President Trump nominated Louisiana Supreme Court Justice William "Will" Crain to serve as a federal judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Crain's nomination raises serious concerns about his fitness for the federal bench given his financial ties to the oil and gas industry, conflicts of interest requiring recusals, lack of transparency in judicial processes, and his vote to uphold Louisiana’s extreme abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest.
Campaign Funded by Big Oil and Gas Interests
Crain raised over $1 million in his 2019 Louisiana Supreme Court campaign, heavily backed by energy industry interests and big business, including strong support from the Louisiana Association for Business and Industry (LABI) and oil and gas associations.
Major contributors included:
Koch Industries: $10,000
ExxonMobil: $5,000
Helis Oil & Gas Company: $2,500
The Dow Chemical Company: $2,500
Lavigne Oil Company: $1,000
Conflicts of Interest and Recusals
Since joining the Louisiana Supreme Court, Crain has been subject to at least three recusal motions from the Talbot, Carmouche and Marcello law firm, which has represented landowners in coastal property damage lawsuits against oil and gas companies.
The firm argued that Crain's campaign mailers targeting attorney John Carmouche showed that Crain harbors “actual bias” against him.
The Supreme Court's other justices voted to recuse Crain from two of Carmouche’s cases in February 2020, though oil and gas companies later argued against further recusals.
Secretive Redistricting Process Lacking Transparency
Crain joined four other justices in secretly crafting a Louisiana Supreme Court redistricting proposal without holding public hearings, seeking public comment, or meaningfully consulting Chief Justice John Weimer.
The process stood in stark contrast to the 2022 congressional redistricting, where the Legislature spent extensive time educating the public and allowing time to review proposals.
Critics emphasized that “adopting proposals crafted behind closed doors without public input is not how representative democracy works.”
Chief Justice Weimer stated that the map was “drawn without his input” and objected to how it “sidelined the state's citizens.”
Voted to Uphold Abortion Ban Without Rape or Incest Exceptions
In August 2022, Crain joined three other justices in voting to keep Louisiana's abortion ban in effect without exceptions for rape or incest.
The ban carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in jail for anyone who provides an abortion deemed illegal.
Doctors warn that the ban's vague language could lead to women's deaths and has created a chilling effect in the medical community, as physicians struggle to determine when they can legally provide care even under narrow exceptions for saving a patient's life.