Beyond Awareness Training

Security has come long since antivirus software and firewalls were considered cutting-edge protection. With cyber threats growing in frequency and sophistication, organisations can no longer rely on outdated tools and check-the-box training to safeguard critical systems and data. Defending today’s hybrid and cloud-enabled environments requires a multilayered approach backed by advanced technologies and, perhaps most importantly, a mature security-focused culture.

The Problems with One-and-Done Training

For years, many organisations have invested in annual or biannual security awareness training for employees, assuming that teaching workers how to spot phishing emails and set strong passwords is sufficient to improve resilience meaningfully. While awareness programs have their place as part of broader security protocols, the “one-and-done training” model has proven inadequate for keeping up with modern cyber risks for several reasons:

• Knowledge decay: People forget! According to research published in the National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine, humans lose an average of 50% of learned knowledge within one hour without reinforced practice or application. Yet most security trainings do little to reinforce concepts after the training ends. Employees may walk away initially more aware, but that knowledge can deteriorate quickly, primarily if the concepts are not used regularly.

• Lack of context: Generic off-the-shelf compliance training often broadly covers security concepts without tailoring messaging, examples, and calls to action to employees’ day-to-day responsibilities. Yet, information security ultimately depends on individual actions. Training content that does not resonate with workers’ unique contexts fails to motivate them to apply that knowledge to make smarter decisions that lift the organisation’s security posture.

• No culture cultivation: Even perfectly designed modules mean little if the prevailing workplace culture does not support security-conscious behaviours. Without guidance, leadership role modelling, and environmental cues that continually reinforce vigilance, employees lack the motivation to assess risks proactively, exercise caution beyond base compliance, or speak up about potential issues.

Moving Beyond Checking Boxes

So, where should organisations go from here if one-off generalised training has proven ineffective for engendering comprehensive security hygiene? The key is evolving from a compliance-based checkbox approach focused on minimal knowledge transfer to strategies centred on building a culture of shared accountability and hypervigilance codified into norms at all levels.

Mindsets Over Modalities

Culture reflects mindsets, assumptions, and shared values of people within groups. An organisation serious about security in today's threat landscape must foster an institutional culture that treats vigilance not as an afterthought or source of friction but rather as an enabler for innovation and resilience. Some tenets of a strong security culture include:

• Collective ownership: Every employee recognises protection responsibilities scale across silos according to access and capabilities. Rather than offloading cyber risks to IT, all internalise their duty to handle data appropriately.

• Healthy paranoia: People maintain scepticism about requests, sources and attachments that raise red flags no matter how legitimate they may appear on the surface. They default to questioning rather than blind trust.

• Speaking up: Anyone who sees something concerning feels empowered to voice issues without fear of judgment or reprisal. Surfacing potential incidents early is valued.

• Continuous learning: Individuals habitually refresh knowledge as technologies and methodologies evolve rather than presuming static awareness. Curiosity fuels proactivity.

• Quick reaction: Once a risk is identified, people know how to appropriately escalate through established channels to mobilise a rapid, controlled response containing impacts.

These attitudes manifest through policies, habits, artefacts, and incentives guided from the top down via executive messaging, management reinforcement and departmental enablement initiatives.

While no organisation realistically embodies all elements of an ideal culture overnight, the end vision guides priorities and measures incremental progress. Directionally pursuing cultural maturation around security sets up the foundation for sustainable risk reduction, unlike checklist activities bound by versions and renewal cycles.

Strategic Standards Alignment

Frameworks provide guidelines for how entities can methodologically build cultures poised to meet and exceed minimum security and privacy requirements. Two of the most internationally recognised and adopted models include:

• ISO 27001: This specification developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) spells formal expectations for information security management systems (ISMS). Central to the ISO 27001 standard is the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) continuous improvement cycle applied to key areas like risk management, asset classification, access controls and human resources security executed under top-level organisational commitment. It also enumerates dozens of detailed controls entities can implement to improve posture methodologically. Because adoption requires rigorous independent audits, ISO 27001 certification signals externally verified adoption of industry best practices.

• NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF): Maintained by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the CSF outlines activities across five concurrent functions – Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover. The guidance is designed to be customised to different sectors and risk environments. It encourages entities to monitor effectiveness metrics over time tied to business outcomes as technology and threat climates inevitably evolve. As opposed to more rigid checklists, CSF provides an adaptable programmatic vocabulary larger organisations can leverage to reduce redundancy and better orchestrate various internal and external cybersecurity initiatives contributing to resilience.

Both ISO 27001 and the NIST CSF transcend static compliance checklists by emphasising that maturing controls and cultivating supportive cultures work symbiotically to drive positive outcomes in the face of dynamic risks.

While neither necessitates outright certification, organisations scaled to support formal adoption of either ISO 27001 or NIST CSF reap immense value from understanding gaps, structuring improvement plans and validating program effectiveness through independent audits. But even smaller entities can readily incorporate both models’ risk-based thinking elements into informal policies and offensive security testing.

Tangibly Embedding Culture

Any combination of principles, frameworks and policies only generates risk reduction when manifested through day-to-day behaviours. Culture cultivation requires translating desired mindsets into tangible activities, interactions, and artefacts within physical and digital environments.

Set the tone at the top

• The CEO establishes a security steering committee consisting of department leaders

• Cyber risks become a standing board meeting agenda item with reports from the CISO

• Funding allocates 1% of revenue specifically towards security initiatives & and testing

• Executives reference the priority of cybersecurity in all-hands meetings and company events

Incentivize vigilance

• Patch management key performance indicators added to IT staff annual reviews

• Employees who surface critical risks receive public (or private if preferred) acknowledgement

• Budget reserved for rapid upgrades driven by exposure discoveries

• Phase risky legacy systems out of commission

Build knowledge

• Monthly lunch-and-learn discussions cover emerging technologies and threats

• Cybersecurity professionals invited to share expertise across internal meetings

• Periodic simulated phishing campaigns gauge susceptibility rates

• Wiki library around security policies and technical controls

Engineer prevention

• Multifactor authentication is enforced for all network and cloud access

• Endpoint detection tools deployed to monitor threats continuously

• Automate policy and software updates push on fixed schedules

• Multi-cloud configuration analysers check for risky misconfigurations

Enable early recognition

• Automate aggregation of meaningful event data across tools/platforms

• Dashboards track KPIs and alerts for incident response teams

• Explicitly define types of issues requiring various levels of escalation

Prepare to respond

• Corporate incident response preparedness training injected into onboarding

• Run emergency scenario simulation exercises with teams across functions

• Maintain dedicated cyber insurance, legal counsel, and public relations support

Motivate honesty

• Safe, anonymous reporting channels such as whistleblower hotlines

• Signage reminding that raising concerns protects the greater good

• Celebrate near misses as opportunities to improve

The Right Metrics for Maturity

As crucial as enumerating desired cultural traits is actively measuring them. Just as organisations mature risk-based thinking, so must they evolve metrics for evaluating security programs' effectiveness.

Lagging indicators – like data breach numbers, audit deficiencies and penetration testing performance – capture historical snapshots of how controls and awareness manifested after the fact. But forward-looking entities couple lagging indicators with lead measures that monitor shifts in risk precursors.

Lead indicators that signal positive culture trends include:

• The proportion of employees who completed advanced security training

• Risks reported via whistleblower channels

• Intrusions successfully blocked by preventative tools

• Investigation caseloads per analyst per week/month

• Time to patch critical application vulnerabilities

• Rates of multifactor authentication adoption

• Percentage of data encrypted

Quantifying leading metrics helps organisations gauge how well they scale capacity, deepen resilience investments, and adhere to paranoid precautions before adversaries fully exploit residual gaps.

