| The linear focus parabolic project, shown on this website, provides
a nice boost in performance, but a more effective reflector and
feedhorn combination is possible. Presented here is an offset fed
parabolic requiring less effort to assemble than the linear focus
antenna, yet outperforming it by a large margin. My design is more
simple and uses commonly available parts. Four turns does a good job of
illuminating a reflector; ten or more turns make a stand-alone antenna
suitable for window mounting. It is easier to build than the linear
focus design and is MUCH more effective. Continue reading for details!

First, find a parabolic reflector designed for Ku band direct-to-home satellite service. These are now inexpensive
and abundant - the one pictured above was discarded by a local resident. After washing off the dirt, spiders,
and millipedes, I found the dish to be in excellent condition. Similar reflectors can be found in thrift stores,
flea markets, and other habitats of electronic scroungers. Seek large reflectors (at least 76cm or 30" diameter),
since these will provide greater gain and directivity.
Consider how to feed the antenna. I have seen web pages featuring
tin can feedhorns, biquads, patch antennas, and helical radiators. A
helical feed seemed suitable for this project as it was simple to
build, inexpensive, and provided good gain and directivity. Being
circularly polarized, a helical eliminates sensitivity to antenna
orientation, and resists attenuation in rain. Though there is a 3 dB
loss working linearly polarized stations, designing for more turns
brings the gain to parity with the tin-cans and biquads. To Calculate
dimensions for your antenna, use this excellent calculator, plugging in a frequency of 2450 MHz.
PARTS REQUIRED:
- one square piece of single sided copper clad PC board for a ground plane
- one PVC kitchen drain tailpiece (3.8 cm / 1.5"diameter) to hold the helical windings
- six 1/8" plastic cable ties
- a length of copper circuit tape (adhesive backed, width 3mm or 1/8") or #14 copper wire
- one suitable chassis connector (I used a reverse sma type matching the connector on my adaptor)
- one 90 degree angle bracket with screws and bolts to fit
CONSTRUCTION:
1) Center the tailpiece on the PC board, copper side, and mark the circumference in ink.
2) Mark four locations on the circumference, spaced 90 degrees, where the cable ties will hold down the PVC tube.
3) Mark one location on the circumference, exactly between two 90 degree markings, where the coaxial connector will be mounted.

At this point you should have a PC board with a circle in the center, four tick marks on the circle at 90 deg intervals,
and one tick mark exactly between two others.
4) Drill 1/8" holes on the inside and outside of the circumference at the cable tie locations.
5) Drill a hole directly on the circumference suitable for the chassis connector. Carefully measure and drill other
holes for this connector if necessary.
6) Drill four holes, spaced 90 deg apart near the bottom end of the PVC tailpiece.
7) Drill holes to accomodate a small 90 degree corner bracket.
8) Drill holes on opposite side of board to accomodate USB wireless adapter that will be affixed with cable ties.
9) Tin the copper around the connector mounting hole, then mount the
connector. Clip the center pin to keep it only long enough for
connection to the helix windings.
10) Cut out a notch to accomodate the connector; it should clear center conductor, but avoud cutting out excess PVC material.
11) Feed cable ties through from the back side of the board, through holes in the tube, and back through the board. Tighten
the cable ties, making sure the tube is firmly held to the copper ground plane.
12) Use a ruler and the edge of a sheet of paper to create a
template for positioning the windings on the PVC tube. Distance zero
represents the ground plane, then add the feedpoint distance, then
ticks matching the turns spacing. Use the template to mark your tube on
both the feedpoint side and the opposite side. The objective here is to
have a guide while precisely winding the helix...

Here is a table used for my prototype helix and its
connector. Note that turn 1 starts at 0.8 cm (height above ground plane
of feedpoint). Turns Spacing is 2.5 cm, and the diameter is 3.9 cm
(close enough for 1.5" PVC tailpiece)
| Spacing=2.5cm ; Diameter=3.9cm (fits 1.5" PVC tailpiece) |
| Turn # |
Height (cm) above groundplane |
Half Turns Height (cm) |
| 1 (feedpoint) |
0.8 |
2.05 |
| 2 |
3.3 |
4.55 |
| 3 |
5.8 |
7.05 |
| 4 |
8.3 |
9.55 |
| 5 |
10.8 |
12.05 |
| 6 |
13.3 |
14.55 |
| 7 |
15.8 |
17.05 |
| 8 |
18.3 |
19.55 |
| 9 |
20.8 |
22.05 |
| 10 |
23.3 |
24.55 |
| 11 |
25.8 |
27.05 |
| 12 |
28.3 |
29.55 |
| 13 |
30.8 |
32.05 |
13) Carefully wind the helix, using copper circuit tape or wire,
then solder to center conductor of chassis connector. Double check
against the turns template. Polarization will be right-handed if the
turns spiral clockwise (looking outward from feedpoint).

15) Attach the angle bracket and wireless adapter, making sure all parts are secure and ready for service.
The antenna should resemble the prototype, pictured below with the angle bracket removed.


At this point, the antenna is ready for its smoke test...plug in the cables and look for some signals! Theoretical gain
of the prototype was about 18 dB over an isotropic radiator; it beat my biquad by about 7 to 13 RSSI units,
and indeed seemed less sensitive to polarization and rainfall. Signals still seem to fluctuate much from
second to second. If your antenna is functioning satisfactorily at this point, I suggest spray painting two
layers of clearcoat onto the windings and groundplane for stability and preventing corrosion.
Currently, I use a short version of this antenna, left hand
polarized, to feed a parabolic reflector and note signals about 22 dB
stronger than on a simple dipole. Mounting the offset fed dish was
tricky - it required inverting the mounting hardware and angling the
dish to about 75 degrees to look for signals on the horizon. It rests
atop a vertical length of 2" sch 40 PVC pipe. After not initially
seeing much strength on a station until finding the right elevation,
the signal strength suddenly pegged full scale when I aimed it dead-on!
Aiming properly in both azimuth and elevation is important with these
larger parabolics - you can aim to reject interference as well as
maximizing weak stations. Mounting the helix was simply a matter of
removing the LNB and (using the angle bracket) bolting the helix into
place at the focal point. It was necessary to bend the bracket just a
bit to aim the helix at the center of the dish.

Note that a biquad feed would also work well with a parabolic reflector, and would have a slight advantage
over a helical - but would show more sensitivity to polarization and rain Source:http://www.geocities.com/ab9il_worldwide/wifi3.html |