Recent news and events related to airplanes and drones suggests that it is possible that that aerial spraying vehicles could be used in a biological attack on an unsuspecting public, especially if they refuse to line up and take the deadly vaccines. Airplanes and drones could be scapegoated for transporting infected animals, for delivering an infected person from another country, for getting hijacked by an alleged terrorists, or to disperse tainted vaccines.
Date: April 15, 2000
- Abstract: The two-day drill kicked off around noon Friday when a vintage 1942 C-47 transport plane flew over the city of McAlester and the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant.
- While flying, the plane simulated spraying an aerosol mist containing the pneumonic plague.
- McAlester-area residents participated in the Sooner Spring exercise in such large numbers that the goal of distributing 10,000 doses of mock antibiotics had been surpassed by 11 a.m. on Saturday.
- The exercise in McAlester and at the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant has been called the most extensive bioterrorism drill in U.S. history. Officials said McAlester is leading the nation on how to respond to such an attack.
- "They will look to McAlester as a model for the way to do things right," Cathey said
- That's not simply Cathey's opinion. Among those who traveled to McAlester to observe the exercise was U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jim Sahli, of Fort Monroe, Va.
- "I work for the Joint Task Force for Civil Support," Sahli said. "If it exceeded the local and state facilities, they would call us here. About a half-dozen of us came down to watch.
- "Just seeing it in action ... being in the field like this, gives us a good feel."
- Sahli watched in the McAlester Regional Health Center, where hospital personnel set up a triage to treat volunteer "victims" of the pneumonic plague.
- Ambulances and buses had unloaded groups of volunteers who were serving as victims to be treated at the hospital. They were carried inside the hospital on gurneys and whisked inside on wheel chairs (Rense, 2000).
Title: Grounding Of Crop-Dusters
Extended After Bio-Terror Alert
Date: September 24, 2001
Source: SF Gate
Abstract: Federal authorities, worried about the possibility of further terror from the sky, extended the grounding of crop-dusting planes nationwide today, after learning that terrorists might have been planning to spray fast-killing toxins into the atmosphere.
During their probe of the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, FBI agents learned that one man under investigation had manuals about crop dusting and that at least one of the hijackers had visited a crop- dusting business in rural Florida.
This was the third time that crop dusters had been grounded since the hijackings. They were grounded with all other aircraft Sept. 11 and allowed to fly again on Sept. 14; abruptly grounded Sept. 16 and allowed to fly Sept. 17; then grounded again yesterday.
"It's still in effect," Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Laura Brown said of the grounding. "It's extended until just after midnight tonight. " It is a rolling deadline of midnight local time.
Asked about the new grounding, the FBI said it was one of the steps the bureau has taken out of "an abundance of caution" and "in reaction to every bit of information and threats received during the course of this investigation."
Sources told Time magazine that Zacarias Moussaoui, a suspected terrorist with possible links to the hijackers who commandeered jetliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, possessed manuals showing how to operate crop dusting equipment.
Moussaoui was arrested in August for immigration violations after flight school officials in Minnesota reported him to the FBI. He raised suspicions when he offered to pay cash to learn how to fly jumbo jets, but said he was only interested in learning how to steer, not how to land, according to published reports.J.D. "Will" Lee, 62, general manager of South Florida Crop Care in Belle Glade, Fla., said today that groups of two or three Middle Eastern men visited that city's airport several times before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. A co- worker of Lee's, James Lester, identified one of the men as Mohamed Atta, the 33-year-old Egyptian who the FBI believes was at the controls when an American Airlines flight from Boston hit the World Trade Center (SF Gate, 2001).
Title: Planes to Be Sprayed Before Departure
Date: February 14, 2002
Source: All Africa
Abstract: Deadly insects such as mosquito will no longer fluke flights into or out of Uganda.All planes passing through Uganda or other tropical countries are to be sprayed with insecticides, a health ministry official has said (All Africa, 2002).
Title: Federal Agencies Begin Bioterrorism Test
Date: March 25, 2003
Abstract: A crop-duster sprayed a harmless substance above a field of cattle and oil pumps Monday in a test to see if weather radar could detect a bioterrorist attack.
It was the first spray of a three-week Army test over central Oklahoma. The plane will make 261 runs, dropping grain alcohol, clay dust and a mix of water and polyethylene glycol -- a common ingredient in lotions and mascara.
The harmless materials were chosen to produce a mist resembling the airborne particles that might be produced by a bioterrorism attack.
The test, taking place in Oklahoma because of the state's advanced weather radar system, will help Army and Environmental Protection Agency scientists determine how well radar can detect such materials.
The new system would keep track of small planes and tiny puffs of particles that typical radars ignore. It will take weeks to analyze the data and determine how successful the test was, Army officials said.
The goal is to develop computer technology for a nationwide bioterrorism detection system, said Robert Lyons, with the Army's nuclear, biological and chemical detection program. The government hopes to install high-tech software in about 150 radar stations across the country.
The EPA has conducted similar tests in Maryland, Utah and Florida since early 2001, before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
The government planned to start the test Feb. 24. But after residents of Goldsby complained, officials re-evaluated the program and deleted two of the originally planned test materials -- powdered egg whites and a sterilized natural pesticide. Those materials were sprayed over the ocean near Key West, Fla., last April with no ill effects (UCLA, 2003).
Title: Death Sought for Animals In Monkeypox Case
Date: July 3, 2003
Source: New York Times
Abstract: Moving to prevent monkeypox from reaching wild animals in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended yesterday that all 850 animals from a contaminated shipment of exotic pets from Africa in April be destroyed, along with all prairie dogs that might have been exposed to them.
The agency warned pet owners not to release any sick or potentially exposed animals into the wild.
Other mammals in homes or pet shops that might have been exposed should be killed or should be quarantined for six weeks and watched for symptoms — fever or cough, cloudy or crusty eyes, swollen lymph nodes or rash, the agency said. Bodies should be burned, not buried or thrown out, and the premises disinfected, it added.