Getting Technical Teams on Board

CISOs often stand at the epicentre of efforts to advance security culture, given their vantage points on risk and oversight of technical controls. But the stereotypical tension between security and agility can no longer stand at a time when threats exploit the slightest gap. The following strategies can help thaw friction to gain IT and engineering allies:

• Speak their language: For all its urgency, cybersecurity often gets perceived by technical teams as an opaque domain detached from coding creativity and solution engineering. So, demystify its pertinence. Frame risks involve factors developers directly control like data flows, user stories, permissions, interfaces, integrations, dependencies, and deprecations. Make recommendations such as shift left, privacy by design, and DevSecOps familiar refrains.

• Tighten feedback loops: Requirements tossed over fences produce compliance-motivated changes that satisfy checks but rarely inspire engineering teams to proactively self-assess. So, please bring them to the conversations early, clearly, and often. Solicit input on control options, guide threat modelling, and discuss findings from scans, penetration tests and real incidents to spotlight how choices intimately shape exposure.

• Loosen the reins: Checklist mandates and blocked releases breed resentment, not enthusiasm. Where possible, define higher risk parameters, then entrust developers’ discretion in choosing tools and techniques for securing releases that steer clear. Partner to embed security unit tests and infrastructure as code templates directly into native pipelines and sprints.

• Democratize data: Visibility catalyses action. Feed engineering teams accessible views into asset inventories, vulnerabilities, and filtering alerts to monitor remediation needs or identify excess noise without middlemen. Grant permissions to make reasonable containment, configuration, and patching adjustments without tickets.

• Celebrate initiative: Offer engineers bounties for discovering and rescuing exposed databases, open ports, or other legitimate oversights. Feature case studies of developers who responsibly self-report releasing bugs. Recognise quick, creative pivots that voluntarily resize attack surfaces, like cutting unnecessary data integrations.

• Keep current: Refreshers on shifts in adversarial tactics, assurance standards and architectural patterns counter skill erosion. Sponsor relevant conference passes, cross-train architects on secure frameworks, run lunch-and-learn series and maintain always-available educational resources. Stay open to peer knowledge swaps.

With compassion and credible expertise, security teams can nurture engineering allies into a multiplier effect. By conferring smart creatives latitude to invent within secure bounds, what once seemed bureaucratic obstacles transform into guiding inspirations.

Overcoming Common Roadblocks

Pursuing an ambitious culture shift around security implicitly necessitates changes to ingrained ways of operating. Change at scale predictably surfaces scepticism, misconceptions, competing priorities, and other institutional antibodies that can thwart progress without thoughtful handling. Common transformational roadblocks and mitigation approaches include:

• We have no budget: Secure architecture does not need to equate to rip-and-replace systems overhaul. Start by inventorying controls already in place and reallocating underutilised technologies—layer intelligent orchestration to automate usage and reduce manual overhead next. Prioritise high-impact quick wins over multi-year commitments. Treat talent development as an investment.

• It will slow us down: Early involvement of security in defining requirements rather than after already building solutions saves rework. Automating policy enforcement avoids bottlenecks. Where friction surfaces, inject user experience (UX) expertise to streamline controls and simplify choices. Set up feedback channels welcoming constructive criticism.

• It only happens to others: Threat modelling injects much-needed empathy, as does stress testing via simulations and red teams. Sharing public breach case studies, even from other industries, underscores inherent vulnerability. Tie cyber insurance premiums and liability directly to executives to stimulate ownership.

• We have too many competing priorities: Connect security imperatives directly to business goals like continuity, compliance, and customer trust. Contrast abstract “best practices” with financial and reputational risk projections. Support innovation by increasing configurable guardrails over locks—stage rollouts in iterative phases.

• Our people will resist: Involve sympathetic voices from the start so changes seem collaborative, not forced. Celebrate contributions publicly. Listen to sceptics’ specific concerns first. Incentivise adoption through gamification - e.g. awarding badges for security quiz scores or reporting phishes. Ensure leaders model desired behaviours.

• It’s too technical for management: Communicate with audiences in mind. Executives care about risk reduction, lawyers care about diligence, and technologists care about architecture. Cite familiar examples - no need to dive into exploit code to convey the severity of log4j. Welcome questions. Create cross-functional buddies.

