Important Announcement: Journal status update, Garuda indexation, and the separation of OJS systems.
Prasita Ayu Widyaningtyas
Departemen Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Airlangga
Keywords: policy, implementation, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), AcquiredImmuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
ABSTRACT
Indonesia is the fourth country with the number of HIV / AIDS incidents increasing from year to year. HIV is a virus that can cause AIDS. The occurrence of AIDS can not only occur in the city but has spread to remote villages. The number of HIV / AIDS incidents at this time is of concern to the world. Until the existence of an HIV / AIDS control policy that refers to the Getting To Zeros global policy, namely: (1) reducing to eliminate new HIV infections, (2) reducing to eliminate deaths caused by conditions related to AIDS, (3) eliminating discrimination PLWHA. Based on global policies, the Indonesian government issued a policy as an effort to prevent the spread of HIV / AIDS. The government also issued a policy which essentially prohibits sexual acts freely, penetration, and sexual relations in similar couples, children, deceased people, and animals. This review aims to conduct policy analysis and implementation in dealing with HIV / AIDS cases through free sexual relations and barriers that affect the success of policies. The results of this literature review are that the policy to prevent HIV / AIDS transmission in Indonesia is still not going well. These obstacles occur in the form of still a dilemma in the law. Evidenced by the existence of problems in translating global and national strategies into packages of (operational) action programs that easily measure success at all levels of service by considering the problem of HIV / AIDS. So far, the action programs carried out by Indonesia are still carried out inconsistently so that the results have not been felt. Thus, HIV / AIDS control programs are not enough to be carried out by health workers alone but must involve other sectors. The community is primarily a key population and the need for government roles and responsibilities.
REFERENCES
1] Baba, I. (2005)HIV/AIDS: Cabaran dan kesan kepada masyarakat malaysia. In R. Omar & S. Pandian (Eds.), Malaysia Isu-isu Sosial Semasa. Kuala Lumpur: Unit Penerbitan ISM Kementerian Pembangunan, Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat.
2] Kemenkes RI. (2016)Program Pengendalian HIV AIDS dan PIMS. In Petunjuk Teknis Program Pengendalian HIV AIDS dan PIMSFasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama. http://siha.depkes.go.id/portal/files_upload/4__Pedoman_Fasyankes_Primer_ok.pdf
3] KemenkesRI. (2015)Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2015: Kemenkes RI.
4] Kemenkes RI. (2017)Data dan Informasi Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2016. Kementerian Kesehatan RI
5] Laksana, A. S. (2010)Faktor-Faktor Risiko Penularan HIV/AIDS Pada Laki-laki Dengan Orientasi Seks Heteroseksual dan Homoseksual di Purwokerto. Mandala of Health.
6] Ginting, M.L.B. (2017)CriticalPolicy Analysis Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 21 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penanggulangan AIDS di Kota Semarang
7] Nitimihardjo, C. (2015)Perempuan dan HIV/AIDS[Online]. Available: http://febriyanjokoleksono.blogspot.co.id/2015/01/perempuan-danhivaids.html [Accessed 19 September 2018].
8] Arifin, N. (2005)Membuka mata masyarakat: Menghapus diskriminasi dan stigma perempuan dengan HIV/AIDS. Jurnal Perempuan, 43, 49-59.
9] PKBI Yogya. (2016)Orientasi Seksualitas (online),(http://pkbi-diy.info/?page_id=3489, diakses 19 September 2018 pukul 15.47 WIB)
10] Tasa, Y. (2016)Pemanfaatan Voluntary Counseling And Testing Oleh Ibu Rumah Tangga Terinfeksi Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, ISSN 1858-1196
11] Naco. (2017)Paving the Way for an AIDS Free India. New Delhi: UNAIDS India