An outbreak of monkeypox tentatively traced to a Gambian giant pouched rat in the shipment has caused 81 confirmed or suspected cases in humans, mostly in the Midwest. Its spread seems to have stopped, and no cases of human-to-human transmission were found. But the disease spreads easily to rodents.
A spokesman for the agency acknowledged that the authorities did not know the whereabouts of many of the estimated 850 animals in an April 9 shipment from Ghana to Texas, nor do they know if any were released.
"That's one of the things we're really worried about," said David Daigle, a spokesman for the agency. "Tracking them all down is darn near impossible."
Nonetheless, a "very aggressive" effort is on now, said Dr. Martin Cetron, the agency's deputy director for quarantine. But many were sold at informal pet swaps, he said, "and then things end without a good paper trail."
Monkeypox — so called because it was first diagnosed in monkeys — is a less virulent cousin of smallpox, and vaccination against smallpox appears to protect against it. There were no deaths in the June outbreak, but in West Africa, up to 10 percent of cases are fatal.
At the beginning of the outbreak, the centers and the Food and Drug Administration banned importing of all African rodents and the sale or distribution of six species from the April shipment: tree squirrels, rope squirrels, dormice, Gambian giant pouched rats, brush-tailed porcupines and striped mice. They also banned the transport, sale or release of prairie dogs.
Yesterday's directive was ambiguous about what constituted contact with an infected animal, and it confused some pet shop owners. Details of the directive are at cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox /quarantineremoval.htm.
Eileen Whitmarsh, an owner of Rainbow Pets in Shorewood, Wis., who caught monkeypox from a prairie dog in her store, mistakenly thought the order meant she had to kill the 60 apparently healthy hamsters, rats and gerbils she now has quarantined.
"Our animals are checked by the Health Department daily, and they are having babies," Ms. Whitmarsh said. "Sick animals do not have babies."
David Crawford of Boulder, Colo., acting director of the Prairie Dog Coalition, which defends wild prairie dog habitats and opposes keeping the animals as pets, called the euthanasia suggestion "a classic case of blaming the victim."
"This problem was caused by human beings, and it's easy for us to take the `kill them all' approach," he said. "But if this was a human population, we'd be aghast at an order to kill. This calls for quarantine and testing, not euthanasia."
Two weeks ago, at a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the centers, Dr. Gregory A. Poland, a committee member and the chief of vaccine research at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, asked why the agency had not already ordered all possibly exposed animals killed.
An official of the centers replied that people became attached to their pets.
"So what?" Dr. Poland said. "I know what we'd do if this was an outbreak of mad cow disease. We'd kill the whole herd" (New York Times, 2003).Title: Plan To Spray Toxic Biological Chemicals Over San Francisco Announced
Date: March 11, 2008
Source: Natural News
Abstract: People of the world, the US Government is planning to poison more than two million people, in California, using an untested biological "pesticide" this summer. The chemical to be sprayed is classified by the EPA as a "pesticide" and the plan is to douse cities with this chemical designed to stick on everything for 90 days or longer. This application is not a one time event, but will continue every 1-3 months for as long as five years. The pesticide to be sprayed is not designed to harm the light brown apple moth's who it is designed for, but merely to confuse its mating habits. While harmless to moths, the pesticide has been documented to harm humans.
Side effects range from vomiting and flu like systems, to male and female reproductive cycle disruption. One child nearly died from the exposure, and some people have developed asthma from being exposed to this chemical concoction. It is cause for alarm that a chemical being labeled as harmless and "safe" even in minute doses, causes severe health effects in some people. The government is racing to cover up and hide the dangerous health effects so that they can continue their aerial spray plans this summer. Your attention and action on this subject is needed in the most important way.
On January 24th, 2008, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Chuck Conner announced the availability of $74.5 million in emergency funding to combat the light brown apple moth (LBAM) infestation in California (1). President Bush's recent budget proposal sent to Congress sets aside $330 Million to eradicate plant pests, like the Light Brown Apple Moth. With crime, prison crowding, pollution, poverty, budget problems and the like, why should the government go through the effort to try to control the reproductive habits of a moth? While most people say the answer is money, a far more sinister plan seems to be at hand. It is unprecedented to design a long term plan to spray chemicals on people, which are untested for safety. This plan violates a myriad of state, federal and international laws.
On February 13th, 2008, the CDFA and USDA, in conjunction, announced their action plan for aerial spraying untested poison on people. This is from the CDFA Press Release "Aerial treatments are expected to begin June 1 in the infested areas of Monterey and Santa Cruz counties, with subsequent aerial treatments expected to begin August 1 in San Francisco, Daly City, Colma, Oakland, Piedmont, Emeryville, Albany, El Cerrito, El Sobrante, Tiburon and Belvedere. The treatments in these areas are designed to be reapplied at 30- to 90-day intervals while the moths are active." (4)
In late 2007, there were 643 documented health complaints (www.1hope.org/SPRAYCOMPLES.PDF) from the aerial spray program conducted in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties. Keep in mind that this documentation is a mere fraction of the real health effects, as no legitimate effort was made to inform even doctors on how to recognize pesticide poisoning. Many doctors also refused to report suspected pesticide poisoning as required by law, and in order for a report to get officially filed, many times the patient had to insist upon it. These health injuries are not being honored in any way, because if they are honored, this sick chemical spray will be seen for what it is. It is a poison to many humans and likely to many other animals as well. I have a difficult time swallowing that a chemical compound designed to disrupt a moth's mating cycle can accidentally create reproductive health problems.
