9/11-New World Order Files
Here we are not afraid to follow the truth wherever it may lead,
nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.
For excellent 9/11 photos on power point: powerpointphotos.pps
9/11 is the biggest lie in world history- and it’s destined to fall sooner or later.
Historian Webster Tarpley
The “War on Terrorism” is the biggest lie in U.S. history.
Economics Professor Michel Chossudovsky
We have had no accountability of 9/11.
Sibel Edmonds, FBI translator and whistle-blower
All warfare is based on deception.
9/11 is in the hands of people who insult our intelligence at every level.
This stuff doesn’t stand up to the most casual examination.
It’s like any of these vast, elaborate attempts to terrorize our people:
Any free examination of the evidence on its merits exposes what’s at work.
The penalty good men pay for their indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
On September 11, 2001, everyone with access to television or newspapers witnessed the mass murder of about 3000 innocent civilians. The media played these images over and over again. Although a Fox News anchor identified Osama bin Laden as the mastermind within 45 seconds of when the second WTC tower came down, FBI spokesperson Rex Tomb admitted in 2006 that “the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11” (Muckraker Report, 6/10/06).
In fact the "official conspiracy theory," that the attacks were perpetrated by Osama bin Laden and 19 Saudi Arabian hijackers, is very easily disproved (see below information and Reflections on the Origins of 9/11: Three Scenarios (2002). But as of January, 2009, there have still been no independent, fair government investigations, trials, or convictions for this crime. There still has been no identification and punishment of guilty parties. There have been no military court marshals for criminal negligence; instead, many of the individuals involved have been promoted. Hence, 9/11 is still an unsolved (mass-) murder and the perpetrators are still on the loose and could unleash another 9/11 any time they deem expedient.
Our leaders told us that 9/11 changed the world forever and that we are now engaged in an endless "war on terrorism" that requires massive spending of public money on the military-industrial complex. We have been told that, for our own safety, we must relinquish the "Bill of Rights" liberties bequeathed to us by the founding fathers. However, an objective evaluation of the evidence indicates that the official account of 9/11 does not hold water (The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 .
Rather, evidence amassed by countless independent researchers over the past 8 years, indicates that 9/11, was a hoax, "psy-op," and inside/outside job used as the pretext or "trigger" to justify a much larger plan for endless wars of conquest abroad and imposition of a police state at home (References). If we look beyond the smoke and mirrors, we see that 9/11 is part of a trauma-based, mass-mind control operation, based on fear, terror, and lies, designed to bring the peoples of America and the world under the domination of a relatively tiny, international ruling elite. In this sense, 9/11 was not just an “inside job,” strictly speaking, because the directors and beneficiaries of the crime include an international group with no allegiance to America or the U.S. Constitution.
Notwithstanding its extraordinary complexity and sophistication, 9/11 is still a crime. And to solve any crime, we need to answer the basic questions of "who, what, when, where, and why." The "when" and the "where" are obvious. So let's see what some of the top, independent 9/11 researchers have discovered about "what," "who," and "why." As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle stated:
When the impossible is eliminated, whatever remains, however improbable, is the truth.
However, caution, skepticism, and objective thinking are required in order to discern the truth from the intentional disinformation generated by those who are trying to neutralize the 9/11 Truth Movement. As Naval War College graduate and 9/11 researcher, Barbara Honneger, pointed out at Dr. James Fetzer's Madison, Wisconsin, 9/11 conference (The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 and Madison 911 Conference Part 2):
The third responsibility of the perpetrators is to control the opposition.
Thus, key 9/11 researchers such as Dr. Judy Wood, refer to the "9/11 Truth Movement" itself as the "9/11 Truth Diversion Movement." Likewise, researcher Dr. Morgan Reynolds states that the real conspirators control even the "9/11 Truth Movement." In fact, Dr. Judy Wood’s excellent website (www.drjudywood.com) prominently features Lenin’s quote:
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.
Alfred Webre and Leuren Moret, other speakers at Fetzer’s conference The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 also stated that the 911 Truth Movement is a controlled opposition movement. According to lawyer Alfred Webre, this controlled opposition movement is planting false facts, using mind control techniques to create a matrix of thought and behavior, and is also infiltrated by counter-intelligence operatives similar to the FBI’s counter-intelligence program (COINTEL-PRO) during the 1960’s and 1970’s.
Even so, due to the tireless work of thousands of independent researchers (References), I now believe that, for the most part, the "what," "who," "how," and "why" of this horrific crime have been revealed. Dr. James Fetzer, co-founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (www.911scholars.org), convened a conference on "The Science and Politics of 9/11: What's Controversial and What's Not" in August, 2007 Madison, Wisconsin which provides, I think, the state of the art summary of what really happened on 9/11. I have summarized most the 19 hours of researcher's talks at the following link: (The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 ).
Fortunately, millions of other Americans are also now waking up to the realities of the 9/11 hoax. Polls indicate that between 80 and 90% of Americans do not believe the official government account of what happened on September 11, 2001. A 2004 Zogby poll showed that 63% of Canadians and over half of New Yorkers believed the U.S. government was complicit in the crime and its subsequent cover-up.
As of January, 2009, countless individual researchers from around the world have written thousands of articles, hundreds of books and videos, produced over 1000 websites, and have joined together to conduct numerous international citizen's investigations (References). Certainly, many areas of debate and disagreement still remain in the "911 truth movement." Many of these areas of controversy are legitimate and stem from different interpretations of the events and evidence. However, as noted, some disagreements within the movement are deliberate smokescreens, stemming from the fact that the "movement" is heavily infiltrated. Even so, I suspect that independent and honest 9/11 researchers comprise the majority of the "9/11 truth movement." And together, these individuals have exposed most, if not all, of the answers as to the "what, where, how, who and whys" surrounding this unsolved crime.
2. The Official (Conspiracy) Story of 9/11 is demonstrably false
The official account of what happened on 9/11- that Osama bin Laden masterminded the deadly attacks of September 11, 2001 using a laptop in a cave in Afghanistan, and that 19 poorly educated Saudi hi-jackers with box cutters foiled the most sophisticated military defense and air traffic systems in the world- is clearly a myth. Some of the obvious factors and evidence disproving this "official conspiracy theory" includes:
1) No wreckage or any parts whatsoever from Boeing 757s were discovered at any of the four "crash" sites (see Morgan Reynolds website The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 ).
2) None of the alleged Saudi hi-jackers was capable of flying even a small plane, let alone a Boeing 757 or 767 passenger jet. Furthermore, pilots for 9/11 Truth, pilotsfor911truth.org state that in six flight simulations, two experienced pilots flying at the equivalent of 500 mph were not able to hit the buildings.
3) Within ten days of 9/11, the media announced that 10 of the 19 alleged hi-jackers were still alive. Several others, including Mohammed Atta, were trained at U.S. military facilities, and hence, may have been double agents.
4) Despite the fact that standard operating procedures require the scrambling of fighter jets in the event of any hi-jacking, the U.S. military and NORAD failed to scramble any fighter jets during the 1 hour and 40 minutes in which the four allegedly hi-jacked airliners were allegedly flying off course.
5) Whatever object hit the Pentagon produced a 10' by 20' hole that penetrated through the outer concrete rings of the Pentagon. This hole could not have been made by a Boeing 757 jet. Rather, the hole looks far more like the effects of the impact of a depleted-uranium-tipped cruise missile. Again, photos taken immediately following the event show no evidence of plane wreckage of any kind. However, photos taken later in the morning show teams of men in suits and ties (probably Pentagon workers) distributing small plane parts over the otherwise pristine Pentagon lawn.
