This is a complete overview of the comments Anders Behring Breivik left at Document.no.
Such cases must be considered together with similar cases where the media consistently ignores issues related to Muslim riots.
Everyone remembers the July riots in Marseilles and other French cities where the media were instructed not to report the news.
One can only wonder how many riots there have been in France or other countries that we have never heard of. We're in the process of developing a trend in Western Europe where there is full agreement that the media is suppressing such cases.
Estimated damage from the July riots in France: 800-1500 burnt-out cars, dozens of buildings burnt out, several injured people (including police officers). Not a single article in the MSM. I called both TV2 and NRK but they said it was not "news worthy" ... Perhaps not so strange when 90-95% of all European journalists are supporters of multiculturalism and do not want to contribute to the damage "integration process" by communicating the truth.
This is a very frightening development and further documents how the media works as propaganda machinery to the multiculturalists.
The orders of the "media blackout" Have Been Strictly Applied. Le Monde refused to respond, citing "Ministerial instructions." "Yesterday morning, every journalist who inquired, even for the smallest piece of news, to the firemen, or gendarmes or police, heard the same answer: 'No fires'. In fact, the truth is quite different. Some of those we questioned admitted under their breath: 'We can not say anything about the fires. We have received orders. " In Lyons, the daily Le Progres reports the same blackout: "Orders not to speak to the press were given to firemen, police and gendarmes."
The following blog documents the number of white South Africans who have been killed in what is beginning to resemble a systematic genocide motivated by racism.
3066 documented killings (the real numbers are probably much higher).
200,000 - 300,000 white Africans have already "escaped" from South Africa since the ANC took over management.
The question you should ask yourself is, if cultural differences were too great for Christian Norwegians and Christian Swedes to live together, how can we expect Norwegians and Somalis to live together peacefully?
The ideology of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) is an anti-European hate ideology whose purpose is to destroy European culture, identity and religion in general. I thus equate multiculturalism with the other hate ideologies: Nazism (anti-Jewish), Communism (anti-individualism) and Islam (anti-Kafir).
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan refused to implement multiculturalism (being the only three Western countries that still have monoculturalism). They argue that "Societal cohesion" is synonymous with harmony within a society. They still look with wonder at this strange European experiment.
I encourage you to read books that explain the multiculturalist ideology, Frankfurt school, and its origin. You can for example start with the book "Defeating Eurabia".
The main problem in Western Europe is that there is only one accepted alternative, namely PC (PC = Cultural Marxism / multiculturalism).
Those who dare to criticize multiculturalism (and support cultural conservative views) are now labeled as fascists / Nazis / racists. The problem is that the doctrines which form the basis of political correctness will not or cannot allow alternative views and are thus very intolerant.
The Progress Party is a victim of this intolerance.
It seems like you're pretty unenlightened and naive in terms of the potential consequences of multiculturalism. I'm starting to wonder if you might be one of those who have not even studied the historical demographic records of countries that have had multiculturalism and where Islam has been involved? ;)
Look at the Lebanese demographic trend. As we all know, Lebanon's demographic development has been characterized by the Islamic demographic warfare (immigration + high birth rates) combined with an escape of the Christian population. Lebanon was once a Christian country. Thanks to multiculturalism modern day Lebanon is a very unstable Muslim country that is characterized by murder, persecution, and torture of non-Muslims:
Lebanon demographic development - (Christian / Muslim), :
1911 - 21% Islam
1921 - 45%
1932 - 49%
1943 - 48%
1970 - 58% (1975-1990 Civil War began when Islam reached 60%)
1990 - 65% (The Christians lost the war)
2008 - 75%
What is the reasoning behind your disbelief that Western European countries will suffer the same fate?
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
You argue very good for your eyesight. I have no doubt that you have good intentions. In all cases, we fundamentally disagree when it comes to goals. I wish it was possible to discuss it freely.
"When you said what you want, you must say what you want instead. If not, nothing happens."
The problem is that the preconditions for discussion is not present in Norway and Western Europe. We, the cultural conservatives are already being branded as fascists / racists / Nazis of the political and media establishment because we dare to criticize multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) which is totally unacceptable. It's as bad as Jewish persecution for 30 years or during the Inquisition. No / very few thus wish to share solution-oriented ideas / concepts in the open forum at this stage as this may help to stigmatize people further in the future.
I have worked full time for more than three years on a solution-oriented work (compendium written in English). I've been aiming to contribute in area that are outside the scope of your main focus. Much of the information I'm sitting on is unknown to most, even to you.
If you send me an email at email@example.com I will send an electronic version when I'm finished.
Norway has been completely uninteresting for me so far. The main focus should be on a consolidated intellectual platform of European cultural conservative organizations / individuals. This alliance should have as its main focus the delegitimization of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and expose it as a "European ideology of hate". Its (indirect) purpose is to completely destroy Western civilization, nation states, western culture / norms / traditions, Christianity - European / Norwegian identity.
If this dirty work is completed there is the basis for a Marxist superstate (EUSSR) without the necessary cultural conservative / nationalist components to stop Islam from dominating this new entity.
Yep, it's really bad (it can not possibly be worse than it is right now).
I got the answers to two questions from my boss in the communist newspaper Aftenposten yesterday, by the way:
News - Interview with Hilde Scientist - Editor in Chief, came from Arbeiderbladet, many Aftenposten journalists are old AKP (ml) and SV sympathizers ...
What is the reason the newspaper Aftenposten, after 1972, gradually began to support multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and thus in practice no longer continued to be a cultural conservative media alternative? Was it because of pressure from the labor movement?
Aftenposten is an independent newspaper, with a liberal-conservative worldviews. Hilde
Why do you think that Norway has joined the ranks of countries that no longer have any great cultural conservative newspapers (newspapers that are critical of multiculturalism)?
I also think it is a problem that the Norwegian media are too similar in their analysis and views. I think it is because conflicts in Norwegian politics aren't really all that big. Greeting Hilde
Great that you found sources on the survey :)
This process (Marxist-infiltration in European universities) started in 1945 after the communists won the war.
Europe's biggest mistake was that they allowed Marxists to operate freely after the war. The 45-50 generation of Marxists were learning champions to the 68 generation that today manages everything.
Infiltration of Marxists in European universities (1945-1968) is described in great detail here:
Muslim riots in London yesterday - 9/11/09!
I reckon this is going on Newsnight today! (NOT).
4 weeks of Jihad in Gothenburg, Sweden. European media companies are refusing to report. This case and the Muslim Riots in United Kingdom (also categorically ignored by 90% of journalists) could have influenced the Norwegian election. How can a democracy work when 98% of Western European journalists openly sympathize with "cultural Marxism"? These Deliberate "media blackouts" are authoritarian in nature.
98% of all Norwegian journalists are now cultural Marxists / multiculturalists / politically correct (or sympathize).
The problem is that the fundamental institutions in Norway like for example, Volda University College (School of Journalism) and University of Oslo has been infiltrated already several decades ago (and most other schools for that matter). These are today's indoctrination camps for future generations of cultural Marxists / multiculturalists / the politically correct.
This of course didn't happen over night. The cultural Marxists have had the opportunity (when the AP never punished / imprisoned them) to infiltrate our institutions since 1945. In 1968 the first "cohort" of indoctrinated Marxists was ready to implement their doctrines. The results we see today.
I have no idea how we are to reverse this. It seems as if Islam can actually solve this problem for us in the course of 30-70 years, as the cultural Marxists will lose control over these forces soon.
I've always wondered, were there no cultural conservative intellectual and / or grass roots options in 1968?
You can see endless demonstrations in the streets by the cultural Marxists demonstrating in pictures from 1968-1972, but where were the conservative cultural forces?
Hårstad / Xebeche / Skaug
Yep, you're absolutely right.
Cultural Marxists managed to bargain crucial popular platforms that secured them victory:
- Sexual Liberation (weakening of the church / moral / patriarchy / nuclear family / birth rates)
- Feminism - positive and negative sides (weakening of the church / patriarchy / nuclear family / birth rates)
- Rights to workers - positive aspects
- Drug / alcohol / release party (weakening of the nuclear family / moral / birth rates)
- Multi-Cultural - sold in as the introduction of exciting offers / food / experiences (negative aspects: mass immigration, Islam, ghettofication-> enclaves, crime, murder / rape / robbery / violence, weakening of the identity / culture / unit / nation mm. )
Most of these elements (with a few exceptions) will help to draw us toward a Marxist utopia (chaos).
The only pragmatic thing we can do is to work for further cultural conservative consolidation in the next 10/20/30/40 years so that we can avail ourselves of the window that is sure to open up (Fjordman's scenario.)
Very good analysis. You're absolutely right. I have not been present in the Norwegian debate until recently, I have debated in English for several years / collecting material for Compendium, which I will soon finish :)
I feel it is important to create a pan-European platform for rhetoric / objectives / policy analysis / research of the historical factors of importance to so and transfer this knowledge to every nation. It pan-Europeiske/US environment around Robert Spencer, Fjordman, Atlas, Analects + 50 other EU / U.S. bloggers (and Facebook groups) is the epicenteret for policy analysis and has been for some years.
Much of this knowledge has already been conveyed through the "document" (are incredibly impressed with the level of knowledge here :)) indicating that it is on track to be formed a new pan-European "cultural conservative" intellectual movement that is agreed on the basic truths .
10/20/30 The next year we should focus on the following:
- Creating a cultural conservative major newspaper (print / online) in each country (our voice that reaches out to all of Norway). The goal is obviously to raise more Norwegians up from the coma.
- Provide funding for this project through cultural conservative investors.
-Contribute to form / develop a youth organization / action group that represents our ideological platform (anti-racist but critical of multiculturalism / Islamization etc) EDL / SIOE forming the outlines of how such an organization would look like. We can develop f as SIOE or create a new one. EDL has been given the racist stamp and they work hard to get rid of this (all the individuals that come with racist / discriminatory speech will be from now evicted). It is difficult to start such a grass roots / activist group in Norway when the government pumps in insane amounts of everything to please everyone (except us ;)
It's just for us to get going. The window opens up in the earliest 10 years from now, for 70 years, so we still have plenty of time. But we should not waste too much time trying to "confirm to each other that we have a problem." It is essential that we also focus on working specifically at these issues.
