Processing use cases
GEOSS Common Record proposal table
Data quality flags
1) Distinguish GCR elements as queryable, brief, summary, full.
1.5) Look at data quality and usage constraints elements in this same light, e.g. one data quality and one usage constraint status field queryable, several fields returnable (e.g. attribution field).
2) Describe more complete definition / format for queryable properties to improve findability, then describe transformations or improvements to be made by metadata providers in order to close the loop on discovery (e.g. geographic extent really does mean observational footprint).
3) Limitation on queryable parameters does not mean that a portal cannot a) utilize/offer fulltext search of other fields or b) provide further local filtering of clearinghouse results. Erin showed uFind as an example of the latter. This clearly has limitations if the initial query returns more than ~1000 records to be filtered, but is at least a start for effective discovery.
4) Also will need to designate which GCR elements are applicable to which resource types (e.g. dataset, service, "dataservice", application).
Perhaps translate to a Sites page for easier comment and consensus.
Solicit feedback from data providers and clearinghouse people.
Local time: http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=8&day=9&year=2010&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
Dimdim & Telecon Info: http://my.dimdim.com/joshlieberman /
Telecon Access Code: 719290# # Telecon: Conference Dial-in Number: * USA (712) 432-1600 * Austria: 0820 4000 1552 * Belgium: 070 35 9974 * France: 0826 100 256 * Germany: 01805 00 76 09 * Ireland: 0818 270 021 * Italy: 848 390 156 * Netherlands: 0870 001 920 * Spain: 902 886025 * Switzerland: 0848 560 179 * UK: 0844 58 191 02