Johns Hopkins University

BIOTERRORBIBLE.COM: The following whitepapers were published by think-tanks, universities, NGO’s and various governmental agencies and have at the very minimum set the stage psychologically for the impending bio-terror induced pandemic. The simple fact that these whitepapers exists in mass confirms that an upcoming bio-terror attack is in the cards and may be played in a last ditch effort to regain political, economic and militarial control of society.

WHITEPAPERS: Army War College ,  ASM (American Society for Microbiology), CATO Institute, Center for a New American Security, Center for Biosecurity of UPMC, Center for Counterproliferation Research, Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute, CRS (Report for Congress),  GAO (General Accounting Office), Institute for National Strategic Studies, Institute for Science and Public Policy, Johns Hopkins University, National Academy Of Engineering, National Defence University, PERI (Public Entity Risk Institute),  RIS (Research & Information System), Terrorism Intelligence Centre, The Federalist Society, UNESCO (United Nations), University of Laussane, and the WMD Center.

Title: Bioterrorism As A Public Health Threat
Date: July - September 1998
Source: Emerging Infectious Diseases (PDF below)

Abstract: The threat of bioterrorism, long ignored and denied, has heightened over the past few years. Recent events in Iraq, Japan, and Russia cast an ominous shadow. Two candidate agents are of special concern—smallpox and anthrax. The magnitude of the problems and the gravity of the scenarios associated with release of these organisms have been vividly portrayed by two epidemics of smallpox in Europe during the 1970s and by an accidental release of aerosolized anthrax from a Russian bioweapons facility in 1979. Efforts in the United States to deal with possible incidents involving bioweapons in the civilian sector have only recently begun and have made only limited progress. Only with substantial additional resources at the federal, state, and local levels can a credible and meaningful response be mounted. For longer-term solutions, the medical community must educate both the public and policy makers about bioterrorism and build a global consensus condemning its use (Emerging Infectious Diseases, 1998)

The Threat of Bioterrorim And The Public Health Response: Summary Of The John Hopkins National Symposium On Medical And Public Health Response To Bioterrorism
Date: 1999
Source: John Hopkins University (PDF below)

Title: The Looming Threat Of Bioterrorism
Date: October 8, 2008
Source: Johns Hopkins University (PDF below)

Abstract: Biological weapons have recently attracted the attention and the resources of the nation. Discerning the nature of the threat of bioweapons as well as appropriate responses to them requires greater attention to the biological characteristics of these instruments of war and terror. The dominant paradigm of a weapon as a nuclear device that explodes or a chemical cloud that is set adrift leaves us ill-equipped conceptually and practically to assess and thus to prevent the potentially devastating effects of bioterrorism. Strengthening the public health and infectious disease infrastructure is an effective step toward averting the suffering that could be wrought by a terrorists use of a biological agents (Johns Hopkins University, 2008).

SelectionFile type iconFile nameDescriptionSizeRevisionTimeUser
View Download
  218k v. 1 Jan 26, 2012, 1:46 PM David Chase Taylor
View Download
  311k v. 2 Jan 26, 2012, 9:31 PM David Chase Taylor
View Download
  137k v. 1 Jan 26, 2012, 1:46 PM David Chase Taylor