Project Description 

Principle B 

Exceptions to Principle C



Main bibliography

1] Aoun, J. and Choueiri, L.: 2000, 'Epithets', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 1-39.
[2] Ariel, M.: 1990, Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents, Routledge.
[3] Ariel, M.: 2001, Accessibility Theory: An Overview. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren
eds. Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 29-87.
[4] Asher, N. & Lascarides, A.: 1991, Discourse Relations and Defeasible Knowledge, Asher, N. & Lascarides, A.:
Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics  table of contents, Berkeley,
[5] Asher, N. & Lascarides, A.: 2003, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge University Press.
[6] Asher, N. & Vieu, L. 2005. Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115:  591–610
[7] Avrutin, S. 1994. The Structural Position of Bound Variables in Russian, Linguistic Inquiry 25.4, Fall  709-729.
[8] Bach, E. & Partee, B.: 1980, 'Anaphora and Semantic Structure'. In J. Kreiman & A. Ojede (eds),  Papers from
the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, pp. 1-28, CLS. Reprinted in Partee 2004.
[9] Barendregt, H. P.: 1984, The Lambda Calculus (Its Syntax and Semantics), revised edition, North Holland.
[10] Ben-Shalom, D.: 1996,  Semantic Trees, Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA.
[11] Bergeton, U.: 2003, The Independence of Binding and Intensification,Ph.D Dissertation, University of Southern
[12] Bittner, M.: 2003, 'Word Order and Incremental Update'. In Proceedings from CLS 39. Chicago: Chicago
Linguistic Society.
[13] Blutner, R.: 'Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation', ms., Berlin.
[14] Bolinger, D.:1977, Pronouns and repeated nouns, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club
[15] Bolinger, D.:1979, 'Pronouns in Discourse', in Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press.
[16] Bosch, P.: 1980, 'The Modes of Pronominal Reference and their Constraints'. In J. Kreiman, A. Ojeda (eds.),
Pronouns and Anaphora. Papers from the Parasession on Anaphora of the 16th Regional Meeting of the Chicago
Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago, 1980. pp. 64-78.
[17] Burge, T.: 1973, 'Reference and Proper Names', Journal of Philosophy 70, 425-439
[18] Büring, D.: 2003a, Binding Theory. Cambridge University Press
[19] Butler, A.: 2003, 'Predicate Logic with Barriers and its locality effects.' In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of
Sinn und Bedeutung 7, Arbeitspapier Nr. 114, pp. 70–80. Universität Konstanz, Germany: FB Sprachwissenschaft.
[20] Chierchia, G. (1987)  ‘Anaphora and Attitudes De Se’,  in Bartsch, van Benthem & van Emde Boas (eds),
Language in Context, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris. 
[21] Chomsky, N. :1981,  Lectures on Government on Binding, Foris, Dordrecht
[22] Clements, N.: 1975 "The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: its Role in Discourse," Journal of West African
Languages 10.2, 141-177, 1975
[23] Corblin, F.: 2002,  'Les Chaînes de la Conversation et les Autres', ms., Université Paris-Sorbonne & Institut
Jean-Nicod, Paris.
[24] Cresswell, M.: 1990, Entities and Indices, Kluwer.
[25] Dekker, P.: 1994, 'Predicate Logic with Anaphora', in Lynn Santelmann and Mandy Harvey (eds.), Proceedings
of the Fourth Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, DMLL Publications, Cornell University
[26] Dekker, P.: 2000,  ‘Coreference and Representationalism’, in K. von Heusinger and U. Egli (eds.), Reference
and Anaphoric Relations, Kluwer, Dordrecht. 
[27] den Dikken, M., Lipták, A. and Zsvolensky, Z.: 2001, On Inclusive Reference Anaphora: New Perspectives
from Hungarian. In Proceedings of WCCFL 2001, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
[28] Doron, E. 1991: ‘Point of View as a Factor of Content’, Proceedings of SALT 1.
[29] Dubinsky, S. & Hamilton, R: 1998,  'Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns'. Linguistic Inquiry 29.685-693
[30] Elbourne, P. 2005: Situations and Individuals, MIT Press.
[31] Enç, M.: 1983, Anchored expressions. In: M. Barlow, D. Flickinger & M. Westcoat (Eds.), Proceedings of
WCCFL 2, Stanford.
[32] Enç, M.: 1987,  'Anchoring Conditions for Tense', Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633-657.
[33] Evans, G.: 1980. 'Pronouns'. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.
[34] Fiengo, R.  & May, R.: 1994,  Indices and Identity, MIT Press
[35] Fischer, S. : 2004, Optimal Binding. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22: 481–526, 2004.
[36] Geurts, B.: 1999, Presupposition and Pronouns. Elsevier.
[37] Geurts, B.: 2004, 'Weak and Strong Reflexives in Dutch', hand-out of a talk given at the 'Workshop on Semantic
Approaches to Binding Theory', Nancy, France, August 2004. 

Additional Sources for Principle C Sections

[C1] Nina Kazanina et al. The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56:349–409, 2007.
[C2] J. Fodor. The Language of Thought. Crowell, New York, 1975.
[C3] Isabelle Haik. Indirect binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 2(15):185–233, 1984.
[C4] Philippe Schlenker. Minimize restrictors!, The Paris Workshop on Presuppositions and Implicatures (Atelier Presupposition et Implicatures), 2004.