now come to Breivik's explanation, and I will ask the defendant to take place in the witness box.

(The defendant is shown to the witness stand)

Arntzen: You can sit down. As a defendant in a public criminal case you do not have to give a statement. But you have a right to explain yourself, if you wish. If you use this right, I will ask you to explain yourself truthfully. You will first have the opportunity to talk coherently about matters that you believe are important for your case. I understand that you have prepared a written statement that you want to read out. I understand that you will begin your statement with a prepared message. I ask you to still keep within the time frame your defense lawyer indicated yesterday. And you also need to be prepared that I may come to ask you questions during your reading. You must also be prepared that I may interrupt you, if you move away from that which has bearing on the case.

What will happen after you have performed your prepared messages, is that the prosecutor will take over and ask you questions related to various topics. Your defense lawyers have already been told which topics those are. You will get some opening questions, and you also need to be prepared for some specific questions. Your defense will then have the opportunity to ask questions and also the coordinating aid lawyers, the experts and the court. If you wish, you may begin now.

Breivik: Dear Judge Arntzen. Lippestad indicated yesterday that it will take approximately 30 minutes and possibly longer. The prosecution laid the framework for their work yesterday, and I also ask that I may lay the framework for my defense, and I can't get that done if I can't use the list of points.

I hope I will be allowed to explain the causes and motives related to July 22 and I hope you do not interrupt me.

Arntzen: You are allowed to do so. What I meant was plain reading. If you have a bulleted list of points that you want to stick to, you'll get more leeway than with a mere recitation.

Breivik: It's true. I have a bulleted list, but I will start over after I've finished to set the parameters for my defense. So the question is whether I get your permission to lay the framework for my own defense. I will remind you that I have undergone 1,100 pages of questioning, and it is so massive an amount of information that I can not set the parameters for my own defense without aids.

Arntzen: No, I understand. You can begin to lay the framework.

Breivik: Yes.

Mette Yvonne Larsen: Administrator, I'm told by the courts we are broadcasting to that they can't hear him well. Please push the microphone a little further down, Breivik, like that.

Breivik: Yes, okay.

Arntzen: Can you talk a little bit louder?

Breivik: Yeah, that's fine. I would also point out that I have toned down the rhetoric for the sake of the victims and their relatives, and I think it should be within both acceptable limits and my rights.

I stand here today as a representative of the Norwegian and European anti-Communist and anti-Islamist opposition movement, shortened the Norwegian and European resistance movement, and as a representative of the Knights Templar Network. When I speak, I speak on behalf of the many Norwegians, Scandinavians and Europeans who do not want to be deprived of their ethnic, indigenous, cultural, and territorial rights.

Norwegian media and prosecutors have argued and will continue to argue that the reasons that I executed the 22/7 attack were inconsequential, and because I was a pathetic and spiteful loser who lacks integrity, does not have dignity or trust, that I am a notorious liar, that I lack morals, that I'm crazy and that I therefore should be immediately ignored and forgotten by others Cultural conservatives and nationalists in Norway and Europe.

They will say that I lost my job and social standing, that I am a cruel and insane person who is only looking for attention to my own person. All of this, they claimed. They also claimed that I am narcissistic, antisocial, psychopathic, that I have a phobia for germs and put on a face mask daily for many years, that I only like red sweaters and that I've had an incestuous relationship with my own mother.

They also claimed that I am a miserable, pathetic child and baby killer despite the fact that I have not killed anyone under the age of 14. That I'm a coward, inbred, homosexual, pedophile, necrophile, racist, sociopath, fascist, Nazi, Zionist and anarchist. All this has been claimed. They also claimed that I am physically and mentally retarded with an IQ around 80.

I am of course not surprised by these characterizations. Before I undertook my mission I described in detail what I expected them to say and write, and it turned out to be true. Most people out there understand that this is just false propaganda, and it borders on comedy. But it is important that everyone understands why these cultural elites, journalists, editors, and even prosecutors in this case, will continue to ridicule, mock and lie about me.

The answer is simple: I have implemented the most sophisticated, spectacular, and the most brutal political assassination committed by a militant nationalist in Europe since World War II. They do this because they fear militant nationalism. They fear that we will be able to damage the cultural Marxist ideology and their multicultural experiment. They will do everything in their power to prevent this. Me and my revolutionary nationalist brothers and sisters manifest their worst nightmare. They want to try to scare others from doing the same. This is the reason the massive sickening demonization of my character is going to continue. I hope all nationalists and cultural conservatives out there do not let themselves be deceived by this propaganda.

I will explain how it all started and what happened after World War II.

Norway and Western Europe have not had a real democracy since the interwar period. Freedom of expression in Norway and Europe is a concept without substance. Norway and Europe are almost completely stifled by conformity and are therefore dictatorships. Norway and other countries in Western Europe are not democratic countries, and they have not been democratic countries since the interwar period between the First and Second World War.

What happened last time there was real democracy in Europe? Yes, Hitler came to power. And this is part of the reason that liberals and cultural Marxists after World War II never wanted to introduce true democracy and freedom of expression. Liberals and cultural Marxists have cooperated after World War II to keep the nationalists and the cultural conservatives from power, as their ultimate fear is that a new Hitler pops up and supposedly starts World War III. So what today is called a democracy, is in fact a liberal and cultural Marxist dictatorship.

Cultural Marxism, which came out on top in Norway and Western Europe after the defeat of the Axis powers in the war, elevated itself to the divine and only truth. Cultural Marxism became sacred, and its followers lifted their voices in support of international solidarity and human progress. Multiculturalism was soon included in this sublime and sacred truth, and it wasn't allowed to criticize the sacred truth. Cultural conservatism and nationalism became prohibited, characterized as barbaric, hateful, and inhumane.

These truths, created and adopted in 1945, were further reinforced during the revolution of '68, which I shall tell you about next.