Jarle, I am sending you a mail :)
I did not say that the EDL in the present form is where we had wished it had been. But it is essential that the intellectual conservative forces provide (unofficially) political ideology and training to our young people 15-25. Who else will do it?
We can not despise the youth in society and refuse to approach these because they lack the ideological exercise, since it is precisely our (the cultural-intellectual conservatives) responsibility to ensure this.
Bawer is probably not the right person to work as a bridge builder. He is a liberal anti-jihadist and not a cultural conservative in many areas. I have my suspicions that he is too paranoid (in terms of their orientation gays). It seems that he fears that "cultural conservatives" are going to be a threat to gays in the future. He therefore refuse to seize his opportunity to influence matters in a positive direction? This seems completely irrational.
It should be noted that many organizations that VB has many "reforms" to complete before they are on our level.
In all cases, we are not in a situation where we can pick and choose partners. We must therefore make sure to influence other cultural conservatives to come to our anti-racist/pro-homosexual/pro-Israel line. When they reach this line you can take it to the next level.
The consolidation must be continued and people must not make a difference (rather than to isolate).
Very well written :)
We should immediately work towards the joint creation of a cultural conservative major newspaper (paper / online national distribution).
I know many of the Progress Party and know that there are strong forces there that want to develop the "Progress" Progress Party newspaper. I also know of several cultural conservative investors.
How about working to consolidate the Progress of document (may idag.no?) + Get funding from strategic investors?
Call the newspaper: "Conservative" as the only cultural conservative media company in Norway.
There is a chance that Reuters will want to be part of such a project.
Critical multiculturalism (Anti-kulturmarxistisk)
Pro Progress Party (perhaps Conservative)
Pro Israel (+ support for Armenia, Christian Copts / Maronite / Assyriere, cultural conservative Indians, support for the establishment of a Christian state of Biafra, Southern Nigeria and support to the establishment of a Christian state in Sudan, support for Russia / Thailand / Philippines / China + Fighting Jihad)
Critical to cultural Marxist media (all)
Pro free market
I can also help in obtaining funding for this project: from the lodge min.
This is a national project, we seriously can not ignore. It is our duty as the intellectual culture, conservative forces in Norway to cooperate on this :)
Congratulations Christine! ;)
idag.no (Norway TODAY) out of the picture as this is a KrF publication / agency.
But I can set up a meeting with Reuters and Geir Mo and present the solution. Investors are going to be the least problem.
The question is how Rustad, Nyquist, Mohn and Hjerpset-Østlie intend to do? I reckon you have other primary jobs?
Putting together an editorial depends on many factors. It is possibly a small team at the beginning and it will be on-line based. We must consider how we can coordinate an online venture with any hard copy.
Want to hear first Rustads input in all cases :)
This option and its coverage proves once and for all that we can not live without a national spokesperson. We are all agreed (Progress Party / Progress editorial staff included). This is all about will and a couple of people who take initiative.
I have the necessary contacts to ensure that this can happen. But I lack total editorial experience, so I can only help to set up a team, building bridges between the relevant parties and help investors.
With the necessary capital there should be a realistic daily circulation of 50,000 using strategy 1 and 15,000 using strategy 2 within 5 years. If we proceed properly, it should be possible to attract about 50% of Aftenposten's readers, 20% of VG readers, 10% of Dagbladet's readers in 10 + years (at 1, quite a bit smaller by 2). This should be the goal.
Looking at the logical steps (based on the desired readers and their sympathies / interests), there are two strategies, one we must take based on the catchment area:
Strategy 1 - Harry model
Estimated circulation within 5 years - 50,000
Estimated circulation within 10 years - 50000-100000
- Such political agenda (see other post) +
- Low financial content
- Common News
- Many "harry themes" (including the erotic element, ref centerfold girls as found in some continental newspapers.
If we choose this model, we can of course forget a large part of the conservative Christian readers.
Strategy 2 - The conservative model
Estimated circulation within 5 years - 15,000
Estimated circulation within 10 years - 15000-50000
- Such political agenda (see other post) +
- Much financial content
- Common News
- Minimal "harry themes"
If we choose this model, we can expect many traders, financial interest, conservative Christian readers. It will be a less "popular" appeal and therefore significantly smaller circulation.
A hybrid of 1, 2
It's possible I used the wrong estimates for strategy 2 If the financial content is solid, it is possible to steal MANY readers from DN, Financial Times. This will have consequences for the investors / existing newsrooms we can choose as strategic partners. Depending on the choice there will be a possible chance that we get financial feeds from existing editors. If the Progress Party is interested the only realistic alternative will be to demerge Progress editorial (Arbeiderbladet / Times scenarion).
Most importantly, the newspaper will have a board that does not allow the newspaper to be infiltrated by cultural Marxist journalists (as Aftenposten were of 70-80 century).
Daily circulation figures - 2008:
VG - 284 414
Aftenposten morning edition - 247 556
Dagbladet - 123,383
Aftenposten's Eve - 124 807
Bergens Tidende - 85,825
Today's Market - 82,775
Adresseavisen - 77,044
Stavanger Aftenblad - 66,343
Fædrelandsvennen - 40,729
Dram Tidende - 39,121
Yep, the possibilities / solution we create ourselves. As independent bloggers who document and others can deliver copies of the content / articles / essays of this new company, if they want extra security / screening.
There will be minimal risk to the involved "content providers". There is only upside for these vendors as they actually will get paid well for a job they current make nothing for. They will also have their content distributed to x3/x5/x10/x30 times more readers. Investors are taking all the risk (press is a bonus but not essential).
This will start as an ideal project but depending on goals, it is actually a good potential for earnings (if combined with the "popular" content). Earnings are however a secondary objective. The main aim is increasing political influence through unofficial support for the Progress Party / Conservative Party.
Finance / business will most likely be the least problem. The challenge lies in whether the desired editorial "content providers" dare to take the step.
Norwegian journalists won the war against the Progress Party. They managed to reduce the party by 6% over four weeks of intense warfare.
Successful media blackout of the riots in France, UK, Sweden sealed the fate and the cost of the bourgeois victory.
This is our own fault because we have failed to create a cultural conservative (pro-FrP) media channel with national distribution.
Yep. This case should not be underestimated! It helps to prove the following:
Labour wants mass immigration to engineer multi-cultural United Kingdom, says Blair and Straw forms adviser.
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multi-cultural" country, a form Government adviser has Revealed.
The shapes Labour adviser said the Government opened up United Kingdom borders to humiliate Partly Right-wing opponents of immigration.
This proves therefore that some of the motivation for mass immigration is not based on humanism (cloak) but more due to direct hatred of people with conservative values ?? as we do, the cultural conservatives. A large part of them hate everything European and want to destroy it through multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is an anti-European hate ideology designed to destroy a European culture / traditions, identity, Christianity and the Nations sovereignty. The goal is a utopian Marxistist superstate. To accomplish this, Europeans must first be annihilated. Of course there are genuine humanists (who are suicidally naive) but I suspect that a larger proportion than previously thought are cultural Marxists (multiculturalists) with direct hateful intent.
Perhaps the following ratio:
Opponents of cultural conservative Doctrines:
Cultural Marxists: 30% (hateful Intentions)
Suicidal Humanist: 65% (naive)
Capitalist globalists: 5% (greed)
Have others tried to make an estimate of our opponents intentions? This will be relevant in a possible future Nuremberg trial. It is of course difficult to prove this, because almost everyone uses cultural Marxist humanistic alibis.
What most people still do not understand is that the ongoing Islamization (secondary process) of Europe can not be stopped before making a settlement with the political doctrines that allow this (and the individuals that fronts these doctrines). There must be more focus on multicultural doctrines (multiculturalism = cultural Marxism) as it is this ideology that enables the political mechanisms that result in continued Islamization (Islamic demographic warfare). People need to learn what the multicultural doctrine does with Europe:
- European Christianity
- European traditions
- European Cultures
- European (a country) identity
Of course, it is well known that cultural Marxists and humanists in Europe think they are going to reform Islam but they will fail like all before them have done. We, for our part, the cultural conservatives and anti-Marxist liberal, must focus on the fundamental problem - multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and how to combat this hate ideology. Multiculturalism can only be stopped through continued consolidation of the cultural conservatives and accountability of individuals who front the ideology. We need to focus more on defending "our" alternative and its doctrines. A further consolidation of the cultural conservatives is the solution. We need to awaken people and help more people contribute through political activism (against specific targets).
Four important tasks we have to work with the next twenty years are the following:
1. Establish a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution (which will be the only newspaper that will support the Progress Party in 4 years). Do believe me, the Progress Party is going to be sabotaged and torpedoed at every election (a select crowd of 35% are "scared" down to 20%).
2. Develop an alternative to the violent extremes Norwegian Marxist organizations Flash / SOS Racism / Red Youth. This can for example be done by supporting the development of SIOE. Conservatives dare not currently disclose his or her views on the street when they know that extreme Marxists club them down. We can not accept that the Labour subsidizes these violent "Stoltenberg Art" that systematically terrorize political conservative.
3. Working to gain control of 10 to 15 NGOs (cultural Marxists control currently 10-15 while we have only 2-3).
4. Initiate a partnership with the conservative forces within the Norwegian Church. I know that the liberal forces within the European anti-Jihad movement (Bruce Bawer, among other things, and some other liberals) will have a problem with this but the conservative forces within the church is actually one of our best allies. Our main opponents must not be Jihadists but Jihadists facilitators - the multiculturalists.
