A few sample comments by our judges to help you understand their thinking process :
vaachaa group :
Overall, good attempt. Often got stuck in some places so further practice of the speech may have been helpful.
Often confused Hindi with Marathi and was not fully prepared.
Nice job! Good command on language and wonderful message.
Good coverage of the topic, including various facts and explaining both positive and negative effects of the virus on society. Looked very confident in her speech!
Did not really cover much information and she seemed to be a little distracted in her delivery.
Covered the topic well. Had some inconsistencies in speech and grammar can be refined.
Made an attempt but was reading the speech and was mixing Hindi and Marathi.
Delivery of the speech was distracting as she kept moving around. Overall, good attempt.
Overall, good speech, appeared confident and prepared in delivery.
Video not working/complete
Good attempt and nice message. Lots of background noise during the speech.
beautiful presentation and very strong delivery
very short speech, needed some additional practice
good introduction, acknowledged help from mom, could have talked more about effects of virus
video was incomplete
good attempt, talked about personal experience
wonderful speech, great delivery (funny rhymes!)
good attempt, keep practicing
good attempt
nice speech, very cute and personal
speech ended abruptly
Very confident and good command on language. Was very repetitive and did not present lots of new information as it progressed.
Very well presented speech, very creative way of presenting the topic through a dream.
Nicely done in the speech, provided several effects of the virus on various aspects of life.
Overall, good speech.
Decent command on language but video and speech were very choppy and hard to follow.
Well done speech and confident delivery.
Well delivered speech
Good speech, needs to work on Hindi diction.
Confident delivery, covered the finanical and educational crisis taking place as a result of the virus.
Presentation was good, was sometimes difficult to understand.
Covered the subject very well, provided lots of good details/facts.
Seems to be same presentation as her brother, Sarthak. Often got stuck while speaking.
Had a good command on language but kept pausing and forgetting the speech.
Some very distracting background music. Struggled with some words and often repeated himself with video making it hard to follow what he was saying.
There was not a lot of substantial content in her speech.
He was very confident in his delivery and seemed to have a good command on language.
Good attempt but it was not a very organized and concise message she presented.
Had lots of breaks during speech and had to be prompted to say the next lines.
Needs refinement of language skills and delivery.
Excellent speech and connection to himself. Very well delivered and good command on language, confident and easily understood. Nice work!
vaaNii group :
Language is good,pronunciation is clear but I feel that kid is reading the specch rather memorising.
langugae is clear but there was some echo initially. she memorised the speech which was good,using action or body language is good but using too much sometime causes a distraction. topic was not dealt in depth.
starting was good but after sometime speech became pretty fast without any pause,was bit difficult to understand at times, effect of dialect is visible. talked about the adverse effect of corona in length but also gives the feeling that she was reading rather than memorising the whole speech. started getting nervous in the middle.
Starting was good.He memorised the speech. He was somewhat confident but was not spekaing holistically. could have gone more in depth. Ending was not in the video,it got cut abruptly.
Language is fluent. Could have done better suject wise but looks like he was reading rather than memorising,Pauses in between has affected the flow of the speech.
proper starting and proper ending. she used body language and expression nicely. memorisation was there,she was not reading from anywhere. could have gone little bit more in depth though.
language is fluent,voice is quite effective. she could have used more expressins though ,would have been better if she kept the phone at one place rather keeping it in hand. and little bit more concrete thoughts. she looks confident.
Almost the whole video is blank cant judge,sorry!
A good presentation from beginning till end. Voice is effective,good flow,talked on world level not just on individual level. confident kid.
almost 85% of video is frozen,can't judge,sorry.
Language is clear,she used memorisation,hand expression well. she is confident,she talked more about what it is and what should we follow,would hav beeen better if she focused on its effect as per the topic.
First of all kid's face doesn't have proper light,he seems nervous and reading from somewhere. there is lots of hesitation in speech,no proper ending.
Good speech,good flow,memorised speech with good hand actions and right expressions. can improve on pauses and little bit code mixing is used.
strong voice and fluency. Didn't talk much about the effect of corona which was the real topic, speech didn't seem well connected. no proper beginning.
very low volume,hard to listen ,also background noice was there. it seemed ki was reading too. Cant's judge properly.
languge is clear,fluency is there. It felt he was talking as if reading from somewhere but cant be sure. was talking more about general information about corona rather than the effects.
very short speech ,couldnt judge much.
very short speech,not enough for a proper judgement
lots of breaking the video in between,seemed he was reading than memorisation,very short video not enough to judge.
Strong and expressive voice. use of hand actions and facial expressions.looks memorised speech which is good.
Her voice is clear and she has memorised the speech which is really impressive. she is speking too fast without any proper pause. mostly she spoke about corona virus and its symtopms not the effect which is the main topic.
volume is low,voice is not clear,very short speech and alos it looked like he was reading, cant judge.
Voice is clear,easily understandable but he is reading rather than memorising. Doesn't talk about the effect at all.
language is fluent. Talks about corona not its effect on or life. Reading and not memorised speech.
