Consumer Legal Advice : Criminal Defense Lawyer Toronto : Fundamentals Of Law Office Management.

Consumer Legal Advice

consumer legal advice
    legal advice
  • In the common law, legal advice is the giving of a formal opinion regarding the substance or procedure of the law by an officer of the court (such as solicitor or barrister), ordinarily in exchange for financial or other tangible compensation.
  • Advice from a lawyer on your individual circumstances.
  • Nothing contained in this site is intended as, nor shall be construed as legal advice, guidance, or interpretation. No attorney-client relationship is established between API and you by your use of this site.
  • a person who uses goods or services
  • Consumer is a broad label for any individuals or households that use goods and services generated within the economy. The concept of a consumer occurs in different contexts, so that the usage and significance of the term may vary.
  • A heterotroph (Greek ?????? heteros = "another", "different" and ????? trophe = "nutrition", "growth") is an organism that uses organic carbon for growth by consuming other organisms.
  • A person or thing that eats or uses something
  • A person who purchases goods and services for personal use
consumer legal advice - Consumer Protection
Consumer Protection Law in a Nutshell (In a Nutshell (West Publishing))
Consumer Protection Law in a Nutshell (In a Nutshell (West Publishing))
Common Law and Equitable Remedies for Breach of Contract; Expectation Damages; Restitution; Reliance Damages; Specific Performance; Contracts for the Sale of Goods: Buyers' and Sellers' Remedies Under Article II of the UCC; Remedies Available to Buyer When He Has Not Accepted the Goods; Remedies Available to Buyer After He Has Accepted the Goods, Including Remedies for Breach of Warranty; Remedies Available to Seller When Buyer Defaults and Has Not Accepted the Goods; Remedies Available to Seller After Buyer has Accepted the Goods; Contractual Control Over Remedy; Liquidated Damages Clauses; Contractual Modification or Limitation of Remedy Under UCC 2-719; Remedies for Mistake and Unconscionability; Mistake in the Formation of an Agreement -- The Recission and Restitution Remedies; Mistake in Integration or Expression The Reformation Remedy: Mistake in Performance of an Obligation The Restitution Remedy; Unconscionability.

