Embedded Files
School Year 2025-2026
The data was collected from August 7, 2025 - September 7, 2025.
Based on the bar chart, the survey collected a total of 40 responses from individuals ranging between 15 and 20 years old. The data reveals a highly concentrated demographic, with a clear majority of the respondents being 16 years old, accounting for 25 individuals or 62.5% of the total sample. When combined with the 15-year-olds (6 respondents, 15%) and 17-year-olds (7 respondents, 17.5%), an overwhelming 95% of the participants fall within the 15–17 age bracket, typically aligning with a high school student demographic. Conversely, older individuals are barely represented, with 18-year-olds and 20-year-olds each making up just a single respondent (2.5% each), while 19-year-olds are entirely absent. Ultimately, the data shows a heavily skewed distribution centered tightly around mid-teenage youth, indicating that the survey either specifically targeted or primarily resonated with 16-year-olds.
Based on the pie chart, the survey collected gender demographic data from the same sample size of 40 respondents, revealing a very balanced distribution between male and female participants. Females make up the slight majority at 52.5% of the total (which translates to 21 individuals), while males account for the remaining 47.5% (representing 19 individuals). This nearly equal split indicates an excellent gender balance within the sample pool, minimizing gender bias in the survey results. When synthesized with the age data from the previous chart, it can be concluded that the surveyed group is primarily a gender-balanced demographic of mid-teenage adolescents, mostly centered around the age of 16.
Based on the pie chart in, the survey collected data regarding the cultural background and ethnicity of the same 40 respondents, revealing a distribution split into two visible categories. An overwhelming majority of the participants, making up 75% of the total (which translates to 30 individuals), selected the "Others" category. The remaining 25% of the sample pool (representing 10 individuals) selected "Not Applicable," while the specific indigenous or ethnic options listed in the legend—Aeta, Igorot, and Badjao—did not register any percentage on the chart. When integrated with the previous datasets, this indicates that while the survey succeeded in reaching a highly gender-balanced group of mid-teenage adolescents predominantly aged 16, the vast majority of these respondents do not identify with the specific indigenous backgrounds provided in the options.
Based on the pie chart and the provided breakdown, the survey gathered data on the religious affiliations of the 40 respondents, showing a predominant religious background alongside several minority groups. Roman Catholicism represents the overwhelming majority, accounting for 70% of the total sample, which translates to 28 individuals. The remaining 30% of the sample is distributed among various other faiths and categories: Born Again Christians comprise the next largest group with 3 respondents, followed by Methodists, members of the Iglesia ni Cristo, and adherents of Islam, each represented by 2 individuals. Additionally, 1 respondent identifies as Baptist, while 2 participants fall under the "Others" category, with options like The Latter Day Saints and Jehovah’s Witnesses showing no measurable presence on the chart. Synthesizing this with the previous demographic charts, the survey group can be summarized as a gender-balanced group of mid-teenage adolescents, predominantly 16 years old, who largely do not identify with specific indigenous ethnic options and are overwhelmingly Catholic in religious affiliation.
Based on the pie chart, the survey captured data regarding the participants' status as beneficiaries of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), a national conditional cash transfer program. Out of the 40 total responses, a majority of 60% (which corresponds to 24 individuals) answered "No," indicating they are not beneficiaries of the program. On the other hand, a substantial 40% of the respondents (representing 16 individuals) answered "Yes," confirming that their households are 4Ps beneficiaries. When synthesized with the previous demographic indicators, the overall profile of this surveyed group is a gender-balanced demographic of mid-teenage adolescents, predominantly 16 years old, who are largely Catholic, do not identify with the specific indigenous backgrounds listed, and feature a notable 40% minority who receive targeted government socioeconomic support.