Nationalists and cultural conservatives lay in shambles after World War II when the Axis powers had fallen. Europe never had McCarthy, so the Marxists had free reign. They used this period to infiltrate the media sector and educational organizations. The first generation of Marxist infiltrators, however, focused mainly on the education sector, especially after the Marxists had been told by the social-democratic parties in Europe that they were too extreme to obtain political positions. This happened not only in Norway, but throughout Western Europe. There were many Marxists who were university teachers, as they believed that this was the most effective way to exercise power.

The Marxist revolution of '68 in Norway and Western Europe occurred as a direct result of our lack of anti-Communist leaders like McCarthy, who prevented the Marxists from infiltrating the media and the education sector. But the problem was that McCarthy himself was too moderate. He considered at one point to deport all American Marxists to the Soviet Union, but unfortunately did not do this.

Cultural institutions in Western Europe were an easy target for Marxists to infiltrate, while the bourgeois economic-liberals were primarily focused on controlling and managing the economy. Hence there was a new distribution of power in Europe. Marxists, who were in control of the culture and the bourgeois economic-liberals, who were in control of the economy.

Deconstruction is the key word.

The Marxist cultural reforms introduced feminism and affirmative action, the sexual revolution, transformation of the church, schools of education, morals and behavior, to name a few. 1968 was the year the Marxist cultural revolution began. The result was the collapse of authority and a systematic deconstruction of social fundamental principles and norms.

They created a socialist, egalitarian society in Norway and Western Europe, where all the groups that were regarded as victims were given power. The greater your sacrificial self-hatred, the higher in the new hierarchy of power you could get. Nationalists and cultural conservatives remained powerless.

A conservative critic said the following in 1968:

In a few years, the Marxists will take care of the culture, while the liberals and bourgeois manage the economy.

And he was right. Today the culture is controlled by the Marxists. Liberals manage the economy, while nationalists and cultural conservatives have been kept out of power since World War II. Today, as a result, Norway and many other European countries suffer of cultural self-contempt, which is due to Marxist doctrines and the multicultural ideology.

A couple of questions, perhaps the most important in our time, which all journalists, parliamentary politicians and academics should ask themselves are the following:

Do you think it is undemocratic that the Norwegian people have never been asked through a referendum whether they accepted that Norway was transformed into a multi-ethnic and multicultural state?

Is it democratic to do this without having to ask people for advice?

The second question is as follows:

Do you think it is undemocratic that the Norwegian people have never been asked through a referendum whether they accept that Norway welcomes so many African and Asian immigrants that they risk being turned into a minority in their own capital?

And then someone will say: No, there is no problem because there are free elections.

But then the next question is the following: Do you believe that free choice is enough, and that the political parties and the Norwegian media have an obligation to inform the public about the consequences? Norwegians and Europeans have been deceived and manipulated by the left-wing politicians and journalists. And they have never explained the consequence, namely that they are going to lose their ethnic group, their culture, their traditions, Christianity, and their country. Nationalist and cultural conservative political parties in Europe are banned.

On several occasions in Norway and Europe it became clear that nationalists and cultural conservatives in Norway and Europe are excluded from the democratic process. Our opinions are seen as inferior. And we as humans are seen as second-class citizens. It has been like this since World War II. There is no real democracy in Norway and Europe while the liberal and Marxist elites are in charge. They boycott democracy whenever they feel like it. And they feel like it every time the nationalist parties are close to taking power.

I'll take an example from Austria a few years ago. When Jörg Haider's nationalist party, the ÖVP, took place in the coalition government, the country was boycotted by 14 countries in the EU. They said: We can not allow a nationalist and cultural conservative party to have influence, because their policies are intolerant, cruel and inhumane. National and international news agencies created their own initiative, putting strong pressure on Austria and calling them racists and Nazis. And then they tried to force them to change their opinion.

The same happened when the Swiss people voted against allowing minarets a few years ago. International news agencies did the same thing here when they started their great propaganda campaigns and called the Swiss racists and Nazis. Guess what they called them: intolerant, cruel and inhumane.

The same is happening now in Hungary, where the nationalist alliance is a victim of the same demonization. Once again the Marxists and liberals boycott democracy and try to force the Hungarians to change their mind by calling them fascists, Nazis, bigots. Swedish news agencies continue to do the same thing against the political party Sweden Democrats. Norwegian news agencies have done this for 20 years in Norway towards the Progress Party. Here, too, they boycott the democracy and try to force the Norwegians and Swedes to change their mind by calling them racists, intolerant, cruel and inhumane.

Norwegian and European politicians and journalists should ask themselves the following questions, as this is very important:

Has the Norwegian press ever directed campaigns against the Progress Party before the election, with the intention of influencing election results negatively? The answer is yes. They have been running a systematic smear campaign against the Progress Party for 20 years, and that they will continue to do so, and the exact same thing is taking place all around Europe.

Can Norway be called a democracy if 100 percent of the Norwegian news agencies promote the multicultural ideology and systematically censor the individuals that support ethnic and cultural protectionism?

The answer is no. Norway can not be called a democracy as long as this systematic censorship is taking place.

A survey by Frank Aarebrot in Norway shows that only 1 percent of journalists votes for the Progress Party, and that more than 60-70 percent votes for left-wing political parties. What do you think the reason for this? The answer is that the journalism faculty at the college in Volda and the University of Oslo is completely dominated by Marxist teachers. Bruce Bawer, among others, has written about this. And these Marxist teachers helps to indoctrinate students.

In all cases it is necessary to introduce a quota scheme for journalists and editors in the European news agencies. This is one of the few opportunities to regain a free and objective press.

A British survey showed that 69 percent of Britons see immigration as either a problem or as a very big problem. Source references are in the compendium.

