AcFin Plan 2012-13b

Text Box


Princess Miriam K. Likelike School

 

Academic and Financial Plan

 

2012-2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Kelly Bart, Principal

 

 

P: 832.3370

F: 832.3374

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Plan submitted on December 19, 2011

 

 

Plan approved on ________________

 

 

Plan approved by Complex Area Superintendent:

 

______________________________________


ACADEMIC AND FINANCIAL PLAN

 

 2012-2013

 

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Narrative Summary

 

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

 

Academic Plan  

 

SCC Assurances

 

Appendices:

 

          School-wide Components, Title 1

 

          School Improvement Elements, Title 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Narrative Summary

 

Likelike School was founded in 1922 and named after Princess Miriam K. Likelike and won a national blue ribbon award in 1992.  The teachers are highly-qualified, as defined by No Child Left Behind (NCLB), with a complementary mix of experience and youth.  They are in the early stage of working as a Professional Learning Community (PLC) and recognize the value of articulating together.  The school is the target of a consolidation study by the Board of Education, which will determine whether to shutter the school or not in May 2012.  The consolidation study has galvanized the community in support of keeping the school open; however, it is a distraction and a strain on the emotions of the Likelike School community.  

The staff is supportive of teachers and school initiatives and very experienced.  Several members live in or near the community, so are very familiar with the students, families, and culture of Kalihi.  Members, however, are not always included in committee assignments and planning sessions.  

The demographics of the students and parents have changed drastically in the last few years.  Likelike School has always had a large percentage of immigrants with limited-English skills and a large percentage of disadvantaged students due to the nearby government-subsidized housing complex that about 75% of the students live at.  For years the Filipino students represented over 50% of the immigrant students, but, recently this population has fallen to 36%.  The Pacific Islander group has increased considerably over the last few years, especially the Micronesian population.  The Chinese and Indo-Chinese groups are also making a noticeable jump in the demographic data.

The number of disabled, or special education (SPED), students has more than doubled from 6% to 13% in four years.  The SPED department has also changed dramatically with many new, inexperienced teachers coming to the school.  The teachers are conscientious workers but there is a lack of coordination among team members and the roles and responsibilities have not been clearly defined. 

The changes in the student population have made it difficult for Likelike School to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under NCLB.  The school did not make AYP in the last school year and is currently ‘In Good Standing, Pending’.   

The vision guiding the Likelike School community is, ‘Working together to develop successful lifelong learners in an ever-changing world’ and the mission statement is, ‘Use research-based instructional strategies and assessment data to provide students with the knowledge and skills to become contributory and productive citizens’.

Likelike School has had five principals in the last decade, each bringing their own leadership style and philosophy.   As a result, teachers were constantly adjusting to initiatives and curriculum changes.   In addition, there is a lack of communication among the stakeholders, which leads to an inconsistent execution of school initiatives.

The school has a solid foundation of teachers committed to excellence; however, there are many new teachers and veteran teachers in new positions, so there is a lack of consistency in teaching strategies and curriculum from class to class.

Student achievement has improved in the last few years but the school lags behind other elementary schools in the complex in overall achievement.  In addition, there are student sub-groups at Likelike School, SPED and ELL, which lag far behind their peer groups in reading and math achievement.  Currently, each grade-level has its own intervention process.  There is a need, however, to make the intervention process consistent and school wide.

There is a lack of early-learning opportunities in the community due to the low socio-economic conditions.  Early-learning would set a foundation in literacy and academic skills that should lead to better achievement and less referrals to interventions. 

School leadership, therefore, announced a pre-school program would be established for the 2012-13 school year, which will be modeled after the Even Start program, so it will include a family literacy and an adult education component. 

In addition, a school wide uninterrupted reading block (URB) will be established to address the low reading achievement.  The URB will use smaller learning groups and research will be conducted to find effective strategies and practices for the limited-English and disadvantaged learners. (SW2)

An inclusion model of co-teaching between SPED teachers and general education teachers will be implemented in grades one through five. This model should allow more SPED students to be taught in a general education setting, which research suggest leads to higher achievement among SPED students.

            Teachers will continue to develop into effective PLCs by establishing ‘norms of collaboration’.  The focus of the PLCs will be to examine school-level data on student achievement to identify gaps in learning and for teachers to use data to inform instruction, so students can progress toward meeting standards. (SW8)

Data will also be collected by the administration on classroom practices and strategies by using an instrument based on the work of Robert Marzano.  Data will be collected and analyzed quarterly so the faculty can identify which strategies and practices are in place and which need to be used more often.

There is a need in the school for a systematic approach to monitor student progress and make referrals for remediation, interventions, and supports.  The school will look at different models and put the building blocks in place.  Research, once again, will be conducted to find the most effective and appropriate practices for Likelike School.  