6) Dan Rather reported on network TV that Osama bin Laden was in a U.S. military hospital being treated for kidney problems on September 10, 2001. Many believe he died shortly thereafter.
7) All seven of the World Trade Center skyscrapers were completely destroyed and "dustified," or literally turned to dust on 9/11.
8) In defiance of the known laws of physics, WTC buildings
1 and 2, each 110 stories high came down in about 10 seconds each, that
is, at the speed of gravity free-fall. The 47-story WTC building 7
also came down at the speed of gravity, in 6.5 seconds. This would be impossible if the buildings came down in a "pancake collapse" as first claimed by NIST, the National Institute for Standards and Technology.
9) WTC Building 7 was never allegedly stuck by a plane, and yet it came down at 5:20 pm. A year later, Larry Silverstein, lease holder of the building, admitted that he and the NYC police department made the decision to "pull" the building, i.e., destroy the building via controlled demolition.
10) The official story is that the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC 1 and 2) came down due to plane impact and fires. However, no steel frame building has ever collapsed due to fires, either before or after 9/11. The melting point of steel is 2800 degrees F., whereas the highest possible temperatures of a kerosene fire is 1800 degrees F. On 9/11, the fires only burned about 1.5 hours in the North Tower and less than an hour in the South Tower and did not reach temperatures above about 500 degrees C. Additionally, these buildings were designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing jet liner.
11) The supposed cell phone calls from passengers to their relatives would have been impossible at the time and therefore must have been faked. Tests have shown that cell-phone calls cannot be made at altitudes over 4,000 to 8,000 feet, as cell towers are located on the ground. Commercial airliners fly at 30,000 feet and higher.
12) Enormous profits were made by insiders on plummeting stock prices of the two airlines allegedly involved- American and United. Federal law protects their identities.
One of the reasons for confusion and disagreement within the "9/11 Truth Movement" is that much of the evidence has been removed, planted, falsified, and/or fabricated. In order to determine what really happened on 9/11, it is imperative, therefore, to identify the evidence that is valid. Dr. James Fetzer, co-founder of Scholars for 911 Truth (www.911scholars.org) refers to the body of valid evidence that must be explained as the “explanandum.” Thus, identification of verifiable evidence is required in order to arrive at an accurate understanding of what happened on 9/11. Unfortunately, much of the information below, which is largely from The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 and Interviews with 9/11 Researchers has not been reported by the media.
3a. The Hijacked Planes
Law and standard operating procedures require that fighter jets be scrambled to intercept hijacked or off-course planes. These procedures have been in effect for over 35 years and have been implemented about 100 times a year. Nonetheless, NORAD failed to scramble any fighter jets during the 1 hour and 40 minutes in which four allegedly hijacked passenger jets were allegedly flying off course on the morning of 9/11.
Also, on the morning of 9/11, there were as many as 15 drills or military exercises taking place simultaneously (Tarpley, 2006). These drills included “Vigilant Guardian”, “Northern Guardian,” “Vigilant Warrior,” “Northern Vigilance,” “Amalgam Warrior,” “Global Guardian,” “Crown Vigilance,” “Apollo Guardian,” “Amalgam Virgo,” “Timely Alert II,” and AWACS. The drills involved, among other things, live-fly hijackings of airplanes, air defense against hijacking, crashing planes into buildings, inserting false radar blips into FAA radar screens, moving F-16s to Canada and Alaska to perform military exercises, nuclear warfare, and emergency response to bomb attacks.
1) Each Boeing 757 or 767 jet has about 3 million parts. No parts or black boxes from the allegedly hijacked planes were recovered at any of the four alleged crash sites.
2) There were no Arab names on the passenger lists of the four allegedly hijacked airliners.
3) No verified security camera images show passengers boarding the planes in question.
4) AA flights 11 and 77 are not registered in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics data base, so officially the hijackings never occurred.
5) Although FAA rules require that tail numbers of crashed airliners be deregistered within 24 hours of a crash, the tail numbers of AA 11 and 77 were not deregistered until Jan. 14, 2002 and UA 93 and 175 tail numbers were de-registered on Sept. 28, 2005.
6) News reports indicate that flight landed in Cleveland, Ohio on the morning of September 11 and passengers were offloaded into a FEMA facility, not to be heard from again.
7) The aluminum skin on a Boeing jet airplane is 1/13th of an inch thick. Therefore, aluminum planes have to shatter, crumple or go to pieces when they crash into steel/concrete buildings.
3b. Media Complicity/Faked Videos
In the 911 Octopus and September Clues video series, video experts analyze archived television footage that was broadcast live on 9/11 (The 911 Media Hoax). Their analysis and that of Ace Baker (The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007) indicate that on the morning of 9/11, four different channels showed four different realities. Their conclusion: fake videos with fake planes inserted onto faked digital images of Manhattan were shown to the world on the morning of 9/11.
1) One channel showed the NBC Chopper Live images of the South Tower but showed no plane striking the tower. You see an excellent view of the explosion happening in the South Tower but no plane.
2) Local New York City station WB11 showed images from a Live Stationary Camera from the same vantage point. This video image showed what looks like a chopper flying in from the right and crashing into the South Tower.
3) On CNN, the reporter failed to notice as a plane moved across the screen. The on-site reporter’s microphone did not pick up an impact sound.
4) Fox News broadcast images of an amazingly “lucky” fast zoom just as “the plane” arrived. “The plane” is seen to come in from the right and crash into the South Tower. Then we see the nose come through the other side of the Tower. The announcer stated: “There it is, the plane went right through the other tower of the WTC.” (Since plane noses are made mostly of plastic and the WTC Towers were made of heavy steel and concrete, it would have been impossible for the nose to crash into the building and emerge intact on the opposite side).
(Thus, this “airplane” was not a real airplane, but rather, was a graphic image of an airplane inserted onto the screen or onto a digitally composited image of Manhattan. Apparently, a supervisor saw the “nose out” fiasco and attempted a rapid fade to black. But this occurred 0.28 seconds later, an error within the realm of human reaction time. So the plan to simulate a plane attack failed. )
5) There is a puzzling 17-second gap between the official impact time of 9:03:11 and the seismic recording of the “impact” (or more accurately, explosion) time. The delay of the live broadcast by 17 seconds is enough time to discard or retain a shot but not long enough to double-check it.
6) No actual witnesses saw Boeing jets hitting the Twin Towers.
7) The NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) and NGA (National Geo-referenced Intelligence Agency) spy satellite agencies that are most likely responsible for making these faked videos evacuated their employees from the WTC for a scheduled ‘“drill” of airplanes crashing into buildings’ on Sept. 11, 2001.
8) BBC News announced that WTC Building 7 came down some 45 seconds before it actually came down.
3c. The World Trade Center Buildings
WTC Buildings 1 and 2 (the North and South Tower, respectively) were completed in 1970 and 1973, respectively. Each building was 110-stories or about 1,365’ high. When constructed, these steel-framed buildings were the tallest in the world and incredibly well built: each containing about 200,000 tons of steel, 425,000 cubic yards of concrete, 43,600 windows, and 60,000 tons of cooling equipment. WTC Construction Manager, Hyman Brown, stated that each building was “over-designed to withstand almost anything, including hurricanes, high winds, bombings, and an airplane hitting it.”