Another survey by Statistics Norway from February 2010, from the UK, showed that three out of five Britons, that is, 70 percent of Britons, believe that Britain has become a dysfunctional country as a result of multiculturalism. The source is The Times, February 2010.

Another British study showed that 70 percent are dissatisfied with multiculturalism.

Arntzen: Breivik.

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: What you've read so far, is it content from your manifesto?

Breivik: No, absolutely not.

Arntzen: Or are you reading what you prepared?

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: Alright.

Breivik: These are citations that emphasize the point: Norwegian and European journalists are anti-nationalist and political activists. They allow Muslims and Marxists to fill the newspapers, but they call everyone else bigoted Islamophobes, racists, and Nazis.

If 70 percent of Britons believe that their country has become dysfunctional as a result of multiculturalism, how many do you think share the same opinion in Norway, Sweden, Germany and France?

Norwegian, Swedish, German and French journalists should be objective, but they are not. It is a mandatory requirement in order to call yourself a journalist. A journalist who is not objective and who chooses to support multiculturalism is not a journalist, but a political activist.

About 30 percent of Norwegians and Europeans are opposed to multiculturalism, but there's not a single news organization that represents our views. In a real democracy 30 percent of the news agencies would in fact speak on our behalf and present our views. Instead, 100 percent of all news agencies are supporters of multiculturalism.

There is no foundation for democracy, and all our state institutions like schools and universities have a cultural Marxist and multicultural curriculum. More and more nationalists and conservatives realize, as I have realized, that the democratic struggle is pointless. It is not possible to win when there is no real freedom of speech, and many more will realize this in the coming decades and pick up arms. When peaceful revolution is made impossible, violent revolution becomes inevitable. It's no secret that the opponents of cultural Marxism and multiculturalism have been silenced since World War II. This oppression of opinion is the real terror.

This grave injustice has caused me and others to lose faith in democracy and decide to become militant nationalists. It are these grave injustices that created me, Laserman in Sweden, and the NSU in Germany. People who call me evil, have misunderstood the difference between brutality and evil. Brutality is not necessarily evil. To call anyone evil assumes you know something about a person's intentions and motives. It is just as ignorant to call me cruel as to call the U.S. military leaders during World War II evil, who decided to kill 300,000 Japanese civilians with nuclear bombs.

They did so not because of evil, but because they calculated that an early end to the war would save millions of lives. They killed 300,000 civilians to, perhaps, save millions of people. This was out of good intentions and motives, that is goodness and not evil even though the methods they used were brutal.

I and other militant nationalists are using exactly the exact same logic. If we can force Labor to change immigration policy, stop the deconstruction and colonization. If we can force them to change direction by executing 70 people, or destroy the multicultural ideology by other means, it would obviously contribute to us not losing our ethnic group, our Christianity, and our culture. This will help to prevent a future civil war in Norway which could result in the death of hundreds of thousands of Norwegians.

I and other militant nationalists in Europe are one hundred percent convinced that if we manage to stop the multicultural experiment in Europe in time, we will help save hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of lives when a great civil war is averted.

And unfortunately we don't have the luxury to wait much longer with the confrontation. If we were to wait twenty, thirty, forty years, then ethnic Norwegians and Europeans will have become a minority. We are therefore unable to wait any longer, and as previously mentioned, the intentions and motives are based on goodness and not evil. If there is someone who is evil, it's the Social Democrats and other multiculturalists who are engaged in systematic ethnic and cultural deconstruction.

Since the Social Democrats and other parties in Norway and Western Europe chose to completely transform our countries into a multiethnic and multicultural society, without bothering to ask their people through a referendum. There have been thousands, tens of thousands of warnings that the consequences will be very bloody.

The only thing that should surprise Norway and Europe is why such a large action has not been carried out before. They have prepared for conflict. Norway and Western Europe, like the Balkans, will end in bloodshed. And yes, I would have done it again. Because the crimes against my people and my culture are a thousand times more barbaric. The implementation of a small barbarity is sometimes necessary to stop a much greater barbarity.

As stated in the compendium, 2083, it is important to trigger and provoke a witch hunt for moderate cultural conservatives and increase the level of censorship. This will increase the polarization which in turn will contribute to increasing radicalization. Short-term it will seem self-destructive because the moderates will attract so much negative attention, but when the moderates are being persecuted many of them will radicalize. To provoke a witch hunt was therefore critically important to our cause in the long run.

Cultural Marxists and multiculturalists have had hundreds, even thousands of opportunities to change the political course since World War II. But they have refused to change course again and again. The question is: do the AUF and the Labour Party do so because they are evil, or because they are naive? And if they are naive, will we forgive them or punish them?

The answer is that most of AUF-ers are naive and indoctrinated, that is, brainwashed. Many people have been indoctrinated and brainwashed by adults Labor people, or by the left-wing media. All others have been indoctrinated by the Norwegian school curriculum, or even their parents.

These were not innocent civilians or children, but political activists who actively promoted multiculturalism and cultural Marxism. As many as 44 of 65 AUF-ers had leading positions in the AUF, and many took part in other political boards, and are nominated for county boards for the Labour Party. AUF is very similar to the Hitler Jugend. Utøya is an indoctrination camp for political activists, and on July 20th they had been indoctrinated for several hours by one of the most extreme Communists in Norway: Marte Michelet, daughter of the arch-communist Jon Michelet. She had been invited by the AUF's leadership as a speaker.

Marte Michelet felt such a huge hatred for our cultural heritage, despite our ethnic group being so vulnerable and oppressed, that she chose to convert to Islam and have Berber Arabic offspring with a Muslim. And it's communist speakers and leaders of this caliber who are indoctrinating AUF.

Arntzen: Breivik …

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: You said initially that you had moderated your rhetoric.

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: For the families and survivors.

Breivik: Yes. It does not get worse than this.

Arntzen: Can you be mindful of that?

Breivik: I will do so.