The new programs and initiatives at Likelike School are designed to raise student achievement in literacy and math.  Formative data on student achievement will be collected, which will be analyzed to see how students are progressing on grade-level standards.  School-level data will determine if the efforts are affecting all students or just a few.  Ultimately, summative data, such as the HSA, will determine how effective the school is in educating the students.  (SW8)

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT

(SW1; SW8)

 

The faculty of Likelike School collected and analyzed reading and math data from DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) and HSA (Hawaii State Assessment) in August 2011.  Each grade-level answered the following questions:

 

  • What are our strengths?
  • What are the need areas?
  • Do the reading and math programs address these areas thoroughly?
  • What will be used to supplement?
  • What will our school/grade level focus on?
  • What are our next steps?

 

In addition, data on attendance, demographics, discipline, and school quality were looked at.   The results of the data mining sessions were:

 

Concerns

  • Improve word analysis skills, grammar, and reading comprehension
  • Increase non-fiction reading experiences
  • Improve writing responses
  • Improve skills in using technology (computers  & calculators)
  • Percentage of students from Micronesia is rising sharply (very little research available on effective strategies and practices for this group)
  • Transitory student population
  • Few early-learning opportunities
  • High percentage of disadvantaged students

 

Positive

  • Math program, Envision, as a supplement
  • Use of graphic organizers and visual tools
  • Use of ‘validation’ and ‘justification’ to help in comprehension
  • Reading program, Storytown, is effective
  • Attendance is near the state benchmark of 95%
  • Few serious discipline violations
  • 97% of teachers are highly-qualified

 

In the 2010-2011 school year the school met all the participation requirements for No Child Left Behind (NCLB); met the retention requirements; met all the math requirements, via Safe Harbor (gain of 10% or more); but, did not meet on any of the reading requirements.  Overall Adequate Yearly Progress was not met’ and the NCLB status was ‘in good standing, pending’.   

 

The achievement data of the school fell short of the benchmarks under NCLB in reading and math.  Overall reading was at 50% with a benchmark of 72% and math was at 55% with a benchmark of 64%.  The benchmarks will continue to rise with the expectation that all students (i.e. 100%) achieve at the benchmarks by 2014. 

The lack of early-learning opportunities for many low-income students is a contributing factor to the low achievement scores.  Over 80% of the students participate in the federal free/reduced lunch program.  Less than half of the kindergarten students have any pre-school experience.  In addition, many students are immigrants and are entering Likelike School with limited-English skills.  Though the DIBELS assessment shows students improving over time, there are still a large percentage of students not meeting the grade-level standards before the end of each school year.

There are two sub-groups, the SPED and ELL, which are far behind their peers in reading and math.  The SPED population has more than doubled in the last five years and the department has many new teachers.  It is difficult to develop the necessary teaching strategies that the new SPED teachers need without any professional-collaboration days, which were taken off of the school calendar due to budget constraints.  In addition, there was a complex initiative of inclusion, which involved SPED and general education teachers co-teaching, that was started but never implemented with fidelity.  Research data suggests that the inclusion model can lead to higher achievement scores for SPED students. (SW2; SW3)

The ELL students are in a pull-out, resource model with one teacher and three part-time teachers.  The ELL staff needs further training in strategies to develop phonemic awareness and to use phonics instruction.  In addition, there are not any supports or interventions for the ELL students beyond the pull-out class.  Many teachers have ELL credits; however, there is limited research on strategies and practices for the Micronesian population.   

The school needs to raise its scores on literacy and math. In addition, the scores for the SPED and ELL students need to increase so the gap between those groups and their peers narrows.  Likelike School intends to focus on providing early-learning opportunities by funding a pre-school program (SW7), modeled after the Even Start program.  The pre-school program will have a family literacy component and a partnership with the Farrington Community School for Adults to provide for adult education for the parents (SW6).  The school will also begin an Uninterrupted Reading Block (URB) that will be school wide and daily.  The URB will use components and strategies that are supported by research, which shows an increase in literacy skills. (SW2)

To address the low achievement in reading and math by the SPED students the school will implement an inclusion program for grades one through five.  The program will allow for most SPED students to be co-taught in a general education classroom.  Research suggests that the inclusion model will increase the achievement of the SPED students, while providing effective instruction to the general education students. (SW2)

 

The school sees a need for a more comprehensive intervention system.  The data suggests that the current interventions are not effective.  One factor may be that the staff members are not using strategies that have been proven to be effective with limited-English and disadvantaged students.  The interventions in place are also not tiered, so there are not multiple levels of interventions and supports, which are needed for this learning community.

The school receives money from the 21st CCLC grant.  The grant allows the school to offer reading and math tutorials to students in grades 2 through 5.  The grant also allows the school to offer enrichment classes in academics, sports, fine arts (music, art, drama) as well as homework assistance.   Over 180 students in grades 1 through 5 attend these sessions after school, during intercessions, and summer. (SW9; SW10)

Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have been established to look at curricular concerns, data, and professional development.  The PLCs have made great progress to develop math problem-solving rubrics and a writing continuum to vertically align the writing component among all the grade levels.  Each grade-level has a PLC that looks at student data and formative assessments regularly to inform instruction. 