Evidence for Directed Energy Weapons
1) All seven WTC buildings were reduced to dust in a matter of seconds. WTC Towers 1, 2, and 7 came down at the speed of free-fall gravity; the 110-story North and South Towers in about 10 seconds each and the 47-story building 7 in 6.5 seconds. Videos show that the "demolition wave" came down WTC 1 and 2 faster than the free-fall of gravity. In each case, damage to nearby structures outside the seven World Trade Center was astonishingly small. (See Power Point images above).
2) Although a "pancake collapse," should produce a rubble pile at least 15% of the original height of the structure, photos taken on the morning of 9/11 show essentially no rubble pile. (Dr. Wood notes that you could have driven a 4-wheel drive vehicle across the site). Building 6, formerly eight-stories high, produced a much higher rubble pile than WTC 1 and 2. Thus, the 500,000-ton WTC 1 and 2 did not really fall to the ground. Rather, they were turned to dust in mid-air.
3) Video footage shows steel columns and concrete in WTC 1 and 2 turning to dust in a process Dr. Wood refers to as "molecular dissociation." Other steel beams are seen to be thrown several hundred feet laterally as the buildings disappeared.
4) Photos indicate that prior to the "dustification" and disappearance of WTC 1, 2, and 7, "fumes" (possibly ionized plasma) engulfed the inside and outside of the buildings. Similar "fumes"/plasma persisted at "Ground Zero" for months following 9/11.
5) Aerial photos show
numerous vertical, cylindrical holes that penetrated as much as 8
stories below ground level, throughout "Ground Zero." These holes are
approximately 24-feet in diameter and penetrate into foundations,
basements, and in adjacent streets. Material within the radius of the
holes has simply vanished.
6) The impact of the "fall" of the North and South towers coincides with Richter scale seismic readings of only 2.3 and 2.1 respectively, which is about the same as that of a quarry blast. The fall of WTC building 7 coincided with Richter scale seismic reading of 0.6, about the same as that of a jack hammer. These very minor seismic readings indicate that the full mass of the buildings did not fall to the ground. Rather, the buildings were turned to dust in mid-air.
7) After initially spreading northward to the pedestrian bridge, the dust cloud abruptly stopped and ascended into the stratosphere. Dust from the North Tower (Tower 1) went one block further north than the dust from the South Tower, which is located one block south of Tower 1. In both cases, the dust clouds stopped abruptly. The bluish 'nanno-haze" continued to waft upward into the stratosphere on September 12th.
8) Although fleeing people were enveloped in the "dust cloud," they were not burned. Thus, the temperature of the dust was lower than that of the surrounding air. Hence, the "dust" was not produced by conventional fires.
9) In October, "fuming" was still occurring at Tower 1. Photos seem to indicate that the "dust/fumes" was breaking down into finer and finer material and then floating upwards. Dr. Wood notes the "fumes" they had a painful, toxic odor. Dr. Wood refers to the gray/blue "fumes/fuzzy blobs" as "nanno-haze" and notes that gravitational forces do not operate on nanno-particles.
10) Ground zero is covered with enormous quantities of dust and a great amount of unburned paper. The unburned paper also suggests that the buildings were not destroyed by conventional fires.
11) The "bathtub," and the foundations and sub-basements of the WTC 1 and 2 were not injured by the impact of the buildings. This evidence as well as the photos themselves show that each of these 500,000 ton buildings essentially turned to dust before it fell.
12) About 1400 cars and vehicles within of the WTC complex were rusted and twisted in extremely unusual ways. Fires burned spontaneously in the vehicles and engine blocks as well as door handles are typically missing from these vehicles.
13) Fleets of trucks were seen transporting many tons of soil/dirt into and out of "Ground Zero." During the months following 9/11, this dirt was used to absorb toxic materials.
14) In the days following 9/11, as more and more dirt was added, the rubble pile at "Ground Zero" continues to grow.
Inside the building explosions?
Numerous witnesses, including firemen and others, reported hearing, feeling, and seeing explosions go off in the buildings. Some were injured from the explosions and some reported being blown off their feet. Tremendous explosions occurred at the base of each of the Twin Towers. Firefighter Edward Cacchia reported:
We thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom and then the tower came down… It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit (Dwyer, New York Times, 8/12/05).
Teresa Veliz, a worker on the 47th floor of the North Tower, reported:
There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing buttons. There was another explosion. And another. I didn’t know where to run (from Loose Change).
Light flashes (bombs and explosions) going off 20 to 30 stories below the “demolition wave” are recorded in video images shown in Loose Change and Painful Deceptions and in Hufschmid’s (2002) Painful Questions.
Columbia University seismographs detected 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude shaking in the South and North Towers, respectively. These seismic events seem to coincide with the first explosions which occurred in the subbasements, which were probably designed to destroy the foundations of the buildings where they were anchored to bedrock (Hufschmid, 2002).
A curious Coincidence?
15) Securacom was in charge of security for the WTC, Dulles Airport, and United Airlines. Their Board of Directors includes Marvin Bush, brother of President Bush. And their Chief Executive Officer is Wirt Walker III, a Bush cousin.
3d. The Pentagon
The Pentagon is the most fortified, well-defended building in the world, and is defended by missiles. The West Wing of the Pentagon, where explosions occurred inside and outside the building on 9/11, was in the process of being reinforced and renovated. The top Pentagon brass worked in the East Wing. Andrews Air Force base, with two squadrons of F-16 fighters, was a mere 10 minutes away.
Boeing 757s are 155 feet long and have a wingspan of 125 feet and a height of 44 feet, including the tail section. If the official story is correct and Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, it would have left about 100 tons of wreckage! The two Pratt and Whitney engines of a Boeing 757 are made of steel-titanium alloy, are 9’ in diameter and 12’ long, and weigh 6 tons each. However, no wreckage of a Boeing 757 or remains of any passengers were ever found or seen on photographs inside or outside the Pentagon. The official explanation- that intense heat from the jet fuel fires completely vaporized the entire Boeing 757- is nearly as preposterous as their proposition that plane impacts and jet fuel fires brought down the three WTC buildings.
1) There was a massive, inside-the-building explosion at about 9:31 am in the West Wing of the Pentagon. Numerous watches and clocks broken by the blast all stopped between 9:30 and 9:32 am. Many witnesses report hearing the blast, smelling cordite (which is associated with explosives) and seeing reinforced windows bow in and out and shatter.
2) This inside-the-building explosion preceded the impact of some object into the outside of the Pentagon by about 6 minutes. The official government story was that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:47 am. This was later revised to 9:38 am, still about 6 or 7 minutes after the bomb went off inside the Pentagon.
3) Four witnesses observed bomb-sniffing dog teams inside the Pentagon at 7:15 am.
4) The hole in the Pentagon wall was much too small (10 by 17 feet) for the cover story of a Boeing crash. So the side of the building was made to collapse 20 minutes later.
5) The official story claims that flight 77 flew into the West Wing of the Pentagon at 500 mph some 10 to 12 feet above the ground. Due to the forces of turbulence and friction, it would be impossible for a jet liner to fly at that speed so close to the ground.
6) Immediately after the impact of the object, fire engines arrived at the scene. Right after the Pentagon was hit, the Pentagon lawn was immaculate; smooth, green, unblemished with no debris. Shortly thereafter, witnesses photographed teams of men in suits and ties (Pentagon employees?) planting debris from a small plane on the Pentagon lawn. Enlisted men are seen carrying a very large box, covered with a blue tarp. Could this be a box full of debris they are bringing out to make the crash look more plausible?
