Exhibits‎ > ‎exhibit 2‎ > ‎

exhibit 2b

You are therefore commanded:

To execute with out notice of authority or purpose, (proof under oath showing that …… harm may result to any person if notice were given.[1]  At the very least this would be PERJURY before this Court or PERJURY in Trial Court.  Which is it?

This is exactly what they asked for [under oath] and is the same as [asked for], described and argued in Exhibit1; Buck, White and Wilson (all further supported by all my affidavits in Exhibit 6) and the prosecutor knows this.  And should not have been allowed to use evidence that he knew to be false.  Not only the statements about how they always do them, (and it’s been analyzed) and it’s for officer safety that they do give notice NO, NO.  The police, prosecutors, judges and the Courts all believe in executing with out notice of authority or purpose, (proof under oath) …… harm may result to any person if notice were given  (that it's always SAFER not to give notice) and evidence maybe quickly destroyed or disposed of.  This judge and prosecutor had to know that there was no “Officer Identification” that night.

                                                                                                                              (Next page)

 



[1] Even though there is no warrant number, or readable date or signature, (usually it might not make any difference, but with all the other bullshit in this case who knows)


Comments