Addressing the Philippines’ debt issues requires a combination of fiscal reforms, efficient resource allocation, and growth-driven policies. One effective solution is improving tax collection systems, particularly through digitalization, which can curb tax evasion and ensure broader compliance (Department of Finance [DOF], 2023). Expanding the tax base by including digital services and revisiting tax exemptions could also increase government revenues (Philstar, 2023). To mitigate the risks of foreign debt, prioritizing domestic borrowing reduces exposure to currency fluctuations and interest rate changes (ABS-CBN News, 2023).
On the expenditure side, addressing inefficiencies in government spending is essential. Regular audits and stricter enforcement of budgetary controls can ensure that public funds are spent on high-impact areas like infrastructure, education, and healthcare (Philstar, 2023). Public-private partnerships (PPPs) provide a feasible alternative for funding infrastructure projects, as they leverage private capital without adding to public debt (ABS-CBN News, 2023). Additionally, fostering economic growth through reforms in sectors like agriculture and manufacturing can boost exports, strengthening the country’s fiscal standing (DOF, 2023).
Encouraging innovation, entrepreneurship, and foreign investments can also drive job creation and increase foreign exchange reserves (DOF, 2023). Long-term policies focused on education, technology, and infrastructure will sustain economic growth and reduce reliance on debt in the future (Philstar, 2023). By diversifying its economy and improving financial inclusion, the Philippines can build resilience against future debt challenges and lay the foundation for sustained growth.
How did the Former/Current Presidents combat the National Debt?
During Corazon Aquino’s time as president, she acknowledged and paid for the debt of the Marcos government and she accumulated around $4.75 billion (in actual debt) (Republic of the Philippines Bureau of Treasury, 2021). Aquino’s government implemented measures to manage the national debt; the measures were mainly to reduce government expenditures and increase input of money through raising taxes and charges. They first raised the income taxes. Next, they transferred the debt of private corporations to the national government. They also removed government subsidies for the control of the price of rice and increased charges exacted by public utility corporations. Lastly, the government enacted limits on their employees’ expenses (1991, Pineda-Ofreneo).
During his presidency (1992–1998), Fidel V. Ramos implemented strategic economic reforms to address the Philippines' substantial national debt and improve fiscal stability. He inherited a heavy debt burden from previous administrations, with a significant portion allocated to debt servicing, which constrained public spending. His administration focused on several key measures as seen below.
By the end of his term, Ramos had stabilized the economy and laid a foundation for growth. Although challenges like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis affected the region, his policies helped the Philippines manage its vulnerabilities better than some of its neighbors (ASEAN, 2023).
Privatization of Government Assets: Under Ramos’s administration, privatization was used as a key strategy to address fiscal challenges. The government sold off state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to generate revenue, which was used to manage the national debt and reduce fiscal deficits (World Bank, 1998). This approach not only provided immediate financial relief but also shifted operational inefficiencies from the public to the private sector, enabling better management and innovation. For example, the privatization of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) led to significant improvements in water distribution and service quality (ASEAN, 2023). Additionally, the privatization of energy and telecommunications sectors resulted in expanded access to services and modernized infrastructure. These reforms encouraged competition among private players, driving service enhancements and cost reductions for consumers (Sinaunang Panahon, 2023). By relieving the government of the financial burden of managing unprofitable enterprises, privatization contributed to economic stability and enhanced investor confidence in the Philippines. Ramos's privatization initiatives ultimately became a cornerstone of his administration’s broader fiscal and economic reform agenda (ASEAN, 2023; World Bank, 1998).
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Framework: The Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) framework introduced under Ramos allowed private firms to construct and manage infrastructure projects before transferring them back to the government after a specified period. This framework mitigated government spending on costly projects, making resources available for other critical sectors such as education and healthcare (ASEAN, 2023). One notable success was the construction of the North Luzon Expressway and new power plants, which addressed chronic energy shortages and improved connectivity across regions (Sinaunang Panahon, 2023). The BOT system attracted foreign and domestic private investors, who were incentivized by opportunities for long-term revenue from user fees. Furthermore, these projects boosted employment during their implementation phases and contributed to regional development. By leveraging private sector capital and expertise, the BOT framework accelerated infrastructure modernization without exacerbating the national debt (World Bank, 1998). The policy also set a precedent for public-private partnerships in the Philippines, providing a sustainable model for future development efforts (ASEAN, 2023; Sinaunang Panahon, 2023).
Deregulation and Liberalization: Ramos’s deregulation and liberalization policies aimed to reduce bureaucratic hurdles and open the Philippine economy to global competition. His administration focused on cutting red tape to attract foreign investment, improving ease of doing business, and encouraging entrepreneurship (Sinaunang Panahon, 2023). A significant achievement was the Philippines’ accession to the World Trade Organization in 1995, which allowed greater market access for Filipino exports and promoted international trade partnerships (World Bank, 1998). Additionally, participation in the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) enhanced regional integration and trade opportunities by reducing tariffs on goods traded among member states. These reforms diversified the economy by fostering growth in emerging sectors like manufacturing and technology (ASEAN, 2023). Deregulation also spurred competition in the banking, telecommunications, and energy sectors, improving services and expanding access. By liberalizing economic policies, Ramos created a business-friendly environment that stimulated both domestic and foreign investments, contributing to sustained economic growth during his term (World Bank, 1998; ASEAN, 2023).
