Recent Post 11.20.17 (Systems & Improvement)
Recently, the National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) released a new learning module: Module 1: Introduction to Intensive Intervention. The module, on average, takes 30-45 minutes to complete, but viewers can select components from which to choose to view and learn. The goal of the module is “to increase users’ knowledge of intensive intervention and data-based individualization (DBI)”. DBI is the method NCII uses to address intensive interventions.
Highlights of the module include:
This module seems to be a strong resource for learning about intensive interventions. Potential use of the module might include discussions within a professional learning community, small group study of the module components, or individual use of the module to meet educator needs and interests.
Lindy Beckman - MTSS Consultant
Recent Post 11.6.17 (Systems & Improvements)
For those who have been following Section 31a At- Risk, the Governor signed the supplemental budget on November 2. This means that many of the concerns brought about by changes to 31a legislation have been addressed. Here is the link to Legislation (link to Enrolled Senate Bill No. 133) and the updated 31a Documents from MDE. The following contains the updated information about Section 31a At-Risk as posted on MDEs webpage.
Program Description: Section 31a of the State School Aid Act provides funding to eligible Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) and Public School Academies (PSAs) for the intent and purposes focused on the following student outcomes: attending school regularly, reading proficiently by the end of 3rd grade, being proficient in mathematics by the end of 8th grade, and being career and college ready by high school graduation [Section 31a(1)]. An "At-Risk Pupil" is a pupil for whom the LEA has documentation that the pupil meets any of the following criteria listed in Section [31a (21)]:
Funds afforded through Section 31a At Risk are limited to instructional services and direct non-instructional services to pupils. They are intended to be spent in the current State fiscal year and may not be used for administration or other related costs. LEAs may carry over funds for one year. Legislative and technical assistance documents are available below.
Resource Materials
School Breakfast - Updated Guidance
Per Section 31a (6), LEAs operating a school breakfast program are to use up to $10/student for the costs associated with the operation of this program. This is not an optional expenditure of Section 31a funds. Please refer to Frequently Asked Questions for further guidance.
Program Reporting
The 2017-18 Section 31a Program Report (due July 15, 2018), is being revised to align with updated legislation. It will be submitted through the Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus(MEGS+). Technical Assistance on completing the Program Report will be conducted and available in late Winter-early Spring.
Program Contacts
Alison Cicinelli; Data and Grants Coordinator
Recent Post 10.30.17 (Systems & Improvement)
Carol Tomlinson is a leading expert on differentiated instruction. In her book, How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms (ASCD 2017), Tomlinson defines differentiated instruction in layman’s terms: “Differentiating instruction means ‘shaking up’ what goes on in the classroom so that students have multiple options for taking in information, making sense of ideas, and expressing what they learn.”
Differentiating instruction is a sound practice in all grade levels and does not mean creating a separate lesson plan for each student in your classroom. It is, rather, how a teacher responds to the needs of learners in a class. The teacher carefully plans specific instructional strategies to maximize learning for each student.
What to Differentiate
How to Differentiate
Carol Tomlinson discusses the non-negotiables of differentiation in a short video clip. Here she explains how differentiation depends on effective use considerations with the learning environment, curriculum, assessment, instruction, and flexible management. The resources below can guide you into taking small steps toward differentiating instruction in the classroom. Differentiation is a key component of effective Tier I instruction.
Resources:
Lindy Beckman; MTSS Consultant
Recent Post 10.16.17 (Systems & Improvements)
Since the release of Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning in 2011, many of us have heard of and read John Hattie’s research on what really matters when it comes to improving student outcomes. Did you know that Hattie continually researches and updates the Visible Learning list? Check out the 2017 list, which now contains over 250 influences on student achievement and their relative effect sizes. Through this site, you can sort the list by source of influence, by aspect, by factor, or by effect size. This is a great tool when thinking about, discussion, and choosing where to focus in classroom instruction and school improvement.
Heather Phelps - Early Literacy Consultant
September 4, 2017
On August 29, the Michigan Spring 2017 Assessment embargo was lifted and the results were released publicly. The link to the Michigan Department of Education News Release containing an overview of Statewide scores can be found HERE.
Below are few of the M-STEP highlights listed in the news release:
Of the 18 grade-subject combinations tested, 10 showed gains in the percent of students proficient or advanced. When compared to 2015 statewide results, this year’s increased proficient or advanced M-STEP scores occurred in:
Ackley, August 29, 2017, MDE News Release
To view district and building results, you can visit https://www.mischooldata.org/ to see the results. If you are new to MI School Data, CLICK HERE for a video tour for new users. A login is NOT required.
MDE has also created a number of resources for districts, schools, and parents to use to better understand the assessment results. From the August 31 Spotlight, you can find the following resources:
Alison Cicinelli - Data and Grants Coordinator
August 21, 2017
Working with many different educators, the question is often asked as to how MTSS and RtI are different. Essentially, RtI (Response to Intervention) is one component of MTSS (Multi-Tiered Systems of Support). RtI is the process of providing high-quality instruction, identifying student needs, providing specific student interventions, progress monitoring, and making decisions based on student response to the interventions. MTSS, on the other hand, includes the process of RtI, and systems for these additional components: student behavior and social-emotional learning, comprehensive assessments, problem-solving data-based staff collaborations, professional learning for staff, parent and community engagement, curriculum alignment, instructional practices, continuous school improvement, and other systems affecting student progress. MTSS is a proactive approach as compared to RtI which tends to be reactive.
In conclusion, MTSS is a much more encompassing approach to addressing all student learning needs - those at benchmark as well as struggling and accelerated learners. MTSS includes collaboration from the staff in order to meet the variety of learning needs with a strong emphasis on high-quality Tier I instruction. As the old adage states “it takes a village to raise a child”, a solid MTSS can be the village for all of our children.
"What Is the Difference Between RTI and MTSS?" What Is the Difference Between RTI and MTSS? :: OnHand Schools. 25 Aug. 2015, Web. 20 Apr. 2017.
The following chart captures some of the major differences between MTSS and RtI:
Lindy Beckman - MTSS Consultant
August 10, 2017
As we make preparations for the upcoming school year, it is a time for new faces, new schedules, new school supplies, and new educational jargon. A common understanding of key school and district improvement language is essential to have crucial and deep collaborative conversations around the continuous school improvement process. Be sure to check out the School & District Improvement Glossary created by the Michigan Department of Education’s Office of Education Improvement and Innovation as a resource.
Alison Cicinelli - Data and Grants Coordinator