2026 Sesssion A URF Presentation
Principle Investigator
Advisors
Girls tend to display higher rates of inattentive ADHD symptoms than boys (Hinshaw, 2022)
Girls with inattentive ADHD symptoms are at risk for peer victimization (Elkins et al., 2011), due to deficits in emotion regulation and inappropriate social behaviors (Soucisse et al., 2015)
Girls most often experience social victimization (e.g., spreading rumors, ignoring) (Rose & Rudolph, 2006)
Teachers can serve as a protective factor against peer victimization for girls with inattentive ADHD symptoms (Iznardo et al., 2023).
Positive student-teacher relationships can promote self-regulation and prosocial skills (Iznardo et al., 2023)
Self-regulation and prosocial skills are associated with lower rates of peer victimization (Bustinza et al., 2022)
Aim: Test positive and negative student-teacher relationships as moderators of the relation between girls with inattentive ADHD symptoms and social victimization.
Hyp1: Higher amounts of a positive student-teacher relationship will weaken the relation between girls with inattentive symptoms and social victimization and impairment
Hyp2: Higher amounts of a negative student-teacher relationship will strengthen the relation between girls with inattentive symptoms and social victimization and impairment
Miami University PSY 112 students (n= 140, Mage= 18.84 ± 0.96, 97.9% cisgender women, 90.7% White) completed an online self-report survey in March 2026
Inattentive symptoms: Current report of the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV (BAARS-IV; Barkley, 2011; a=.91)
Social Victimization: Retrospective report (i.e., 9th grade) of the Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument social subscale (Balan et al., 2022; a=.92)
Impairment: The Bully Survey – Student Version (BYS-S;Hamburger et al., 2011; a = .80)
Student-Teacher Relationship: Retrospective report (i.e., 9th grade) of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (Brinkworth et al., 2018; a=.90 for positive subscale and a=.81 for negative subscale)
Participants completed the positive subscale for a teacher they were close to, and the negative subscale for a teacher they did not get along with
This project was approved by the IRB at Miami University (#02455r)
RESULTS
Bivariate correlations were in expected directions (Table 1)
Inattentive symptoms positively and strongly correlated to social victimization and impairment
Student-teacher positive relationship negatively correlated to impairment
Student-teacher negative relationship positively correlated to impairment
The type of student-teacher relationship did not change the strength of the relation between inattention and victimization
Main effects were explored through four regression models (Table 2)
Inattentive symptoms predict social victimization and impairment over and above student-teacher relationships
DISCUSSION
Consistent with literature, inattentive symptoms in girls strongly related to peer victimization (Hinshaw, 2022).
Inattention predicts social victimization over and above the influence of student-teacher relationships, but positive relationships still contain avenues for support
A positive student-teacher relationship is correlated with lower impairment of peer victimization, but not frequency
When victimization has occurred, this relationship can generally be protective for all students. For example, peer victimization exacerbates inattention and executive dysfunction (Aguado-Gracia et al., 2021) but having a trusted teacher is related to lower internalizing problems (Reinke et al., 2024)
This sample reported low levels of inattention and social victimization/impairment
Future studies might look at a clinical population of inattentive ADHD rather than inattention on a continuous scale
Prior studies that indicated student-teacher relationships as protective against peer victimization were on younger populations (e.g., Iznardo and colleagues (2023) studied 6-12 year olds)
For high school students, peer relationships might be more protective (Kok et al., 2016)
Future studies might sample high school students, as retrospective reporting impacts recalled memory of experiences (Hassan, 2005)
The following is an image of poster presented at the 2026 Undergraduate Research Forum
Aguado-Gracia, J., Mundo-Cid, P., Lopez-Seco, F., Acosta-García, S., Cortes-Ruiz, M. J.,
Vilella, E., & Masana-Marín, A. (2021). Lifetime Victimization in Children and
Adolescents With ADHD. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP3241–NP3262.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518771680
Balan, R., Dobrean, A., Balazsi, R., Parada, R. H., & Predescu, E. (2022). The Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument- Bully/Target: Measurement Invariance Across Gender, Age, and Clinical Status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), 1484–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922350
Barkley, R. A. (2011). Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale–IV (BAARS–IV) [Assessment
manual]. Guilford Press.
Bear, G., Yang, C., Mantz, L., Harris, A., & Hearn, S. (2021). Technical manual for the
Delaware School Survey: Scales of school climate, bullying victimization, student
engagement; positive, punitive, and social emotional learning techniques; and social and
emotional competencies. Center for Disabilities Studies, University of Delaware.
