MSQI is now part of the NYC Public School Literacy Collaborative! Click here to see our new site.
Just fifteen years ago, comprehension involved locating and identifying facts, combining explicitly stated ideas, and making simple inferences from single text sources. Today, our new standards demand that students analyze, interpret, integrate, critique and evaluate information within single and across multiple sources of information (National Assessment of Educational Progress, NAEP 2009). Yet, across the world only 10% of adolescents are proficient in these advanced reading comprehension skills. It is also widely recognized that building background knowledge and expanding a student's lexicon (vocabulary) are instrumental to understanding the content of text.
Therefore, the content areas - the majority of a secondary school's program in terms of daily instruction - have never been so consequential; however, our approach to literacy in the disciplines is often muted in professional learning plans. Under a content area literacy approach, teachers explicitly model these processes, then provide opportunities for students to practice them independently and in small groups. This approach is based on "the assumption that when students apply strategies for reading and writing challenging texts, they can more fully learn from and create texts in each discipline" (ILA, 2017).
Cross Content Area Resources
Visible thinking refers to resources and routines that allow teaching and learning to "extend beyond the passive transmission of knowledge from teachers to students, to engage and inform learners in and outside the classroom" (Harvard Project Zero website). By using visible thinking routines to guide students through critical thinking processes, or to frame text-based discussions, teachers can create a space where students' voices are prioritized and thinking is collaborative and multilayered.
Visible Thinking Routine Matrix
Close Reading and Comprehension Resources
Using close reading strategies and routines helps students navigate complex tests and provides a framework for deeper analysis and critical thinking. Close reading is an investigation of a text, with "multiple readings done over multiple instructional lessons. Through text- based questions and discussion, students are guided to deeply analyze and appreciate various aspects of the text, such as key vocabulary and how its meaning is shaped by context; attention to form, tone, imagery and/or rhetorical devices; the significance of word choice and syntax; and the discovery of different levels of meaning as passages are read multiple times". (Brown & Kapps, 2012).
Notice and Note Fiction: Professional Learning Guide
Supporting Underserved Readers in Content Area Classrooms PD: Session 1
Supporting Underserved Readers in Content Area Classrooms PD: Session 2
Supporting Underserved Readers in Content Area Classrooms PD: Session 3
Reciprocal Teaching in Social Studies
Reciprocal Teaching in Science
Reciprocal Teaching in ELA
Fluency Development
Academic Language and Language Acquisition Resources
Adolescent students increasingly encounter academic vocabulary in print that is not part of everyday spoken language. Some of this academic vocabulary, referred to as Tier 3 by Isabel Beck, is content-specific (e.g. photosynthesis, sarcophagus, numerator) and conveys a significant share of text meaning and discipline-related concepts. More challenging to middle and high school readers are Tier 2 academic vocabulary words whose meaning shifts depending on context (e.g. analyze, function, structure). These words are often found across multiple disciplines and, without explicit teaching and practice using the word within a disciplinary context, can impede comprehension.
Word Generation Math Lesson
Word Generation Science Lesson
Word Generation Social Studies Debate Lesson
Word Generation ELA Launch Lesson
Language Acquisition Strategies in Action
Language Acquisition Strategies
Increasing the Volume, Range, and Diversity of Text Resources
According to data that MSQI gathered from New York City middle schools, students read much less than the recommended 120 minutes per day (and the daily four hours of meaningful interaction with text that Reading Next suggests for adequate yearly progress). We are committed to increasing meaningful, independent student time on text across disciplines. Engaging with a wide range of texts and text forms, including some of students' own choosing, can help students see text all around them and to recognize the many ways in which they utilize their literacy skills every day.
MSQI Fall 2021 Book List