विश्व हिंदी वीडियो भाषण प्रतियोगिता (वर्ष ३ - २०१८) के परिणाम

हिंदी दिवस के उपलक्ष्य में बालोद्यान आयोजित एवं प्रायोजित सर्वप्रथम एवं एकमेव विश्व हिंदी वीडियो भाषण प्रतियोगिता (वर्ष ३ -२०१८) के परिणाम घोषित करते हुए बालोद्यान को अतीव हर्ष हो रहा है | भारत एवं अमेरिका से ६४ विद्यार्थियों ने इस प्रतियोगिता के लिए अपने भाषण भेजे | सभी प्रतियोगियों का हार्दिक अभिनंदन|

प्रथम पुरस्कार - $१०० (रू.६,५००), द्वितीय पुरस्कार - $७५ (रू.४,८७५), तृतीय पुरस्कार - $५० (रू.३,२५०), और एक दर्शक-प्रिय पुरस्कार - $२५ (रू.१,६२५) | 

वाचा समूह (आयु ७ से १० वर्ष ) : प्रथम - जान्हवी उद्धव कासुर्डे , द्वितीय - अनुष्का संतोष कदम , तृतीय - तनिष्का राजेन्द्र अभंग , दर्शक-प्रिय - गरिमा रवी आचलिया | सभी भाषण देखें - https://goo.gl/Rft7sg  

वाणी समूह (आयु ११ से १४ वर्ष) : प्रथम - रोहित राजाराम चव्हाण , द्वितीय - अथर्व प्रकाश वीरकर , तृतीय - निर्झरा शशिकांत निकुडे , दर्शक-प्रिय - सुरभि किशोर निकम | सभी भाषण देखें - https://goo.gl/WEry88

विचार समूह (आयु १५ से १८ वर्ष) : प्रथम - श्रावणी राजेन्द्र गोसावी , द्वितीय - प्रगती संतोष कदम , तृतीय - लक्ष्मी यशवंत गुप्ता  , दर्शक-प्रिय - तेजश्री विरेश राजे |  सभी भाषण देखें - https://goo.gl/HVsHCj 

शिरढोण (जिला-सातारा) स्थित सार्वजनिक वाचनालय को इस प्रतियोगिता में सहभागी होने के लिए छात्रों को अत्यधिक संख्या में प्रोत्साहित करने के लिए "श्री. हेमचन्द्र नाहर हिंदी-मित्र" पुरस्कार मिला है | इस पुरस्कार की राशि रू. ७,००१ /- है |

प्रतियोगिता के आयोजन में मदद करने के लिए बालोद्यान संस्था श्री. पूनमचंद सिंगवी, एवं सभी निर्णायकों (परिचय नीचे) की आभारी है | 

VHVBP (Year 3) 2018 Results

On the occasion of Hindi Diwas, Balodyan is pleased to announce the results of the first and only Vishva Hindi Video BHAASHAN Pratiyogitaa (Year 3 - 2018). Sixty four participants from India and U.S.A. sent their speeches for the contest. Hearty congratulations to all the contestants.  

Prizes for EACH group - first prize - $100 (Rs.6,500), second prize - $75 (Rs.4,875), third prize - $50 (Rs.3,250), and an audience vote prize - $25 (Rs.1,625).

vaachaa group (ages 7 to 10 years) : First - Janhavi Uddhav Kasurde , Second - Anushka Santosh Kadam , Third - Tanishka Rajendra Abhang , Audience Vote Winner - Garima Ravi Achaliya . See all the speeches - https://goo.gl/Rft7sg  

vaaNii group (ages 11 to 14 years) : First - Rohit Rajaram Chavan , Second - Atharv Prakash Virkar , Third - Nirzara Shahsikant Nikude , Audience Vote Winner - Surabhi Kishor Nikam . See all the speeches - https://goo.gl/WEry88

vichaar group (ages 15 to 18 years) : First - Shravani Rajendra Gosavi , Second - Pragati Santosh Kadam , Third - Laxmi Yashwant Gupta , Audience Vote Winner - Tejashri Viresh Raje . See all the speeches - https://goo.gl/HVsHCj 

Saarvajanik Vaachanaalay, Shirdhon (District - Satara) is being presented with "Shree Hemchandra Nahar Hindi Mitr" Award for encouraging their students in large numbers to participate in this contest. The award money is Rs. 7,001.