The PLCs are expected to be a big part of the professional development needed by the faculty and staff.  There is a need to develop teaching strategies in literacy in order to successfully use the Uninterrupted Reading Block.  Co-teaching strategies for the inclusion teams are also necessary.  The school recently purchased iPADs and Promethean boards (SW4), so professional development will be needed to identify best practices for these tools.  The use of technology among the students should make the curriculum more interactive and engaging.  The technology should also provide opportunities for our students to develop 21st century skills necessary to be college and career ready. (SW5)

There are several ways to monitor the progress presented in this academic plan. The school community council (SCC) will review this plan each quarter and report to the stakeholders at least twice during the school year. In addition, teachers will monitor data from summative and formative assessments regularly.  Summative data can be gathered from HSA and LDS and formative data can be gathered from DSI and other teacher-made instruments.  The data can be monitored monthly (or, more frequently, as needed).  Classroom practices and strategies will be monitored by the walkthrough protocol that was developed in the fall of 2011.  Faculty will review the data quarterly to guide instructional strategies that each teacher will accountable for.

 

 

 

 

 

 AcFin Plan Part 1

AcFin 2012-2013 Part 2

 

Goal 1  ASSURE ALL STUDENTS GRADUATE COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF     

             STANDARDS-BASED EDUCATION

Objectives: 

a.      Utilize formative assessments, including Data for School Improvement to drive instruction.

b.      Improve schools and system through use of Longitudinal Data System Dashboards.

c.      Use high quality standards, curriculum and materials.

d.      Expand opportunities for rigorous Career and Technical Education programs of study within the pathways.

School Strategies (aligned to DOE Strategic Plan measures) (SW6) (SW8) (SW9)

1.

Continue the development and refinement of grade-level common assessments in reading and math

2.

Use research-based practices to make informed decisions on curriculum, instruction, and assessment strategies and materials

3.

Collect, analyze, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data to inform instruction

4.

Implement co-teaching practices in grades 1-5, via Gloeckler’s inclusion model

 

Rationale

The school leadership looked at achievement, accountability, and behavior data (SW1).  Analysis of the data showed the overall reading and math achievement scores to be short of school and state objectives.  In addition, two gap groups, the limited-English speakers (ELL) and the disabled learners (SPED) were identified as lacking their peers in achievement.  The percentage of all students proficient in reading was 51% and 55% in math.  The SPED levels were 13% of students proficient in reading and 17% proficient in math.  The ELL levels were 28% proficient in reading and 33% proficient in math.  One very successful sub-group was the recently exited ELL students.  The achievement proficiency for that group was 80% for reading and 67% for math. 

 

Reading comprehension and math problem-solving continue to be an area of need for the students.  Over 40% of the students are identified as ELL and 83% of the students qualify for the free/reduced lunch program.  The school population is transitory and a majority of students are first or second-generation immigrants attending a new school system.  Attendance, however, has held steady at 95%, which is the state benchmark.  It was determined that many students lacked early-learning opportunities, such as pre-school, and were entering Likelike School lacking the necessary phonemic awareness and phonic instruction necessary to perform at grade-level.  DIBELS data showed that 39% of the students in kindergarten through second grade needed ‘substantial interventions’ in the beginning of the 2010-2011 school year.  While that percentage was down to 25% by the end of the school year, only 50% of the students in kindergarten through second grade achieved at the grade-level benchmarks during the school year. 

 

The steering committee looked at research in the areas of raising literacy and math scores for a diverse population and identifying effective instructional strategies to raise achievement levels for the ELL and SPED. students.  The faculty will continue to use formative and summative assessments (SW8; SI1) with the former used by the professional learning communities (PLCs), also known as data teams, (SW2; SI2) to analyze and interpret data for student improvement.  Proven research-based practices and strategies will be utilized across the curriculum.  Examples of these practices are using descriptive feedback and co-teaching models (SW2; SI2).  Co-teaching, also known as inclusion, would allow for most SPED and ELL students to be taught by two teachers, a general education and a special education teacher, in a regular classroom. 