There are many who believe that this spray is not directed at the moth population which the government says is the goal of the spray, but rather that it is directed at humans. There is a growing body of evidence to support this claim, considering that the moth itself does not cause any crop damage. It is similar to the government deciding that we must eradicate all the ants, because ants cause millions of dollars of damage. Like ants, the light brown apple moth is a harmless pest. Another strange observation is the name of the mating disruption chemical Checkmate. In order to pull off the deployment of this biological chemical, a hoax, or reason for aerial spraying had to be created. That reason is called the Light Brown Apple Moth infestation. The second requirement to pull off releasing a massive chemical cloud of disease, is to trick people into believing it is safe. This whole aerial spray program depends on the belief that the chemicals to be sprayed are safe.
Since the chemicals planned to be deployed have never been sprayed over cities before, and are even being developed as I write, and thus have not been proven safe for humans, this is by the facts a large scale experiment. The question people should ask is, "why?" While it may be just coincidence, a recent article displays this headline: "Top-secret Livermore anti-germ lab opens." (2) This same lab, has routinely exploded thousands of pounds of lethal, chemically toxic, and radioactive Depleted Uranium in the greater San Francisco Bay area's air for the past fifty years (3).
When people hear about this aerial spray, many people experience a sinking feeling in the pit of their stomach. This is truly a sickening action. The government is willfully breaking countless laws in order to combat a stupid leaf rolling moth that curls up into the leaves of some plants and that doesn't cause any crop damage. It has not caused crop damage or embargo's in Hawaii over the past 100 years, so why would it cause damage in California?
No ounce of sanity can explain why the government must insist on violating countless laws to spray people with never before tested chemicals, except as to realize a deadly game is being played.
Unlike the horrible malathion spraying over 20 years ago, which was a one-time ordeal with chemicals that evaporate, this spraying is a time release microscopic device, which will be continuously applied, short of the winter months, for up to five years. Even five years of spraying will at best reduce slightly the moth population, as pest control experts explain that mating disruption technology is used as a small part of an overall pest management plan. Pretty much any pest control expert, except for those on the government take, will tell you that the light brown apple moth cannot be eradicated, and that even if it could, the mating disruption technology is not the best means to do it. Since aerial spraying is to be the sole method of controlling the light brown apple moth in many locations, then even after many years of spraying, the moth will still be alive. It is not sane to spray people with chemicals. That begs attention, there is not any hard evidence that the spray even works at all. In fact on the EPA's own website, there's an article about pheromones released from microcapsules, it states: "The studies show that only a small proportion of the microcapsules actually release any pheromone." (5)
This is now clear and reprehensible evidence of State and Federal Governments attempting to commit a large scale crime against the American people. Let us forget about supposed terrorists for a second whose propagandized images are placed on the television, and lets pay attention to this biological attack planned on our fellow neighbors. The presence of a minuscule pest, is no excuse to douse millions with chemicals. There are NO CROPS IN CITIES! So why are they going to spray cities?
This Is A Cover-Up
The LBAM infestation is a monumental hoax designed as a cover for an operation of devious goals to expose people to dangerous chemicals over several years. Following is a link to a recently published proposal of spray boundaries, the yellow lines indicating the proposed spray zones (www.hopefortruth.com/lbam_2008.jpg) . More than two million people who live in these and other targeted cities are scheduled to be exposed this summer to chemicals that that have never been tested on humans or animals before. Let me repeat: the government of the United States is conducting a human biological experiment, on a massive scale, breaking State, Federal and International laws. Children, pregnant women, and the sick and elderly will be most as risk to this increased exposure to long lasting chemicals. Chemicals which are newly designed, chemicals which have not been proven safe. Just like the reproductive health effects reported from the spray, it is important to realize that a large team of "experts" working on this project do not mistakenly douse people with chemicals. This is done on purpose, with a purpose.
Does it make sense to douse over two million people with literally hundreds of billions of microscopic balls of volatile chemicals over an extended period of time to try to limit the mating habits of a few thousand moths? Is it legal to do this? Is it ethical? Is it moral? Yet rather than halting the spray plans to investigate the damage it has done to many people, the spray plans continue to grow exponentially.
To see this insanity clearly, let's examine the moth population. In San Francisco County, 3,501 moths total have been trapped and killed over an eight month period. The entire city of San Francisco, whose population is 744,041, is in the proposed spray boundaries. About 744,000 people are to be exposed to 'never tested safe for humans, microencapsulated pheromones' for several years. This is really a needle in the haystack approach to pest control. Keep in mind, each moth found is a moth that has been trapped and exterminated (6). In Alameda County, 431 months have been found in the past 8 months out of 2,327 traps. The moth population in Alameda County is thus sparse at best. Just look out your window. Imagine how many insects are in the tree, the yard, or the local park. I have seen more than 431 ants crawl into my kitchen on a rainy day. So in a giant area of 141 square miles, and the tens or hundreds of millions of insects in that zone, to try to eradicate a few hundred moths by just spraying chemicals everywhere is both ludicrous and unsafe.
When I learned that Santa Cruz, my previous hometown was to be aerially sprayed, I was in a state of shock. This was followed by a long period of disbelief.
Apparently the CDFA or the USDA, or both, decided that the previous chemical formulas used, Checkmate LBAM-F and Checkmate OLR-F were not good enough, which really points to the fact that the past two aerial sprays in Monterey, and the one in Santa Cruz County, were a waste of time and money. Not to mention the tragedy of the many severe health reactions experienced by thousands of people from chemical exposure. It doesn't matter to those in charge at the CDFA, EPA, or USDA, if a new chemical is needed to be used, because the goal is not to stop the moth, the moth cannot be stopped, it can only be controlled. This is known. The goal may be to coat people with a toxic mesh of disease causing microcapsules.
The chemicals that were sprayed, and that are planned on being sprayed, have not undergone thorough safety evaluations. And they won't undergo such evaluations in a legitimate way, because if they did, they would prove only one thing - that these chemicals are potentially deadly.
