Note the following:
So the question is, are we referring to the 1st Beit HaMikdash or the 2nd Beit HaMikdash? The GR"A's peirush on the Tikkunei Zohar answers this. On the words "and there are those who calculate it from the cessation of the Tamid", he writes that the Tamid ceased to be brought 20 years prior to the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash. This explains Daniel having 1290, and this teaching having 1270. In his notes on the bottom of the page, on the issue of the 2 years for the letter beit, he writes that in reality it was 18 years. (Explanation - We go 20 years back, and then count 1292 years, or go forward 2 years before counting 1290. Alternatively, subtract 18 from the year of destruction.) Let's look at the 2nd Beit HaMikdash, destroyed in 3828. 3828 - 18 + 1290 = 5100 The GR"A explains that this is the (implied) calculation. What is the problem, which the GR"A does not say explicitly? The Tamid did not cease 18 years prior; the events leading to the Churban started less than a decade prior to the actual Churban. Indeed Rashi on Daniel 12:11 says the Tamid of the 2nd Beit HaMikdash stopped 6 years prior to the Churban, and even this seems to be difficult, since the revolt that lead to the destruction only started approximately 4 years before the Churban. The 1st Beit HaMikdash was destroyed in the year 3338. If we look 18 years prior, we find the year that Nevuchadnezar first came to Yerushalayim. The sod of the Tikkunei Zohar is referring us to this year as our starting point. So theoretically, if we add 1290 years to this point, we should find our answer as to the identity of the Desolate Abomination.
What happened in 850 CE of note that might shed light on the matter? Nothing. However, according to the physical reality, the 1st Beit HaMikdash was not destroyed 2430 years ago, but rather a further 163 years prior in the year 3175 (586 BCE).
That year was the beginning of the construction of the Dome of the Rock. That is it. The verses say to count days. Why would it say days if the meaning is years? I propose that the word days is given to indicate to us that these are physical years. Why? If I tell you to count a number of days, you can actually count the number of days very easily. If I tell you to count a number of years, you will most likely find an outside event as a reference point for your beginning and end. Days represent the physical reality, while years represent a different, yet not contradictory, spiritual reality based on the Jewish year count. It is clear as day that 45 years later (i.e. 1335 years from the starting point) was not something to rejoice over. We must start over at 0 and count to 1335 starting the next year. 4448 + 1335 = 5783 Construction continued until 4451. 4451 + 1335 = 5786 Indeed happy we will be to witness the events that will occur during those years. Postscript: The chidush here is not the simplicity of seeing that 3175 is about 1290 years before the Dome of the Rock was built, but rather:
|