A nightmare scenario as I see it is if the multiculturalists pull an "Ataturk" in Western Europe. The result in this case is a long and painful death for Europe's part, as in Lebanon. Turkmenistan proved that a Muslim population can control itself (no requirements) under an authoritarian regime, to demand Sharia 100 years (or longer) in the future as soon as the opportunity presents itself. This combined opportunity for continued Islamic demographic warfare is going to end in disaster.
It should be noted that the majority of the Christians in Lebanon were cultural Marxists that fronted multicultural doctrine from 1911 (there were too few who fronted nationalism and separatism of Muslims). As we all know this ended in tragedy:
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) :
1911 - 21% Islam (79% Christian)
1921 - 45%
1932 - 49%
1943 - 48%
1970 - 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 - 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 - 75%
Worst of all is that there are more such examples that can be documented. Western Europe is a Lebanon in effect ...
So please. Focus on the actual evil - multiculturalism and not the result of evil. Don't start mopping until you've turned off the faucet! ;).
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
The problem is quite under-analyzed.
If we work to "temporarily secularize" Islam in Europe, by supporting individuals like Kokkvold, it will be the same as shooting ourselves. The only thing that will be secularized are the "visual aspects" of Islam, while the destructive aspects - demographic warfare, will continue in silence. This war is accepted as long as the "visual" is a factor.
Moderate multiculturalists like Kokkvold may thus prove to be even more destructive to Europe than the more extreme multiculturalists.
Hate propaganda against Italy and Denmark is incredibly hypocritical. Norway's own violent "Marxist / Islamist Jugend" (Red Youth, SOS Racism, Blitz, in cooperation with the Jihad youth) who have corrupted and terrorized hundreds of cultural conservatives in recent years in Oslo is not mentioned with one word ... It may be fine as long as the multiculturalists control the violent mob?
It is unacceptable that the Labour Party, Socialist Left Party, Left, SP, CDP fund these violent extremists.
Funny to see every European cultural Marxist "foam around the mouth" of hatred against Denmark and Italy. The only Western European countries that have a touch of wise leadership.
It is our duty to make sure to support the only anti-racist cultural conservative organization that has guts enough to walk the streets of Oslo - SIOE. FpU is another anti-racist conservative organization culture. Unfortunately they lack the guts to demonstrate against anything other than tolls and high gas prices, etc.
However, it is understandable. No one dares because they know they are being harassed and attacked. But people are starting to get tired of this insecurity. The result is organizations such as EDL and other forms of vigilante.
National Socialism has always been an extreme left ideology yet why do they constantly strive to strategically place this on the right side?
If you hate capitalism and the free market, such as Marxists, Nazis and Islamists do, attain the left side, period.
Lars Gule, "This is simply unacceptable in a modern and democratic state based on religious freedom and other human rights."
The problem is that many cultural Marxists actually care very little about religious freedom and human rights. They are cultural Marxists driven by contempt and hatred for the cultural conservatives, for European cultures, etc. Many hide behind false allegations of human rights and religious freedom as it serves as the perfect obfuscation of their real motives.
Where have they been the last 20 years in terms of criticism of Islam? Why have they been totally absent in this area? They have however used very much of your time attacking Christianity ...
It becomes very difficult to relate to individuals who knowingly use deception to advance their agenda. Cultural Marxism has hidden for 40 years behind humanistic principles while their real agenda was to crush the European tradition, culture, identity and sovereignty of nations. All in the name of human rights ...
You can not have a dialogue if one side deliberately lies, time and again.
You are, of course, absolutely right. What I was referring to were individuals like Gule (leader of the Humanist Association), which only attackChristianity while ignoring Islam's spread.
It is ironic that an important NGO NHA has been the coup of a cultural Marxist, then it should be led by a liberal anti-Jihadist type like Bruce Bawer.
The next 20 years we have to work hard to regain control of at least 5 important NGOs. The fact that the Progress Party is part of the government makes this task easier.
It is wonderful to reflect that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. The European cultural conservative movement is small at the moment but we are growing every day. And within 70 years it'll be time for regime change in Europe. At this point, the multicultural regimes either implode or become very Stalinist.
Before that, we must focus on the following:
1. Creating a culture Conservative newspaper with national distribution
2. Regaining control of several NGOs
3. Develop and consolidate the cultural conservative intellectual movement
4. Build a "EDL" type of youth
New Muslim riots in Marseilles
Watch youtube video :)
Do not know quite where to take it up but our own Fjordman is about to be voted in 3rd place among the most reputable / influential European intellectuals anti-Jihad/anti-multikulti/anti-Marxist / bloggers.
After the Gates of Vienna (No. 1) and the New English Review (2). Surprisingly enough Fjordman is actually poised to turn the Brussels Journal!
In other words. Those who have not yet read Fjord 's book, "Defeating Eurabia" are lagging behind. I know it's hard to be a prophet in his own country but this is beyond all expectations. Congratulations Fjordman! ;)
See the list here: http://infidelbloggerawards.blogspot.com/
The main problem when cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists debate is that the perception of reality are too different.
cultural Marxists look at Israel as a "racist" state.
Cultural conservatives disagree when they believe the conflict is based on Islamist imperialism, that Islam is a political ideology and not a race. Cultural conservatives believe Israel has a right to protect themselves from Jihad.Cultural Marxists refuse to recognize the fact that Islam's political doctrine is relevant and essential. They can never admit or support this because they believe that this primarily is about a race war - that Israel hates Arabs (breed).
As long as one can not agree on fundamental perceptions of reality it's naive to expect that you should come to any conclusion.
Before one at all can begin to discuss this conflict one must first agree on the fundamental truths of Islam's political doctrine.
Most people here have great insight into the key concepts that Muslim al-taqiiya (political deceit), naskh (abrogation Quranic) and Jihad. The problem is that cultural Marxists refuses to recognize these concepts.
They may not recognize these central Islamic concepts. For if they do it erodes the primary argument that Israel is a "racist state" and that this is a race war (Israelis vs. Arabs) and not defense against Jihad (Kafr vs Ummah).
It's a fact that there are 40 different Jihad Fronts (warrior) around the world they choose to ignore. For them, jihad does not exist. For them, these 40 ethnic fronts (40 race wars) don't have anything to do with Islam.
These Marxist theories are very poorly conceived. For example, the so-called Bosnia plants are ethnic Serbs. The only thing that separates the two groups is Islam. The examples are many.
Mini Nations such as Norway have never pursued an independent, sovereign foreign policy.
They, however, have always followed the big three European heavyweights - France, United Kingdom, Germany, to the letter. In other words, Norway have always copied these heavyweights and will always do so.
It's like comparing Belarus and Russia. We will always be Belarus and Russia are our three tigers.
United Kingdom is no different from Germany and France, all have chosen multiculturalism. The fact that the United Kingdom is skeptical about the EU is not about multiculturalism but more that the United Kingdom will continue to have a special relationship with the U.S. (which is also 100% multiculturalist).
The only "Western" nations that refused to implement multiculturalism were Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and partly Finland.
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have been protected from the EU / U.S. 's witch hunt because they are not Europeans.
If they had been Europeans they had been demonized as Nazis, fascists and racists.
Why Norway is "more European" than the EU has nothing to do with "Little Man Syndrome". It can be compared with a "convert to Islam", who is often far more fundamentalist than even conservative Arab Muslims because they themselves feel that they have a lot to prove ("Little Man Syndrome").
I assumed that the attackers were Muslims as the Southern Philippines were mentioned. Everyone knows that the Southern Philippines are one of the world's 40 Jihad Fronts.
It makes little difference whether the victims were Christian or Muslim. Muslims in Asia are known to use extremely brutal methods.
There are a number of extremely brutal Islamist groups in the southern Philippines - Abu Sayyaf Islamists (Al-Harakat al-Islamiyya) is one of them. They fund their organizations through kidnappings and decapitating Christian civilians is one of their methods. Now, of course not cultural Marxist Euro / U.S. MSM attempt to find connections between these groups and attack. Again, we ordinary citizens have to do journalistic work FOR them ...
Again, try European and U.S. MSM to have its people deceived. I have not read a single place in the MSM that the attackers were Muslims.
So what was it that happened? A more conservative Muslim clan that made an example out of a more secular clan for unknown reasons?
You can read more about the Abu Sayyaf and other Islamist groupings in Southern Philippines:
For almost 30 years Various Muslim groups Have Been Engaged in an insurgency for an independent province in the country.
Abu Sayyaf, Al Qaeda group
The group received funding from Al-Qaeda in the early 1990s through Mohammad Jamal Khalifa, a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden.   Al-Qaeda collaborator Ramzi Yousef operated in the Manila in the mid-1990s and Soldiers trained Abu Sayyaf. The 2002 edition of the United State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism mention two links Al-Qaeda.
Abubakar Janjalani Abdurajik's first Recruits Were Soldiers of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). However, the M.I.L.F. and M.N.L.F. deny having links with Abu Sayyaf. Both officially distance restriction elves from Abu Sayyaf Because of its attacks on Civilians and its supposed profiteering. The Philip Pine military, however, has claimed That element of bothering groups Provide support to the Abu Sayyaf.
Any document aimed to get the "approval" stamp from Lars M and Gule has instantly become irrelevant. It is reasonably certain ;)
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims who do not follow the Koran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam that is the problem.
The problem is that the key Islamic concepts al-Taqiyya and naskh (abrogation Quranic) makes it virtually impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Qur'an) from orthodox Muslims.
Who first presented the concept of "War is deceit"? ;).
Lars M. and Gule,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-Taqiyya and naskh?
Daniel Pipes: Leftism and Islam. Muslims, the warriors Marxists Have Been praying for.
The following summarizes the agenda of many cultural Marxists with Islam and it explains also why they will give their life to protect them. It explains thus why we, the cultural conservatives are against Islamization and the implementation of these agendas.
I have great respect for a cultural Marxist who is tough enough to admit his true intentions. It is very annoying however that 90% of the cultural Marxists directly lie to the people by hiding their agenda behind "humanism and human rights."