Funded Enabling Activities

(SW2, SW4, SW5, SW6, SW8,SI 1, SI 2,

SI 3, SI 4, SI 8, SI 9)

Outcomes (SI 5)

Initial

Intermediate

 

Lead

(SI 7)

 

Timeline

Expenditure (SI 3)

Description

Est $ Amount

1.     Common grade-level assessments

·       Teacher created

·       End-of-unit tests

·       Data for school improvement (DSI) (3-5)

·       DIBELS (pre-2)

·       Easy CBM math DIBELS (K-5)

·       DRA (3-5)

 

(SW8; SW9)

a. 100% of teachers will administer common grade-level assessments regularly (evidence: assessment instrument and data records)

a. 100% of teachers will collaboratively score or mark student work regularly (evidence: grade-level meeting minutes and data records)

a.  100% of teachers will collect quantitative and qualitative data on student performance and analyze the data to determine instructional strategies (evidence: grade-level meeting minutes and data records )

b.   70% of students will perform at the grade-level benchmark for DIBELS by the end of the grade 2 (evidence: LDS )

b.  65% students in grades 3 through 5 will perform at the meets or exceeds level on HSA for reading and math (evidence: HSA data) (SI2)

 

Teachers

- GLCs

 

 

Quarterly

- 4X

 

DIBELS  dues

 

$300/year

2.     Inclusion practices (1-5)

 

(SW2; SW3

a.  Inclusion teams will be established for grades 1 through 5 allowing for at least 60% of SPED students to be taught in the general ed. setting for LA and math (evidence: LRE data)

b.  The number of SPED students, who will meet or exceed on the HSA, will increase by 10% in reading and math (evidence: HSA data for SPED. cell)  (SI2; SI5)

 

Principal &    Sped. DH

 

Ongoing

- monthly articulation

 

 

 

 

3.     Research-based strategies

·       Marzano strategies

·       Advancement Via Individual Determination- AVID (3-5)

·       Uninterrupted Reading Block (URB)

 

(SW2; SW3)

a.  Administration and school leaders will collect data on Marzano strategies using the Walkthrough Protocol regularly each quarter (evidence: collected data from Walkthroughs)

a.  All teachers in grades 3 through 5 will implement AVID concepts, strategies, and practices in the classroom (evidence: Student portfolio) (SI1)

a.  All teachers and support staff will implement a common 90 minute URB (evidence: classroom observations) (SI1)

b.  The use of Marzano strategies in the classroom will be determined by data collected and analyzed quarterly to determine efficacy of Marzano strategies (evidence: data from Walkthroughs). (SI1)

b.  AVID portfolios will be randomly pulled and evaluated regularly and 80% of the portfolios will demonstrate proficient use of the AVID strategies (evidence: evaluation of AVID portfolios) (SI1)

b.  Student achievement scores in reading, as assessed by DIBELS and HSA, will increase by 10% (evidence: DIBELS and HSA scores) (SI5)

Principal

-  walk -   through data

 

 

 

AVID

- GLCs

 

 

 

URB

- GLCs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly

 

 

 

 

 

Ongoing

- quarterly 

   assess.

 

 

Ongoing

- quarterly

   assess.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AVID annual dues

 

 

 

3 PTTs at $22/hr. for reading

 

 

 

 

 

$1900/yr.

 

 

 

 

$40,000

4.     Data Coordinator

·       Collate student and school data for analysis

(SW5)

a. Coordinator will collate summative and formative data regularly each quarter (evidence: collected data)

b.  100% of students will be monitored and evaluated for progress each quarter.

 

Data Coordinator

 

Quarterly

 

One Full-time teacher

 

$55,000

(Title 1)

TOTALS/SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Possible Enabling Activities if Supplemental Funds are Available

(SW 2) (SW / SI 4)

Outcomes (SI 5)

Initial

Intermediate

 

Lead

(SI 7)

 

Timeline

Expenditure (SI 3)

Description

Est. $ Amount

1. Summer school      

 

(SW9; SW10)                                                        

a. Allow students, particularly the at-risk or under-performing students, to attend summer school in order to receive instruction in the core academic areas of literacy and math (evidence: classroom observation). (SI9)

b. 100% of students participating in summer school will improve in literacy and math by 10% as measured by teacher or program developed assessments (evidence: teacher or program created assessments). (SI5)

 

Principal & summer school dir.

 

June 2012

 

Four teachers at $22/hr. for 6 weeks

 

$8000 (appx.)

TOTALS/SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clarifying Comments

1)    The use of (Robert) Marzano’s instructional strategies began in SY 2009-10 as part of the McKinley complex’s professional collaboration day training.  The complex adopted the Marzano strategies in an effort to address the goal of “using research-based strategies”.  (SW2)

2)    AVID was established in SY 2008-09 in grades 4 and 5.  This SY 12-13 will be the first year of implementation for grade 3 (SW2; SW3).

3)    The Walkthrough Protocol is a version of the Marzano short-form and was created in SY 11-12 (SW2).

4)    Inclusion teams were established in grades 1 and 5 in SY 11-12.  Inclusion teams for grades 2-4 were trained by the Gloeckler team in SY 11-12 for practical implementation in SY 12-13 (SW2; SW3).

5)    Research for the uninterrupted reading block (URB) began in SY 11-12 with implementation planned for SY12-13 (SW2; SW3).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goal 2  ENSURE AND SUSTAIN A RICH ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE FOR LIFE-LONG LEARNERS

Objectives:

a.         Increase personalization with appropriate and timely supports.

b.         Ensure quality professional development including PDE3.

c.         Improve performance through a quality performance evaluation process.