3e. Shanksville, Pennsylvania
A local TV anchor stated on live TV: “All you see is a large crater, about 10 by 20 feet, in the ground. 100’s of investigators have found nothing larger than a phone book at this site. All you see is a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.” The latest government explanation was that Flight 93 happened to crash into a mine shaft and disappeared underground.
George Nelson, an Air Force crash investigator, said it looked like someone took a bulldozer, dug and ditch, filled it with trash. and blew it up. Government officials on the scene wouldn’t allow photographers within a 1000 feet of the site.
Wally Miller, the Somerset County coroner, described the crash site like this to the Houston Chronicle and the Washington Post:
It looked like someone took a dump truck, dug a 10’ ditch and dumped trash into it…. I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes. There were no bodies there. I have not to this day seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.
Cleveland (Mayor) White stated on the morning of 9/11 that UA Flight 93 was moved to a secure area of the Cleveland (Hopkins) airport and was evacuated there. United Airlines itself identified the evacuated plane as Flight 93 (WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 11:43 am, 9/11). According to United Airlines, Flight 93 and another airliner were evacuated due to bomb threats. Flight 93 landed at 10:43 a.m. whereupon 200 passengers were evacuated and brought to the Glenn Research Center, an empty NASA facility at the airport (from Loose Change). We still do not know what happened to those passengers. On April 10, 2003 David Freedman, an employee at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport, spotted Flight 93 at O’Hare Airport.
Within days of 9/11, Bush and Cheney called Senate Democratic Minority Leader Tom Daschle, requesting him to limit a Congressional investigation. After much stonewalling and withholding of evidence, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee was established in early 2002. Members of Congress reported that the White House, FBI, CIA, and Justice Department were not cooperating with their 9/11 inquiry (New York Times, 10/5/02, CBS 5/23/02).
Eventually, mounting pressure from victim’s families forced the government to set up an “independent” investigation. But it wasn’t until 441 days after the attacks that Bush finally appointed the so-called “independent” commission (Zwicker, 2006). The New York Times editorialized that it was clear that the goal of all this stalling was “to contain an investigation the White House long opposed.”
Vanity Fair editor, Graydon Carter observed:
The Bush White House did everything in its power to derail an open inquiry. Then when faced with its inevitability, the president and his aides sought to limit its scope, its access, and its funding.
- Individuals on the 9/11 Commission, hand-picked by the President, had tremendous conflicts of interest. Ralph Schoenmann observed: “the official investigation was overseen by the very individuals who should have been investigated.” Henry Kissinger was initially appointed to head the investigation, but stepped down due to strong public protest. Bush then appointed Dr. Philip Zelikow to head the commission.
Zelikow was part of Bush’s transition team for the National Security Council. As Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Zelikow oversaw a staff of 70 “researchers”, mostly comprised of ex-FBI, ex-CIA, and ex-Department of Justice employees skilled in the arts of misinformation and disinformation. Zelikow had the power to determine what would be researched and what would not be researched (from Griffin, 10/3/04). Thus, The 9/11 Commission Report, which finally appeared in 2003, was effectively co-authored by the White House; and the process essentially amounted to the White House investigating itself (Griffin, 2004).
Congress originally allotted only $3 million for the investigation; this figure was later upped to $15 million. (By contrast, $50 million was allocated for the Challenger disaster and the Clinton failed Whitewater deals, whereas $40 million was allocated for Ken Starr’s “independent” investigation of Clinton’s sex scandal). The committee had no subpoena power, little staff support, and was unable to obtain basic information like detailed blueprints of the buildings that collapsed. The White House released only about 25% of some 11,000 documents requested by the commission, and the documents released were often heavily blacked out. Administration officials refused to testify under oath. Eventually, Bush, Cheney, and Rice did meet with the commission in secret, behind closed doors, but they were not under oath, and no tape recorders or transcripts of the conversations were allowed. And the government has still not released much of the forensic data, which is either classified, concealed, or has been destroyed. Zwicker (2004) notes that in a court of law, this pattern of behavior is known as “guilty demeanor.”
Harpers Magazine, Oct. 2004, called The 9/11 Commission Report a “whitewash, a cheat, and fraud.”
In The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions Dr. David Ray Griffin (2004) called the 9/11 Commission Report a “571-page lie.” Griffin noted that the report began with the a priori assumption that Osama Bin Laden and 19 terrorists did it and then selected only the evidence that confirmed that assumption. Griffin found a staggering number of omissions in the report. Of 400 questions posed by victim’s families over the course of two years, none were addressed in the report findings. Griffin documents 115 lies that the 9/11 Commission Report uses to reinforce “The Big Lie” of the official narrative.
The report laid complete blame for the attacks on the FAA. However, a taped interview with FAA employees taken on the evening of 9/11 by an Italian journalist was confiscated and destroyed. Indeed, the FBI thereafter placed gag orders on all FAA employees.
Griffin (2004) noted that the report reads like a novel and does not contain an index. Much of testimony was not taken under oath or recorded or transcribed. The footnotes go nowhere and refer to things that cannot be checked or verified. The report does not state who its author is, although, Griffin suspects it was Zelikow himself. No family members were allowed to participate in the process and the report does not answer the family members’ questions. In one of his lectures, Griffin (2004) asked rhetorically; ”Can I find a true sentence in the book? It’s hard to find any truth there!”
4a. Victim’s families
The U.S. government tried to silence the 9/11 victim’s families by offering $1 million for each victim from the Victims Compensation Fund, with the stipulation that they had to agree not to sue and to stop asking questions. However, over 400 9/11 victims’ families refused the “hush money” and have filed lawsuits against members of the Bush administration for “complicity” in 9/11 (Mariani, 2004). At least three such lawsuits have been filed, each of which has been censored from the mainstream media.
In January, 2004, Ellen Mariani and her lawyer Phillip Berg filed a suit against the Bush administration under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and wrongful death. Both Mariani and Berg have been active participants in 9/11 Citizen’s Inquiries. Berg has stated that for 9/11 not to have been an inside job, over 60 federal agencies would have had to fail simultaneously. Berg’s recommendations for how we might proceed toward prosecution and punishment of the real 9/11 criminals are given in Appendix A (from Marrs, 2004).
4b. Destruction of evidence
Evidence, including news clips, taped testimony, airplane transponders, etc., that disprove or conflict with the official 9/11 narrative has been confiscated, classified, and/or deleted from the official record. Whistleblowers have been fired, witnesses have been threatened, and hundreds of FAA, FBI, and military employees, firemen and policemen with first hand knowledge of the events of 9/11 have had gag orders placed upon them. And the government’s timeline of events on the morning of 9/11 have been completely revised twice, as noted above (Zwicker, 2006).
Immediately following the 9/11 attacks, New York Mayor Giuliani granted access to the WTC only to Controlled Demolitions, Inc. and AMEC. Giuliani and FEMA oversaw the removal of steel columns and beams within days and sold the metal as scrap metal to Asia. AMEC, the company that removed the steel from the WTC, was also responsible for both renovating and cleaning up the West Wing of the Pentagon before and after the 9/11 attacks.
4c. The Pentagon
Within five minutes after the explosion at the Pentagon, FBI agents confiscated video tapes from security surveillance cameras from three nearby buildings: a gas station across the street, a Sheraton Hotel, and a Virginia Department of Transportation building. Each of these surveillance tapes would show what hit the Pentagon. But the FBI has never released these tapes to any investigative committee. The FBI agents also ordered employees at these facilities not to discuss what they had seen.