Breivik: Before I continue, I want to read a quote from John Stuart Mill, a former member of parliament and an English philosopher. "A person may cause evil to others not only by his action but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury".

All political activists who advocate cultural Marxism and multiculturalism should expect to be liable for their actions in the future. Now you know what the price for treason is, and this will not be the last time in Norway and Europe that this happens. We militant nationalists know what to expect when we choose to fight. We perform the ultimate sacrifice, with or without recognition.

You try to save your people, a nation where the majority is so indoctrinated that they believe that they need not be saved. You try to save your people, but the majority blindly accepts the propaganda that you are a murderer and terrorist, and not a national hero. All this we know beforehand, so we do not complain. Before the operation I wrote in the compendium that I would be demonized as an insane evil monster and terrorist. It is to be expected as long as Europe is controlled by multiculturalists. It is a price we are willing to pay.

And to be imprisoned for life, or to die as a martyr who was crucial to our people's and culture's survival, is the greatest honor a man or woman may experience in their lives. This is not only our right but also our duty. Knowing that I will be imprisoned does not frighten me. And the reason for this is simple: I was born in a prison, and have lived my entire life in a prison. In a prison where it is not possible to express yourself politically. A prison where there is no freedom of speech and where I have been forced to watch as my own ethnic group and culture are slowly deconstructed by Marxists and liberals. In this prison, resistance is not allowed, and it is even expected that I applaud my people's and culture's downfall.

In this prison the system has decided that if you criticize, you will be branded, publicly demonized, ridiculed, dehumanized. This prison is called Norway. It does not matter if I'm locked in a solitary confinement cell in Ila, or if I live in Skøyen or Frogner. The injustice is just as urgent, regardless of where in Norway you live. Because you live with the knowledge that all towns and cities will ultimately end up like the multicultural hellhole that we call Oslo.

And you sit there with the knowledge that democratic struggle is useless, because those in control use undemocratic methods. The latest report from Statistics Norway showing that immigrants will become a majority in 2040, is very misleading and deceitful. It tells very little about the relationship between ethnic Norwegians and non-Norwegian. The reason the report is worthless, is that they have deliberately excluded all Asians, Africans and non-Nordic Europeans who are adopted. They have also omitted the third generation immigrants, illegal immigrants and children from one parent from Africa, Asia or other non-Nordic area. The report is commissioned by multiculturalists, where they try to hide the fact that ethnic Norwegians will be a minority in Oslo within five years. This is going to happen.

In addition, statistics from 2010 show that as much as 47 percent of those who are born in hospitals in Oslo are non-ethnic Norwegians. Another study shows that ethnic Norwegians are already a minority among first graders in elementary school in Oslo. This is today's Oslo, not Oslo in 28 years. Statistics should be renamed to the Labour Party Central Agency.

Many have claimed that ultra-nationalists like me want to introduce and create a terrorist regime. This is incorrect. I support the Japanese and South Korean cultural model, nothing more, nothing less. Are Japan and South Korea truly terrible regimes? No, they are not. They are high-tech, successful and monoculture mentalist nations. They said no to multiculturalism and mass immigration in the 70s.

They are the living proof that nations can be successful, if not more successful, if they say no to mass immigration. Discipline, honor, and pride in your heritage and culture is essential in Japan and South Korea. Women have a secondary role in the workplace. This is the most perfect society in the world today. It is therefore absolutely incorrect that people like me would like to introduce a vicious terrorist regime.

Today's most successful nations are Japan and South Korea which have prioritized both economic protectionism, but also ethnic and cultural protectionism. This model is currently the most perfect of all political models. In Europe, however, the alliance between Marxists and liberals after World War II, in principle, destroyed Europe. We have transferred our entire industry, exporting tens of millions of jobs to Asia, due to lack of protectionism.

In addition, the European Marxists made sure we focused all our resources on social security, sick pay and time off for Europeans. On the opposite direction, Japan and South Korea focused much more on research, advanced technology, export and commercialization of high-tech products.

Arntzen: Breivik...

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: Are you approaching a conclusion in your written statement?

Breivik: I'm on page six of 13, so I'm halfway there.

Arntzen: Yes, it's very much. And now it's been thirty minutes, so I suggest you prepare to end your written statement. And then you can come back to the points.

Breivik: It is not possible. This forms the framework for my defense. If I can not be allowed to create the framework for my own defense, then there is no point in me explaining myself at all. However, there are still six pages, and everything is relevant. And …

Arntzen: It has limited relevance what you say about Japan and other countries. Can you at least stick to your opinion on Norwegian conditions?

Breivik: Yes. Okay... Always end the argument.

Both Japan and South Korea, and to some extent Taiwan and China, are living proof that countries that clearly say no to multiculturalism and mass immigration are better off in the long run and are more success.

Jo Benkow, leader of the Conservatives during the seventies and eighties issued the following statement: "An ethnically homogeneous society is a harmonious society".

The more culturally and ethnically fragmented a society becomes, the more impaired its national unity.

A culturally and ethnically fragmented society is therefore of low social confidence, where trust between citizens is reduced every day until you end up like Greece, where primarily public employees pay taxes. This will not only affect the interaction between the different groups, but will in time lead to confrontation. This is sure to happen, you also see that Islam is already very dominant in Norway and Europe.

It has been claimed by the European left-wing politicians, academics and journalists that the vast majority of European Muslims are peaceful and renounce violence. These people claim that as many as 99.9 percent of Muslims are well integrated and strongly oppose violence. Of course these are lies and propaganda. The Koran and Hadith require that all Muslim men are obliged to support or engage in Jihad. A British survey showed that nearly 25 percent of British Muslims said that the London bombing of 7/7, where 52 people died, can be justified because of NATO's presence in Afghanistan. Another study from Britain shows that 40 percent of British Muslims – 40 percent – believes that 9/11 can be justified. Source: Aftenposten 2006.