Are you tough enough to admit that this is your agenda, Gule, or claim that you can still run by "humanism"? It's pointless to discuss if one side refuses to admit his true intentions.
Most of us cultural conservatives are honest enough to admit that we are working against Marxism and Marxist principles (which is the main reason we are opposed to the ongoing Islamization when we look at the Ummah as an entity that promotes Marxist principles, among others). So why can't you be brave enough to admit that the real agenda is to work for the implementation of Marxist principles and that you look at Muslims as a natural ally (for practical reasons and not the humanities).
We know by the way, all what happened to the Christian Marxists in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country (80% in 1911). When the Muslims became the majority in 1970 (an increase of 40% in just 60 years), they declared war. The reason that they came in that situation was due to the Marxist's appeasement policy (they allowed demographic warfare). Marxists thought that they would get an extra special dhimmi status, which of course did not happen. There are now fewer than 25% Christians in Lebanon and even the Christian Marxists live in a difficult situation. Do you honestly believe that you will get a special dhimmi status in a few decades in Western Europe when ALL historical examples show that Christians Marxists are stabbed in the back again and again?
It is odd that they never learn from historical examples? Cultural Marxists have much in common with Muslims, but at the end of the day they are seen regardless of the Ummah as god-hating and gay-loving infidels, who are incompatible with Islam. The result is that they once again will be betrayed by the Ummah.
It is quite ironic that the Ummah has more respect for their opponents, the cultural conservatives, than their allies, cultural Marxists, who they see as only "temporary" useful idiots.
They get to enjoy the alliance as long as it lasts :)
Very well written, Hans :)
Euro / U.S. cultural Marxists MSM is now working on a comprehensive counter campaign consisting of psychological warfare against the Swiss people (as we saw against Austria a few years ago). They will ridicule, belittle, and threaten to shift perspective. They will be depicted as Nazis, racists and fascists (monsters) and they are going to be forced into silence. There may be a new referendum in a few months where only 40% ish will vote for. That's how the game works, unfortunately.
We should not underestimate the MSM and their highly efficient power to shape people's opinions.
The attack was most likely carried out by Muslims from Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
There are now several key Jihadists that are sought.
No "bomb" with other words ..., p
I do not understand why the bbc mention extreme right and the National Socialists? I have never ever heard of a right extreme or NS terrorist attack of importance on European soil. This sounds like cultural Marxist wishful thinking.
This is only the beginning of a prolonged campaign of psychological warfare against the Swiss people. Worst of all, it works very effectively, as we saw with Austria a few years ago. The Swiss people will succumb to demonization, as Austrians and Serbs before them.
The fact that cultural Marxism controls the Euro / U.S. MSM, 95% of NGOs and 80% of the political parties are perhaps the main reason why we should expect to struggle with multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and the Islamization of at least 20-70 years.
Until this happens, it points out that Hårstad further polarization between cultural Marxists (elites) and the cultural conservatives (the people). Muslims now control 20-25% of Oslo and similar areas in other European capitals. 50-60% is the magic enclave boundary and there are several cities that gradually approach this. Marseilles is the worst example in Western Europe at the moment with 38% Muslims. The city will have a Muslim majority within 20 years. It is thus conceivable that the battle for Islam's future in Europe will unfold in France within 20 years. Perhaps the consequence will be that France breaks out of the U.S. / Euro dominated multicultural world order and seeks a new political alliance with Russia and some other mini-nations (hopefully followed by several European nations).
20 years earlier, my bet (70 years maximum). So change will occur, guaranteed, we just have to be a little patient.
Controllers - dominate, not necessarily very big difference. The common denominator in all historical cases dhimmitude + demographic warfare. Are non-Muslims in Furuset, Holmlia today dhimmis? Yes, of course they are. Why do you think they systematically choose to move?
Why do you think Furuset, Holmlia and other areas in Oslo will soon be emptied of non-Muslims? Enclavisation in Oslo East continues slowly but surely every single day.
For those who take these words with a grain of salt (this may be fine with a little reminder of demographic history and to):
Demographical development Kosovo :
1900 40% Islam
1. http://www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/011.shtml # 6
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) :
1911 - 21% Islam
1921 - 45%
1932 - 49%
1943 - 48%
1970 - 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 - 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 - 75%
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
1948 85% Christian 
2006 12% Christian 
1948-60% Christian 
1983-20% Christian 
1300 - 99% Christians
1450 - 90% (3 years before the fall of Constantinople)
1600 - 55%
1850 - 35% (Genocide / forceful conversions intensifies)
1900 - 20%
1920 - 15%
1945 - 6% (Focus shift to Muslim persecution of Kurds)
1980 - 3%
2009 - 1%
1. http://home.att.net/ ~ dimostenis / greektr.html
2. See all sources from the Balkans and Anatolia Historic demo graphics
1920 - 33% Christians
2007 - 10% (would be less than 5% if it were not for Christian immigration from Iraq).
Pakistan (Hindu / Muslim population) 
1941 - 25% Hindus
1948 - 17%
1991 - 1.5%
2007 - 1%
Bangladesh (Hindu / Muslim population) 
1941 - 30% Hindus
1948 - 25%
1971 - 15%
1991 - 10%
2007 - 8%
2008 - Numbers and Percentage of Muslims in many European cities (legal / illegal Including city suburbs)   :
The Hague 17%
3. Indymedia.be notes That Brussels is 25.5% Muslim
What then is the common denominator in all these historical cases?
Islam + + dhimmitude demographic warfare (Jihad)
Hårstad / Fjordman,
Do not take it personally but rather as a compliment. You will have to read between the lines sometimes (we have actually progressed so far that we have learned something from the Marxists - war is deceit, etc. ..). The truth is there. But do not believe that truth can only benefit us, it can actually hurt us if we do not use it properly. The truth is so ugly that it has the potential to scare many moderates cultural conservatives back into apathy. Yes, you (we may), but we don't have such a bad self-image that we will have to gloat with it all the time?
To put it another way. It is critical that individuals / ideologues who Fjordman / Hårstad presents the unpackaged truth to other moderate but experienced conservative culture. These moderate conservative culture will then make their own judgments and take the necessary precautions. If you believe that the broad strata (individuals who do not have the same intellectual conservative cultural knowledge as us) are ready for the full packaged truly take you wrong. I, with several years of studies of this truth is still sick and poor to think of it. What do you think an a-political person had been? He had most likely been shocked and moved to Svalbard or still lying to himself.
Dokument.no has the potential to become an even more influential media company if they play their cards right. The goal is to reach the broad masses must therefore Dokument.no moderated. The purpose of the media companies / NGOs is to convey as much of truth that is "appropriate", the goal is after all important, not the means. Thus, there is also on the cards that they can and want to acknowledge doctrines of very specific individuals ONLY if it is appropriate.
I see such ideologues as a martyr-ideologues (I might be in this category, even with similar theories, even though I was not familiar with Fjordman's works until 2008). They provide the basic ideological lines for the more moderate individuals, the ugly truth, beauty, foundation, other more moderate build on this. It will often be appropriate to distance themselves from these martyr-ideologues for tactical reasons (especially if your goal is to reach out to the large masses). Such is the game whether we like it or not. Individuals have different functions. Do not be offended because of that, and take it rather as a compliment ;)
Do you think cultural Marxists will ever be so stupid that they admit that they want to implement Marx's doctrines? The fact that they use humanism to promote a Marxist utopia? No, they distance themselves from Marx for strategic reasons. They are not born yesterday and it's not us either.
We were honest once, but Marx and Muhammad has forced us to become more like them, unfortunately.
They had their "Frankfurt School". We are going to develop our own "Vienna School" of necessity.
Embrace it! DE has made the rules, we just follow them. ;)
I think that people often forget the very definition of the word "conspiracy". What is it?
To conspire is to work in common (among peers) to another group / the other group's interests (conspiracy) or to implement a particular goal / agenda.
All groups with a political agenda conspire directly or indirectly. Whether they will admit it or not is irrelevant. Document, like all other political-led entities (such as class struggle, N (A) RK, cnn, daily newspaper. Clue is that everyone working toward a specific political goal conspire (including us, we are cultural conservatives (> 10%), the others are kulturmarxister (> 10%), Muslims (supports cultural Marxism by default) (> 5%) global capitalists (> 1%) and then we have the gray mass in the center (consisting of many humanists, and others who either sympathize with Marxists or conservative. This is the group (80%) that we all try to "win the favor of".
A large proportion of the multiculturalists IS not Marxists but rather either naïve humanists (Christian Democratic Party, V, Cr, half AP, half right) or gobalist capitalists (half right).
Many of these "real humanists" being manipulated by "false humanists" (Marxists) that so often hides its true agenda by playing on humanism.
This is obvious to me, but still theories. I know that many would like to implement Marxist agenda (they have a Marxist background) but we can not prove it 100%, hence there will be theories.
People can't prove this of course, unless all from one political group had admitted it (something they are not going to do). It does not mean that the truth about people's political motives are not obvious.
Individual's background tells all about their intentions). For items. It is well known that Barroso was a member of a Portuguese Communist Party in the past. But it is harder to roll up and prove that he and hundreds of other central European elites want to implement these Marxist doctrines through the EU. This is where the martyr-ideologues rails. They come with the charges, presents theories, adds impact the plan, other more moderate supplies of this and look at what this theoretical material that can be used at the present time, as appropriate, etc.
To return to the point. The word "conspiracy theory" is often associated with something very negative. But it is in reality very often central truths which currently lacks evidence, only claims which have not yet been proven. In time the truth will come out for ALL ;)
In the meantime, we share with the masses of what is "appropriate" at this point ;)
A little theory is appropriate if it is in line with people's perception ;) And of course it is important to consistently (slowly) stretch the elastic to ensure that these perceptions are moving towards the truth.