Based on the pie chart under the "Family Information" section, the survey collected data from 40 respondents regarding their current family structure, showcasing a diverse range of living arrangements. A plurality of the participants live in a nuclear family setup, with 45% (18 individuals) reporting that they are "Living with both parents." Single-parent households account for a combined 25% of the sample, split between those "Living with Mother" at 15% (6 individuals) and those "Living with Father" at 10% (4 individuals). Extended family and alternative care arrangements are also highly visible: 15% (6 individuals) are "Living with Grandparents," while another 10% (4 individuals) are "Living with Authorized Guardian." The remaining small portion of the chart is divided between respondents "Living with step family" and "Others." Synthesizing this with the previous datasets, the comprehensive profile of this surveyed group is a gender-balanced demographic of mid-teenage adolescents—predominantly 16-year-old Catholic students who mostly do not identify with specific indigenous ethnicities and feature a 40% minority of 4Ps beneficiaries—with nearly half residing with both parents while the remaining majority navigate single-parent, step-family, or guardian-led households.
Based on the pie chart under the "Socio-Economic Background" section, the survey collected data from 40 respondents regarding their perceived household financial status, revealing a complex economic distribution. A plurality of the participants, making up 42.5% of the total (17 individuals), selected the "Others" category. Looking at the defined economic brackets, 20% (8 individuals) identify as "Low-income," while equal segments of 17.5% (7 individuals each) identify as "Middle-class" and "Struggling." The remaining small slice belongs to the "High-income" category, while the "Wealthy" option has no visible representation on the chart.
Comprehensive demographic profile of this 40-respondent sample can be established:
Age & Gender: It is a highly localized, gender-balanced peer group of mid-teenage adolescents, overwhelmingly dominated by 16-year-olds (62.5%).
Cultural & Religious Background: The vast majority do not identify with specific indigenous ethnic options (75% "Others") and are predominantly Roman Catholic (70%).
Family Structure: Living arrangements are highly varied; while a 45% plurality live with both parents, the remaining majority navigate single-parent households, step-families, grandparents, or legal guardians.
Socio-Economic Profile: There is a significant presence of financial vulnerability within the group. Combined with the previous data showing that a substantial 40% are 4Ps conditional cash transfer beneficiaries, the socio-economic chart confirms that at least 37.5% explicitly identify their families as either "Low-income" or financially "Struggling," positioning a large portion of this adolescent student population within lower-income brackets.
Based on the pie chart under the "Academic Records" section, the survey gathered data from 40 respondents regarding their senior high school track, showing an even distribution when corrected for the misoriented responses. Initially, the chart reflects an equal split between the "Academic" track at 45% (18 individuals) and the "Techpro" track at 45% (18 individuals), with a minor 10% (4 individuals) mistakenly selecting "Basic Ed (For Junior High School Only)." Accounting for the fact that these 4 individuals are actually Techpro students who were misoriented during the survey, the true adjusted distribution shifts the Techpro track into the majority at 55% (22 individuals) of the sample size, compared to the Academic track's 45% (18 individuals).
Based on the pie chart, the survey collected data from the 40 respondents regarding their current grade level, revealing a completely homogenous group. A total of 100% of the participants belong to Grade 11, meaning all 40 individuals are in the exact same year level, with no representation from grades 7, 8, 9, 10, or 12.
Based on the pie chart, the survey captured the specific section or specialization breakdown of the 40 Grade 11 respondents. The distribution across the five sections is as follows:
Section A (Caregiving): 15% (6 individuals)
Section B (Food and Beverages Operations - FBO): 27.5% (11 individuals), representing the largest single section in the sample.
Section C (Animation): 17.5% (7 individuals)
Section D (Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities): 20% (8 individuals)
Section E (Business, Accountancy, and Entrepreneurship): 20% (8 individuals)
Based on the pie chart under the "Current Student Classification/Status" section, the survey collected data from the 40 respondents regarding their academic enrollment status. The chart reveals the following distribution:
Regular: An overwhelming majority of 80% (32 students) are classified as regular students.
Transferee-Regular: A notable 17.5% (7 students) are regular students who transferred from another school.
Open High School Program Student: The remaining 2.5% (1 student) is enrolled under the Open High School Program (OHSP), an alternative delivery mode for education.
Irregular and Transferee-Irregular: These categories show no visible representation on the chart (0%).
Page updated
Report abuse