The official lie is that 99.9 percent of Muslims do not support violence. But the truth is that as many as 25 to 40 percent of Muslims openly support Jihadist violence. Marxist organizations like the Labour Party and other left wing and liberal politicians, academics, journalists and political commentators are intelligent people who know this truth. The reason that they lie about this, ignore, cover up or tamper with the relevant information is that there is a consensus, that is, an indirect cooperation between European elites who systematically go behind the Norwegian and European people's backs with the intention to protect the multicultural experiment.

The few examples I mention here, and a hundred other examples which I documented through the compendium, are only the tip of the iceberg, proving that the Marxists and liberal politicians, academics and journalists indirectly work together to deconstruct the Norwegian and European culture and allow further Islamization. But now everything is turned upside down. The Norwegian press has the power of definition, and they have decided that evil is good, and good is evil. According to them multiculturalism is good, and I and others who oppose it are evil. Nationalists and cultural conservatives are treated just as badly as Islamists were treated in the Middle East before the Arab spring. Ole Wilhelm Kluwer, a spokesman for the Association of Norwegian NS Children has said the following: "How can politicians talk of multiculturalism when they can not even accept the cultural differences within their own population?"

There are hundreds of thousands of descendants from members of the National Front in Norway. The question he posed was: How much longer will European nationalists and cultural conservatives be punished for World War II? Norway has not progressed further than 1945, war settlements against nationalists and cultural conservatives were never completed and are still continuing today. It is time that Europe's liberals and Marxists stop punishing today's nationalists and cultural conservatives for what happened during World War II.

We do not accept it anymore. A weak and fragmented ethnic group will result in a weak culture, resulting in a weak nation. An ethnic group is the heart of a culture, and you will see that as the ethnic group becomes more and more fragmented, the culture itself becomes weaker. Of this we already see clear signs in Oslo and other European cities. In such a setting, the aggressive cultures and political ideologies like Islam increasingly dominate. The Muslim enclaves in Europe will grow as aggressively as cancer, until one day they constitute a dominant force. Is this really so difficult to understand?

Of all that our people have acquired over time, the freedom of our people has always been directly related to the integrity and strength of our ethnic group. This is the most precious and also the most fragile. Our ethnic group is the heart of our culture. Our culture can not survive without a strong heart. The survival of this ethnic group, our culture, in addition to our freedom and our independence, is what our ancestors dedicated their lives to, and hundreds of thousands of our people throughout history have sacrificed their lives for.

Our ethnic group, our culture, our identity, our Christianity, our nation and our freedom and independence are the fruits of centuries, even millennia of collective effort and hard work. And in 60 short years Labor has managed to deconstruct everything. The only thing we'll be left with is sushi and flat panel displays, we are about to lose everything that is precious to us.

Arntzen: We must ask you for a close, Breivik.

Breivik: There are five pages still, I'll be brief.

Arntzen: Attorney Lippestad, this goes far beyond what was announced yesterday.

Breivik: It is the framework for the defense. And I can not defend myself if I am not allowed to explain why 22/7 was carried out. But I've toned down the language really, I take into account the families and the victims. All I want is to explain why I carried out 22/7 and explain the reasons and motives. And I have, originally this was 20 pages, and I have cut it down to 13 pages. It is not possible to shorten it.

Arntzen: Attorney Lippestad, do you have some comments regarding the duration being far beyond what was requested earlier?

Lippestad: That was your decision, Honorable Judge, that we now have five days for the defendant's explanation. We still have five pages worth of what he should read. I understand the Court's opinions, but I hope that we will continue with the current explanation. He also indicated at the start that he sees no reason to further explain himself if he's not allowed to read this. It is imperative that we get his explanation, firstly this written statement, and oral statements afterwards. So I would strongly urge that we finish the five sides that are left, but also, Breivik, make it as short as possible and cut out anything that you deem unnecessary.

Breivik: Yes.

Lippestad: Thank you.

Arntzen: Try to cut it down a little as we've gone far beyond schedule. When finished I will give the word to the Attorney Engh, to continue your examination.

Breivik: Just for the record, that is, there is much talk about these five days that I've received. I have never asked for five days. The only thing I have asked for is one hour, and it is the hour I'm currently in. It is critically important to me that I get to explain my reasons and motives.

Arntzen: Then you can continue.

Breivik: Thank you.

Islam is currently engaged in demographic warfare through mass Muslim immigration, combined with explosive Muslim birth rates over 3. This is more than twice as much as the ethnic Norwegian birth rate, set at 1.5. If we let this continue, we know what will happen. We will end up being a minority in our own country, as we see with the Christians in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country and 80 percent Christian in 1911. When the Muslims became the majority around 1960, they felt strong enough to take control of the country. So they accused the Christians of cooperating with Israel to justify a civil war. It's well known that the Christians lost in the 1980s, and today they are a persecuted minority constituting less than 25 percent.

And so we come to another important European problem. Namely, Islamization, which manifests itself in the endless list of demands. This includes demands for sharia-compliant foods, burial rituals, public swimming pool, banks, credit cards, loan agreements, insurance agencies, courts, schools and kindergartens. This gradual Islamization of Europe is funded in part by Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, while Norway uses oil money for developmental aid to Muslim countries and the benefits and tuition for Muslims in Norway. So one should ask oneself, what is Saudi Arabia using its oil money on? According to official information from Saudi Arabia from 2007, the country has spent more than 600 billion to finance the construction of Islamic centers in European countries. They have financed the construction of 1,500 mosques, 202 Islamic colleges, 210 Islamic cultural centers and nearly 2,000 Islamic schools, mainly in Europe, America, Canada and Australia. And it is worth noting that in most of these institutions Wahhabi Islam is propagated, which is a very conservative form of Islam.