I am generally quite reluctant to move and theorise too much about the U.S. because of the assumptions which are different from those in Europe. They are dominated by Christian immigration, which is not the case here. We are indigenous to Europe which isn't something Americans are in the U.S., etc. This does not mean that development can not unfold the way you describe (although it currently lacks sufficient evidence), but I do not think it's necessarily appropriate to put too much emphasis on U.S. geopolit. at this time. I actually think the U.S. their fate (and the fate of multiculturalism / cultural Marxism) will be settled in France in 20-70 years. The indications suggest it.
It is essential that people like yourself and Fjordman continue to develop theories of their own (our). They are about to lay the foundation for our "Vienna School". What moderates cultural conservatives think of this work, you should worry less about. They will come after a few years and shout "hallelujah" when "enough" evidence supports these claims ;)
Hlund, Fjordman, Hårstad, Rustad
I'm probably much later in the game than him when I have only been politically active for 13 years. I am a first generation dhimmi (Generation Y). I was active in the Oslo Progress Party / FpU in the first 6-7 years (in the cultural conservative laissez-faire capitalist + / liberal camp) and contributed to the Progress Party's success before I stopped. I felt at the time it was more important to help develop / market the political doctrines abroad, especially British, German, French, American). I ran the business for some years while I studied and earned a few million so I could finance a politically active life. I now use these funds to be able to work full time to develop / market the Vienna Academy (Vienna school of thought) as Fjordman, Bat Yeor, Spencer, and many other have already contributed so much to. The last three years I worked full time on a conservative cultural work that will help to further develop / promote these political doctrines.
Anyway, I consider the future consolidation of the cultural conservative forces on all 7 fronts as the most important, in Norway and in all West European countries. It is essential that we work to ensure that all these 7 fronts use the Vienna school of thought, or at least parts of it's foundation for the 20-70 years of battle that lie in front of us.
The book is called, by the way in 2083 and is in English, 1100 pages).
To sum up Vienna school of thought:
- Cultural Conservatism (anti-multiculturalism)
- Against Islamization
- Anti-authoritarian (resistance against all authoritarian ideologies of hate)
- Pro-Israel/forsvarer of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries
- Defender of the cultural aspects of Christianity
- To reveal the Eurabia project and the Frankfurt School (ny-marxisme/cultural Marxism/multikulturalisme)
- Does not apply to an economic policy and can collect everything from socialists to capitalists
Frankfurt School (cultural Marxism) is a very ambitious unofficial ideology (and quite unknown to most) and they have succeeded in most areas (except to smash capitalism, European Christianity and European identity, traditions, culture). The Vienna school is more a defense against this, where we often use the Marxist 'own creations against them (sexual liberation, feminism, liberalism, anti-racism, anti-autoriære arguments).
The Vienna school of thought is far from a complete ideology but consists of principles and ideas that are constantly under development. It is unofficial and does not necessarily need to be recognized.
The number is 270-300 million (not billion). Approximately 80-150 were Hindus who were killed in the east-jihad campaigns (Hindu Kush) before and after the conquest of Sindh, which lasted in organized form until the British arrived.
Hindus and Buddhists were shown no mercy whatsoever for the first centuries, as opposed to the book.
Today's "traveling people / gypsies" are descendants of the Hindu slaves who were brought during the Hindu Kush. Tens of thousands of these gypsies fled when the Caliphate lost in 1683, in Vienna (they brought with them approximately 100,000 slaves in the Vienna-campaign). There why so many of them made it to Europe.
The Hindu Kush genocide is the largest in human history. Ironically enough, the authorities in India are worse when it comes to indulgence than our cultural Marxists in Western Europe.
Hiding Genocide corresponding to Hitler's x 45 can not be described as anything but insane.
Gule - here is the definition of an "Islamic no-go zone"
There are more than 30 Islamic no-go zones in Norway and those in other Western European countries in proportion to Muslim concentrations in various cities. Therefore, there is probably far more than 751 in France. Guaranteed more than 1000, and it is growing every day!
Here is the definition:
An Islamic no-go zone:
1. Where full, scantily clad non-Muslim girls / women cannot travel without imminent danger of rape, violence, robbery, harassment.
2. Where young non-Muslim people cannot travel without imminent danger of harassment, robbery, violence by Muslim gangs and / or individuals.
3. Where non-Muslim people cannot express individuality in all free forms (including religious, sexual, cultural) without the imminent threat of physical / psychological harassment or robbery from the Muslims.
Parts of Holmlia, Furuset and many other areas of the Eastern Oslo / Oslo are obvious Islamic no-go zones.
Why do you think non-Muslims move from these areas? Why do you think the Muslim enclavisation continues? The existing 30 Islamic no-go zones in Norway are growing every day.
Much of Serbia is now a no-go zone for non-Muslim Serbs (Kosovo) to name an extreme. The Muslims now require passports from the Christians! An Islamic no-go zone is being developed when the first Muslim family moves into an area, where non-Muslims have to live in a varying degree of dhimmitude. No one accepts this, so they move away from these Islamic no-go zones. This in turn makes it even harder for the remaining dhimmis to live normally. The results is that the Muslim no-go zones / enclaves are growing dramatically every single day!
Non-Muslims want to live in freedom, not under dhimmitude.
Any area where the non-Muslim citizens or those who travel experience varying degrees of dhimmitude (the limitations of their freedom, violence, harassment BECAUSE they are Muslims and follow sharia, go with the hijab, etc) is by definition an Islamic no-go zone .
Gule, I'm impressed regardless of your knowledge related to the rhetorical deconstruction and your rhetorical abilities in general. We have much to learn from cultural Marxists in this area.
Non-Muslim youth in Oslo aged 12-18 are in a particularly vulnerable situation with regard to harassment by Muslim youths. I myself am born and raised here and chose out of necessity the friendships / alliances with the A and B gang to roam freely. The alternative is that you stick to your neighborhood, or west side. I know of hundreds of incidents where non-Muslims were robbed, beaten and harassed by Muslim gangs. My best friend aged 12-17 was from Pakistan and I was one of the protected sphere "potatoes" who had protection. But I saw the hypocrisy up close and was nauseous. Muslim gangs are / were freely rampaging (racism / Jihad-behavior), while all attempts "potatoes" do / did to create the corresponding threads are systematically labeled as racism and deconstructed by the local police.
No wonder the Progress Party won the election in the school year. There's been grown a new generation of dhimmified youths who actually know what Islam and dhimmitude is, in contrast to parliamentary politicians and journalists who choose to move to Oslo when they are 20-30 years of age.
I'm glad I've always lived in Oslo West. For it must be hell in Oslo East: o
There's a bunch of no-go zones in most American cities. The LA one are the most famous - Compton, Crenshaw, Watts, Inglewood, etc. but it can not be directly compared with the situation in Europe as Afro-Americans are Christians, etc.
Well, the essence is that the Muslim boys learn a code of honor, pride in their own religion, culture and cultural conservative values at home while Norwegian girls have become feminized and taught excessive tolerance. This makes them totally unprepared for what awaits them ... The curriculum at the school now consists to a large degree of demonization of our ancestors (evil imperialists, large farmers who raped maids, bloodthirsty Crusaders who invaded the peaceful Muslims) as it gives Muslims the victim role. The result is that Norwegian men aged 12-18 are particularly vulnerable and often become depressed. They lack pride, honor, and a correct understanding of Islam.
There has now been a mass exodus of non-Muslims from Oslo East in the past 20 years, even if the media refuses to cover this trend. The reason is simple. People do not want to be cowed, they do not want to live like second class citizens (dhimmitude). Parents observe but can not do much. There are of course very dependent on the situation. If it is 50% Muslim school, or just 2%. It is often easiest to move instead of letting your child carry the "integration problem" on their shoulders.
In many ways intensified polarization between Muslim and non-Muslim occurs among the younger generations. There are ten times as many Muslim gangs as non-Muslim. Abuse and harassment is perceived as clear racism and frustration is great when the media ignores this racism in total. 100 racial / Jihadi murder of Norwegians in the last 15 years are totally ignored, while a single murder by a Norwegian racist results in a torchlight procession with 50,000 participants and the establishing of a Memorial Fund.
Many young people are apathetic as a result, others are very racist.
I got the impression that the younger generations in Oslo do not quite manage to see the political context here. They see racist attacks but do not fully understand that this is Jihad (political / cultural attacks). They repay what they perceive as racism with racism.
My hope is that they will see the cultural / political context, but one should not ignore the fact that the new generations of young people will go in the direction of ethnocentrism.
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist cultural conservative options for youths. Some therefore choose the options that exist, which then is ethnocentric.
I dare not even think about how many Norwegian children who have committed suicide because of these experiences (assault, robbery, rape, psychological terror perpetrated by Muslim youth). There are probably hundreds over the past 15 years.
Well, this is certainly part of the reason that the Progress Party was greater than the AP at the last school election ...
The interesting thing here is that if we had removed the Muslim vote at the last school election in Oslo, Progress Party had ended up with about 30-40% support.
Trondb: There is no doubt that what I say about a mass exodus match any documents proving the following:
And you can check back in 10 years, then the number will be 70-80 schools, 100-120 in 20 years ;) The majority of these are Muslims, although this is not mentioned.
Supra, we all know that people on the right Aslak Nore can just forget about getting anything published. Believe me, we have all tried for years. We had of course been more likely to penetrate the cultural Marxist censorship if any of us had had a Somali background, or was an Egyptian Copter but unfortunately I am not :). You must also remember that there is no free press in Norway. Aftenposten was the only cultural conservative newspaper in Norway, but they were known as the coup of cultural Marxism in 1972. 100% of the national media companies now fully support multiculturalism and none of these will help to undermine this ideology.
It should at least be mentioned that conditions improved drastically over the past 18 years. The reason is that most of these Muslims I spoke of don't have the grades to get into good VGS. Many of these are either craftsmen, unemployed or criminals. It is especially in the age group 12-18 where a large group of Norwegians have it hard when they have to go to the public schools with the most hateful Muslims in the city.