 

School Strategies  (aligned to DOE Strategic Plan measures ) (SW6) (SW9)

1.

Continue after school and intercession tutorial sessions for students who require support

2.

Continue professional development training sessions with research-based practices and strategies

3.

Continue grade-level articulation and faculty PLCs

4.

Continue to conduct parent workshops

 

Rationale

The school leadership set a goal of making AYP by focusing on raising literacy and math achievement scores. PLCs have been established as a routine for grade-level and department teachers to meet, so this year the goal is to become more focused on the PLCs to collect and analyze school and student data (SI2) and to use research-based strategies and practices to increase the learning by students (SW8).  The prior plan called for PLCs to meet quarterly, while this plan calls for weekly meetings.  The PLCs should become more efficient and the impact on student-learning should be greater.

 

A significant number of students are not meeting on the HSA so it is imperative that students participate in the supports available during the school day, after school, and intercessions (SW9; SW10; SI2).  The supports will be focused on literacy and math.  Particular focus will be put on the SPED and ELL students as they comprise the gap groups identified by school data.  A grant, the 21 Century Community Learning Center (CCLC), was awarded to the McKinley complex schools. The grant allows for Likelike School to hire certified teachers to tutor in reading and math, as well as the arts, PE, and health, after school and during extended breaks. 

 

In SY 11-12 the school purchased nine Promethean Boards (eight Promethean Boards were previously purchased in 2010) and 30 iPADs with the intent of increasing student engagement.  Teachers, however, need to understand how the technological tools can be applied in the classroom environment, therefore, professional development (SW4) in the use and application of the technological tools is important. 

 

Less than half of the kindergarten students at Likelike School have pre-school experience.  Hawaii, unfortunately, does not allocate any state funds to early child education programs, so it is difficult for children in the Kalihi-Palama area to access any pre-school program.  Early education is critical because children who do not have access to quality programs can enter kindergarten 18 months behind their peers.  Likelike School, therefore, will add a pre-school position and create an early-learning program to establish a foundation of academic skills and student-learning for the pre-school students (SW7).

 

The parents of the pre-school children will be mandated to participate in the family literacy and parent-training workshops (SW6; SI8) as part of the pre-school program.  Parents of ELL and general education students will also be offered the workshops with the hope of creating a rich environment of literacy for the students at school and home.  

 

Funded Enabling Activities

(SW2, SW6, SW7, SW8, SW9, SW10, SI 6, SI 8)

Outcomes (SI 5)

Initial

Intermediate

 

Lead

(SI 7)

 

Timeline

Expenditure (SI 3)

Description

Est. $ Amount

1. Pre-school

 

(SW7)

a.  Pre-school teacher to implement age-appropriate curriculum, instruction, and assessments (evidence: classroom observation)

b.  100% of students will meet age appropriate benchmarks in language development (evidence: program assessments). (SI5)

 

Pre-school teacher

 

Ongoing

 

One full-time teacher

 

$55, 000

2. Parent Workshops

  • Family literacy
  • Parent training

 

(SW6)

a.     Pre-school and ELL teachers and PCNC will conduct workshops for parents to develop and enhance parent knowledge and skills (evidence: sign-in sheets)

b.     100% of students, whose parents participated in the workshops, will transfer the skills into the classroom. (SI8)

 

Pre-school & ELL teachers and PCNC

 

 

Monthly

 

Parent training

 

$1200 (Title 1)

3. PLC (data teams)

  • Data readiness matrix
  • Analyzing student data
  • Adjust instruction  

 

(SW2; SW8)

a. Grade-level teachers will meet weekly to collect and analyze data and to determine instructional strategies to meet the needs of the learners (evidence: grade-level minutes) (SI1; SI2)

a. Grade-level teachers will progress at least one score on the data readiness matrix (evidence: readiness matrix)

b. 50% of students, who did not meet the benchmark on an assessment, will meet the benchmark on the subsequent assessment, each month     (evidence: DSI data). (SI5)

 

GLCs

 

Ongoing

 

 

 4. Continue to provide additional support for all students not meeting proficiency in reading and math

  • Targeted direct-instruction
  • Supplemental programs
    • Phonics for Reading (gr.1-3)
    • REWARDS (gr. 4-5)
    • 21st Century Grant program
  • Supplemental computer-based programs
    • Achieve 3000/KidBiz (gr. 2-5)
    • Math Whiz (gr. 2-5)
    • iXL Learning (math)
    • Imagine Learning
    • Star Fall (gr. K-1 and ELL)

 

(SW3; SW9; SW10)

a. Grade-levels will provide    

    interventions and supports to   

    all students not meeting

    benchmarks in reading and

    math (evidence: enrollment

    data). (SI2)

b. 100% of students receiving supports will show at least a 10% growth per quarter, as measured by teacher, program, or state assessments (evidence: teacher, program, or state assessments). (SI5)

 

Teachers

 

Ongoing w/quarterly assess.