Journalists and political commentators have claimed that I called Mullah Krekar to confirm my worldview that there is a war of civilizations between the Islamic world and Christian Europe. According to many of them, including Husby and Sørheim, these are psychotic delusions, which are only shared by myself and perhaps Mullah Krekar. What these reporters have forgotten to inform the Norwegian and European people about, is that not only do I and Mullah Krekar share these visions, but up to 60 percent of Muslims in Europe actually believe the same, and in addition, a large proportion of Norwegians and Europeans, perhaps as many as 30 percent. A study in Germany found out that 56 percent of German Muslims believe there will be a war of civilizations between the Islamic world and Europe. So to say that this is extremism or a psychotic delusion is particularly stupid.

One of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, Subhi Saleh, a member of the committee to design a new Egyptian constitution, said: "Anyone who separates religion and politics has abolished 600 Koranic verses".

It also means that anyone who does not accept a religious state based on sharia is an apostate or non-Muslim. The same leader said that the Muslim Brotherhood does not recognize diversity, because there are no secular and liberal Muslims, there is only Islam. According to orthodox Muslims, the Muslim Brotherhood is trying to use Abid Raja and other secular Muslims in Norway and Europe to hijack Islam and use it for their own purposes.

There are no secular and liberal Muslims, there is only Islam. Orthodox Muslims like the Muslim Brotherhood wonder who has given Raja Abid and faithless Muslims in Europe the right to abolish the 600 Koranic verses. One can not trust these so-called secular Muslims in Norway and Europe. The reason is simple, there are no secular Muslims. There are only Muslims and apostates. Apostates have absolutely no influence on Islam and the orthodox Muslims.

The other option is that Muslims practice al-Taqiyya, religious and ideological deception, which even the Prophet Muhammad on many occasions recommended to Muslims to use to protect Islam or their faith. One can not rely on so-called secular Muslims because it is a possibility that they are practicing al-Taqiyya, Islamic deception.

Ethnic Norwegians and Europeans have been subjected to cruel actions since our doors opened to mass immigration in the sixties and seventies. Since Norwegian and European multiculturalists opened up the doors to immigration about 30 million Muslims poured into Western Europe, of which 300 000 in Norway.

More than 90 000 of my Norwegian sisters have been raped by Muslims in Norway between 1960 and the present day. Several of these have been gang raped, or committed suicide as a result of rape. More than 300 000 Norwegian boys and girls, men and women, have been physically and mentally harassed and terrorized, beaten and robbed by Muslims in Norway between 1960 and the present day.

Several have committed suicide as a result of these atrocities. Hundreds of Norwegians have been killed by Muslims since 1960 to the present day, including Martine Hermansen who was raped and killed by a Muslim in England, and the brother of Minister Thorkildsen, who was killed in a nightclub by a Muslim in Copenhagen. All these atrocities are crimes against the Norwegian people, and it is the Norwegian Labour Party, including the AUF, which is directly responsible for this because they are the ones that invited the Muslims here, and continue to invite them against the people's will. And it is primarily the Labour Party who will be held accountable for these atrocities committed against my Norwegian brothers and sisters.

Larsen: Administrator, sorry to interrupt here, but there have been quite a few inquiries from victims who are reacting to Breivik having the opportunity to talk in this way, and it is a case which we are obliged to report on because we are coordinating this matter and can not censor. So I will just ask that Breivik will take the victims into account and quit so that we get the opportunity to conduct the case in the usual way, namely by examination.

Breivik: I will pay heed to it.

Arntzen: Yes. You now have a clear call. I also asked you to come to a close.

Breivik: Yes.

Arntzen: ...I want to ask you to round it off now, Breivik.

Breivik: There are three pages left.

Arntzen: You must be concise now.

Breivik: Yes. I have been a victim and witness to much of this myself, and I will address this later on. As a result, we see that ethnic Norwegians flee …

Arntzen: Breivik, I suggest you go over to your conclusion or your ending.

Breivik: There are still three pages, out of thirteen.

Arntzen: You, I ask you to go to the ending.

Breivik: Eh, I have reduced it from 20 pages, the reason why I try to do it now is to explain the reasons and motives, I can not …

Arntzen: You will also have the opportunity to discuss the cause and motive in the further examination.

Breivik: I must, I must be allowed to set the parameters for my defense, I must be allowed to explain myself.

Arntzen: You will be allowed to set the parameters for your defense even when you answer the questions that come next.

Breivik: There are still three pages and it is integrated information, it is crucial information to clarify the matter, to explain why, and I think there are quite a few people who deserve to know why 22/7 was carried out.

Arntzen: Now you've heard the suggestion from..

Breivik: I will pay heed to it.

Arntzen: You've heard the suggestion from the coordinating counsel on how those affected react to how you are allowed to read your statement. Will you take that into account?

Breivik: I will consider it.

Arntzen: Is it relevant to you?

Breivik: It is relevant to consider.

Arntzen: Yes, and so I ask you to do it, and quit as soon as you can.

Breivik: Yes.

Holden: Distinguished Judge.

Arntzen: Yes.

Holden: As the defense's voice has been heard and the aid lawyer's reaction has also been voiced, I would like to highlight the prosecution's view on this, and we think it is important and just that Breivik has the opportunity to complete his three pages. Thank you.

Arntzen: It is then noted. I've asked you to quit, but make it as short as you can.

Breivik: I will do so.

As a result, we see that ethnic Norwegians flee in droves from today's Muslim enclaves, like Groruddalen. These have become Muslim ghettos, no-go zones, which are not safe unless you are Muslim. The actions described are nothing more than a low-intensity Jihad. People who have lived sheltered lives far removed from these problems, that is, people who haven't grown up with Muslims, do not know what they are talking about. I was born and raised in a conflict zone. Oslo is a conflict zone and is now a ruined city. Although I grew up on the west side I wasn't unaffected.