Tell me one country where Muslims have lived peacefully with non-Muslims without the Jihad against Kafr (dhimmitude, systematic slaughter or demographic warfare)?
I can name 40 countries / areas where this has disastrous consequences for non-Muslims. Can you please mention one single example where it has managed to assimilate Muslims? You seem rather naive. Of course, some integrate but it is completely the outcome that counts (everything else is irrelevant).
How many thousands of new Europeans must die, how many hundreds of thousands of European women must be raped, robbed and how many millions attacked until you understand that multiculturalism + Islam does not work?
Why do you think Norway will be the first country in the world for the last 1400 years in which this will succeed?
History repeats itself forever.
Speaking of stubborn multiculturalists. I remember a story from Oslo Aftenposten of approx. 6 months ago (I can unfortunately not link this).
I can remember that it was a school in downtown Oslo East, in a class where there was only one Norwegian boy again (the majority were Muslims). Most others had taken their children out of school. The mother of this boy was of course a hardcore Marxist who on the death and life should prove that multiculturalism and Islam will be functioning. She refused to move to another area or take him out of school. Her son would prove once and for all the Islamophobes on the document and other cultural conservatives were wrong and that it WAS possible.
The poor boy was harassed for several years until one day he began to self mutilate. He told his Marxist mother that he wanted to die. Only after this the mother realized that she had been wrong. The result was that they moved to another neighborhood and changed schools.
So one should not underestimate the reality of how "hardcore" some of these cultural Marxists are. I am sure that some of these had actually sacrificed their own children just to prove this sick Marxist theory.
But there is after all a justice in this. The positive for us, the cultural conservatives, is that we are among the first to protect our children, we move to safe areas where our children do not need to live in dhimmitude.
It is often the children to the boundless naive and Marxist children who end up as victims. The irony here is that those who survive with their psyche intact end up as a dedicated cultural conservatives, or to that of ethnocentrism with great frustration for their parents or humanistic cultural Marxism :))
In all the cases.
It is very important that we here in the document do not restrict our "political commitment" to this page. There are major political upheavals taking place in Western Europe at this moment (at the congressional root level). The cultural conservative movement is growing at record speed and it is a consolidation process going on in all West European countries. ANYONE can contribute and every contribution counts :) The best thing you can do in Norway is to support Dokument.no either financially or through volunteer work. Go into the various Norwegian debate forum and market articles on the Dokument.no. With dedicated effort, I am sure that the document has the potential to become the new "Aftenposten".
His will soon present their ideas for how this can be done.
I recommend to you all to also strongly expanding your Facebook networks, use the daily quota of 50 invitations to make contacts with the Brits, French, Swedes, etc. Join the groups that SIOE - Stop Islamisation of Europe, Against Multiculturalism, join Progress Party if nothing else :)
Watch the pages gatesofvienna, brussels journal, Jihad Watch, religionofpeace etc.
Read Fjordman's work "Defeating Eurabia". This is also the perfect Christmas gift for family and friends.
Add: Analects Informatics on Facebook. This group communicates news articles that are unknown to most. Very good news that the document can use if desired.
It is particularly important that we, the Norwegian cultural conservatives, make an effort. Norway and Sweden are among the world's most repressive regimes extrusion (extrusion grade) when it comes to a critical view of Islamization and multiculturalism.
The biggest mistake most people make is they assume that "someone" should make the effort for them. There are no others, it's just us ;)
Looking forward to meeting as many as possible of you on Thursday :). Let's hope he doesn't select Blitz Cafe or international :)).
(To Add me on Facebook please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org)
It would be strategically and fun PR stunt, Hårstad :)
It is actually very interesting for us younger generations to learn about Norwegian Marxist movement, former power conflicts, etc.
I got the impression that the more "hardcore" Marxists have been denied key positions in the AP after WW2. They were instead predicted senior positions within the various colleges / universities, newspaper leaders and NGOs?
Can you confirm whether there has been no organizational incentives / assisting behind this or is simply Marxists exceptional career conscious and able to climb in the cultural hierarchy?
I've always wondered what happened to the Norwegian fascist movement in Norway? Has it never existed or they cut just the politics and focused on the business after WW2?
Do you know exactly how Aftenposten was the coup and when this happened? They supported the NS during WW2. Was the leadership imprisoned or replaced immediately after the war?
You raise many interesting points. I have made lists of these networks which I shall introduce in my book. It is essential to countering the continuing consolidation (have paste the charts earlier than specific tasks and activities, annual plans etc. to systematically regain control of specific NGOs and strengthen the cultural conservatives of all 7 different political fronts. Another important task will be to create a cultural conservative media company with national distribution. We are in the process.
About your choice of an ideological basis. 50 years of effort by ethnocentric organizations / movements (from 1960-2009) has failed completely. We know this and further focus, illumination of these strategies will only be counter-productive and potentially very damaging to the current Norwegian and European cultural conservative movement.
Ethnocentric movements that BNP, National Front is not successful and will never be able to get over 10% support (GDP 5%, the UN has 7%). One can not fight racism (multikulti) with racism. Ethnocentrism is therefore the complete opposite of what we want to achieve.
We have chosen Vienna School of Thought as the ideological foundation. This means opposition to multiculturalism and Islamization (on cultural grounds). All our ideological arguments based on anti-racism.
This has proven to be very successful which explains why the modern conservative movement culture / parties using Vienna School of Thought is so successful: Progress Party, Geert Wilders, document and many others.
Ethnocentrism is contrary to the principles of the Vienna School of Thought which is why you may have been censored in the past.
I have worked several years for the Progress Party and guarantee you that the Progress Party had less than 10% support if they had chosen Vienna School of Thought as the ideological foundation.
Yes, we will defeat multiculturalism / cultural Marxism finally (as this is very discriminatory and racist). But we must do it the right ideological grounds.
I strongly doubt that your theory is correct. The whole conflict between GDP and EDL started with a change of leadership in the EDL for a few months ago. They threw out the racists and took away from GDP. They chose instead SIOE's ideological base that is more or less the mainstream view of modern day Western Europe (Vienna School of Thought).
Nick was very offended and began to demonize the EDL. Although they are now attacking each other as they compete not at all as this is two completely different fronts. 90% of all votes in the EDL continues to GDP (Since this is the only alternative to multiculturalism in the United Kingdom) and 90% of GDP supports EDL regardless of what Nick might think.
Secondly, Labour governs the intelligence service. They would never support the EDL as these create a lot of positive attention for the cultural conservative movement in the United Kingdom.
I have on some occasions discussed with SIOE and EDL and recommended them to use conscious strategies.
The tactics of the EDL is now out to "entice" an overreaction from Jihad Youth / Extreme-Marxists as they have succeeded several times already. The over reaction has been repeatedly shown on the news which has boosted EDLs ranks significantly. This has also benefited GDP. WinWin for both.
But I must say I am very impressed with how quickly they have grown but this has to do with smart tactics by management.
EDL is an example and a Norwegian version is the only thing that can stop Flash / SOS to harass Norwegian cultural conservatives from other fronts. Creating a Norwegian EDL should be No. 3 on the agenda after we have started a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution.
The agenda of the Norwegian cultural conservative movement over the next five years will therefore:
1. Newspaper with national distribution
2. Working for the control of several NGOs
3. Norwegian EDL
The day Dokument.no launches as a national publication in paper-/net edition with a circulation of 2000 + the editors / management of the company should moderate, of course depending on what is the objective in terms of circulation and ideological goals. For example, one can allow themselves to be less moderate with a circulation of 2000 opposed to 100 000 This is obvious.
It is essential that the editorial staff act in a way that is appropriate for the company and its ideological goal (if the document at all has no ideological goals). It must also be considered in the future (at 20, 50, 100K circulation) to allow the commenting on articles, in addition to specifying constraints to express themselves in this respect.
- Should only individuals who believe that the other party is "weak" to express themselves?
- Should individuals who feel part of the other party is aware of the ideological beliefs be censored?
- Should only individuals who have a humanistic view of news reporting to express themselves?
- Should those individuals who want to convey clear cultural conservative ideological beliefs be censored?
These questions can only be answered when setting up their ideological principles. In all cases there should be an open and honest line toward themselves and their readers as much as possible.
I think the editorial in the future (soon) will have to go in themselves and specify their objective (s goal of humanistic nature or shall be clear ideological principles of reason). I am curious about the editorial staff at all have a clear ideological beliefs / goals (an ideological agenda as other publications seem to have: class struggle, the Times, some Norwegian, etc.) or is the goal of humanistic art?
Humanities in the sense that there is a duty to examine the other side of an issue (where other publications obviously fails). Is it true that the basis for dokument.no will be driven by a "humanistic duty" and not driven by any kind of ideological ambition (cultural conservative or otherwise)?
This discussion should not be taken here, of course, but should be noted for the editorial staff and, if possible, be discussed on Thursday :)
It is important to clarify such basic questions early on, when a possible involvement of other parties, such as cultural conservative political parties / NGOs / investors / volunteers will be depended on to clarify this before any are willing to give their financial / organizational support to the Document.
It is a known fact that commercial publications (ranging from CNN, BBC, Dagbladet, Fox) is clear but often "unofficial ideological platforms" as it is expected that employees will follow. Such ideological principles is necessary to have an unofficial "ideological mutiny clause" that prevents undesirable future developments.
F as Lou Dobbs of CNN was hit by the unofficial section and he ultimately chose to go. It is not unlikely that he was forced out because he changed ideological point of view during his career. He became more and more critical of Muslim mass immigration to the U.S. which was not compatible with CNN's politically correct line.
The document is currently relatively innocent, but the price one must pay for success is often losing virginity :) For better or for worse.
All idealistic projects / individuals experience this phase of identity / crisis as soon as they want to cross a certain more or less commercial barrier :)
Here is a nice overview - 10 reasons why the modern church will die:
I myself am a Protestant and baptized / confirmed to me by my own free will when I was 15
But today's Protestant church is a joke. Priests in jeans who march for Palestine and churches that look like minimalist shopping centers. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion from the Protestant Church back to the Catholic. In the meantime, I vote for the most conservative candidates at the church elections.