Short speech,no connection in points and reading from paper,visible in video.
voice is clear, didn't use hand actions or expression but memorised the whole speech which is impressive.
she spoke well and fluent but needs to giv epause in between. she memorised the speech which is really good. talked about the efefct of corona nicely. she could have used timely pauses,hand actions etc.
can't judge, video is frozen for 70 % of the time. she used props and did a good job with actions but i hardly hear any speech.
She spoke well with a smooth flow.
Clear and strong voice but she is reading and didnt talk about the effect which is real topic.
75% video is frozen and even when its get better,volume is very low. cant judge.
very short,reading from the paper,main points were not discussed at all,no peoper beginning.
Good speech,proper beginning and end,use of hands action and expression really good,she has memorised teh speech so another good point. She could have talked more on the effect of corona than just waht is corona and sumptoms or what to do.
looks like he is speaking well but very low volume,cant hear so cant judge.
Voice is good,strong but lots of variations up down kind of. he is trying to read and not meorised.
she spoke well and was on the topic. could have used little bit more expression and could have used timely pauses.
beginning was proper,camera was too much moving which was distracting. she didn't talk about the main topic and she didt use expressions or hand actions.
She started well but lost confidence in sometime and was reading from screen.
She has a good style of speaking,memorised speech and right expresions to match with. She could have focused more on the main topic which was the effect of corona then her speech would have been perfect.
Good beiginning and ending,strong voice,good expresiion,memorisation and style. He didnt talk about teh effect of corona which was the main topic.
She has memorisaed the speech which is good. She speaks without any pause also the main topic was not dealt nicely.
low volume,very slow way of spekaing without any expression.he is reading from screen.
He memorised the speech and used some expressions appropriately. He needs to focus on the main topic.
He spoke with confidence,memorised the speech. Could have used hand action and stayed on the topic of corona's effct which he didn't.
short speech,backgorund noise,low volume and he is reading,cant judge on these accounts.
He has a strong voice,memorised speech,spoke on hwo it affected us so stayed on topic. Could have worked on style,topic.
She has a good style of speaking,speaks in clear voice. could have worked more on expressions and it seemed she was referring to a paper in btween could have wored more on topic side as well.
she speaks in a straight way,no expression,topic is not deat properly.
seh has memorised the speech,has a good ,clear voice, spoke with confidence. she could have talked about the main topic more.
Very confident,memorised sppech,he spoke well with quotes and saying. could have stayed more on teh topic of effect though.
language is good and so is the voice but she was completely reading from the paper.
voice is good but too much dialect effect,completely reading from the paper.
She spoke with confidence,memorised the speech,she stayed on topic. Little bit more practice and actions would have beeen nice.
70% video was frozen so cant judge properly.
Language is ok but she read through paper completely.
She is comepltely reading and speaking so fast that its difficult to understand her. She can improve by memorising,speaking slow and actions.
Has a good and clear voice,used some hand actiosn too. she was completely reading form the paper. Can improve by memorising and using more expression . Also she didnt spoke on teh real topic which was the effect of corona.
She has a consitent voice,used soem hand expressions too. It felt like she was readinhg but cant be sure. She can improve by suing more expression and memorising the speech ,also stay on the main topic.
She has good language,expressions are good too but i feel she was reading and also i felt video was edited.
She started well but reading from teh paper and also not atlking about main topic which is the effect.
85%video is frozen ,cant judge.
Volume is low, lots of pauses. its good that he memorised it but needs to be fluent and stay on topic.
She spoke with confidence and very well. Good expressions and stayed on topic. also used prompts in between..over all a good one.
language not fluent,kid was reading while speaking.
languge was good,fluent but he was reading form the screen and no expression. can work on these tw points.
60% video is frozen,can't judge.
She spoke well in a smooth tone,memorised the speech. her expression is good too,she needs to saty on topic of effect a bit more.
She has fluency but too much speed,she needs to slow down a bit. She memorised teh speech which is really good,use of hand action too. Could have mad e the topic more crisp and focused on the main point.
he was speaking fluently but he was reading completely from the paper.
She is completely raeding from the paper and lots of pauses,didnt talk about teh main topic.
She has a good and clear voice but read completely from the screen. she needs to memorise and use expression.
vichaar group :
Good attempt, seemed very energetic in the delivery of the speech. The overarching message of the speech was unclear, went from idea to idea without getting to a primary focus.
Command on language and delivery can be improved, was getting stuck often and obviously referring to notes. Topic was covered holistically, explaining impacts of the virus on various different fronts.
Confident delivery and covered various aspects of the coronavirus.
Good intro and closing to engage listeners and leave them with a strong message. Very confident delivery explaining both positive and negative effects of the virus.
Good command on language, good intro and delivery. Good message along with call to action for listeners. Mentioned several effects of the virus in various parts of life. Good speech overall!
Excellent command on language and very confident in delivery. Provided various facts but did not leave listeners with a strong closing message. Followed good speech conventions by thanking those that helped her.