87% (7)
Where there's a Brad Will, there's a Way
Where there's a Brad Will, there's a Way
"Es mejor morir en los pies que vivir en las rodillas." (""I prefer to die standing than to live forever on my knees."") - Emiliano Zapata "No soy un libertador. Los libertadores no existen. Son los Pueblos quienes se liberan a si mismos." ("I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves.") - Ernesto Che Guevara "El gran poder mundial no ha encontrado aun el arma para destruir los suenos." ("The great powers of the world have not yet found a weapon capable of destroying our dreams.") - Subcomandante Marcos -------- Calderon's Inauguration Behind Closed Doors: Midnight in Mexico By GREG GRANDIN December 1, 2006 This is how the Washington Consensus ends: With the president-elect of Mexico Felipe Calderon sneaking off with outgoing Vicente Fox Thursday night to hold a midnight, locked-door inauguration. Fait accompli, the next day the videotaped ceremony was broadcast to the nation. "How now, you secret, black, and midnight hags! What is't you do?" "A deed without a Name," they answered. Over the last two decades, the Washington Consensus was more than just a set of economic policies that opened up Latin America's economies to US corporations and banks. It was a political directive as well, aimed at redefining the meaning of Latin American democracy. Once US-backed Cold War military regimes and death squads had violently severed the ties between socialist and nationalist political parties and their working-class and peasant base and allowed a return to constitutional rule, an army of corporate and government-funded U.S. social scientists descended upon Latin America. They advised politicians to move the fulcrum of politics away from mass rallies in the central plaza to televised campaign ads and back-room elite negotiations. They also sold a new brand of democracy, one defined exclusively as the protection of political and economic freedom and the defense of property rights, rather than the achievement of social justice. Such advice was aimed at putting to rest Latin America's populist, egalitarian tradition, which had deep roots in the region's political culture, drawing from Catholic humanism, Rousseauean notions of participatory democracy, and indigenous conceptions of justice and solidarity. "Political democracy," Samuel Huntington lectured Latin Americans in one transitology handbook, "is clearly compatible with inequality in both wealth and income, and in some measure, it may be dependent upon such inequality." It depends on what you mean by democracy. The success of such a campaign to turn Latin Americans into passive consumers of electoral politics was dependent on the success of the Washington Consensus's economic policies. But the 1990s were a disaster for a majority of Latin Americans. Inequality increased at a stunning pace and millions were thrown into not just poverty but extreme destitution, leading activists across the continent to rebuild alliances between grassroots social movements and political parties and lay the groundwork for today's left resurgence. Popular protests brought down governments in Bolivia and Ecuador, and restored one in Venezuela. Poor people increasingly became involved in politics (Evo Morales is the first Bolivian president to win more than fifty percent in a first-round vote since the country returned to democratic rule in the 1980s, drawing the bulk of support from impoverished rural communities). What is more, a majority of Latin Americans continued to believe that democracy should entail some form of equity and wealth redistribution. The conflict between these visions of democracy were brought into sharp relief in last summer's presidential election, which pitted Calderon against Manuel Lopez Obrador, a center-leftist with a strong grassroots base of support. Lopez Obrador built his campaign around old-style rallies and marches. In fact, it took a massive social movement just to get him into the game, with hundreds of thousands filling Mexico City's Zocolo to protest Vicente Fox's bogus attempt to use a legal technicality to block his candidacy. He even refused to visit the US to glad-hand bankers and think-tank pundits who watched his early large lead with alarm. Calderon, in contrast, might as well as have set up his headquarters in Washington for all the personal contact he had with actual Mexicans. With an enormous corporate-funded war chest, he relied heavily on TV commercials to sell himself. In an effort to whittle away at what seemed like an insurmountable Lopez Obrador lead, he turned to US political consultants, who micro-polled, product-tested, perception-managed, and focused-grouped to roll out the most relentlessly negative political campaign in Mexican history. It worked, at least enough to equalize the playing field just enough for Calderon to squeak in with a victor
Which support McKenzie Friends for Scotland
Which support McKenzie Friends for Scotland
I write on behalf of Which? in support of Petition PE1247, submitted by Mr Stewart Mackenzie, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce a McKenzie Friend facility in Scottish courts as a matter of urgency. We are concerned that the inability of legal litigants in Scotland to be able to draw upon the support of a 'McKenzie Friend' in court is likely to prove a distinct disadvantage to those unable to find legal representation. The system, as you may know, has successfully operated in England and Wales for many years, allowing those who cannot access legal representation to draw upon the expertise of agencies and individuals who can provide such support. Indeed, McKenzie Friends are routinely permitted and are only denied where the judge believes it is fair or in the interests of justice to do so. A McKenzie Friend typically: • Provides moral support for the litigant • Takes notes • Helps with case papers and • Gives advice to the litigant on points of law, procedure and issues that the litigant may wish to raise in court. Which? believes that where litigants cannot afford to, or are indeed unable to find, legal representation, the right to use a McKenzie Friend would be highly beneficial and could only result in a fairer hearing and outcome for members of the public in this situation. At the moment we are concerned that individuals are unfairly disadvantaged where they represent themselves in court, but are unable to take a McKenzie Friend with them to help support them during what can be a very difficult experience. Ideally of course, we are keen to ensure people have good legal representation, but in our experience, it is not always possible for litigants to find a lawyer willing to represent them, even where they have a strong case, and many people simply cannot afford legal representation. In such circumstances it is quite inequitable that they should be denied some support and we can see no reason why the Government should not permit this. Although some recent improvements have permitted construction litigants this facility, all other legal litigants are currently denied this support, which would improve access to justice and consumer redress in Scotland. Which? is the UK's largest independent consumer organisation, a charity funded by sales of our magazines and other services, and represents the consumer voice on many issues including legal services. We support Mr Mackenzie's petition and ask that you support it too. Regards, Julia Clarke Principal Public Affairs Officer Which? The Executive Centre, 7 North St David Street Edinburgh EH2 1AW Tel 0131 524 9624 In

consumer legal advice
consumer legal advice
How to Make Money from Property: Authoritative, Ccmprehensive, and Acthentic advice - whatever the state of the market
If you are interested or involved in property, this is the book for you. It describes every type of property business worth getting into, and how you can make a profit from investing in each one - at whatever stage of the property cycle the market may be. The author spells out the earnings potential, capital requirement, risk profile, and competitive analysis of 12 ways to make money from property. He includes budget templates and sample letting agreements, and exactly details best practices and the authentic 'how to' information that years of successful experience in property have given him. Learn how to: * Turn your own home (whether owned or not) into a tax-free revenue earner; * Build a property portfolio that will generate a generous income; * Make money by refurbishing properties and selling at good prices; * Earn hotel room rates for well located apartments in a city centre. * Buy properties for GBP1 by using the appropriate legal documents - such as options (full documentation is within this book); * Gain high earnings with minimal effort by 'flipping' properties; * Profit from the lucrative bed and breakfast market; * Profit from the ever-growing student property lettings market while sticking to current legislation * Build a profitable UK-based holiday letting business