The chemicals planned to be sprayed will no doubt be similar to the ones used in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties in 2007. They are a plastic encapsulated microtechnology, a microscopic plastic dust. The reported microcapsule size of the aerial mating disrupter is as small as 10 microns and averages 25-35 microns in size for an undeployed moth spray. For comparison, a human hair is approximately 70 microns in thickness. The size of these chemical containing plastic balls comes suspiciously close to micro-sized particles that are used to evade the body's defensive systems for biological weapons, those are reported to be 3-4 microns in size. Miniature particles between 2.5-10 microns in size, especially from pesticides, are known to cause both short term and long term health effects, including decreased overall life span.
A University of California at Davis report confirmed that some unsprayed and undegraded microcapsules are indeed 10 microns in size. The small particle size explains the severe reactions, that I, along with countless others have had when being exposed to minute dosages of the chemical. Minute dosages of chemicals designed for moth's, advertised as harmless, do not accidentally make people sick. In other words, the people who designed these chemicals and manufactured them had to have an intimate understanding of what each chemical does, and how they react with each other. So, too, should the EPA have this understanding. It is not unreasonable to assume that a chemical designed to stop moths, that is being sprayed on humans, would have such drastic health effects, but it does. The only conclusion is that this is intentional in the design. Imagine someone designing a "safe" car. If this "safe" car had no brakes, then nobody would assume that the car accidentally had no brakes. Likewise, chemicals designed for moths, in minuscule doses, cannot accidentally harm people. It is more than just chance.
Again, nobody in the public as of yet knows how small the degraded microcapsules are, or how this will effect people in the short and long term, because no such testing exists. Once sprayed, these microscopic balls can easily enter deep into the mouth, eyes, skin and lungs. Even after 90 days and several rains, some people in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties are still experiencing symptoms of spray poisoning. When they leave the counties, their symptoms many times abate. This aerial program is a real sword through the heart of democracy and decency. The government has really gone too far and it must be stopped now.
I must inform you that through a freedom of information request, a local newspaper has learned that the CDFA has hired media spin doctor extraordinaire Porter Novelli at the tune of almost $500,000 tax payer dollars to convince the public that it is okay for the state to dump chemicals all over them, their gardens, their pets, and their neighbors. The state of California is in a budget crisis, and this is one example that explains why. Here the state is using tax payer dollars to lie to and mislead the public, to try to convince the public that the state should be spending millions of dollars of resources on polluting the air, sea, and land with chemicals that the public in general does not want or need. Since a majority of spray funding is coming from the federal arm, know that your tax paying dollars are going to a government sponsored large scale crime.
Originally, the USDA announced that the moth might cause $100 million in crop damage if allowed to multiply. Then they keep expanding their figures to create false reasons to justify this unethical chemical assault. The most recent estimate of LBAM damage is $160 million to $640 million just in California. Mind you this moth has a hard time finding its way into crop fields and seems for some very bizarre reason to live only in cities. The estimate of this level of crop damage is absurd. The figures used to estimate the damage came from one particular year in Australia and have little meaning in California, as the climate is different. Even if this $160 million crop loss did come true, one has to consider that $90 million has now been ear marked to contain the moth, primarily the funds are for aerial spraying chemicals on cities which contain people, and not crops like apples, oranges and grapes. One expert estimates that if the CDFA stays on this track, by the time the aerial treatment is complete after five years, close to $500 million will be spent on aerial eradication. With little to no impact on the apple moth population.
The pheromone being used, (E)-11-Tetradecen-l-y Acetate is identical to pheromone's which many native moths and perhaps other species also contain. So this spray will effect other non-target species. The pheromone only represents between 10-20% of the ingredients of the aerial spray.
Now, organizations like the Breast Cancer Fund, Center For Environmental Health, Calpirg, and the Sierra Club are issuing statements opposed to aerial spraying.
What to Expect Next
The CDFA, USDA, and EPA will do anything and everything to convince, lie, cajole and get people to agree with the plan to spray chemicals. The facts of this situation are irrelevant to those in charge because the goal is to spray people, not to operate under the laws of this constitutional government of checks and balances. They are going to go to meetings, pretend it is safe, have doctors testify it is safe, pretend to listen to the public, ignore any health complaints, and try to lull people into complacency on the matter. They have even gone as far as promising an environmental review, which will contain a giant pile of documents again to try to prove that it is okay to spray people with chemicals. The CDFA will continue to find more moth finds, and create more fake evidence of how much harm the moth will do. They will get more money from Mr. Bush's pesticide funds and continue to enlarge their aerial spray program. Strangely the moth will continue to spread, finding its way into other cities, and in the coming years, cities like Los Angeles and San Diego will be targeted.
Knowing that the government is actively lying, hiding evidence, manipulating the public, and that they are spraying chemicals illegally on people should be enough evidence to convict these felons under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) laws.
Freeing Yourself From the Government's Pro Spray Propaganda
These 643 health injury reports represent a fraction of the real injuries. The actual spray has surely caused thousands to be poisoned from this biochemical formulation. See my related article (www.naturalnews.com/022434.html) . Despite these reports which include 330 official illness claims filed with the CDFA, the CDFA states the following lies on their website, "Pheromones are extremely safe" and "Public safety is the primary concern." The statement that pheromones are safe is a misleading distorted truth. Sure, pheromones can be safe when used responsibly, for example a benign moth sticky trap in an apple orchard (away from people) that contains pheromones to attract the moths. But when you create a microscopic biodegradable ball of volatile chemicals, and then place within it a synthetic moth pheromone, which itself is described as an explosive chemical, you have more of a drug which can interact and create changes within the human body, than a pesticide. Furthermore, no thorough investigation has been done of these 330 official illness complaints, and some of these people have not yet recovered. And a further investigation won't be done, because a legitimate investigation would find that the spray made people sick, and thus, the aerial spray program would be halted.