 

One PTT at $22/hr. for math

 

 

 

3 PTTs at $22/hr for ELL

 

IXL license

 

Imagine Learning License

 

$5000

 

 

 

 

 

$32,000

 

 

 

$1800 (Title 1)

 

$3600 (Title 1)

5.     Professional Development

  • Research-based practices and strategies
  • Common Core State Standards
  • Inclusion/co-teaching model
  • Technology support
    • Promethean Boards
    • iPAD apps

 

(SW4)

 

a. 100% of teachers will engage in PD to acquire or enhance knowledge and skills in research-based strategies and practices to be delivered in the classroom (evidence: sign-in sheets). (SI3)

b. Student engagement will increase and, as a result, student disruptions will decrease by 10%, quarter-over-quarter (evidence: teacher referrals).

 

Principal & coords.

 

Ongoing

 

125 sub. Days @ $159/day

 

$20,000 (Title 1)

TOTALS/SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clarifying Comments

1)    Likelike School had a pre-school program, Evenstart, which was de-funded in May 2011. The pre-school program would use the Evenstart program as a model, which has an academic component for the children and a parent component that is focused on family literacy and parent-training (SW6; SI8).  The school has hired the former Evenstart teacher(s) to run the pre-school program.  15 children and their parents are expected to be in the pre-school class during the SY 12-13 (SW7).

2)    The CCSS will be implemented, K-2, in math and literacy this year with grades 3-5 to implement in 2015.

 

Goal 3  CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY, AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

Objectives: 

a.         Use effective external and internal communications.

b.         Standardize practices based on data and research.

School Strategies  (aligned to DOE Strategic Plan measures) (SI 1) (SI 2) (SI 9)

1.

Monitoring school plan to ensure all goals are met

2.

Improve communication through the use of technology

3.

Improve the quality of teachers, particularly non-highly qualified,  through a mentor program

 

Rationale

All stakeholders in the Likelike School community should be aware of how the school is performing and should have opportunities to meet and dialog with school leadership and teachers to discuss issues at the school or in the community.  It is important to school leadership that all stakeholders participate in the crafting of the strategic plan (SW1), i.e. the academic plan, and the decisions to allocate resources; therefore, it is critical to breakdown barriers to communication among the stakeholders and provide opportunities for stakeholders to meet and dialog.  Developing relationships and creating a culture of high-performance is obtainable if all stakeholders are engaged in the process.  

 

All teachers at Likelike School are certified in their field of teaching, while only one teacher is not Highly Qualified.  Teachers who are not Highly Qualified (according to NCLB) will be expected to develop a professional development plan (PDP), with the principal, to meet the requirements of becoming Highly Qualified (SW4).  Teachers who are not Highly Qualified will be provided a mentor teacher to guide and monitor progress on the PDP and other teacher responsibilities (SW5). 

 

Funded Enabling Activities

(SW 2) (SW3) (SW4) (SW5) (SW10) (SI 6)

 (SI 10)

Outcomes (SW2) (SI 5)

Initial

Intermediate

 

Lead

(SI 7)

 

Timeline

Expenditure (SI 3)

Description

(SW10)

Est. $ Amount

1.     Evaluation of Academic Plan

  • By committees
    1. Steering & SCC
  • Use PDCA model

 

(SW10)

a. The goals and objectives of the

     academic plan are monitored,

     evaluated, and adjusted monthly  

     (evidence: meeting agendas and

    PDCA worksheets).

b. Student achievement in reading

    and math will increase by 15%

    year-over-year (evidence: HSA

    data).

 

Principal

 

Monthly

 

 

2.     School-wide communication

  • Use school website to post school data
  • Use Lotus Notes to post meeting agenda and minutes

 

a. School will post information and        data on website for greater access by school-community members     (evidence: website).

b. Awareness by students of school information and data will increase by 50% year-over-year (evidence: surveys).

 

Tech. coord.

 

Ongoing

 

 

3.     Teacher-mentor program

  • Focus on non-highly qualified teachers
  • Develop highly effective teachers

 

(SW4; SW5)

a. 100% of teachers will become    Highly Qualified (evidence: HQT data).

b. 15% more students will meet or exceed on the HSA in reading and math (evidence: HSA data).

(SI10)

Mentor

Ongoing

 

 

TOTALS/SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clarifying Comments

1) If there are any funds not allocated from the prior year plan (so called “carryover funds”), then the school would utilize the funds to enhance classroom instruction.  For example, hiring PTTs to teach reading and math or, perhaps, to hire PTTs to enhance after school instruction.  Other possibilities, depending on the amount of carryover funds, may be to enhance the professional development of the teachers. Leadership would like to hire a consultant in the norms and effectiveness of collaboration.    