Balodyan is grateful to Shri. Punamchand Singavi, and all the six judges (bios below) for all their help in organizing the contest.

 प्रतियोगिता की निर्णायक समिति Contest Judges -

Smriti Anand is Associate Professor of Management at Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago. Her research interests include leadership & diversity. Smriti has extensively published in leading management journals, and has won many awards for excellence in research and teaching. She is an avid reader of Hindi books, and has served as the editor of her high school and college Hindi magazines.

Mona Das manages the U.S. overseas office of a manufacturing company in India. She learnt Hindi as a second language and out of necessity after moving to Delhi from Odisha in middle school. She is very interested in languages and speaks several Indian as well as foreign languages. She is also interested in Balodyan and all that it is doing to keep Hindi alive among our local communities, her own children having been Balodyan students in the past.

Ritu Jayakar is an adjunct Instructor for Hindi at Penn State University. She enjoys incorporating technology and project based themes and always open for new ideas and challenges. She has been involved with CARLA's StarTalk Teacher Training program for last four years that blends her love for technology and pedagogical collaborations. She has a master’s degree in Hindi-Urdu Pedagogy though Kean University, N.J. She lives with her family in a scenic valley of State College in central Pennsylvania and enjoys long walks, knitting, yoga and audio books.

Namitha Pai Nayak spends her day working as Business Liaison at Federal Reserve Bank where her job requires her to constantly interact with people via listening , presenting and moderating communications. In her own time, she is an active member of the community and coaches upper elementary and middle school kids on communication skills through her debate club. In her school days , she loved poetry , essay and recitation in both Hindi and English and fondly recalls memories of school contests that framed her love for all things communication oriented.

Archana Shukla loves to volunteer in the community. She works in an elementary school. She is a native speaker of Hindi, and teaches Hindi to children.

Shalaka Wakankar has worked as master tax advisor for H& R Block for last 10 years. She is interested in writing Hindi/ Marathi poems, articles in community magazines. She likes teaching Marathi. She started Marathi Shala in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A. with friends. She is active in her local Maharashtra Mandal. 

A few comments by our judges to help you understand their thinking process :

Well prepared speech, and delivered with confidence.

Good speech, good topic, need to work a little bit on tone and body language. 

Very well prepared and well delivered speech. Very natural tone and effective style.

Lack of confidence, and tone is not engaging. Next time, try to develop more confidence on what you say.

Very good choice of person as role model. Little bit need to work on more eye contact. I like whole tone of speech & body language.

Speech looks effective when read without paper. It seemed participant not well prepared. Topic is good. 

Good speech, good tone, would like to see some more hand gestures next time.

Well prepared speech, great topic, would like to see more confidence next time.

The speech had good points, but was overly dramatic and had too many hand movements.

Speaks in a friendly conversational manner, and makes excellent points.

Points are not clear.The speech felt rehearsed and stiff.

The speech had few mistakes/repetitions (probably due to retakes and editing). Diction is not as good as many others. The speech had good points though.

Began nicely, but became nervous as the speech went on. Good points, but the presentation could be better.

Some irregular words. Good description.

A little more dramatic. 

Successfully connected what inspired the speaker to choose their ideal.

Described father as his ideal, touching description.

Honest and personalized speech.

Good life sketch But failed to explain why ideal was selected.

Inspired by personal experience. 

Missed giving credit for speech recording. To the point, relevant, good memorization but  style can be forceful.

Very well rehearsed topic. Strong confidence and great posture. Great pace for speech too. The only impact it’s missing is a feel of personality or personalization. Hand gestures also appear too rehearsed and lacks an ease which will round up the speaker to be most appealing to audience 

This speaker was heartfelt and appealing. The passion on the topic was evident. Couple of reasons the scores are lower is because of the pace being too aggressive causing repetition of phrases ; some intermingling of English words. 

Good composure and body posture. Hand gestures are rehearsed but still effective 

Extremely appealing style and good content. Confidence and vulnerability combined.

Good content and confidence. More speech and tone variation would have added more interest to audiences 

Good effort. Content is good. Speaker will develop with more practice 

Suggest improving eye contact as first step.

Good content and presentation. Hand gestures are rehearsed and almost distracting. Will encourage speaker to become more free flowing with hands for more effective speeches in future 

A much younger speaker than other competitors but good effort. With practice she can develop into a more engaging speaker 

Good effort. Speaker can focus on developing ease of speech 

Speaker had good connection with audience by smiling and hand gestures that were more naturally flowing. It appeared like speaker believed in her speech.

