The topics below cover Integrity issues that you might encounter, and some tips on how to address them. If you suspect any of such or similar issues, please contact the editor in chief immediately.
The resources and text on this page are directly from or based on resources provided by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)
What is gift or ghost authorship?
An author is added to a paper when they have not actually made a contribution to the work, perhaps to reward a collaborator, return a favor, or for some other gain. This article discusses the currently topical issue of ‘gift’ authorship.
Warning signs
an author is much more productive than is typically for their field and/or career stage (link to example case)
the contributions listed for this author in the Author Contribution section does not meet the criteria for co-authorship (widely accepted standard created by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ICMJE)
Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; AND
Final approval of the version to be published; AND
Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Link to Decision flow chart on gift authorship
Recommended action
Immediately contact the editor in chief and the managing editor about your concern.
What will happen next:
The peer review process should be suspended if suspicion is raised about authorship
When the authors have been contacted and the relevant investigation has been conducted by the journal, further action depends on whether guest, ghost, or gift authorship has been identified
Based on the journal’s findings, the authorship list should be corrected
The editor in chief may notify the authors’ institutions and reviewing the journal’s policies
Link to Decision flow chart on ethics issues
An ethical problem could be lack of ethical approval, concern about patient consent or protection, or concern about animal experimentation.
Recommended action
Immediately contact the editor in chief and the managing editor about your concern.
What will happen next:
The journal will contact the authors requesting relevant details (eg, evidence of ethics committee or institutional review board approval, or copy of informed consent documents).
If no or an unsatisfactory response is obtained, peer review should be suspended.
Consider forwarding the concerns to the authors’ employers or person responsible for research governance at the institution.
What is citation manipulation?
Citation manipulation can occur at the author level (such as excessive self citation or citation of collaborators) or during the peer review process (such as editors or journal affiliates pressure authors to include citations to artificially boost citation rates and impact factors).
Link to Decision flow chart on citation manipulation
Data manipulation can happen in many forms, such as fabricated data sheets, manipulated images (such as Western Blots), manipulated charts
Recommended action
Immediately contact the editor in chief and the managing editor about your concern.
What will happen next:
Initial steps, the journal will ask the reviewer for evidence and investigating the concerns.
The editor will then contact the authors to discuss concerns about data integrity, allowing them an opportunity to respond or clarify before proceeding with any formal actions or decisions.
Potential actions based on the journal’s findings include notifying relevant parties, rejecting the manuscript, or reporting to the authors’ institutions, depending on the severity of the misconduct identified.
What is data fabrication or manipulation?
Data manipulation is the intentional misrepresentation of research results.
Examples: fabricated data sheets, manipulated images (such as Western Blots), manipulated charts, removing outliers or “inconvenient” results, changing, adding or omitting data points
Link to Decision flow chart on data fabrication
Recommended action
Immediately contact the editor in chief and the managing editor about your concern.
What will happen next:
Initial steps, the journal will ask the reviewer for evidence and investigating the concerns.
The editor will then contact the authors to discuss concerns about data integrity, allowing them an opportunity to respond or clarify before proceeding with any formal actions or decisions.
Potential actions based on the journal’s findings include notifying relevant parties, rejecting the manuscript, or reporting to the authors’ institutions, depending on the severity of the misconduct identified
Additional resources
Image manipulation - what's OK and what's not. Editorial by Editage from 2022 (accessed 06/2025)
Visit COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) for more information
Contact the editor in chief and managing editor