Numbers, Time, and the Counting Process


John L. Waters


Use down arrow or vertical scroll bar

to view whole page!


Numbers, Time, and the Counting Process


John L. Waters


February 25, 2001


Copyright 2001 by John L. Waters. All Rights

Reserved

-------------------------------------------------------


(Revision of second paper entitled "What Counts?")


In front of Wall Mart, with the hundred and ten pound

family Great Dane "Poochie" standing by, a gleeful

five year old boy is counting his hops. He's hopped

out from under the sheltering eaves of the building.

"One, two, three, four, five, six," he shrieks again

and again.


The young man is elated in his newfound mathematical

ability. He's getting soaked in the rain but his

attention's on hopping and counting. Moreover, the

boy's parents are inside shopping so they aren't aware

of his ecstatic behavior. So to the consternation of

several passersby, the lad keeps on enjoying himself


In the kitchen of an Iowa farmhouse a whistling girl

sits in a chair happily counting eggs and putting

them into egg cartons. Her right hand grasps one egg

after another and moves the food item from a wire

basket containing more than a hundred similar items.

She carefully places each oblate spheroid in a

styrofoam carton holding eleven others. Her hand

follows the same path over and over. The hours creep

by.


3. In front of his class, a grey-bearded pedant

wearing a tuxedo is meticulously counting one bean at

a time, and marking on a notepad a stroke for each

bean, to determine exactly how many beans are in

bathtub filled with beans. The man's doing this to

illustrate an important point. Furthermore, after

sitting in a chair for fifty minutes, each student

understands. The silent man's body is going through

cyclic motions reminiscent of an oil rig pumping

black gold from beneath the Arabian sands. And as the

man repeats the same body movement, a recording he's

put on the CD player repeats the nonsensical chant,

"unkachunka, unkachunka, unkachunka", and the clock

keeps on ticking off the minutes tickaclick,

tickaclick, tickaclick, like a frog chirping on a cool

night without feeling the urge to dream up any esteric

philosophy or theoretical mathematics.


A mechanical boy resting on his hands and shins is

rocking on his bed, repeating the same body movements

as he hums the same tune over and over. After forty

minutes he has hummed this theme over fifty times. At

five AM he is standing in the pantry counting the

number of rotations of a phonograph record spinning on

the turntable as he listens to the same tune for the

nineteenth time. This autistic boy is intrigued by

mechanical, repetitious activity, and he counts

objects for the sheer delight of doing so. When people

walk by he pays no attention to them.


Over a broad expanse of water shimmering in the

moonlight, a robust man is rowing a small boat.

Sitting in the bow, his lady friend counts the number

of strokes he makes. The man's body rocks forward and

back, forward and back, forward and back, and

sometimes he grunts with delight. But the woman

records only numbers. She doesn't record the man's

vocalizations. Later, when the numbers are

contemplated, no record of the vocalizations and the

body movements exist in a tangible, physical form.


On page 126 of a tattered Mother Goose book there's a

picture of a grandfather clock. One can almost see

the ticking of that large mechanical clock, with its

fourfoot long brass pendulum swinging like a liana

with a jungle boy or a monkey hanging on at the bottom

of it. But we aren't supposed to think about the law

of the pendulum. We aren't supposed to think about

Mother Goose or about what is living in the Jungle.

Instead, we are going to think about the

cyclic-repetitive process by which any counter records

the number of strokes. Each time the boy swings past,

each time the pendulum makes a stroke, the system

returns to its former position and the cycle repeats.

This goes on for days and days.


You can observe the cyclic-repetitive movement in

small clocks and in large clocks. Furthermore, when

you look in the back of an old-fashioned mechanical

clock you see a tiny wheel rocking back and forth with

an attached spring which returns the wheel to its

former position. In an electronic modern watch or

clock there's a quartz crystal with vibrating atoms in

it. It's the vibration in these atoms that the clock

uses to keep accurate time. The clock is just

counting the vibrations of these atoms.


Other clocks work off sixty-cycle electric current.

