Ali Reza Hadjesfandiari, PhD.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
You can download the paper entitled
"Do we need two theories of relativity?" from
Abstract: This article discusses the ambiguity created by dividing the theory of relativity into special and general branches. A systematic study of covariant electrodynamics reveals the relation between matter and Minkowskian space-time, and the governing non-Euclidean geometry. This in turn results in the completion of Poincare's theory of relativity by showing that motion of a particle is a four-dimensional rotation of its body frame and the interaction field is a four-dimensional vorticity field. Therefore, one can see that there is only one theory of relativity, which is fully covariant.
Comments: Theory of general relativity is an inconsistent theory, which has sabotaged theoretical physics for almost a century. This theory claims that mass bends the space-time without clarifying the fundamental meaning of space-time. My more complete covariant theory of relativity shows that every massive particle has its own space-time and "bent space-time" is meaningless. This theory unifies electromagnetic and gravitational fields as four-dimensional vortex fields.
It is seen that the theory of electrodynamics is the most important theory in physics, which its fundamental meaning has not been understood before.
I have discovered the fundamental geometry of covariant electrodynamics, which reveals the meaning of space-time, motion and interaction. Therefore, by understanding the new aspects of theory of electrodynamics, we understand the theory of everything. Nature has symmetry. Gravitational field must be like electromagnetic field as a vortex field.
It should be noticed that I have not added any equation to theory of electrodynamics. What I have done is discovering the fundamental geometrical meaning of Maxwell's equations and Lorentz force, which looks like a miracle.
I hope the truth prevails.
The fallacious theory of general relativity has been a big obstacle in a systematic development of modern physics during the last century.**************************************************************************
Particle is a four-dimensional object.
Geometry of uniform and accelerating motion is non-Euclidean.
Space-time is relative and created by matter.
This is the origin of non-Euclidean geometry governing the three vectors and three tensors.
Theory of relative motion is a model for hyperbolic geometry.
Relative motion of particles is the result of relative rotation among their body frames.
Particles interact with each other through four-vorticity and four-stress that they create in the ether.
Fully symmetric Maxwell's equations is not allowed.
Electromagnetic field is a four-dimensional vortex field.
Magnetic field is a circular vorticity field.
Electric field is a hyperbolic vorticity field.
Magnetic monopole is an inconsistent concept.
Geometry governing electrodynamics is non-Euclidean.
A Maxwellian theory of gravity is inevitable.
Therefore, Heaviside's theory of gravitomagnetism is the correct theory of gravity.
magnetic monopole is an inconsistent concept
Geometrical theory of electrodynamics shows that the magnetic field is a
circular vorticity field. Since circular vorticity does not have any source, we
can conclude that magnetic monopoles do not exist.
You can see this comment on Talk:Magnetic monopole in Wikipedia which was
deleted right away by some opposition:
Interestingly, I explained the inconsistency of magnetic monopole three years
ago based on the potenial theory . You can see this in following:
While examining his work, I noticed that his derivation was incorrect, because he used a wrong vector potential A to represent the magnetic field of the stationary magnetic monopole. However, based on the Helmholtz decomposition theorem, a scalar potential should have been used. Interestingly, this result can be used to show that magnetic monopoles do not exist. Consequently, the magnetic field is only the result of moving electric charges.
Although there is a gauge freedom in potentials in the theory of