Faughey, D. (2020). "I Got This!" visual methods as restorative practices. English Journal, 110(2), 77-84.
Faughey’s article documents their process to include visual methods for instruction and assessment in a tenth-grade English Language Arts (ELA) and English as a New Language (ENL) class. She analyses the use of multiliteracies and transmediation for student comprehension of texts and videos in class. In this instructional research, students created graphic essays to best represent their understanding of the course material, and to eliminate the boundaries of language-based responses.
The author provides strong evidence that this restorative approach addresses the academic and social isolation that many students in her class faced, and notably (for this research), that of being an English Language Learner (ELL). As Faughey writes, “[a student] is able to understand the novel and the English language, thereby debunking the labels …mistak[ing] her multilingualism for a deficiency” (2021, p. 79). Using transformative and restorative justice theorists such as Maisha Winn, Meredith Sinclair, and Weltsek & Koontz, the author makes a strong argument for using graphic novels and representations to confront systems of oppression. However, this article uses the term ‘restorative practices’ to explain the class instruction and this may not be purely accurate. While it is restorative in that it gives ownership of their understanding of the work, the author does not demonstrate the more holistic methods that are being used to ensure restorative justice education.
While this source focuses on ELA class and does not express the use of restorative justice pedagogy or the use of talking circles in class, it is relatable to EAL learners in the context in which I am learning. I will use this source to examine visual methods for representing high-context ideas for ELLs. It will prove useful for recognizing curricular areas that could be understood and assessed in ways that do not depend on English writing to demonstrate comprehension. This will be especially relevant when deciding how to share complex ideas in sharing circles.
Ogilvie, G., & Fuller, D. (2016). Restorative Justice Pedagogy in the ESL Classroom: Creating a Caring Environment to Support Refugee Students. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, 33(10), 86-96. doi:http://dx.doi.org/1018806/tesl.v33i0.1246
The purpose of this article is to address how restorative justice (RJ) pedagogy could be utilized in a refugee-centred ESL classroom, addressing three main points. First, they review the history and origins of the RJ movement in the criminal justice system and how these methods have been transferred to school-based discipline. Further, the authors discuss the potential for RJ principles to be incorporated into the English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom to hear authentic student voices and build community and healing among refugee students. Thirdly, the article discusses a pragmatic method for incorporating RJE into ESL pedagogy.
The authors acknowledge the Indigenous ideologies as the foundation of RJE, making direct connections between the interconnectedness of all to a healthy state of well-being, and how this may be transferred to a trauma-informed learning environment for refugee and other ESL students. Using research from key authors in the field and drawing upon the origins of the RJ movement, this article makes an undeniable claim for the importance of community and relationships for refugee students. Furthermore, they demonstrate the conflict of building relationships for learning within an authoritarian and discipline-focused school setting. The article provides valuable research to recognize the deficit-driven approach used when teaching newcomer students, and how we can change this mode of thinking.
This work is important as I examine RJ pedagogy to create Circles that are inclusive of all language levels, backgrounds, and experiences. It provides both evidence-based materials and pragmatic uses of ESL engagement in RJE. The authors do an excellent job of showing how RJ pedagogy is an authentic practice to draw out knowledge from refugee students who have experienced a rich non-formal education. Furthermore, using RJ practices with refugee youth creates a community with others who have similar life experiences, and this informs how I will create these Circles.
Terry, M. (2017). Restorative practices and English language learners: Language development in relational contexts. In Restorative Justice Meets Social Justice (pp. 89-105). Information Age Publishing.
The central purpose of this case study is to outline and explore the value of the “Fair Process” of restorative justice education (RJE) that is embedded into an international high school situation in the United States. Specifically, it details how this practice addresses the needs of newcomer English Language Learners (ELLs) and, “create[s] a restorative space where historically marginalized students thrive” (2017, p. 90).
This was a valuable study that used critical research methods to demonstrate how newcomer students have higher graduation rates when engaged in relationship-building methods such as RJE. This evidence was juxtaposed with external ELL statistics that show higher rates of suspensions, expulsions, disengagement, and eventual dropouts. The authors outline three key components in this case study prioritizing restorative environments that focus on relationships: student intake surveys; hand-crafting classes with whole-staff input; and curricular choices for student needs. Their study demonstrated a critical need for RJ engagement throughout the school community, and not only with circle reflections. The authors effectively show the need for relationships to be at the centre of all school interactions, and that utilizing the prior knowledge and whole student to inform learning is the key to meeting learning needs.
This case study is very useful for me as I focus on methods to include ELLs in responsive Circles. Valuing the diversity and contributions of newcomer learners in our programs is critical. It has supported my understanding that to create a culturally responsive environment we must reflect all learners throughout the school culture, not only in Circle sessions.
Winn, M. (2018). History, Race, Justice, and Language: Four Pedagogical Stances to Practice Restorative Justice. In M. Winn, Justice on Both Sides: Transforming Education through Restorative Justice (pp. 29-49). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
In this chapter, Winn provides a conceptual framework for using restorative justice education (RJE). The author recognizes the grand scale of change that is required for institutions to approach classrooms and student relationships from such a fundamentally different perspective and offers four pedagogical stances that are nested within each other. These include 1) History Matters, 2) Race Matters, 3) Justice Matters, and 4) Language Matters, encircling each other from the outside in, respectively. Winn acknowledges this pedagogical change as paradigm-shifting and outlines how we must, “recognize and affirm the importance and interconnectedness of history, race, justice, and language” to problem solve.
Of particular interest for my research is the section Language Matters. This part details how our frames or assumptions are embedded in, and shaped by, language and metaphor. The language that we use in our institutions creates a deficit framing of students before we even meet them, and this is especially true for ELLs. Furthermore, the author writes a powerful argument that BIPOC people are owed an education debt from years of erasure and colonization of their schooling. Winn asks critical questions including, “Who belongs? Who doesn’t? Who looks the part? Who sounds and behaves the part” (2018, p.40 ) Conversely, the author requires us to recognize who traditionally has been worthy of restoration. What group gets to decide this, and who or what are we restoring? ( 2018, p.
This chapter has had a profound effect on my learning. As detailed above, these questions are fundamental ones in English as an Additional Language (EAL) education. She calls upon “a time to listen”, which is something that ELLs rarely get to be a part of. This will inform how I approach my project of creating methods of inclusion in Circle discussions for newcomer students.
Nov 16, 2023
Restorative justice is increasingly applied in schools worldwide to manage classrooms and create inclusive, socially connected, and supportive learning environments for every student. Restorative practices help students develop self-advocacy and social-emotional skills and address conflict at the same time they are building academic competencies. This experiential webinar will help participants explore the needs of diverse learners including students with disabilities and English language learners, identify restorative applications for supporting these students and their families, and accommodate differences when circle-keeping. Attendees will learn methods for removing barriers to participation for students with disabilities that are beneficial for all. During this session, facilitators will also demonstrate how facilitation and training of restorative practices in bilingual classrooms support the social emotional needs of students and staff by recognizing the diversity of languages spoken and taught in the school community, developing positive relationships through languages and deepening cultural competency.
This information sheet uses comprehensive approaches for reaching a diversity of learners, including ELLs. For beginners in this area- EAL teachers new to rje, or rje practitioners workign to reach ELLs, this material provides valuable information.