4d. The WTC
Marvin P. Bush, the President’s brother, was on the board of Directors of the company (formerly Securacom, now called Stratesec, Inc.) that had the contract to handle security at the WTC “up to the day the buildings fall down” (Burns, 2003). This business, backed by a private Kuwaiti-American investment firm, also had the security contract for United Air Lines and Dulles International Airport. Marvin Bush resigned on September 11, 2001. In December, 2000, Stratesec added a government division, providing security systems to the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Department of Justice. This same company stood to gain by limitations on liability and national-security protections from investigation that were provided in Congressional bills passed since 9/11. HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., a reinsurance corporation on whose board Marvin Bush also sat as director until November, 2002, similarly benefited from legislation pushed by the Bush White House and rubber-stamped by the Republican Congress. HCC carried some of the insurance for the WTC (American Reporter, 1/20/03; Loose Change).
4e. The Phony NIST Report
Lawyer Jerry Leaphart points out that the Bush administration gave the task of reporting on what caused destruction of WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7 to NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is located in the Department of Agriculture (The Science and Politics of 9/11: Notes from conference in Madison, WI, August, 2007 ). It took NIST from 2002 to October, 2005 to draw up its report on what caused the destruction of the WTC 1 and 2. To this day, NIST has not yet issued a report on what caused the destruction of WTC 7.
In pursuance of the Qui Tam lawsuits of Drs. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds against NIST, Leaphart has learned that the NIST gave the job of writing the report to a number of subcontractors, and that chief among these are companies that specialize in the development of “psy-ops” and “directed energy weapons.” These contractors include:
1) SAIC, Science Applications International Corporation, based in San Diego, which develops “psychological operations.” SAIC has about 6000 employees and is the 9th largest DOD contractor, with $6 billion/year in government contracts. SAIC has more employees with top security clearance than any other company in the world.
SAIC is also a weapons manufacturer. (SAIC spelled backwards is CIA… S).
2) ARA, Applied Research Associations, based in Albuquerque, NM, with principle ties to the Directed Energy Directorate. ARA comes in second to SAIC in terms of numbers of employees with top security clearance. One of their most recent newsletters states that the mission of “the concept development group” is to develop advanced and unusual weapons concepts. They are working with major aerospace companies to develop such devices. And they actually develop and manufacture directed energy weapons themselves. And they are also contractors/consultants to other directed energy manufacturers.
It is not surprising then, that the NIST report does not address or explain the evidence that Drs. Wood has uncovered, including 1) the lathering process, 2) the speed of the buildings’ destruction, 3) the absence of any appreciable debris pile, 4) the appearance of steel and concrete being turned to dust, 5) the appearance of cylindrical and perpendicular holes in the buildings, 6) the appearance of “toasted cars,” at incongruent distances from the site.
Rather, in essence, the NIST report altered their mandate from the original (determine the cause of the collapses) to describing “the probable sequence of events leading up to the collapse of the WTC towers.” Thus, NIST and its contractors assumed the license to ignore the factors surrounding the actual “collapses” of the buildings.
The NIST report also included a couple of disclaimers; 1) the report did not come under the stricter requirements of the Data Quality Act and 2) nothing in the report could not be used in any legal proceeding for any purpose.
In the process of the lawsuit Leaphart determined that the Directed Energy Professional Society, the Directed Energy Directorate, and their sponsors are the rosetta stone that tell us the key players involved in 9/11.
The foregoing facts lead to the formulation of a hypothesis that may be tested against future evidence and information:
a) The World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons or a combination of directed energy weapons (www.drjudywood.com) and inside-the-building-bombs, possibly up to and including mini-nukes and depleted uranium.
b) Although four passenger jets were hijacked (by government officials or their surrogates), none of these aircraft actually crashed at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, or near Shanksville, Pennsylvania (www.nomoregames.net). Rather, the "live" video images of planes hitting the WTC Twin Towers on TV were faked, as per the research posted on u-tube series by Ace Baker, "September Clues," and "Octopus 9/11." If this is correct, 911 was also a media hoax (http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_james_fe_070726_mounting_evidence_o.htm ).
c) The self-inflicted attacks on the Pentagon include the explosion of pre-placed bombs in the Pentagon followed by the cover story of airplane crashes outside. The Pentagon was probably hit by a cruise missile, and/or possibly a A3 Sky Warrior as well a missile.
d) In order to make it appear that a Boeing 757 crashed near Shanksville, operatives dug a 10' by 20' hole in the ground with a bulldozer, filled it with trash, and set it on fire.
e) Finally, near Shanksville, a plane apparently shot down by an F-16 fighter left debris scattered over some 8 square miles.
As of January, 2009, then, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that 9/11 was a false-flag, synthetic, state-sponsored terrorism operation conducted by the so-called “secret government” against the American people (Tarpley, 2006). Evidence also suggests 9/11 was a highly sophisticated and well-coordinated psychological operation, a "black/wet op" coordinated by intelligence agencies (including Israel's Mossad, Britain's MI6, and America's CIA, and Pakistan's ISI) and elements of the U.S. military on behalf of a cabal comprised by a private, international elite. Whereas 911 was used immediately to provide a pretext for wars of aggression abroad and imposition of a police state at home, the long-term goal of this cabal, apparently, is to usher in a one-world, totalitarian dictatorship, sometimes referred to as the "New World Order."
Thus, as of January, 2009, the preponderance of evidence indicates that 9/11 was a false-flag, synthetic, state-sponsored terrorism operation directed against the American people (Tarpley, 2007). Evidence also suggests 9/11 was a highly sophisticated and well-coordinated military, psychological operation, hoax, and inside/outside job. More specifically, 9/11 was a "black op"/"psy-op" coordinated by intelligence agencies (including Israel's Mossad, Britain's MI6, and America's CIA, and Pakistan's ISI) and elements of the U.S. military on behalf of a private international elite. Whereas 911 was used immediately to provide a pretext for wars of aggression abroad and imposition of a police state at home, the long-term goal, apparently, is to usher in a one-world dictatorship or "New World Order."
If the good news is that the truth has emerged and the 9/11 perpetrators can now be identified, the bad news is that the perpetrators seem to be the world’s ruling elite that, along with their myriad corporations, front groups, public-private partnerships, secret societies, etc., comprise a “secret government” that has orchestrated world events from behind the scenes for generations. More potential good news, however, is that the actual ruing elite is a very, very small group (Coleman, 2006). More bad news, however, is the fact that this relatively small group exerts an extraordinary degree of control over most institutions in the world, including the major media (NWO: Diagrams, Flow Charts, and How U.S. Policy-Making is Controlled and Channeled).
In a talk before the 2004 International Citizen’s Inquiry, Webster Tarpley identified the cabal which perpetrated 9/11 as the "CIA/Brown Brothers Harriman/Skull and Bones/Bush family/ neo-conservative/oligarch faction." Lawyer and member of the Kuala Lumpur war-crimes tribunal, Alfred Webre, refers to this group as the "International War-Crimes Racketeering Organization" (IWCRO), the Anglo-American-Zionist faction, or simply the New World Order (see Webre in Madison 911 Conference Part 2). According to Webre, this cabal has interlocking branches in:
1) North America through the “Brotherhood of Death,” or Yale Skull and Bones secret society and its affiliated networks of the Rockefeller groups, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and myriad corporations (The Illuminati, Skull and Bones, and "The Plan").