Brinkworth, M. E., McIntyre, J., Juraschek, A. D., & Gehlbach, H. (2018). Teacher-student relationships: The positives and negatives of assessing both perspectives. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.09.002
Bustinza, C.C., Adams, R. E., Claussen, A. H., Vitucci, D., Danielson, M. L., Holbrook, J. R.,
Charania, S. N., Yamamoto, K., Nidey, N., & Froehlich, T. E. (2022). Factors Associated With Bullying Victimization and Bullying Perpetration in Children and Adolescents With ADHD: 2016 to 2017 National Survey of Children Health. Journal of attention disorders, 26(12), 1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547221085502
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and
Behavioral Correlates of a Measure of Prosocial Tendencies for Adolescents. The Journal
of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
Carucci, S., Narducci, C., Bazzoni, M., Balia, C., Donno, F., Gagliano, A., & Zuddas, A. (2023). Clinical characteristics, neuroimaging findings, and neuropsychological functioning in attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder: Sex differences. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 101(5), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25038
Connors, L. L., Connolly, J., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Self-Reported Inattention in Early
Adolescence in a Community Sample. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(1), 60–70.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054710379734
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed). (2013). American
psychiatric association.
Elkins, I. J., Malone, S., Keyes, M., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2011). The Impact of
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder on Preadolescent Adjustment May Be Greater
for Girls Than for Boys. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(4),
532–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.581621
Faheem, M., Akram, W., Akram, H., Khan, M. A., Siddiqui, F. A., & Majeed, I. (2022). Gender-based differences in prevalence and effects of ADHD in adults: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 75, 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103205
Gambone, M. A., Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2002). Finding out what matters for youth: Testing key links in a community action framework for youth development (Report).
Youth Development Strategies, Inc. & Institute for Research and Reform in Education.
Hamburger, M. E., Basile, K. C., & Vivolo, A. M. (2011). Measuring Bullying Victimization, Perpetration, and Bystander Experiences: A Compendium of Assessment Tools: (580662011-001) [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.1037/e580662011-001
Hinshaw, S. P. (2022). Straight talk about ADHD in girls: how to help your daughter thrive.
Guilford Press.
Iznardo, M., Ryan, J., Rogers, M., McKibbin, S., Piers, L., & Hogan, T. (2023). Examining
Resiliency in Children With Learning Disabilities and Co-occurring ADHD Symptoms:
The Protective Role of a Close Teacher-Student Relationship. Learning Disabilities.
Kamal, M., Al-Shibli, S., Shahbal, S., & Yadav, S. K. (2021). Impact of attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder and gender differences on academic and social difficulties among
adolescents in Qatari Schools. Qatar Medical Journal, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2021.11
Kok, F. M., Groen, Y., Fuermaier, A. B. M., & Tucha, O. (2016). Problematic Peer Functioning in Girls with ADHD: A Systematic Literature Review. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165119
Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012).
Kindness counts: prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance
and well-being. PloS one, 7(12), e51380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051380
Mastrokoukou, S., Berchiatti, M., Badenes-Ribera, L., Galiana, L., & Longobardi, C. (2025). Bullying in Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Analyzing Students’ Social Status and Student–Teacher Relationship Quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060878
Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., Huang, F. L., Glenn-Perez, A. L., Raut, P., Aguayo, D., Venkat, S., Boddie, D., Harris, J. M., & Owens, S. (2025). Having a Trusted Adult in School: Concurrent and Predictive Relations With Internalizing Problems Across Development. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 27(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241276534
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
Schonwald, A., Cormier, D., & McCafferty, S. (Eds.). (2025). ADHD in Adolescents: A
Comprehensive Guide. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 96950-8
Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2003). Adolescents’ emotion regulation in daily life: links to depressive symptoms and problem behavior. Child development, 74(6),
1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00643.x
Simmons, J. A., & Antshel, K. M. (2021). Bullying and Depression in Youth with ADHD: A Systematic Review. Child & Youth Care Forum, 50(3), 379–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09586-x
Ten Bokkel, I. M., Roorda, D. L., Maes, M., Verschueren, K., & Colpin, H. (2023). The Role of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships in Bullying and Peer Victimization: A
Multilevel Meta-Analysis. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 110–129.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2029218
Career + Self Development: This project helped solidify my passion for psychological research, and helped me hone in on a specific topic.
Critical thinking: This project pushed me to develop my own research questions by gathering multiple sources and finding where gaps existed in the literature.
Teamwork: I worked with my advisors weekly to develop this project. I listened carefully to their instructions and came prepared with my own ideas..
Equity and Inclusion: This project looks to highlight girls with ADHD because there is a comparative lack of research for this group of individuals.
https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/career-readiness-defined/