SCC Assurances SY12-13 Part 3

Hawaii State Department of Education

Academic and Financial Plan 2012 – 2013

 

Assurances and Recommendation for Approval

 

The Likelike School Community Council (SCC) recommends this school plan to the Complex Area Superintendent for approval and assures the following:

 

1.   The SCC is correctly constituted and was formed in accordance with the Board of Education policy, Department of Education procedures and state law.

2.   The SCC reviewed its responsibilities under the Board or Education policy, Department of Education procedures and state law, including those related to the review of the Academic and Financial Plan.

3.   The SCC sought and considered all recommendations from the school community or committees before recommending this plan for approval. Check all that apply.

 

A School Community Meeting was conducted to share the school data and gather input on student priorities.

Date of School Community Meeting:

October 28, 2011

 

A School Community Meeting was conducted to share the draft Academic and Financial Plan and gather feedback and recommendations. 

Date of School Community Meeting:

December 9, 2011

 

Other (List Examples -- School Leadership Team, Curriculum Committee School Safety Committee, School CSSS Cadre

Faculty Meeting on December 7, 2011



4.    The SCC reviewed the Academic and Financial Plan and found that it is based upon a thorough analysis of student performance data and incorporates researched-based interventions.

 

5.  The actions proposed herein form a sound, focused, and coherent plan aligned with and aimed at improvement goals targeting student academic performance.

 

6.   The principal has provided a clear explanation to the SCC about the status of each of the recommendations made by the SCC regarding the Academic and Financial Plan.

 

7.   This school plan was adopted through consensus or by vote by the School Community Council on: Date:  December 9, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attested:

 

 

 

 

 

 

School Principal

 

Signature

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCC Chairperson

 

Signature

 

Date

 

 

SCC Recommendations to the Academic and Financial Plan (AFP):

The School Community Council, in review of the Academic and Financial Plan has provided the principal with the following recommendations for consideration. These recommendations are included as a means to share these issues with the Complex Area Superintendent and to identify the action taken by the principal on the SCC recommendations.

SCC Recommendation:

Rationale for the SCC Recommendation:

Principal’s Response to SCC Recommendation:

 

Include classified staff and other support staff in training sessions

 

 PD conducted for all staff members to improve professional knowledge and skills

 

  Agreed

Match parent workshop goals to student learning outcomes

 

Parent training should be aligned to student learning

 

 Agreed

 

 

 

 

SCC Comments:  [Statement of problem or concerns regarding AFP process]

 

 

         Left intentionally blank


 

Title I SW crosswalk Part 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix One:

 

 

 

Crosswalk of School Plans and

 

Title I School-wide Components


 

 

10 Components of a School-wide Program for all Title I Schools

Location in Strategic Plan or Academic & Financial Plan

SW1

Incorporate a comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1:  Rationale

 

SW2

Identify school-wide reform strategies that –

·       Provide opportunities for all students to meet proficiency

·       Use effective methods and instructional strategies

·       Include strategies to address the needs of all students, particularly the needs of low achieving students and those at-risk of not meeting the State’s academic achievement standards

·       Address how the school will determine if such needs have been met

·       Are consistent with, and are designed to implement the state and complex area improvement plans, if any

Academic Plan: Overview SY 2012 – 13

-How Are We Going to Get to Where We Want to Be

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1:  Rationale

              Enabling activity 2 & 3

              Clarifying Comments: 1 – 5

Goal 2:  Enabling Activity 3

 

 

 

SW3

Provide instruction by highly qualified teacher

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1: Enabling Activity 2 & 3

             Clarifying Comments 2, 4, 5

Goal 2: Rationale

             Enabling Activity 4

 

 

SW4

Provide high quality and on-going professional development for teachers, principals and paraprofessional, and if appropriate, pupil services personnel

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 2: Rationale

             Enabling activity 5

 

SW5

Implement strategies to attract high quality, highly qualified teacher to high need schools

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 2:  Rationale

              Enabling Activity 5

 

 

 

 

 

SW6

Implement strategies to increase parental involvement, such as family literacy services

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 2: Rationale

             Enabling activity 2

             Clarifying Comments 1

 

SW7

Incorporate transition plan for assisting preschool children from early childhood programs, such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a State-run preschool program to local elementary school program.

 

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan:

Goal 2:  Enabling Activity 1

              Clarifying Comments

 

SW8

Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program.

 

Academic Plan: Overview SY 2012 – 13

-        How Are We Going to Get to Where We Want to Be

-        Is What We Are Doing Making a Difference

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1:  Rationale

              Enabling activity 1

Goal 2:  Rationale 

              Enabling Activity 3

 

SW9

Ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering the proficient or advanced levels of academic achievement standards shall be provided with effective, timely, additional assistance which shall include measures to ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance.

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1: Enabling activity 1

             Possible Enabling Activity 1

Goal 2:  Rationale

              Enabling Activity 4

 

 

SW10

Coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local services and programs, including programs supported under this ACT (NCLB), violence prevention program, nutrition program, housing program, Head Start, adult education . . .