Extremely good speaker. Excellent control on speech and body language. Strong content , start and end too.

Good realistic speech. Content seemed close to speaker heart and that helped delivery quality

Extremely good speaker. Passion in voice and gestures. Very strong content , start and end too.

Good effort. Constant similar hand gestures were a little distracting. More practice will make speaker more confident

Good topic and content. Very distracting video due to edit of pictures etc. also due to the multiple edits , it does not compare equitably with other participants who have unedited single cut delivery of content

Very interesting twist to the topic. The intro was very non traditional and speaker accurately captures the potential sentiment of the audience. Speech was short but extremely impactful.

Picked a strong persona to idolize. Very good coverage about the idol. Scores are lower due to lack of eye contact , monotony of pace and lack of personal connection 

Maybe something to check. Another speaker has similar if  not same words. :) speaker was well paced and kept good eye contact. Seemed to be missing passion.

Good content and delivery. Would have been more impactful if speaker was louder and standing up instead of sitting behind desk.

Good effort.speaker will definitely benefit from more such participation to develop delivery style and confidence too.

Good strong speech. Confidence and good body language. Missed the personal connection and reasoning for picking the idol

The speaker is heartfelt. Good effort. Areas of improvement would be pace and eye contact.

Good topic. Good lead in into the speech. Good coverage of info and nice wrapup. Would have been more impactful if speaker was facing the camera.

Good recovery when content was forgotten. Confidence firm from start to finish. Good effort.

Very entertaining speaker with her hand gestures and verbal tuning. Good content. Areas of improvement would be reducing pace. Including voice modulation and tone variations. More control on hand gestures will allow audience to focus on speech content.

Good pace and very calm speaker. Would have helped if speaker stood up and added some hand movements to support the speech 

Good speech. Good pace and content coverage. Will encourage speaker to continue speaking to allow ease of body language 

Speaker would have been more impactful with eye contact and posture 

Good speech. Calm and composed. Good posture

Good calm pace and clear words. A little tonal variation and emphasis would have made speech more effective 

Calm and good speech. Good content. Adding passion and emphasis will add to audience engagement 

It appears that video is edited and not single take. Good effort 

Speaker had good sentiments towards his topic. The mode of delivery and abruptness of transitions made it hard to concentrate on the content. Good effort.

Speaker was at ease and laid her opinions down in straightforward and relatable way. The body language was calming and voice allowed for focus on words. The lead in to the topic was interesting and the closure was also very well done !  Only minor use of English observed. 

Speaker had extremely good content. From explaining what the topic meant to her to reasoning behind her choice. There was some degree of repetition but not much. Area for improvement would be better control on body language and a little bit more rehearsal 

Speaker's passion was evident from the beginning and retained same level through the end. Pace was very good and easy to comprehend. Hand gestures were not over the top and had good flow with topics. Only areas for improvement would be adding more meaningful qualifiers in addition to sentiments.

Not clear enunciation, rushed.

Clear and confident.

Nervous and hesitating.

Unclear diction and rushed, fumbling.

Nervous, Repetitive, fumbling with words.

No eye contact, no modulation.

Clear diction, confident but repetitive content.

No modulation, sounds stilted.

Sounds rushed and little modulation.

Clear enunciation, eye contact, natural.

Good beginning, clear, articulate, eye contact, confident.

Good beginning, good diction,smooth flow.

Good start, clear, good presentation.

Not clear diction, no projection.

Clear diction, good content and eye contact.

Not clear content, unfocused.

No eye contact, not smooth presentation. 

Good diction but too rehearsed.

Repetitious content, lacking substance.

Hesitating and fumbling with words.

Clear diction and good projection.

Too fast, flat tone and less modulation.

Smooth flow and clear presentation.

Good projection, clear diction but loosing thread often.

Not clear diction but didn't connect very well.

Simple and direct, clear and precise presentation.

Nervous and slight hesitation and fumbling.

Seems like reading off of prompts but clear.

Clear diction, good language, enunciation, modulation, eye contact and content.

Interesting subject and perspective, clean and clear presentation.

Good eye contact, good language and presentation.

Good vocabulary, clear but flat presentation.

Clear pronunciation, good eye contact and presentation.

Good language, clear but not smooth flow.

Good flow, clear diction, simple but substantive.

Good and confident presentation.

Clear diction but flat and nervous presentation.

पुरस्कार वितरण