One must realize that any documentation regarding the safety of pheromones reported is from non-aerial applications, such as a moth sticky trap that is scented with pheromones and stuck on a tree, or a pheromone laced twist tie applied to apple orchards or vineyards. These safety assertions also do not relate to the aerial method of application. A sticky trap laced with pheromones is a different entity than a microscopic ball that can easily enter the body and then biodegrade and release chemicals within the body. Part of the less dangerous aspect to pheromone laced traps is the fact that the pheromone is so volatile that it rapidly evaporates, so the chemical won't travel too far. The microcapsules are the opposite, they are designed to stick around in the air for months. They are infinitely more dangerous than sticky traps, and you cannot really compare them. It's like saying that a tank is the same as a motorcycle because they are both vehicles. Microcapsulated pheromones are a different beast than pheremone laced moth traps.
The newly designed chemicals, which are scheduled for June and August deployment will not have their ingredients disclosed to the public. We do not even know what this stuff is? How can the government say the chemicals are safe, and then hide the ingredients from scrutiny? If these chemicals are so safe why not tell us honestly what they are? Clearly the intention of the CDFA, USDA, and EPA, is to cover up the real nature of this biochemical assault. They are trying to hide what they do from the public's eye. They do not want you to know the truth. The truth is people get sick. Not everybody gets sick from the moth spray, but many people do. Its effects can be strong and violent. The truth is, the US Government is a vehicle being used to poison us.
The CDFA reports that they want their newest moth weapon deployed this summer, to be even longer lasting, which to me means that the microcapsules will be even more dangerous, possibly indefinitely sticking in the environment, and irritating people's sensitive ducts and glands; much like allergies from pollen. In each aerial application, spray planes are contracted through Dynamic Aviation (www.dynamicaviation.com/home.htm) , which has other specialties beyond aerial application of pesticides. They also do "Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance." The spraying is conducted at a height of between 500-800 feet and residents in the sprayed area report feeling like they are in a war zone. Once in contact with residential neighborhoods, parks, and playgrounds, the balls slowly disintegrate over time. The hope is that during this time, they release pheromones and limit the moth's mating patterns. Again, this is a whimsical hope because no legitimate studies exist proving this new technology is effective at either releasing pheromones, or at stopping the moth's mating habits.
Typically a drug takes many years for the Food and Drug Administration to approve for safety for humans. Under an emergency declaration, the EPA can exclude new chemicals from rigorous testing. The catch to this exception is that these laws were designed for agricultural emergencies and are being violently misused because they are planning on spraying large urban populations and not agricultural zones. These laws cannot lawfully apply to cities. Among other things, we have legal control and authority of our bodies, and our properties. We can say "No" to the spray, and if necessary, defend ourselves from this highly toxic assault. The EPA and USDA have flagrantly crossed legal and ethical boundaries by applying laws designed for agricultural fields to densely inhabited city centers.
Further, consider that the testing of these chemicals is not done to make sure that it is safe for humans, as the safety is merely an untested assumption. As an example, it took several months after the first aerial spray of Monterey County for the CDFA to pay the University of California Davis to see if the Checkmate formula was toxic to certain very small ocean insects. It took several months for this first test of the Checkmate formula to be conducted. This test only happened after the chemical was sprayed on well over two hundred thousand people. The testing being conducted in New Zealand is not to ensure safety for humans, but to see if the mating habits of the moths are disrupted. This spraying is illegally approved by the EPA because Congress passed legislation to legally prevent the EPA from conducting human experiments. "EPA's rules make it clear that all pregnant women, all nursing women, and all children are excluded from all studies involving intentional exposure that are intended for submission under the pesticide laws." (www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/human-test.htm) If the EPA cannot test pesticides on pregnant women, nursing women, and children, then under what jurisdiction and authority can they simply endorse and approve the exposure of pregnant women, nursing women and children with untested pesticides?
How many more children do we need to see poisoned by these indefensible government actions until we wake up and say, enough! How many more of our friends, relatives and neighbors do we need to see develop chronic health conditions due to exposure to aerially sprayed chemicals until we take effective action to stop this insanity? How much longer are we going to allow the government that is created for the people, to represent the people, to break its own laws and poison its own people and then disregard any reported health concerns?
I call for the arrest and trial of the appropriate employees in the CDFA, EPA, and USDA, for conspiring to poison people of the State of California, for lying and deceiving the public, and for polluting our environment (Natural News, 2008).
Title: Drone Technology Could Be Used To Spray Bioweapons
Date: October 12, 2011
Source: Bio Prep Watch
Abstract: Experts have warned that as remote-controlled drone technology produces smaller and cheaper units, terrorists could seek to use them to potentially spray biological weapons.
The U.S. military is currently the undisputed leader in drone warfare, but many world powers are quickly acquiring and adapting the technology, which presents a challenge to American security experts, according to TheAustralian.com.au.
"I think of where the airplane was at the start of World War I: at first it was unarmed and limited to a handful of countries," P. W. Singer, the author of the book Wired for War, said, TheAustralian.com.au reports. "Then it was armed and everywhere. That is the path we're on."
The recent arrest of Rezwan Ferdaus, a 26-year-old man accused of plotting to fly an explosives-laden remote controlled airplane into the U.S. Capitol, shows that a scenario where an unmanned vehicle could be used to attack a city is not farfetched.
To date, only the United States, Israel and Britain are thought to have used drones for air-to-ground strikes, but more than 50 countries have bought or developed their own unmanned aerial vehicles, according to the New York Post.
The same qualities that make U.A.V.’s appealing to the Obama administration for counterterrorism make them appealing to the terrorists themselves. They can be used for surveillance or strikes, are cheap and no danger is posed to their operator, who could be located on the other side of the world (Bio Prep Watch, 2011).