Academic Plan: Comprehensive Needs

     Assessment SY 2012 - 2013

Academic Plan

Goal 1:  Possible Enabling Activity 1

Goal 2: Rationale

             Enabling Activity 4

 

Title 1 SI crosswalk Part 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix Two:

 

 

 

Crosswalk of School Plans and

 

Title I School Improvement Elements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elements of School

Improvement Plan

For

Schools In Status

Reflective Questions

Notations

(indicate location in the AcFn plan – i.e. pg. #, Goal #, Enabling Activities, Overview etc.)

SI 1.

Using research-based strategies:  The plan must incorporate strategies, based on scientifically-based research, that address the academic issues that caused the school to be identified.

To what extent has the staff used ideas from current research and thinking related to content area (e.g., State and national standards)?

Academic Plan

Goal 1 – Rationale

               Enabling Activity 3 – Initial and

                   Intermediate Outcomes

Goal 2 – Enabling Activity 3 – Initial Outcome

SI 2.

Adopting “best practices.”  For the core academic subjects, the plan must outline policies and practices that have the greatest likelihood of ensuring that all subgroups of students become proficient by 2013 – 2014.  (The key is adopting those practices that will benefit all students, not just the subgroups that traditionally have had the best chance of meeting standards.)

How have you used best practices to directly address the academic achievement problem that caused the school to be identified for school improvement?

Academic Plan

Goal 1 – Rationale

-        Enabling Activity 1, Intermediate Outcome

-        Enabling Activity 2, - Intermediate Outcome

Goal 2 – Rationale

-        Enabling Activity 3, Initial Outcome

-        Enabling Activity 4, Initial Outcome

SI 3.

Meeting professional development needs.  The plan must provide an assurance that the school will spend at least 10 percent of its Title I, Part A funds for high-quality professional development.  (This professional development must directly address the academic achievement problems that caused the school to be identified.)

 

What professional development activities are planned to address academic achievement problems?

Have you set aside 10% of you new Title I School Allocation for professional development?

 

SI 4.

Using professional development funds effectively.  The plan must specify how the school will use the 10 percent set-aside described above to remove itself from improvement status.

 

Provide high quality and on-going professional development for teachers, principals and paraprofessional, and if appropriate, pupil services personnel.

What evidence do you have to show the implementation of school-centered professional development?

 

Based on your needs assessment, how have you involved the role groups or personnel to receive this high quality and on-going professional development?

 

SI 5.

Setting Annual Goals.  The plan must set specific annual measurable objectives for continuous progress by each subgroup of students.

What goals/objectives assure that all groups of students progress toward meeting proficiency on State standards?

Academic Plan

Goal 1 –   Enabling Activity 2, Intermediate

                Outcome

-        Enabling Activity 3, Intermediate

Outcome

-        Possible Enabling Activity 1,     

Intermediate Outcome

Goal 2 – Enabling Activity 1, Intermediate

                 Outcome

-        Enabling Activity 4, Intermediate

Outcome

SI 6.

Outlining parent notices.  The plan must describe how the school will provide written notice about the improvement identification to parents.

How does your school notify parents of your school improvement identification?

How does your school notify parent regarding:  1) HQT,   2) Supplemental Educational Services, and 3) Public School Choice and Transportation Related Services?

 

How are parents educated about the relation between local school programs and the federal or state programs that support them?

 

How is the complaint procedure communicated to parents?

 

 

 

 

 

SI 7.

Assigning responsibilities.  The plan must specify the responsibilities of the school, the district, and the state under the plan, including descriptions of the district’s technical assistance and fiscal responsibilities.

Which individual or group is clearly identified as taking the lead role for answering questions and concerns regarding the interventions in the plan?

 

Are the roles and responsibilities for accountability clear?

 

SI 8.

Increasing parent involvement.  The plan must detail strategies to promote effective parent involvement.

Implement strategies to increase parent involvement, such as family literacy services.

What strategies are being implemented to promote effective parent involvement?

 

What actions in the plan address your school’s parent involvement policy and parent compact?

Academic Plan

Goal 2 – Rationale

-        Enabling Activity 2, Intermediate

Outcome

-   Clarifying Comments

SI 9.

Increasing instructional time.  As appropriate, the plan must incorporate activities for students before school, after school, during the summer, and during any extension of the school year.

What extended learning opportunities are you providing your students?

Academic Plan

Goal 1 – Possible Enabling Activity 1, Initial

               Outcome

SI 10.

Setting up teacher mentoring.  The plan must incorporate a teacher mentoring program.

What teacher mentoring program(s) are available for your staff?

Academic Plan

Goal 3 – Rationale

            - Enabling Activity 3, Initial Outcome

 





Google Translate My Page


1618 Palama Street Honolulu, HI 96817 Phone: (808) 832-3370 Fax: (808) 832-3374 Principal: Mr. Kelly Bart