Tax System Reforms: Fidel Ramos implemented comprehensive tax system reforms aimed at expanding the tax base and improving collection efficiency. By closing loopholes and increasing enforcement measures, his administration reduced tax evasion, significantly boosting government revenue (World Bank, 1998). One of his notable initiatives was the implementation of the Expanded Value-Added Tax (EVAT), which broadened the scope of taxable goods and services, generating a steady revenue stream for the government (ASEAN, 2023). These reforms were essential for financing infrastructure projects, social programs, and public services without increasing reliance on external borrowing. Additionally, the improved tax system enhanced fiscal transparency and accountability, further encouraging both domestic and foreign investments by creating a stable economic environment (World Bank, 1998). Ramos's focus on tax reforms contributed to reducing the fiscal deficit and allowed the Philippines to allocate more resources toward national debt repayment, improving the country’s overall fiscal health (ASEAN, 2023).
Debt Management: Ramos's administration implemented strategic measures to consolidate fiscal policy and improve the country's credit standing. By focusing on reducing the fiscal deficit and increasing foreign direct investments, his government enhanced international confidence in the Philippines' economic trajectory (World Bank, 1998). The improved credit rating to BB+ in 1997 reduced borrowing costs for the country, lowering the interest burden on national debt and freeing up resources for development programs (ASEAN, 2023). Fiscal discipline was complemented by structural reforms in trade and privatization, which attracted capital inflows and diversified revenue sources, mitigating the risks of over-reliance on debt (World Bank, 1998). These efforts ensured that debt servicing remained manageable while maintaining fiscal stability, even during external shocks like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Ramos’s debt management approach laid a foundation for sustainable growth by reducing vulnerabilities to future economic disruptions (ASEAN, 2023).
During his presidency, Benigno Aquino III (A.K.A Noynoy Aquino) was able to lead the country to a gross domestic product (GDP) average of 6.5%. Ways he did to achieve this include a tax reform he pursued, named the “Sin Tax Reform Law of 2012,” which aimed to both lessen tobacco and alcohol use in the Philippines, while also funding health programs, which creates fiscal space for public investments, while also reducing budget gap, by increasing the taxes on tobacco and alcohol products (Punongbayan, 2021). He also enacted a law named the GOCC Governance Act of 2011, which looked to improve the efficiency and to enhance the transparency of government-owned or controlled corporations (GOCC’s), improving economic development (Republic Act No. 10149, 2011). Along with this, his government was able to hold inflation to a level within 3-5% annum, while also keeping interest rate low (Sicat, 2016). The frugal spending kept the fiscal deficit to a minimal level. It is also worth mentioning that in 2013, we received our first ever investment grade, which is a credit rating that implies a low default risk, receiving 24 positive credit ratings, our most in history (Mirasol, 2021).
Compared to his predecessors, Rodrigo Duterte took on significant amounts of loans and debts from international partners, particularly Japan and China during his presidency (2016-2022). To combat and justify the cons of the increased debt, the Duterte administration designed the “Build! Build! Build!” or “BBB” program, the highlight of his presidency. This acted as a long-term economic solution that promised to improve the national infrastructure and increase the national GDP. throughout its execution, the BBB program generated over 6.5 million jobs from 2016 to 2020 and expanded multiple expressways boosting economic growth and activity (Patinio, 2022). Duterte also enacted both Administrative Order (AO) No. 13 and Memorandum Order (MO) No. 26 to reduce regulations on the importation of agricultural products to combat the peak inflation rates experienced during his term (DOF, 2019).
During current president Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s first SONA in 2022, his administration aims to reduce the Philippine debt-to-GDP ratio to 60% by 2025 by implementing a tax reform that will increase collection (PIA, 2022). So far President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. enacted multiple executive orders to combat inflation stemming from food prices and has implemented a medium-term fiscal framework as a guide to contain inflation pressures (DOF, 2023). In 2024, the Marcos administration signed the Republic Act No. 11976 also known as the “Ease of Paying Taxes Act” to increase tax-payer rights and security which allows for ease for tax claims and returns (Eleazar, 2024) and the Republic Act (RA) 12066 or the “CREATE MORE” act which further income taxes for registered business enterprises by 5% to incentivize foreign investment and boost economic growth (Reuters, 2024).
Graph of the national debt from Macapagal's presidency to the middle of Duterte's (Institute for National Studies, 2020).
Proposed Framework in Resolving the Crisis
Transparency is crucial in being able to prevent the Philippines ongoing debt worsening. The government needs to implement a way to ensure that borrowed funds are used effectively and transparently. This can also lead to public trust and support for the debt management measures.
Seeking low interest loans from international organizations can provide additional funding without significantly increasing the ongoing debt problem. Though keep in mind that this solution is somewhat risky. For this solution to be effective the next solution must also be maintained.
This goes hand in hand with the previous solution as promoting economic growth within the country would lead to a higher GDP which could then lead to an increase in the demand for the Philippine peso. The way the Philippines can promote economic growth is by implementing plans similar to what the UAE is currently doing which is in solution 4.
Investing in infrastructure such as airports, seaports, public transportation, and roads in order to support the potential needs of any international businesses looking to enter into our country.
The Aquino and Ramos administrations have done this in the past. Privatization is the process of transferring ownership or control of a business, service, or public asset from the government to private individuals or organizations. This often involves selling government-owned entities, such as utilities, transportation systems, or natural resources, to private companies. This is currently ongoing in 2024 as most recently NAIA (the international airports of the Philippines) is currently being managed by mega corporation SMC.