2) The United Kingdom through Masonic, satanic networks in government, military, intelligence, finance, media, and the house of Windsor (the royal family of England),
3) International neo-Zionist networks, including the House Rothschild and the London banking entities that go back over 300 years. The City of London is a private sovereign state of 677 acres in central London that is ruled by a committee of twelve banks and is headed by Bank of England. All these banks are an extension of the House of Rothschild, which is in reality a crime syndicate with a net worth of some $100 trillion, according to Webre. The Rockefeller crime syndicate, which has always been an extension of the Rothschild syndicate, has a net worth of some $10 trillion.
The International War Crimes Racketeering Organization (IWCRO), then, is synonymous with the Anglo-American-Zionist block, which is controlled "International Finance," as described in Knuth's "The Empire of 'The City'" (Empire of "The City"). The stated goal ("Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time," Quigley, 1966; References) of this elite group is to develop a feudalistic one-world society in which slave-wage earners are ruled by the bloodline elites. There are many front groups, secret and not secret, which have advanced this agenda for generations. Among the modern front groups for this agenda are the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, etc. According to Alfred Webre, the U.S. and Canada are puppet governments of the City of London, which in turn, controls the U.S. president, dictates U.S. foreign policy, the value of the U.S. dollar. The state of Israel is also a front for the City of London. The depopulation goals of "The City" are to increase death rates and decrease birth rates of targeted countries. False flag operations such as 9/11 and engineered wars such as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are ultimately intended to trigger a war of terror, leading to a possible WWIII conflagration.
According to Webre, other goals of the New World Order (IWCRO) are:
1) to provide a pretext to engage in genocidal and ecocidal depleted uranium bombings of Central Asia in order to secure its vast oil and uranium reserves,
2) to roll out a terror-based national security system worldwide, and
3) to implement the final stages of its world depopulation policy that would result in total control of strategic resources and the world’s wealth.
Neither Tarpley nor Webre, however, identified the locus of global governmental organization, which is the United Nations (The United Nations as World Government- according to Joan Veon). And to my knowledge, none of the 9/11 researchers, with the possible exception of Afred Webre and Eric Hufschmid, have delved into the global warming hoax.
True Confessions by some of the Possible Culprits
Certainly, the “neoconservatives” are an important part of the cabal that seized power in Washington upon the selection of Bush in 2000. The neo-con doctrine is ideological and closely follows that of Machiavelli. They endorse terrorism, martial law, coups, propaganda, lies, and enforcement of a state of emergency as the way to rule the masses. Their academic guru is the late University of Chicago political scientist, Leo Strauss (a German Jew). His disciples today include Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Lutti, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, ex-CIA director, James Woolsey, William Kristol, Michael Leeden, and Samuel Huntington, i.e., the people who essentially ran the Bush Administration.
In turn, Strauss’ ideological gurus were proto-Nazi Frederich Neitche, considered one of the four precursors of Hitlerism, Nazi philosopher Martin Heidegger, and Nazi legal theorist Carl Schmidt. With this intellectual lineage, it should come as no surprise that the Bush administration behaved in a criminal manner; stealing elections, detaining and torturing innocent civilians, conducting preemptive wars of aggression abroad, and using Gestapo tactics at home.
The cabal that stole the last two national elections (Greenwald, 2002; Miller, 2006) serves a private, international financial network. Evidence suggests this cabal is part of the same multi-generational “secret government” that has orchestrated myriad crimes in the past, including the Bay of Pigs, the Kennedy assassinations, the secret wars of the CIA, the Iran-Contra affair, the Vietnam War, World Wars I and II, the Great Depression, the Federal Reserve Act scam of 1913, the Russian Revolution, and a host of terrorist and false-flag “war trigger events” in the same vein as 9/11 (Still, 2004, Schoenmann, 2004).
A few individuals or groups have provided what may amount to limited confessions to the crimes of 9/11.
Confessions of guilt and/or complicity?
1) The Bush II agenda was outlined prior to the 2000 election in a series of policy papers written by the “neo-conservative” think tank, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Among its recommendations: The U.S. should “pre-emptively attack other countries not of immanent danger to the U.S., abrogating agreed-upon treaties when they conflict with U.S. goals, installing U.S.-friendly governments to do America’s will, using tactical nuclear weapons, simultaneously conducting “multiple-theatre wars”, and controlling space and cyberspace for military purposes.” The document calls for a global Pax Americana, i.e., “full spectrum dominance” of the whole world. And it ominously states that the American people are not likely to support the required transformation of the military “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbor”. The document also states: “Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has.”
Prominent members of PNAC include Vice President Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Secretary of Defense (now World Bank President) Paul Wolfowitz, indicted former Chief of Staff Lewis (Scooty) Libby, Jeb Bush (the President’s brother and Governor of Florida), Richard Perle, John Bolton, Dan Quayle, Gary Bauer, Steve Forbes, Elliot Abrams, Paula Dobrianski, Robert Kagan, William Schneider, Jr., Peter Rodman, and William Kristol. Many of these individuals are Zionists, arguably more committed to the interests of Israel than those of the United States.
According to the documentary DVD “Missing Links," another document may be central to understanding the planning for 9/11. “A Clean Break: a New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (or the “ABC doc”), created in Israel by the IASPS (Israeli Agency for Strategic and Political Studies), lays out a systematic plan for Israel to conquer the Middle East. Many of the same authors of the “ACB doc” wrote the neo-conservative, Republican think tank’s Project for a New American Century’s position paper, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” Again, this PNAC document calls for a “catalyzing event such as a new Pearl Harbor” to help mobilize Americans to accept the needed increases in defense spending to prosecute multiple wars abroad and the imposition of a police state at home. Additionally, by engineering a flawless image of Israel and promoting Israel as a great ally of the U.S., the authors intended that the U.S. should carry out Israel’s foreign policy objectives of expanding Israeli borders to extend from the Nile to the Euphrates, i.e., to establish an “Eretz Israel” or “Greater Israel” (Piper, 2004).
Thus, PNAC essentially serves the interests of a “Zionist criminal network” and the state of Israel. PNAC’s primary objective, then, may have been to foment and control the social and economic chaos following 9/11 to serve the benefit of this racist-supremacist power elite.
2) Another compelling possible confession for 9/11 and the host of crimes justified by 9/11 was offered by neo-conservative scholar/pundit Michael Leeden, who has been amongst the fiercest advocates for U.S. invasions of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and even Western Europe. And Leeden was one of the most influential advisors of Karl Rove, who in turn, was a chief strategic advisor of President Bush.
In his book, The War Against the Terror Masters (2002), Leeden wrote:
Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence- our existence, not our politics- threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.
Essentially, Leeden’s theory of “creative destruction,” holds that sweeping away the old order through violence and “total war” is the only way for society to progress. (This is identified as the “Shock Doctrine” by Klein, 2006, Operation 9/11, the Shock Doctrine, and the North American Union). In the last sentence of this quote, Leeden states “we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” But who are “we,” and what is the “historic mission?”
Leeden is a Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, author of more than a dozen books, and regular commentator on Fox News, and radio talk shows and regular contributor to William Kristol’s National Review. He has worked for the Departments of Defense and State and the National Security Council.
After being denied tenure in the history department at Washington University for plagiarism and the quality of his scholarship, Leeden took a teaching job at the University of Rome, where he is rumored to have been involved in the P2 Masonic lodge scandal that rocked Italy in the 1980’s. Leeden, an admirer of Machiavelli, and studied and enthusiastically supported the policies of Italian fascism under Benito Mussolini. He returned to Washington in 1981 and became anti-terrorism advisor to Secretary of State, Al Haig.
