Senior Seminar debates the voting age
In our Senior Seminar class, we engaged in a discussion centered on whether the voting age should be lowered to 16. As we explored this topic, several significant points emerged, prompting debate among classmates.
One crucial aspect was the potential ripple effects of lowering the voting age. It would not only grant voting rights to more citizens, but it would also open doors to other legal responsibilities traditionally tied to adulthood. Such as obtaining driver's licenses, military, and tax obligations. The consideration of younger individuals to parent influence could potentially lead to misinterpreting results. This is from being influenced by their parent's views and not their own opinions.
Many argued that the teenage person would not possess the necessary maturity to make informed political decisions. Then there were doubts about the long-term engagement of younger voters remaining politically active. After a while things start to fall out of interest, especially in modern society. In summary, our discussion on lowering the voting age to 16 brought to light various concerns and considerations of teenage voting. No final determination was made about whether it is a viable option or not for the modern-day American voting system.
Mr. Pounds leads the Student Centered Discussion for Senior Seminar.
Michael Ceraso, Kenny, Hagerich, and Andi Householder respond to their fellow classmate's discussion.
What do you think? Take the poll below to let us know how you feel about the topic...
Students participate in the most recent Student Centered Discussion on lowering the voting age
Maddy Torrell and Cam Wagner
Hadyn Herbulock, Nick Ciufoletti, and Devin Beattie
Jace Ebel, Michael Ceraso, Kenny Hagerich, and Andi Householder
Sam Stell, Johnny Lukac, Jace Ebel, and Michael Ceraso
Writing & Photo Contributor: AJ McLafferty