The reason is that the Labour Party opens up Oslo West to Muslims because they are buying up apartments, public apartments and handing them out to them. As a consequence many Norwegians have been exposed to great danger. Delusions of Norwegian and European politicians are that they believe that the Norwegian and European Muslims want inclusion, integration and assimilation. Many Muslims do not want to be included. They despise the Norwegian and European culture, they despise feminism, they despise the sexual revolution, they despise the decadence and moral decay that characterizes not only Norway but all of Europe. They do not want this.

What a large number of Muslims in Norway and Europe want is autonomy, that is, self-rule with Sharia. This is true for Forskjellen, Furuset, Holmlia, in parts of Malmö, Copenhagen, Luton, London, Utrecht, Berlin, Paris, Marseille, to name a few. The former president of Algeria, Houari Boumedienne, issues a prophetic warning to Europe in a speech at the UN in 1974, "One day, millions of men will leave the southern latitudes to settle in the northern latitudes, and they will not come as friends, for they will go there to conquer and defeat it, and they will overcome it through their sons, the uterine of our women will give us victory".

Many Muslims do not want the cultural and moral decay that Marxists and liberals represent; they want autonomy, self-government with sharia. If one looks at the developments elsewhere in the world you will see the act same thing. Muslims want autonomy and demands independence for the regions in their host countries they eventually dominate. This has already happened in India, Lebanon, Israel, Southern Philippines, Southern Thailand and Western China, and we are going to see this the next decades in Europe as well. As the Muslim population increases it will start to require special arrangements which will progress into claims and demands. Historical examples document that this always results with demands for autonomy and self-government.

There is no country in the world where Muslims have assimilated and lived in harmony with the host country. There is not a single example. But unfortunately there are more than 40 examples to the contrary, that Islam has become increasingly dominant until they took control of the nation.

Sitting Bull is and was a hero who is celebrated by America's indigenous peoples, Native Americans. He was an Indian chief who fought on behalf of his people against General Armstrong Custer and the U.S. forces. Crazy Horse and Chief Gall were other militant leaders of the American indigenous peoples. Were Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse and Chief Gall terrorists because they were fighting for their ethnic group, for their indigenous rights and culture? Or were they heroes? Were they evil terrorists, or were they heroes? American and European history books describe them as heroes and not as terrorists. Meanwhile, militant nationalists in Europe are described as terrorists and murderers because they are fighting for exactly the same ideals. Isn't that hypocritical and extremely racist?

An individual or group that fights against foreign colonization to protect their indigenous rights are not terrorists, as history clearly illustrates. We are no more terrorists than the native Britons who fought against their own treacherous elites, who facilitated the Roman invasion, colonization and occupation.

And then comes the question that many have thought about.

Norway has an indigenous population? Aren't ethnic Norwegians Norway's indigenous people? Haven't these indigenous people lived here the past 12 000 years?

The answer is yes. Norway has an indigenous people, and ethnic Norwegians are Norway's indigenous people. There is no difference from the battle that is fought by indigenous peoples in Tibet against the colonization of the Han Chinese, to Bolivia's indigenous people who are fighting for autonomy, and to us, the European, Nordic and Scandinavian indigenous people who are fighting for autonomy and cultural protectionism.

In 2009, the Bolivian parliament decided that the indigenous people in Bolivia should be allowed self-governance if they wanted it. There is no difference between the Norwegian people and the Bolivian indigenous people. Why treat the Nordic and European indigenous worse than other indigenous populations? Why is it that indigenous European fighters are branded as racists or Nazis, while indigenous rights activists like those in Tibet, Bolivia and America will be respected and receive assistance from the international community?

It is extremely unfair and it is unacceptable. Our ancestors have lived in this country for 12 000 years. And we as indigenous people of Norway will not accept our country being colonized against our will, we, like all other indigenous peoples, have special rights in this country. And this is something we are going to fight for.

I know that the information I present is difficult to comprehend and understand when one has been indoctrinated to believe something else. It is difficult to fight against the current, when one hundred percent of the media companies pump out multi-cultural propaganda every minute of every hour of every day. But in the future the majority of Norwegians and Europeans will understand that what I say here today is the truth. Soon it will dawn on everyone that multiculturalism has failed.

Mark Twain once wrote, "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot".

This trial is about finding the truth. The documentation and examples I have provided are true. If they are true, how can what I did be illegal? I have documented that the multicultural policy makers and academics and journalists are working together, using undemocratic methods to deconstruct the Norwegian ethnic group, the Norwegian culture and traditions, Norwegian Christianity, and the Norwegian identity. How can it be illegal to engage in armed resistance against these people?

Thomas Hylland Eriksen, professor at the University of Oslo and one of the ideologues behind multiculturalism in Norway has previously expressed: "the large white spot is to deconstruct them, we will deconstruct them so thoroughly that they will never be able to call themselves a majority again".

What he meant when he said this was the following. Our biggest challenge is to deconstruct the Norwegian ethnic group. We will deconstruct the Norwegian ethnic group so thoroughly that they will never be able to call themselves a majority again. This is what they are planning, they hope that they will manage to implement this ethnic deconstruction without resistance, and this is where they are mistaken.

They will face opposition to this insane and evil multicultural experiment, as shown on July 22, as Peter Mangs showed many people in Malmö in 2010. Something that the NSU showed Germany in 2011. These three preventive attacks testify that a European civil war is coming, and it shows that Enoch Powell was right. Enoch Powell was a member of parliament in England, and he warned as early as the seventies what would be the consequences if the liberals and cultural Marxists got together and allowed the mass immigration from Asia and Africa. He said: "Rivers of blood will run through our streets". Unfortunately, no one listened to him or any of the others like Enoch Powell in Europe.

The reason is that everyone has been silenced and ignored. And what we see today? Rivers of blood caused by militant Muslims have run through Madrid, London, Toulouse, Belgium and many other places, and rivers of blood caused by European patriots who are trying to save their country, have run through the streets of Oslo, Malmö, Germany and many other locations.