When you stand near an electric clock you hear the

low pitched hum. The clock is filling the air with a

musical monotone. If you could slow down the number

of beats per second from sixty to forty to twenty to

five to four to three, you would certainly see how

counting is actually just naming musical beats as they

pass by.


The person who is counting beans in a jar or musical

beats in a symphony is just beating out time, counting

time, and reckoning time. The man rowing his boat

across the lake is just counting time, and reckoning

time. The autistic boy rocking for hours on his bed

is enjoying the pleasures of being mechanical,

mechanistic, mathematical, and perfectly in tune with

the physical universe.


The foregoing examples and illustrations help us

understand what we do as we become more aware of time

and counting time. As we are counting numbers and

counting time we are using the same process. As young

mathematicians and clock-obsessed timekeepers, we also

are nascent band leaders. However in dwelling upon

abstractions, we may miss a lot of the joy in our

bodies, and we may become deaf to the music of

existence.


Being true to the dominant cultural ideology of their

times, the ancient theoretical mathematicians

abstracted the idea of counting numbers away from the

actual process of counting and keeping time. The

first mathematical theorists disassociated the idea of

counting numbers and the idea of reckoning time away

from the working physical body. The ancients theorized

about the idea of number and the idea of time without

considering the naked facts about how children

actually learn to count numbers and how clocks

actually count the many small durations of time. This

traditional dissociation of the imaginative "mind"

from the actual physical brain and body has led to the

conventional modern idea that numbers are only "in the

mind" or "in the imagination." This cleavage occurred

because the ancient theoretical philosophers failed to

focus on the actual mechanical action that truly does

the counting both in clocks and in persons.


Counting durations of space is the same as counting

durations of time. Look at people counting the number

of steps they take, and the number of units of

distance they must travel. Automatic speedometers

count the number of rotations in a wheel whose exact

circumference is known. Practically speaking, we

reckon times and distances using the same counting

process. Either we count numbers mechanically or we

use a mechanical device which counts numbers.


If we use the same counting process to reckon both

distance and time, then a general theory of counting

numbers and numbering is precicely a theory about what

exists "beyond space and time." This theory is about

what young school children are taught to do in order

to become conscious of both time and space, but with

the school's increasing emphasis on abstractions

removed from tangible physical reality, the child is

never made conscious of what clocks and other

mechanical counters are actually doing!

One consequence of this error is that years later,

when a person studies under an Oriental Master and the

Master teaches the adult to forget about the intellect

and the reasoning, verbal mind, the disciple gradually

comes to focus upon doing that very same thing and

devotes his or her attention to just that, then the

person who succeeds loses all his or her customary

focus upon what is in time and in space.


Without understanding what has been going on inside

his or her brain, the person has become focused on the

purely physical non-verbal "somatic" realm, not the

abstract, mental, intellectual, rational-verbal realm

of traditional Western culture. This physical and

somatic realm is governed by purely mathematical laws,

not by wordiness and reasoned, sequential thinking.

But the philosophers are still not able to explain

what the mystics perceive, in terms of what is

observable in real life. The reason for all this

confusion is the refusal of the ancient theorists to

pay careful attention to the workings of real objects

in the tangible and physical world.


When we go back and read the writings of Aristotle,

this habit of the ancients doesn't surprise us.

Genius that he was, Aristotle preferred to review

academic knowledge and catalog it than actually step

out into the physical world and record events fresh

from the world. We note, also, that modern children

are expected to pay attention to words, and to

persons' ideas, conversations, and thoughts, rather

than focus upon physical objects and body movements.

As a consequence a child who fails to pay attention to

words and to people is said to be disturbed,

psychopathological, autistic or braindamaged. This

child is even likely to be forced to take mind-numbing

and brain damaging medication.


The antiquated cultural traditions live on and on and

on and on and on.


2:38PM Saturday, February 24, 2001


John L. Waters


johnlwaters@yahoo.com


The information on this page represents that of John Waters and not

necessarily that of Humboldt State University. John Waters takes full

responsibility for the information presented.


This page is maintained by: John Waters