As part of the Reagan administration's "anti-terrorism" campaign, Leeden worked with the shadowy network of operatives of the “secret government” to provide arms to Iran at a time when that was against U.S. law. This was the so-called Iran-Contra scandal. (ETK note: the shadowy network of arms and drugs dealers, criminals and ex-military intelligence operatives involved in the Iran-Contra scandal - which included cooperation and funding for Islamic fundamentalists of Afghanistan’s Mujahadeen ) later morphed into the modern Al Qaeda. Many names of individuals involved were exposed by a lawsuit prosecuted by Daniel Sheehan of the Christic Institute).
Leeden is also accused of being involved in the forgery of the document that claimed that Saddam Hussein had purchased yellowcake (uranium) from Niger and was planning on building nuclear weapons prior to the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. This was a key piece of “cooked” and falsified evidence used to justify the 2003 US/UK invasion of Iraq.
Leeden is also a founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and serves on JINSA Board of Advisors. At an April, 2003 address to JINSA, Leeden declared: “the time for diplomacy is at an end, its time for a free Iran, free Syria, and free Lebanon.” (In other words, U.S. invasions of each of those countries.) He was also board member of the “Coalition for Democracy in Iran (CDI), founded by Morris Amitay, a former Executive Director of American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In June 25, 2008, Leeden addressed the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).
3) Larry Silverstein, holder of the WTC building leases, appearing on PBS’s “America Rebuilds” (September, 2002) said he ordered Building 7 to be “pulled” (i.e., demolished): At that time, Silverstein stated:
I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure that they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said “You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is … is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.
What is the background on the WTC and Larry Silverstein and his associates?
The WTC was a project of the Rockefeller brothers. David, then Chairman of the Chase-Manhattan Bank, helped arrange funding while Nelson, then New York’s governor, controlled who would be appointed to the Port Authority, which owned and ran the complex. The complex remained a perennial money loser, requiring huge annual subsidies to cover operating costs. In 1991, the Port Authority began litigation in a U.S. District Court to try to recover money from investors for the estimated $1 billion worth of asbestos reclamation work it needed.
Thus, the WTC was considered a “white elephant” and therefore, expendable by the financial powers in New York (Thorn, 2006).
The key individuals who arranged the privatization of and then acquired the 10.6 million square-foot WTC complex are Larry Silverstein, Frank Lowy (former Israeli commando and Australian shopping mall magnate), and Port Authority chairman, Lewis Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases. Each of these individuals holds senior positions in the ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and/or the New York Museum of Jewish Heritage. Silverstein is a former chairman of UJA, which raises hundreds of millions each year for agencies in the U.S. and Israel. Eisenberg is also on planning board of UJA. It was Eisenberg who negotiated the 99-year leases on the WTC for Silverstein and Lowy’s Westfield America. Silverstein and Lowy were the low bidders. Six weeks before 9/11, the Port Authority granted the WTC leases to developer Silverstein, and the underground retail space to Lowy’s Westfield America. Silverstein was already leasing WTC Building 7.
On July 24, 2001, Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties signed a $3.2 billion lease on the WTC complex (estimated to be worth $8 billion), personally paying out only $15 million (or 0.005% of the total financing) to secure private ownership (Paul, 2002). Included in the lease was a $3.5 billion insurance policy specifically covering “acts of terrorism.” Silverstein, who has already received a reported $4.7 billion in insurance payouts, is now reportedly suing to increase this sum to $8 billion, arguing that the attacks on WTC 1 and 2 were separate terrorist attacks.
William Fox (www.amfirstbooks.com), who has extensive business experience in New York City, stated in an email communication to me:
Jewish lightning” is a slang term for a scam where a Jewish owner of a failing business deliberately burns it down to collect the insurance. According to Michael Collins Piper, the term originated in the late 1800’s, about the same time that Jews arrived en masse in New York City. 9-11 was simply more “Jewish lightning,” on a bigger scale, after Zionist landlord Larry Silverstein loaded the boat with insurance policies. A caller to Piper’s Republic Broadcasting Network program recommended that we start calling Silverstein “the God of Jewish Lightning.”
The Real Estate Journal article (11/5/01 REJ) concluded:
It may also end up being a good investment. In the end, Mr. Silverstein may wind up controlling 11 million square feet of attractive, lower-rise space instead of 11 million square feet of 30-year old space in New York’s tallest and most conspicuous buildings.
Silverstein himself declared: “It should prove to justify the time, energy, and the psychic impact of what we’ve been through” (from Thorn, 2006)
4) Finally, in his book, “Between Two Ages- America’s Role in the Technotronic Era,” Dr. Zbigniew Bzrezinski stated:
Technologies will make available to the leaders of the major nations techniques for conducting secret warfare of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised. Technology of weather modification could be used to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm…. Uses of weather and other weapons for mind control….
The remaining pages on this website give background information relating to the larger, overarching conspiracy to usher in a One World Government with a "New World Order." I believe that in order to understand the significance of 9/11, we need to understand this larger plan, its history, its methodology, and the identity of those who are working to bring it about (NWO: Diagrams, Flow Charts, and How U.S. Policy-Making is Controlled and Channeled, The Federal Reserve Scam, The Bush Dynasty of Death: Four Generations of Wall Street War-Making and War-Profiteering. These pages suggest that a relatively small, international financial elite has acted in secret over the past centuries in order to topple existing institutions, including monarchies, nation states, organized religions, etc., to bring about a global dictatorship with them in charge. They have a plan and preferred methodologies (Techniques and Strategies of the New World Order: A Hypothesis to be Tested Against Historical Evide,). Many authors, including George Orwell (1984, see References (chapter 33), have warned us about the diabolical nature of this "open conspiracy."
Blueprint for World Conquest
The permanent war economy is created by controlling both sides of an artificially created conflict using the Hegelian dialectic, thesis vs. antithesis yields synthesis (Sutton, 1982). War is and has always been the most profitable business for the world’s richest financiers. Thus, 9/11 should be seen as one in a series of major planned, global, false-flag operations. According to Alfred Webre, the NWO has been planning “Operation USA Freedom” for a long time and this essentially involves imposition of indefinite Martial Law, installation of a military government, and overthrow of the U.S. Constitution. The so-called “War on Terror” (actually “War of Terror”) is expected to go on forever.
The deeper reason for military government is depopulation. Terms like Martial law, New World Order, Security and Prosperity Partnership, and North American Union (Operation 9/11, the Shock Doctrine, and the North American Union) are code words for depopulation policy to reduce the human population by between 2 and 4 billion persons and eventually to about 500 million. Webre believes they envision a planetary theme park where the aristocracy rules a second tier class in a feudalistic system.
Webre also asserts that global electronic weapons, including HAARP (the Department of Defense’s High Altitude Active Frequency Research Program) and chemtrails, are being deployed as instruments of environmental warfare in order to advance this strategy of global political control. He notes that Hurricane Katrina was a test case and was teleguided by HAARP and that other HAARP capabilities include mind control and triggering earthquakes. Webre stated: “Don’t buy into global warming,” because warming is occurring on other planets such as Mars due to the natural variations in solar output. However, the U.S. military is pursing a strategy to melt the ice caps and global warming is being deliberately accelerated by chem trails, HAARP technology, etc. Again, just as it was in the eugenics movement of the earth 20th century, the goal of these movements, including the global warming hoax is to reduce human population. Their goal is to relocate, incarcerate, depopulate, and appropriate our property.