With compassion, honesty, and tenacity, even histories of breaches and undiscovered shadow IT can transform into backdrops showcasing an organisation’s true security potential.

Sustaining Momentum Over Time

The hallmark of resilient security cultures lies not in any control adopted at a fixed point but in institutionalised hypervigilance that evolves as quickly as the threats and technologies it defends. Sustaining change requires intentional upkeep.

Once culture maturation initiatives gain traction, several leading practices prevent backsliding:

• Codify Expectations: Formalise essential policies like access management, acceptable use, remote work, and bring your device (BYOD) tied to regular security awareness training upon hiring and annually. Update codes of conduct outlining everyone’s responsibilities. Reduce tribal knowledge around response plans to on-demand run-books.

• Engineer For Usability: Cumbersome controls directly undermine adoption, no matter how well-intentioned. Analyse authentication workflows through user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA). Set apps to default to encrypted, expire and lock. Phase out solutions that frequently prompt policy exceptions or generate unreasonable false positives.

• Incentivize Vigilance: Compensate based on leading risk metrics versus lagging incident rates alone. Recognise those who voluntarily retire risky legacy—sponsor employees to attend immersive security conferences. Rotate technical talent through the information security team.

• Verify Authentication: Protect accounts from routine threats like stolen passwords via firm multi-factor authentication (MFA). Question overdependence on single sign-on (SSO) as a magic bullet. Revalidate trust periodically through re-enrollment.

• Play Offense: Schedule rotating red team attacks to probe controls as adversaries would in actual intrusions. Fix findings fast. Run simulated social engineering attempts to gauge susceptibility rates continually.

• Monitor Entropy: Log and inspect account modification peaks signalling insider risk. Analyse HR terminations against access revocations to catch privilege creep. Screen third parties’ security rigour as severely as employees.

• Keep Current: Care for professional education around evolving languages, privacy regulations and attack techniques. Attend local events or access online training through emerging modalities like VR.

• Check Compliance: Although compliance does not equate to security, renewals force periodic progress checks. So, pursue flexible standards like ISO 27001 or SOC 2 tailored to your entity’s needs. Consider certifying for signals to customers.

• Always Be Auditing: Treat audits as learning opportunities, not judgments. Discuss seeming redundancies. Request evaluators focus specific reviews on priority areas each year to highlight what’s working and opportunities.

With vision, reflection and trust, organisations can escape chronic risk firefighting to realise security cultures ready for whatever happens next.

Final Thoughts

In the end, cyber risk is created by people that must be defended by empowering people, not just constraining them.

Checking compliance boxes will only provide a false sense of security in environments where threats persistently evolve. But nurturing cultures that motivate intelligent decisions at all levels based on collective responsibility primes organisations to get ahead of risks instead of perpetually reacting.

Where does your entity fall on the security culture continuum? What tangible artefacts currently reinforce or inhibit target mindsets? And what leading metrics best reflect your organisation’s distinct maturity aims? The answers can guide what standards elements to weave into your broader assurance strategy next.

So, move beyond rote annual training. Set security awareness in motion through interwoven codes of conduct, institutional habits and workplace cues that empower everyone to sustain collective mission assurance. The threat landscape only continues intensifying. So, foment a culture ready to rise resilience in response.

Technological change may accelerate, but human nature, in many ways, remains constant. Employees stay busy, budgets stay tight, and threats stay creative. Yet through that turbulence, seeding resilient cultures can steer organisations toward security outcomes once hard to fathom.

True transformation takes time, transparency, and collective courage. But the foundations laid - through standards alignment, architectural upgrades, and meaningful metrics - position entities to thrive in the face of whatever risks the future holds.

Security of yesterday monitored compliance. Security of today hunts threats. Security of tomorrow, though, moves beyond chasing danger to enable aspiration.

So do not just react to the mounting chaos. Set bold ambitions for the cultures you want to see, then align priorities to catalyse maturation. With consistent modelling, communication, and care, you can uplift understanding and ownership across your organisation’s human core.

Build that culture now and watch potential take flight - no matter what storms may strike ahead.

ALSO PUBLISHED AT: