SALVAVIDAS I PERIODO

Logro y tema: 

Razonar analógicamente varias corrientes y pensamientos filosóficos, en pos de dar cuenta de una pregunta, la cual estará clasificada según una rama de la filosofía –Metafísica y Ontología, Epistemología, Filosofía Política, Filosofía Moral, Filosofía Antropológica, Filosofía de la Justicia, Estética, Filosofía Analítica-, proponiendo instancias de solución a tal pregunta a través de una investigación y una socialización de lo que se ha llegado, y profundizándolo en las preguntas Tipo ICFES, siendo  libre y responsable con su propia experiencia filosófica. 

Fundamentos del pensamiento filosófico: Filosofía Contemporánea I (Freud, Nietzsche, Marx) 

Fundamentos del pensamiento filosófico: Filosofía Contemporánea II (Husserl, Heidegger y Frege) 

PHILOSOPHY OF SUSPICION

Modern philosophy is usually divided into two parts: the first one starts with Descartes' claim of the Cogito; Epistemology as First Philosophy begins with the revolutionary affirmation that the thinking subject is the central and safest starting point for building scientific knowledge. From then on, rationalist and empiricist philosophers would develop other versions of the same project: either the thinking subject is made exclusively on cognitive abilities or is made exclusively on perceptions and sensible impressions. Then Kant comes into the discussion, claiming that the thinking subject is made of both things simultaneously. After Kant, modern philosophy changed radically because Kant started a whole other project: the Critical project. Hegel would try to override the project by claiming an Absolute Subject who can rationally apprehend reality by itself, but is quickly refuted by Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud, who would, each of them in their own way, retake the Kantian critical approach and augment its scope to unimaginable limits...

In this section we'll delve into what Paul Ricoeur calls the hermeneutics of suspicion, three philosophers whose jobs was to create three new ways of critique, revaluating the way Western philosophy should operate, making claims about how christian values shape culture (Nietzsche), how bourgoise economics shape life (Marx) and how the unconcious pulsions shape our deep desires (Freud). Even when these three philosophers are widely different from each other and do not compose a single movement or school, for Ricoeur they are three great examples of how the 19th-century philosophy was creating not just a new way of evaluating how humans think but three different ways to radically change the life we have inherited. Their invitation was not only to think about the world but to change it...

In the following videos you will find a little teasing of each thinker. Try to consider what exactly is wrong with the current society for each of them, what is the diagnosis of modernity; and what is the solution to the problem, what is the treatment for modernity.