A Shared Underwater Network emulAtion dataset (ASUNA)

The underwater channel is a fast frequency-selective-time-varying environment that is hard to model. For this reason, a reliable comparison of algorithms and protocols designed for UWAN is challenging, and common approaches rely mostly on sea experiments for performance validation. Yet, while experiments represents well the performance in the instantaneous tested environment, they cannot validate performance over a verity of scenarios. In particular, robustness to sea conditions and to network topology structures cannot be explored via a singular test point. Considering this challenge, we share our database of recorded time-varying topologies in multiple sea experiments with the aim that this will serve as the benchmark to test and compare UWAN solutions. Our database is very diverse, including multiple time-varying topology structures, multimodal communication technologies, and a verity of link quality measures. The database will be extended as new data becomes available from the UWAN community. We provide the details of the database structure, the list of recorded topologies, and an example on how to use the database as an emulation system to test in-lab the performance of a scheduling protocol in a realistic scenario. We freely share both the database information and description and the emulation code over a designated web server.

Download demonstration files how to use emulation (click to download)

downloads

Experiment, Data,

Organizer, location

Experiment Setting &

Hardware Used

Topology Metrics &

Recording Measure

Haifa harbor, Israel;

May 2009;

Rafael Ltd;

32.471285, 34.876159

4 boats moved in harbor created 6

topologies;

Self modems: ITC transceivers,

BrÜel & Kjaer transceivers, NI data

acquisition, laptop processing

effective bit error rate per 5 s

Raw acoustic measurements

Security: Hadera, Israel;

May 2017;

U. Haifa;

32.824165, 35.000870

  • 6 nodes (2 drifting boats, 3 anchored buoys, 1 from pier) communicated in sparse topology;
  • On boats: 2 EvoLogics 7-17 software defined modems and on pier 1 EvoLogics 7-17 software defined modem ; signal generation and processing over laptops;
  • On buoys: 2 RUDAR-mk2 recorders

symbol energy to noise ratio

Raw acoustic measurements

Garda lake, Italy;

Dec 2015;

U. Padova;

45.504283, 10.723853

4 boats (5 nodes) moved in lake created 4 topologies;

5 EvoLogics 18-34 modems, network

layer over laptops

RSSI

Modem’s logs

Werbellin lake, Germany;

Jun 2016;

EvoLogics;

52.923195, 13.715654

3 boats and station on pier (5 nodes)

moved in lake created 5 multimodal

topologies

10 EvoLogics modems (18-34, 48-78,

HS), network layer over laptops

transmission success per 1 s

Modem’s logs

Alomex:

Maroco & Western Sahara;

Jul 2016;

CMRE, NATO;

30.477298, -10.035655 &

26.200657, -15.249750

3 nodes deployed from one vessel

recorded links

3 EvoLogics 18-34 modems, network

layer over laptops

RSSI from the modem logs

Scheduling: Hadera, Israel;

May 2017;

U. Haifa;

32.824165, 35.000870

4 nodes (2 drifting boats, 2 from pier)

communicated and created 2 topologies

On boats: 3 EvoLogics modems

(7-17,18-34) on pier 3 EvoLogics (7-17,

18-34) modems, signal generation and

processing over laptops

RSSI and integrity

Modem’s logs

REP16-A

4 EvoLogics 18-34 modems

Laptops


Modem’s logs - transmission success