Literary Oracle

A Peer Reviewed International Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Insight

(Journal of the Post Graduate Department of English, Berhampur University)


ISSN: 2348-4772

Indexed in ERIH PLUS

Call for Papers: December Issue 2022

The last date for submission of paper : 31st October , 2022



INDEXED IN ERIH PLUS


Editorial Board

Journal of the Department of English, Berhampur University, Odisha, India

Chief Editor:

Dr Shruti Das, Head, P.G.Department of English, Berhampur University, Odisha, India.


Associate Editors:

Dr Sharbani Banerjee, Associate Prof., Post Graduate Department of English, TDB College, Raniganj,West Bengal

Dr. Deepshikha Routray, Maharshi College of Natural Law, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

Publisher: AuthorsPress, New Delhi, India

Editorial Board:

CHIEF ADVISORS:

Professor Jatin K Nayak, Utkal University, India

Professor Nicolas Tredell, University of Sussex, UK

Professor Alan Johnson, University of Idaho, USA

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr Balabhadra Tripathy, Associate Professor, PG Dept of English, Berhampur University, India

Prof. Susheel K Sharma, Allahabad University, Prayagraj, India

Dr Patrycja Austin, University of Rzeszow, Poland.

Prof. Bijay K. Danta, Tezpur University, Assam, India

Prof. Hitesh D Raviya, The Maharaj Sayajirao University of Baroda, Gujarat, India

Prof. M E Vedasharan, EFLU, Hyderabad.

Prof. Lynette Russell, Director, Monash Indigenous Centre, Australia.

Prof. Sukhbir Singh, Prof. Emeritus, Osmania University, India

Prof. Ram Narayan Panda, Berhampur University, India.

Prof. Ludmila Volna, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Prof. Subhra Prakash Das, Ravenshaw University, India.

Dr Joji J. Paniker, CMS College, Kottayam, Kerala, India

Prof. Sooshilla Gopaul, Open University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

REVIEW EDITORS

Prof. Jaydeep Sarangi, Principal,

Jogesh Chandra Choudhry College, India.

Dr P.V. Laxmiprasad, Asst. Prof of English, Satvahana University, Telengana.

NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD

Prof. Peter Wolfe, Prof. Emeritus, University of Missourie, St. Louis, USA

Prof. Daya Dissanayake, Writer, columnist, Activist, Sri Lanka

Dr. Ecaterina Petrascu, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania.

Prof. Ellen Handler Spitz, Visual Art University of Maryland, USA.

Dr. Lata Mishra, Associate Prof., Editor Labyrinth, Gwalior.

Prof. Fewzia Bedjaoui, Sidi Bel Abbes University, Algeria.

Prof. A. Karunakar, Director, OUCIP, India.

Prof. Maggie A. Bowers, University of Portsmouth, UK.

Dr. Debashree Dattaray, Associate Prof., Jadavpur University, India.



Contact


Chief Editor:

Dr Shruti Das, Head, P.G.Department of English, Berhampur University, Odisha, India. +91 9438435130


Associate Editors:

Dr Sharbani Banerjee, Associate Prof., Post Graduate Department of English, TDB College, Raniganj,West Bengal

Dr. Deepshikha Routray, Maharshi College of Natural Law, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

Publisher: AuthorsPress, New Delhi, India


Tel: 09526781674;

09439761168;

09438435130;

09732777284

P G Department of English

Berhampur University

Bhanja Bihar, Burhampur, Odisha, India. 760007

editor.litoracle@gmail.com

Authors Press, New delhi, India

authorspressgroup@gmail.com




Archive

Peer Review Format

Peer Review Format

Review of the article ---------------------------------------------- submitted to ‘Literary Oracle’

A. Summary assessment of the article :

[ ] it can be published in its current form-

[ ] it needs to be revised in line with the comments of the reviewer

[ ] after which it must be reviewed again

[ ] after which it does not have to be reviewed again

[ ] it cannot be accepted for publication in Literary Oracle because:

[ ] it does not meet the criteria of academic writing

[ ] it does not make a sufficiently large contribution to the to the literature of the subject

[ ] contains significant errors

B. Weaknesses of the article:

Please choose from the options below as appropriate

1. [ ] it does not specify a research question or a main argument that is being made

2. [ ] opinions that it presents are not sufficiently supported

3. [ ] it does not refer sufficiently to the literature of the subject

4. [ ] it contains significant factual errors

5. [ ] its contribution to the research in the field is marginal

6. [ ] it uses the works of others in inappropriate way

7. [ ] it contains grammatical, stylistics and other writing errors

8. [ ] its title does not correspond to the content

9. [ ] it is too long and contains unnecessary footnotes.


C. Comments:

D. Suggested changes: