To earn authorship on a scholarly publication, a person should have contributed directly to the work in a meaningful and substantive way.
All collaborators in a project should evaluate their own and each other's roles and contributions to determine if and where they should be included in the list of authors. This assessment should take into account each contributor's role.
Authorship requires direct contribution to each of the following aspects:
planning and executing some aspect of the study (conception, design, execution, analysis, interpretation) that led to the manuscript
writing of the draft or substantive editing and revising of the scholarly content
reading and approval of the finalized manuscript, at least of the aspects relevant to their roles and contributions
Please use the most current guidelines for inclusive attribution of authorship, such as guidelines developed by the British Ecological Society.
TBD
Authorship (Committee on Publication Ethics COPE)
Contributor Roles Taxonomy CRediT - a tool to determine contributor roles for traditional academic collaborators; please use the expanded tool below for a more inclusive approach to attributing co-authorship
How CRediT helps shift from authorship to contributorship (journal article)
Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research (journal article, 2021)
How to Handle Co-authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It into the Paper (journal article, 2021)
Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (journal article, 2021)
Guidance on Authorship in Scholarly or Scientific Publications (Yale University resource)