Texas Nearly Ends Rabies With Aerial Vaccine Drops
Date: January 18, 2012
Source: Fox News
King Air planes are lined up on a small runway in the town of Del Rio preparing
to bomb south Texas—not with explosives, but with hundreds of thousands of
packets of rabies vaccine.
The packets, each about the size of fast food ketchup, contain enough vaccine to inoculate the coyotes that roam the southwest Texas brush country against rabies, which until the last two decades was threatening livestock and humans alike.
"We had two outbreaks of rabies in coyotes and in foxes,"
recalls Dr. Ernest Oertli, a veterinarian who works with ranchers in this area.
"There were a couple of human deaths from rabies, and it was spreading
northward and eastward into the populated parts of the state, and was on the
outskirts of San Antonio, Austin, Waco and Ft.
Oertli said that at the time, animal and human health experts were
worried about an urban rabies epidemic, and were urgently telling residents to vaccinate
their pets against rabies. Rabies in humans is almost always fatal unless the
patient receives immediate and lengthy treatment.
A handful of human rabies cases are reported in the United States every
year. A woman in South Carolina died from the disease in December and a case
was recently reported in Massachusetts, both believed to be infected from bats.
Researchers with the Texas Department of State
Health Services learned of an aerial vaccination program underway in Canada, and
decided to try it in the equally vast south and west regions of Texas. The
results over the past 18 years have been dramatic, according to department
spokesman Chris Van Deusen.
"Animal cases of the canine strain of rabies in southern Texas fell
from 122 the year before the program began, to zero in 2000," Van Deusen
said. "There have only been two cases since then, and both of them were
within a mile of the Rio Grande."
He said the program is also concentrated against the fox strain of
rabies, and those cases have been reduced from 244 animal cases in 1995, to
zero cases in the past two years.
"We have effectively eliminated these two strains of rabies from
Texas," Van Deusen said, adding that there have been no human cases of
rabies in the region since the airdrop began.
"This is the same idea of the airborne attack against the
Mediterranean Fruit Fly in California," Oertli said as he supervised the
launch of the planes on one of the 12 flights they will make each day.
Flying at 500 to 1,000 feet elevation, they will drop a total of 1.8 million packets over about 7,700 square miles of rural south and west Texas before the program comes to an end later this month. The packets are dipped in fish oil and coated with fish meal to make them attractive to coyotes and foxes, which eat them and are automatically vaccinated.
"Now our goal is to put into place and maintain a barrier zone to
prevent rabies from being reintroduced from Mexico,"
Over the 18 years of the program, a total of 36.7 million bait packets
have been dropped. In the early years of the program, local media were asked to
urge people in urban areas to watch out for falling bait and asked them not to
touch the packets on the ground because animals could smell humans on the bait
and would not eat it. Van Deusen said, as the rabies has been pushed back
toward the Rio Grande and the operations now are taking place over largely
rural stretches of west Texas, those warnings are less necessary.
Oertli said the idea of an aerial assault on rabies is spreading across
the country. Health officials in several northeastern states are now using the
same practice to fight against the spread of rabies in raccoons.
He noted that January is the best time to drop the bait in Texas for
several reasons. Coyotes and foxes are short of food this time of year and are
more likely to eat the bait, and spreading the baits makes them less
susceptible to the roaming fire ants which crawl over everything in their path
during hot weather.
"As a citizen, I am thrilled at what we have been able to accomplish with this program," Oertli said.
Now that fox and coyote rabies are nearly eradicated, crews are now
planning a similar aerial assault against skunk rabies. He said a special bait
packet has been developed for skunks.
Van Deusen stressed that the program is only successful because of laws
requiring people who live in cities to vaccinate their pets against rabies.
"Vaccinating domestic animals is essential to stopping the spread of rabies," he said (Fox News, 2012).
Vaccine Warfare! Texas Carpet-Bombs 7,000 Square Miles With Air-Dropped Rabies Vaccines
Date: January 19, 2012
Source: Natural News
weaponization of vaccines just took another leap forward in America with the
recent air-dropping of rabies vaccines by the Texas Department of State Health
Services. Using a battery of small planes based out of Del Rio, Texas recently
dropped 1.8 million edible vaccine
packets over 7,700 square miles of rural Texas.
The packets contain edible rabies vaccines dipped in fish oil and coated with fish meal to entice foxes and coyotes to eat them. Once consumed, the animal is "vaccinated" against rabies, researchers claim.
Of course, what these researchers don't yet understand in their scientific ignorance (and arrogance) is that they are also engaged in a rabies DNA / RNA bombardment of Texas. As even the Institute of Medicine has admitted, MMR vaccines for use in humans actually cause measles because many of the vaccines contain live viral strains.
Vaccine manufacturing is conducted under such poor quality control today that vaccines are routinely shipped out the door containing viable viral strains that often infect and sometimes even kill human victims. For example, in 2009 Baxter Pharmaceuticals was caught red-handed shipping out live avian flu viruses to 18 countries.
What Texas Dept. of State Health Services workers probably don't yet grasp is that vaccine manufacturers routinely use vaccines to spread the very disease they claim to be preventing. By injecting live rabies strains into a small percentage of the vaccines dropped on Texas (say, one percent), they are effectively engaging in a DNA carpet-bombing run that will absolutely guarantee rabies continues to remain endemic throughout feral animal populations in the state. This, of course, will result in yet more rabies vaccines being purchased to "combat the problem," thereby achieving the goal of the entire scam: To sell more vaccines to the government.
Vaccines become Weapons to be Inflicted on Innocents
This air-dropping of vaccines over Texas is all part of the militarization of modern medicine
taking place today. In just the past few months, we've seen the AMA calling for
"mandatory participation" in vaccine trials, where you would be
"volunteered" by the government to be injected with an experiment
vaccine, at threat of arrest.