The only thing that can save the Protestant church is to go back to basics.
Article Ekstremistan Series I, II, III is one of the best that has ever been here. Incredibly well written, Hans :)
Well, I think one of our problems is that for many individuals (especially liberals) on the right side helps to cannibalizing their own opinion allies. The reason is related to decades of brainwashing by cultural Marxists. For others, perhaps because of cowardice or fear of helping to create something that may one day evolve to an even worse alternative.
Many who are trying to consolidate on the right by present organizational structures, bullets or ideological banners (and to push for specific agendas and deadlines are followed to achieve the organizational goals) are criticized by individuals who wish to restrict the opposition to "essay critique / criticism of the system ". They hope well that this alone would be enough to kulturmarxistiske elites / hegemony will realize how stupid and mean they have been?
Before "we" can do something, there must be a "we". Consolidation is the only option and resistance can not be limited to "critical essays / criticism of the system." Progress Party is already established. But it must work actively to ensure cultural conservative control over NGOs (old or new) and also help to create youth organizations (national newspaper is obviously the most important but this is already on the agenda).
I know that Hans and Aesop disagree with me regarding the above (as they are afraid to help to create a monster which they later want to lose control over) but this will take you wrong :-)
And I hope you are tough enough to discuss this rather than to censor it out :).
Key words for discussion:
"Can dissidence, alone, save us or are we going to finally start to consolidate the cultural conservative on all fronts?"
I've never understood why the West focus so disproportionately on Iran and so little on the Wahhabi leadership in Saudi which after all is the most dangerous and most powerful Muslim central power. We should, of course, as soon as the bombing suspect their facilities but otherwise focus much more on Saudi. Could it be because Iran is a major oil exporter?
Shias make up a relatively small proportion of Muslims and has absolutely no influence on the Sunnis.
I would actually argue that we undermine our own interests by unilaterally attack the only relatively weak alternative to Sunni Islam. If Iran falls to Wahhabi position strengthened considerably since they have no competitors.
We should not forget that Saudi Arabia and several other Sunni Muslim countries want to destroy Iran. Nor is Iran that has built 300-500 Wahhabi centers around in Europe of the fund only 2 of 30 Jihad Fronts around the around the world.
The problem is that Europe lost the Cold War already in 1950, the moment they allowed Marxists / anti-nationalists to ravage freely, without restrictions on the positions they could have, and power positions they had the opportunity to wrest (teacher / professor positions in particular).
The result, in particular Norway and Sweden is that extreme Marxist attitudes have become acceptable / everyday while old established truths that patriotism and conservatism today are branded as extremism (of kulturmarxister and humanists). Anti-nationalist attitudes have unfortunately not only become mainstream but is now required as the basic attitude to have the opportunity to climb inside PK hierarchies.
There are not many prominent kulturmarxister actually admits the purpose of dennne anti-national and "Marxist grand scheme" but nobody can say it better than Thomas Hylland Eriksen:
"The main challenge is now to deconstruct the majority and do it thoroughly so that it can never be called a majority anymore"
"Something like that may contribute to the understanding and emancipation."
This is clearly extremist hate-speech. It admits Eriksen, on behalf of many European kulturmarxister that the goal is to create a Marxist utopia, a world without borders ruled by the UN, an opinion which is the main doctrine of Marxist thinking. To achieve this, the people declared insane (racist / nazi) and anti-democratic methods can therefore be allowed to replace the people by allowing the systematic colonization of the Third World.
In a society where the Marxist extremists Thomas Hylland Eriksen is allowed to practice freely within the bounds of political correctness, others more moderate humanists / kulturmarxister (extremists), as Mads Gilbert and Erik Fosse appear frigjørngshelter (Nazis (Jews) should be crushed just like Nazi Germany).
Had Western Europe and the U.S. decided to imprison all Marxists (Nazis and Marxists) after WW2 and swear Marxist principles hate ideology similar to Nazism, we had never been in the current situation.
But we learn just as long as we live. I doubt that a future patriotic regime will make this mistake again, if we manage to save the West before it is too late ... :-)
"Globalization and modernity are irreversible phenomena."
Classic multicultural propaganda. What has globalization and modernity to do with mass Muslim immigration?
And you may not have heard, and Japan and South Korea? These are successful and modern regimes even if they rejected multiculturalism in the 70s. Are Japanese and South Koreans Santas?
Can you name ONE country where multiculturalism is successful where Islam is involved? The only historical example is in the society without a welfare state with only non-Muslim minorities (U.S.).
This, I expect that everyone knows when it is elementary verifiable truths.
What I do not understand is why multiculturalists (which traditionally has consisted of and / or been supported by the labor movement) have not been able to understand that multiculturalism will destroy the future welfare provision (then social Cohesion / trust / willingness to let the tax) dollars in line with the spread of multiculturalism?
Best case scenario for Europe is that we end up with a super-capitalist system like the U.S. with large sub-classes / class differences.
It does not sound very humanistic ;) But then we are certainly not goblins anymore?
There are political forces in Oslo who wish to conduct mass-subsidized / low cost "Islam-blocks" of the Oslo West in order to "better integrate". As far as I know, only the Progress Party / Conservatives oppose at the moment so it might actually become a reality over the next decade.
If this ever becomes the case, many of the Oslo West will move to Bærum (and most will eventually follow suit).
Hm, but where do you move when this policy comes to Bærum?
Very good article :) It helps to push the debate to a new level.
I'm tempted to contact the owners and would reflect their success through restructuring through my leadership. This will involve kicking out all remaining cultural Marxists and start with conservative cultural coverage as the first major newspaper in Norway (critical of multiculturalism / Islamization). It is realistic to believe that the circulation will then have the potential to reach up to 120-200k.
It surprises me that there are no more "conservative cultural entrepreneurs" in the Kingdom of Norway?
Do you think the owners will have a positive attitude to such a proposal?, P
I will not be a good option when I have absolutely zero understanding of editorial processes. I think however, Hans Rustad should be responsible for the editorial and invite them to consider his concept. I think that the timing for this is optimal at this moment!
There are 15 kulturmarxistiske politically correct the ink is already in Norway and not a single cultural conservative. The first cultural conservative (not politically correct) the publication will be guaranteed success.
The problem with the Progress Party is that in their attempt to comply with the multicultural demands and ideals of suicidal humanism they threw out the baby with the bath water.
Genuine resistance has been reduced to listening to the PR agency and make 2-3 tactical statements before each election, to secure the votes of the core.
The vast majority of new faces in the Progress Party are now politically correct career politicians and not in any way idealists who are willing to take risks and work for idealistic goals.
The funny thing is that even though they have thrown virtually all principles overboard and reduced cultural struggle to "reduce the flow of asylum with a couple of thousand" they are still branded in public, ridiculed, harassed and isolated by the humanist-Marxist.
Parliamentary Representatives of the Progress Party, should at least read the document every single day and stay involved as it is their duty to be the people's voice. Unfortunately, very few of them at all know what the document is about, and fewer than 5% of them knows what Taqiyya and naskh is.
For example. when a combined force chose to ignore the Swedish and French intifada before the last election for strategic reasons, which later cost FrP maybe 5%, Siv should have instructed all his people to call the ARK and other newsrooms and forced them to cover this.
I have great respect for how the Marxist-humanist networks in Norway is able to use their power optimally through "force Multiplication" and cooperation.
They are insanely industrious, capable of consolidation and hard-working and most right-wing has a lot to learn from them.
Enemy of the People, Carl Christian,
What you manage to come up with here is nothing more than very ugly control techniques.
You claim that all Norwegians who do not follow landsmo (s) container Gro Harlem Brundtland's definition, is racist:
"Everyone who holds a Norwegian passport is fully Norwegian" ... Which means that even a Somali coach (with a Norwegian passport) who chews khat all day, and sends half his welfare check to al-Shabaab should be viewed as a full-Doe.
If anyone in this country Dares to look at the Somali coach as anything other than a full-Smith they are publicly branded as racists. And you say that anyone who disagrees with their extreme cultural Marxist world view - the utopian, global citizen-definition is racist?
In that case, I think you've stamped 95% of the world's population, but that's just a minor obstacle for you?
You are only committed to paralyze all the debate in society, to gag anyone who is not of the same opinion as you, to exercise social control in line with the conservative Muslims in Greenland? Once a person takes off his "ideological veil" they'll see you for the troll you are.
Sorry, but it does not work anymore. More are becoming increasingly immune to these techniques due to the inflation of mass rhetoric.
I think the majority of Norwegians require full cultural assimilation (European culture) to calculate other full Norwegians. His analysis is thus correct. Norwegian passport is irrelevant in this context. Get over it ...!
I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant communicator and retoriker, one of the best we have seen over the past 30 years.
But firstly, we can not and should not compare cultural struggle in the U.S. with Europe. The rhetoric must and should be different. The average "right click" - Republican in the U.S. is a "libertarian" (anti-socialist but pro multikulti) while the average conservative in Europe is much more anti-multikulti with arguments based on cultural resistance against Islamization.
The so-called anti-multiculti rhetoric in the U.S. is based on their own ethnocentrism which thus differs greatly from the Europeans. This is the main reason that we must distinguish American and European cultural struggle. I usually stay away from American issues as a result.
Regardless of whether we are in the U.S. or Europe, it is essential you have to ask about the following:
When was that multiculturalism ceased to be an ideology designed to deconstruct a European culture, traditions, identity and nation-states? If you support a leader that propagates multikulti (ideology of writing systematically deconstruct Western civilization), one can not then might as well stick to the class struggle or the MSM?
And if you really mean that multicultural doctrine is the main cause of the ongoing Islamization of Europe and the U.S., one should not criticize multiculturalism while leading No. 1, himself Jesus Christ Obama for his fundamental principles?