What is most frustrating of all is that the European multiculturalists are so arrogant that they do not even want to enter into dialogue with militant nationalists, although this could have prevented future attacks. Let it be known that we wanted peace talks with Marxists and liberals since the Second World War, but they do not want dialogue, they prefer their choice of censorship, ridicule and persecution. They're not going to succeed, as more censorship, more ridicule, more persecution of nationalists and cultural conservatives, only result in increased radicalization and more attacks.

Arntzen: Are you done now, Breivik?

Breivik: There is one page left..

Mass immigration is a disaster and has caused huge social problems. At last the three most important leaders in Europe have admitted that multiculturalism does not work. In Norway the opposite happens; instead we go for more mass immigration from Asia and Africa. They refuse to change the ideological direction.

From this point I'll engage in self-censorship, just letting you know.

They refuse to introduce ethnic and cultural protectionism. They have apparently decided that they should deconstruct the Norwegian ethnic group, Norwegian culture, whatever the cost.

Thomas Jefferson, America's third president and author of the American Declaration of Independence, said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants". He also wrote: "Whenever the national government becomes destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and institute a new national government. It is their right and their duty to overthrow such a government and establish new safeguards for their future security".

What is 100 percent certain is that there will be a civil war between nationalists and internationalists in Europe. We, the first militant nationalists, are the first raindrops of the purifying storm that is to come. This civil war will not come suddenly and unexpectedly. There will be a gradual escalation and polarization in society, and we will see more frequent attacks from right-wing patriots and from Islamists. The multicultural regimes in Europe will be forced to fight on two fronts, against militant nationalists on one side, and against Islamic militants on the other side. When that time comes, unfortunately, rivers of blood will flow through the major European cities.

My European nationalist brothers and sisters will prevail in the end, which will mark the end of the extreme left rule that has lasted since the Axis powers fell.

How can I be so sure that this happens? The reason is that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. As soon as native Europeans have become a minority in their own cities and their own countries, the national sense of unity becomes so fragile that the economy can not sustain the welfare state. This will result in such a huge economic crisis, so big and paralyzing, that it'll make the current European financial crisis look like a picnic. The economy will crash, resulting in mass layoffs of public employees.

People who previously lived with blinders for the evils of multiculturalism due to their economic prosperity will lose everything. Once they have lost everything they are forced into a state of suffering, and then, only then, will they dare to say what they really think.

And at this time in the future, having lost their religion, their culture, their identity and their nation, Norwegian, Scandinavian, European men will no longer fear the demonization of the cultural elites. This because they will make a stand once they've looked death in the eye and realize there's nothing left to lose. And this will happen within a few decades in Europe, and within fifteen years in France. In the meantime it is important that more patriots in the Nordic countries and Europe will take responsibility as I have done, as Peter Mangs of Malmö has done, and as Beate Zschäpe, Uwe Böhnhardt and Uwe Mundlos from Germany have done. It is important that the Nordic and European militant nationalists and national heroes like these are celebrated and get the respect they deserve. These heroic young people have sacrificed their lives to try to prevent the deconstruction of all that we love.

They are all perfect knights, perfect foot soldiers for the conservative revolution. The anticommunist and anti-Islamist revolution. For national rebirth. Europe needs more heroes like them.

I'm nearing the end now.

Multiculturalism is a key part of cultural Marxism. Multiculturalism is an anti-Norwegian and anti-European hate ideology, which is designed to deconstruct our ethnic group, our religion, our culture and our traditions. Multiculturalism is an evil ideology forced upon us by either ignorant or malicious people.

We do not want the Norwegian and European liberal and Marxist elite's family reunification schemes, stays on humanitarian grounds, the Schengen directives related to the immigration of non-Nordics, adoption schemes and refugee quotas as a tool for Asian and African and Islamic mass immigration. We do not want our liberal and cultural Marxist leaders to use our country as a dumping ground for the excess births of the Third World. We want an ethnic nation, and we want a Christian nation. We, Norway's indigenous people, ethnic Norwegians, who belongs to the Nordic family, Northern European family, are now in a situation where we are losing our capital and our largest cities, for the first time in our history of 12 000 years.

We are within 5 to 10 years of becoming a minority in our own capital, and in many of our largest cities. The political elites in our country are so arrogant and rude that they expect us to applaud our own ethnic, cultural, and Christian destruction. And those who do not applaud their deconstruction are branded as evil right-wing extremists and Nazis. This is the real madness, not I, but the Labour Party's parliamentary group should be subjected to psychiatric evaluation and be branded as evil. And the same for all the other social democrats in Europe and elites who support multiculturalism and mass immigration.

And why is this the real madness?

This is the real madness because it is not rational to work towards the deconstruction of your own ethnic group, culture, and religion. It is not rational to flood your country with hundreds of thousands of Muslims, and hundreds of other Asians and Africans, so that our own culture is destroyed. This is the real madness. This is the real evil.

Universal human rights and international law allow for the Norwegians as an indigenous people, which we in fact are, threatened by systematic ethnic and cultural deconstruction, the right to defend itself militarily. Responsible Norwegians and Europeans who feel a sense of moral obligation will not sit idly by while the ethnic Norwegians become a minority in their own capital. They're not going to sit idly by while we become a minority in our own country. We do not accept it. We are going to fight.

We will fight against the multiculturalists in the Labour Party, and against all vicious political activists working for the same goal.

The attack of 7/22 was a preventive attack in defense of Norway's indigenous people, ethnic Norwegians, and our culture. I cannot admit guilt.

I acted out of the principle of necessity on behalf of my people, my culture, my religion, my city and my country. I therefore demand that I be acquitted of the charges in question.

These were the thirteen pages I had prepared.