We've also seen cases where police have been called and CPS workers threatened to take children away from parents who refused to vaccinate their children (
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already conducted bizarre experiments on genetically engineered mosquitoes that carry vaccines to be silently injected into unsuspecting humans. And that same foundation has also invested heavily in covert vaccination technology that could, for example, vaccinate you with a spray mist used at airport security checkpoints.
As these examples show, vaccines are increasingly being used in the context of weapons: air-dropped, covertly injected or even forcibly injected at gunpoint. These are signs of a system of medicine that operates like a police state, where people are stripped of their rights and freedoms "for the good of society." The individual is sacrificed, in other words, to serve the interests of the state. Such a philosophy is fully consistent with the entire history of secret government-funded medical experiments against blacks (Tuskegee), Guatemalans and even criminal medical experiments involving Dr. Jonas Salk and the polio vaccine.
Here's a list of just a few of the criminal, inhuman medical experiments that have been conducted on innocent people by the U.S. government:
All this adds up to classic eugenics -- especially given that vaccines in humans are strongly tied to lifelong infertility, spontaneous abortions and birth defects. It's all part of a human de-population agenda that Bill Gates has openly admitted to in his public speeches about "reducing world population" with the help of vaccines.
The Law of Unintended Consequences will come back to Haunt Texas
The state of Texas, of course, claims its air-dropped rabies vaccines
have been a huge success. Rabies cases have plummeted in every area targeted by
the vaccine carpet-bombing runs, they insist. But even if you believe those
numbers, you must ask: At what cost?
What are the unintended consequences of air-dropping viral fragments of rabies over 7,000 square miles of open terrain? Engaging in such an act is just begging to be humbled by nature as that viral material gets recombined into some other deadly pathogen that exists in the wild, creating a hybrid "Franken-virus" that never would have existed without this arrogant "scientific" intervention. Can you imagine a "rabies bird flu pandemic?" Mother Nature can!
Add to this the fact that many deer in Texas are being fed genetically modified corn (GMOs), and you now have engineered genetic material from bt corn residing in the flesh of deer that might be consumed by the very same coyotes who are eating the air-dropped rabies vaccines. What might be the consequences of such a dangerous genetic experiment involving tens of thousands of animals in the wild?
No one knows. And that's the point, because the Texas scientists don't know either. They were all educated at Texas A&M which is still stuck in the era of chemical agriculture, and they think spraying everything with Roundup is the solution. (Seriously, Texas A&M graduates are totally infatuated with the use of chemical pesticides on everything...) They don't know anything about the dangers of GMOs, nor the recent research published in Cell Research that shows how microRNA (small fragments of genetic code) can pass through the digestive system, attach to organs such as the liver, and alter the physiology of those organs.
These "scientists" do not know what they are doing. They are narrow-minded and short-sighted. They play God with Mother Nature and hope they don't make a mistake. They risk the future integrity of Texas agriculture and wildlife on their bizarre Frankensteinian schemes that run the risk of wreaking total havoc with the biosphere. They are, like most other conventional scientists, blinded by their arrogance.
It's too late to stop them, of course. This program has been going on for 18 years, they say. And they claim it's an amazing success! It's so successful, in fact, that now they're moving on to develop an airdrop vaccine for skunks. So in 2012 and beyond, they'll be carpet-bombing Texas with skunk rabies vaccines.
Gee, did they ever consider the possibility that the reason skunks have so much rabies is because they've been dropping rabies DNA / RNA onto the landscape for nearly two decades? And after they treat the skunks, they still have a long list of animals to target with yet more vaccines, see? What about a raccoon vaccine? How about wild pig vaccines? Deer vaccines? At what point does this effort vaccinate all the wild animals of the world ever end?
If they keep this up, before long Texas will become a DNA battlefield where the entire natural ecosystem is massively contaminated with genetic intervention at every level.
But of course, it keeps the vaccine companies in business, doesn't it? And as Rick Perry proved with his HPV Gardasil scandal, Texas loves to force vaccines on innocent people while collecting payoffs from the drug companies that make them.
You can bet someone in the Texas Department of State Health Services is receiving a nice, fat payoff for all this (Natural News, 2012).
Title: Poison Drones Carrying Biological Weapon Are New Olympic Threat, Warns Colonel In Charge Of Keeping London Calm
Date: May 5, 2012
Source: Daily Mail
Abstract: A senior Army officer has warned that unmanned drones carrying deadly poison could be used in a devastating terrorist attack during the Olympic Games.
Lieutenant Colonel Brian Fahy delivered the grim warning at a meeting intended to allay the fears of residents worried about the Army’s plans to place missiles on the rooftops of flats.
He said it was ‘feasible’ that remote-controlled aircraft filled with poison and small enough to fit into a backpack could be used as a biological weapon in the capital.
He told The Mail on Sunday: ‘An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can be put in a backpack. They come in all sorts of sizes and it’s feasible they could be filled with something noxious and flown by remote-control.’
Lieut Col Fahy – the officer responsible for community relations during the Games – made his remarks on Friday in Leytonstone, East London, near one of six sites which could see the deployment of surface-toair missile batteries in order to shoot down aircraft attempting to infiltrate an Olympic ‘no fly’ zone.
During the meeting at Buxton School, his team showed locals a ‘dummy’ missile battery and allowed children to play on the unarmed weapon.
Lieut Col Fahy declined to elaborate on what type of poison might be used during an aerial attack.
He said: ‘For the duration of the Olympics anyone flying into controlled airspace is to file their flight plan with the Civil Aviation Authority.
‘The range of threats varies in size and capability. It could be a commercial airliner hijacked by somebody with malicious intentions or a protest group using a microlight to get their name in the papers.’
His poison warning came as it was revealed that SAS troops have had anthrax emergency training at the Government’s top-secret military research establishment at Porton Down, Wiltshire.
Sources say the elite soldiers wore biochemical protection suits, gloves and masks during exercises over the past few months to prepare for any attack using the deadly bacteria.