At this link Global Warming and Global Government,I provide notes on Dr. Michael Coffman's excellent DVD: Global Warming or Global Governance. In addition, I have assembled some pertinent quotes on global warming at quotes on the global warming hoax and a reference list on the global warming hoax at.
The Martial Law Depopulation Matrix (published in San Francisco Bay View) is a matrix of martial law legislation and executive orders for the abolition of constitutional democracy, and illegal expropriation of private property.
The Police State Roadmap:
Both the US and the UK may suspend parliamentary democracy after the next terror attacks. There is no functional reason to cancel the Constitution except for depopulation.
The new realities of Martial Law are presaged by the following:
1) The USA Patriot Act. Signed Oct 26, 2001, which undercuts our Bill of Rights freedoms
2) The North American Union and Security and Prosperity Partnership agreements (soft-law), signed March 23, 2005 created a regulatory structure for implementing the legal matrix of martial law and for extending it to Canada and Mexico (Corsi, 2007).
3) The Military Commissions Act of Sept. 28, 2006 eliminates the right of Habeas Corpus and for first time since the Civil War designates US citizens as enemy combatants.
4) The John Warner Defense Authorizaton Act undercuts the Posse Comitatus Act renames the Insurrection Act of 1807 as the enforcement of the Law to Restore the Public Order Act. This lets the president deploy troops in the US in order to deal with natural disasters, epidemics, or other serious public health emergencies, including terrorist acts, and such conditions are not defined or limited. And the president has the authority to direct all private activities and to block (confiscate) property of certain persons who threaten stabilization in Iraq. Peace marchers can be targeted under this act. .
Thus, we see that the U.S. is the “bouncer” of the international war crimes syndicate that is centered in City of London. False-flag operations such as 9/11 are needed to sucker your people into invading other countries.
9/11 is a war crime. In 1945, war has been outlawed by the Geneva Accords and the Nuremburg Tribunal. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 9/11 is a crime of genocide, a crime against humanity, a crime of genocide, and a crime of aggression. 9/11 was a crime against humanity through the use of an exotic weapon. The false flag operation was used as a pretext for illegal war of aggression against Afghanistan. In addition, The Tokyo International War Crimes Tribunal found in 2004 that the use of DU in Afghanistan constituted genocide, ecocide and omnicide. Using 9/11 as a pretext is itself a war crime.
There are at least 4 possible solutions.
1) A citizen’s war crimes justice movement.
2) In order to stop depopulation and genocide, stop HAARP and chemtrails,
3) Shift to new breakthrough energy technologies, thus, moving beyond petroleum and nuclear which are the principle tools of the war crimes organization. Breakthrough, non-polluting, fuel-less and zero-point (free) energy technologies are now sequestered by black budget National Security State, which has a $1.6 trillion budget.
4) Transform the permanent warfare economy by banning permanent warfare weapons in space, the next arena. Some 40,000 international agreements have been filed. Regarding the Simon Bolivar strategy, other countries voted 178 to 1 in Dec. 2006 at the UN general assembly to ban weapons in space.
The June 24, 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference proposed the formation of a 9/11 Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal. This would e established under jurisdiction of the already existing Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
Unfortunately, the world’s only permanent citizen’s war crimes tribunal today is the International Criminal Court (World Court), which has ignored over 240 citizens’ complaints about war crimes in Iraq. This is because the ICC is controlled by agents of the International War Crimes Racketeering Organization.
One hundred and four nations are parties to the Rome Statue of International Criminal Court. Now their national courts can enforce and prosecute war crimes. So the national courts of Chile, Argentina, Germany, Venezuela, Spain, Italy, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Bolivia now have jurisdiction. We need to ask them to prosecute the 9/11 war criminals and seek restorative justice, that is confiscate their wealth and apply towards reparations. (ETK note: However, based on Joan Veon’s research, nearly all nations now have a Rothshild-controlled central bank, which could easily crash the economy of any nation that attempted to expose the activities related to the Rothschild criminal syndicate).
We need to attack the legitimacy of Executive Order Presidential Directive 51, which was sneaked in and which essentially cancels the legislative and judicial branches of government.
Other Useful Websites: 9/11
http://www.wanttoknow.info is an excellent site that includes links to many other sites. Contributing experts include Dr. David Ray Griffen (Emeritus Professor of author of The New Pearl Harbor, and ), Peter Phillips (Professor of )
http://www.patriotsquestion911.org is the website of Alan Miller that links to 100's academics, military and government workers, and 9/11 victim's families that question the official account of what happened on September 11, 2001.
http://911scholars.org is the website of Dr. James Fetzer, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Science and the organization, Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
http://www.globalresearch.ca is the website of Canadian economics professor, Dr. Michel Chossudovsky. This site posts articles on a wide range of topics, including 9/11
The One World Government/New World Order
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Global_Governance_1.htm Global Governance: Why? How? When?- Part 1, by Henry Lamb, 1996.
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Global_Governance_2.htm Global Governance: Why? How? When? - Part 2, by Henry Lamb, 1996.
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/ggNotes.htm Global Governance: Why? How? When?- Notes (by Henry Lamb, 1996).
http://www.sovereignty.net/timeline.html Timeline to Global Governance
http://www.pehi.eu/introduction.htm - Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions
http://www.pehi.eu/organisations/Pilgrims_Society.htm Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions: Pligrims Society Membership List; Highest Level Anglo-America relations for over a century.
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo The New World Order (NWO): An Overview
http://threeworldwars.com/nwo-timeline1.htm Three World Wars: Significant Dates in the the Creation of the New World Order.
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com - Cutting Through the Matrix is the website of Alan Watt.
http://www.realjewnews.com Real Jew News: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=161 Corporate Power of the International Jew, http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=177 Federal Reserve Bank: A Private Jew Bank Strangling America!, http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=190 How the Rothschild Dynasty Operates, http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=129 The Rothschild-Israel Occult Connection
http://www.the7thfire.com/9-11/Pastore_Investigations_of_%209-11/chapter_7--Zionist_power_structure_in_America.htm Zionist Power Structure in America: An Independent Investigation of 9-11 And the War on Terrorism, by Dr. Albert D. Pastore, Ph.D.
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/WhatYouDontKnow.html About the NAU (North American Union)- What You Don't Know CAN Hurt You! By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/may2007/040507EUUS.htm EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth, by Steve Watson.
http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/260207SPP.htm Officials meet to Implement North American Union: Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in Otawa draws protests, by Steve Watson
http://www.bariumblues.com/methodic_demise_of_natural_earth.htm The Methodic Demise of Natural Earth- An Environmental Impact Overview, by Dr. R. Michael Castle
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/Earth-Weapon-Moret24feb06.htm Planet Earth As Weapon and Target, Leuren Moret, World Affairs, the Journal of International Issues, v. 9, no. 4, Winter, 2005.
http://www.haarp.net/ The Military's Pandora's Box, by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, a summary of their book "Angels Don't Play This HAARP;" http://www.haarp.net/haarpoverview.htm Project HAARP: Overview; http://www.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=1 Background of the HAARP Project, by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH; http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.p.html Washington's New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change, by Professor Michel Chossudovsky; http://www.haarp.net/mindcontrol.htm Could the HAARP Project Be For Mind Control? by Nicholas Jones.
Webmaster: Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Professor of Geography (email@example.com)