Failure to criticize him, you have not then accepted the multicultural premise?
According to two studies 13% of young British Muslims between 15 and 25 supports Al Qaeda's ideology. The United Kingdom is presentative for Norway, so I would guess that at least 15-20% of Norwegian Muslims support the killing of gays. There is certainly no fewer that support the killing of gays than those supporting Al Qaeda.
The problem is that it often does not matter if 80% of Muslims are "moderate", ie they ignore the Koran. "It takes very few people to crash a plane."
What percentage is the Taliban of Pakistan's population? 1%, 3%, 5%? And how much chaos is there today?
In any society where Islam exists there will be a certain percentage of the Muslims who actually follow traditional interpretations of the Koran.
And then we have the relationship between conservative Muslims and so-called "moderate Muslims".
There are moderate Nazis, too, that does not support gassing of Romas and Jews. But they're still Nazis and will only sit and watch as the conservative Nazis strike (if it ever happens). Do we accept moderate Nazis as long as they distance themselves from the gassing of Romas and Jews?
Now we've unfortunately already cut ourselves with Marxists who have already infiltrated, culture, media and educational organizations. These individuals will be tolerated and will even work as professors and lecturers at colleges / universities and are thus able to spread their propaganda.
For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists different. They are all supporters of hate ideologies. Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most people are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazis may, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to get into a club, be conservative, etc.
It is obvious that moderate supporters of hate ideologies, at a later date may choose conservatism.
Islam (ism) has historically led to 300 million deaths
Communism has historically led to 100 million deaths
Nazism has historically led to 6-20 million deaths
ALL hate ideologies should be treated equally.
Very good and very important article. Great work, Hans!
Japan and South Korea are much clearer examples of countries that consistently and very directly dismissed multiculturalism. This continued through the 70 -, 80 -, 90's and this day.
The United Nations has for years tried to push them to receive hundreds of thousands of refugees, but this has only resulted in a tiny fraction of the original claim. Europe has never chosen to run psychological or economic warfare against them for this reason (as they do to European nations / individuals who advocate the same arguments and principles)
Multiculturalists will be very embarrassed if you mention Japan and South Korea as these nations prove quite openly that mass immigration is only a result of specific Marxist doctrines and very rarely economically or culturally beneficial. Japan / South Korea have a border and border guards. If you are missing one is refused a visa pass ... (Europe had known this scheme until 1950 to 1960)
The interesting question is, why aren't the Japanese and South Koreans demonized as Nazis and fascists? The answer, we know ...
The main axes are economics and culture.
They were right-wing culturally but economically leftist (not as extreme as the planned economy but still strong socialist). So it is equally wrong to call them right-wing as left extreme. They were both: P
The Left of course like to tag them as right-wing extremist, as well as anti-socialists refer to them as left extreme.
The third axis: authoritarian vs liberal is inappropriate to use as the main marker.
Thanks for the great job so far, Hans and Document. You are doing an incredibly important job and you're considered to be one of very few alternative modern ideological voices. And you will be noticed from the country's parliamentary representatives and journalists. I would even argue that the Document has been a political force in Norway, as we all know that the country's elites surreptitiously read Document weekly :-) You continue to do Norway a great service! :-)
However, I want to come with some constructive criticism when it comes to Documents organizational and financial plans. Please do not take it personally :)
Considering Documents modest economy and that in any case are 50 talented writers in Norway who had willingly contributed more actively, I think it would be a very bad idea to focus 90% of Documents funds in a real journalist position. Today there are a plethora of essays and articles that require distributed without financial compensation so why spend all the funds in a journalist position? I'm pretty sure that, under the circumstances, very costly position is liquidated in the course of a two-year period when I expect that you will ultimately reach the same conclusion.
It would be a pity if you ignored the suggestions and decided to squandered all the money in a potentially "politically correct" person on the basis of the Marxist boot camp: Volda University College or any other journalist (Marxist) camps etc.
What you however should focus economically is to develop "Concept Document" socially and organizationally, primarily by developing this blog to a solution more like a social networking site that is linked to similar organizations in other countries (equivalent to a beginnig of a cultural Euro-version of the Tea Party movement).
Alternatively, should you give out a monthly magazine that is distributed through Narvesen. I have already presented a detailed strategy for how this can be done. I collected all the offers from suppliers, I contacted even Narvesen and then send it to you, Hans. Full distribution through Narvesen (2000 copies monthly magazine), can be produced for less than $. 35,000 per month, an investment which promises to provide "break-even" and could potentially result in twice the revenue! I do not understand why someone from the Document has not wanted to consider my proposal?
You have, at present, access to an armada of some of the brightest talents in most industries, which will be willing to work for free. This talent is now unused. So why spend up to 90% of the assets of Documents on a journalist position?
I have worked for 14 years with several projects related to network solutions, have financial education + two other bachelor degrees, earned my first million as an entrepreneur at the age of 24 and have many friends that are currently successful entrepreneurs in most industries. Several of my friends are experts on the development of online communities (one of them runs Deiligst.no, Norway's probably the most profitable online communities despite a frayed moral concept).
The point of the illustration is that you have access to very valuable skills, free, which you refuse to use.
I hope you will be willing to receive help in a much greater extent than you are today and spend the modest funds to more essential costs, as outlined above.
Anyway, go! I support you 100% no matter what you ultimately have to choose ;-)
Hello Hans, Nina, Christian, Rubb and the rest of you I know :-)
Firstly, very well done over the last year :-) Thanks to all the editors / contributors, Hans, Nina, Christian, Rubb and all others who contributed! You have become a political force in Norway whether you like it or not :) Well deserved. (And we like it <3): D
Documents Regarding future tasks, I think you should continue to focus on what you have done best. Small steps have been taken and have been positive, more activity on facebook, twitter launch + facebook / twitter-like features, etc.
What I am however a little disappointed about is the appearance of an editorial printed version. It is VERY easy to distribute print anno 2011 with minimal financial risk.
Why not go ahead with the project that I described in detail a year ago?
Paper Distribution through Narvesen
We create a pilot sample and presents this to the marketing manager in the Reitan Group. I already talked to them and the only thing that remains is to call for an appointment. Presentation of the pilot copy of which may well be a PDF file displayed on a lap-top. I'm sure he accepts the magazine's content and acknowledge that it is "worthy of distribution" at the national level through Narvesen chain. I suggest that everyone take a trip to Narvesen and look at all the magazines that are sold there. They distribute a magazine for people who love tattoos -. - And one of the anarcho-Marxists (Blitzer types) ... so it would be only fair if a moderate conservative culture magazine was represented ... (There are approx. Cultural conservative 35% in Norway, in contrast to the 1% anarcho-Marxists).
Research on this distribution method is already in place and we have got a very good offer from printing the email I mentioned a year ago.
File delivered to the printing as a PDF file. A PDF template for magazines are available and any person with a minimum of Photoshop / IT can manage the knowledge to put together a magazine (PDF file) that looks professional. We can also print shop to create a PDF template to us if Photoshop / IT the knowledge of their limited (this will cost £ max. 3000). We can for example use the same PDF template every month (only need to change the content / graphics). When the PDF file is ready will be sent to the printing that creates an initial copy of the inspection (or corrects imperfections).
Paper Magazine with glossy front / back, bound (equivalent to average down Narvesen magazines) and finished delivered on pallets. Transportation to Narvesen leaf central costs only $. 500 as this is sent to many other magazines.
Number of pages: up to 60 pages
Production number: 1000 copies
Price per copy including VAT: £. 8 - sold for $. 50 Narvesen, of which kr. 21 is Narvesen commission and the remainder, £. 21 is direct income to the Document (can not remember if VAT is calculated by the magazines, but this was the first mail). The purchase of 1,000 copies through Narvesen this is an income before tax of NOK. 13 000 per 1,000 copies sold. It therefore requires only 380 copies sold to reach break even (£ 8000 / £. 21). The economic risks of this project is the deformation minimum. Document has virtually nothing to lose by initiating such a release asap.
The only counter-argument I heard of this strategy, a year ago was that, class struggle and apparently had suffered terribly at the launch at 60-70-80 figure. This argument is however not applicable to the magazine copies now be created in PDF (single digital feed of articles / graphics in a standard template) and the actual printing is outsourced (no need to buy printing equipment for x number of millions).
I therefore propose that you consider this again :-) I'm also willing to help with various tasks if necessary (for example, negotiate a good agreement with the Reitan).
I recommend strongly that you focus on this (very attractive income opportunity and minimal work) rather than use £. 50,000 per. month on a reporter position. Remember that there is a "sea" of very good articles that are printed weekly in Europe that can be distributed free of charge and are consistent with the values and principles of Documents.
So to sum up three tips for improvement:
1. Focus on increased distribution (paper magazine with national distr. Makes. Narvesen)
2. Be better to involve competent supporters (Document has the potential to generate up to 5-years free of charge when many want to help the idealistic reasons)
3. Try to be a little risqué / controversial. Try not to fall in the "politically correct / defensive trap". Do not be afraid to "teasing on you", the calculated provocations, parliamentary representatives, NGO leaders, VG, Aftenposten, NRK, Dagbladet, Times journalists. Until Forced attention of individuals like this can generate "PR breakthroughs" Document needs. For example, an NGO leader is "accused / criticized" the person will feel compelled to defend themselves (and then often through the large, VG, Aftenposten, etc.). Controversial multitude as this will help to make the Document more relevant and will result in the editorial, to a greater extent, will be invited to various discussion forums (if done correctly). This can be done by running a more "aggressive-UKIP Nigel" style against them when it comes to their incompetence, their bias or their unfallenhet toward addressing highly relevant but politically Incorrect topics. "Reverse engineering" of kulturmarxistiske debate / argumentation techniques are often the most effective works. There are at least as often provokes them the most :-)
Regardless of the recommendations, you are doing a great job! :-) Documents support seems to increase every single day! The paper will also give you a huge boost :)