Such an incident could threaten the lives of thousands of people attending the Games this summer.
Lieut Col Fahy told The Mail on Sunday: ‘We have worked up a comprehensive plan to protect against the potential hijacking of a commercial airliner down to slow-moving microlights or radio-controlled planes.’
Asked if they would fire a missile at a protester flying a microlight near the Olympic site, Lieut Col Fahy said: ‘We would not take it out. For something like that we would scramble helicopters to go and look at it.
‘There will be an RAF sniper on board if there was serious evidence to suggest something like that represented a threat. That information gets passed on and it’s a political decision to engage.
‘It’s the same politicians who will decide whether we fire surface-to-air missiles at a potential threat. It’s a decision that I’m quite happy not to make. It will weigh very heavily.’
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond has made it clear he is ready to give the order to shoot down any aircraft threatening the Olympics with a 9/11-style attack.
Lieut Col Fahy also revealed that armed police would guard any missile sites being used in case any attempts were made to steal them or protest against their deployment.
He added: ‘What we are doing is unusual. Londoners are not used to seeing a lot of soldiers around. Some people feel uncomfortable about the missiles but the vast majority, I think, appreciate we are doing this.’
HMS Ocean, one of the UK’s biggest warships, is based in the Thames, with the capability to fire a hail of missiles at a terrorist aircraft.
The awesome array of military hardware ready to thwart an attack includes four RAF Typhoon jets, three Royal Navy Sea King and two RAF Puma helicopters.
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said last night: ‘We are prepared for any eventuality’ (Daily Mail, 2012).
Title: U.K. Army Official Warns Of Poison-Carrying Terrorist Drones
Date: May 7, 2012
Abstract: A senior Army officer attempted to justify a plan to place missiles on London apartment rooftops during the Olympics on Friday by warning of possible terrorist plans to use unmanned drones carrying deadly poison.
Lieutenant Colonel Brian Fahy made the announcement during a Leytonstone meeting meant to allay the fears of residents expressing concern about the missile plan. Fahy is the officer responsible for community relations during the upcoming Olympic Games, Gulf News reports.
“An unmanned aerial vehicle can be put in a backpack,” Fahy said, according to The Mail. “They come in all sorts of sizes and it’s feasible they could be filled with something noxious and flown by remote-control.”
Fahy said that such a device could be used as a biological weapon. He declined to go into more detail about what type of poison might be used as an aerial attack, but troops have recently had anthrax emergency training at the government’s top-secret Wiltshire-based military research facility.
“For the duration of the Olympics anyone flying into controlled airspace
is to file their flight plan with the Civil Aviation Authority,” Fahy said,
according to The Mail. “The range of threats varies in size and capability. It
could be a commercial airliner hijacked by somebody with malicious intentions
or a protest group using a microlight to get their name in the papers” (BioPrepWatch, 2012).
Title: West Nile Virus “Outbreak” Justifies Spraying Toxic Chemicals Onto
Date: September 2, 2012
Abstract: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that the cases of West Nile virus (WNV) are raising to the point of having the largest outbreak ever seen in the domestic US. In total, the CDC is reporting 1,118 cases with 41 deaths attributed.
Yet the CDC claims that most bitten by an infected mosquito do not come down with WNV. It appears the governmental agency fear-mongers and downplays the threat in the same breath.
Dr. Lyle Petersen, the director of the CDC’s Vector-Borne Infectious Disease Division confirmed:
The peak of West Nile virus epidemics usually occur in mid-August, but it takes a couple of weeks for people to get sick, go to the doctor and get reported. Thus we expect many more cases to occur.
The Connecticut Mosquito Management Program asserts that because the mosquitos carrying WNV are one an estimated 1 in 500 which would point the attribution of the infected to another source.
The areas of the country where the most cases have been reported are Texas, South Dakota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Michigan. Petersen believes that “we think the reported numbers will get higher through October.”
Fifty-six percent of the reported cases correlate with a neuroinvasive disease wherein the WNV enters the nervous system directly causing the manifestation of meningitis or encephalitis.
In response to the “national outbreak” of WNV, there have been concerted efforts to step up the aerial assault of spraying to eradicate the disease. This spraying, to kill the mosquito population is causing viable damage to the humans and the environment which is most likely the reason for calling the WNV outbreaks a sorted epidemic.
The US government has been involved in creating designer viruses onto unwitting populations that have been the obvious causation of viral epidemics. In response to WNV and a burgeoning mosquito population in 2000, the spraying of malathione began. The result was a massive attack on the human immune system from the toxic chemical.
As the WNV “outbreak” is being hyped in the mainstream media now, the use of malathione is again being utilized. However, this chemical use is tantamount to bioterrorism on the American public. Malathione is a cancer-causing toxic substance that has been sprayed over-head in the name of keeping the WNV from continuing to spread.
Governmental propaganda extends to WNV outbreaks being initiated by suspected Middle Eastern “terrorists” according to Congressional record. In a 2002 Congressional testimony, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, said that the makers of WNV vaccines were suspect as participating in public outbreaks.
By combining CDC reports, with the documentation of pharmaceutical corporations, and bioweapons laboratories that supplied vials of WNV to Iraq in the 1980s, the movement of the bioweapon has been traced.
The Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) has conducted extensive research and development into bioterrorism since 1986. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) believes that the CIGB is a biological weapons laboratory. Because the CIGB was located in Cuba, the Castro connection and classification of Cuba as a terrorist nation then creeps into the American social meme.
The aerial response to the current WNV outbreak involves the
chemical Duet which is an “advanced dual-action mosquito adulticide” that is
combined with Anvil, another mosquito pesticide, as well as prallethrin. The purpose of these chemicals is because of their neurotoxic
properties and damaging effects on the human immune system. They also are
associated with organ failure, as well as dangerously carcinogenic as they have
been linked to breast cancer (Infowars, 2012).