TABLE OF CONTENTS Here is a list of the pages on this site. At the end of the list, you will find some general explanatory notes, including "A Question of Quotes". The essays on this site were written over a period of years. There is some overlap, some repetition, and some minor disagreement among them. I wrote most of these essays, but other critics of Waldorf schooling are also represented — including Dan Dugan, Pete Karaiskos, Ian Robinson, Margaret Sachs, Debra Snell, Peter Staudenmaier, and Diana Winters. I think you'll find that, overall, the essays present a clear explanation of Waldorf schooling and the thinking that lies behind it. GUIDE
The Table of Contents lists all pages, showing which pages are tucked inside others. I WENT TO WALDORF: A report on life as a Waldorf student. UNENLIGHTENED: An overview of Waldorf schooling; a far longer version of "I Went to Waldorf", including:
COMPASSION AND ITS ABSENCE (including addenda, etc.) WALDORF NOW: Bringing the inquiry up to date: What goes on inside Waldorf schools today? WEIRD WALDORF: A brief look at the purposes of Waldorf schooling. SIX FACTS ABOUT STEINER EDUCATION: A guide for students and parents. NUTSHELL: A brief summary of Rudolf Steiner’s doctrines and teachings. ANTHROPOPERY: Steiner's theory of everything. CLAIRVOYANCE: The missing basis of Waldorf thinking. SECRETS: Some of the things you aren’t supposed to know. REPORT CARD: Debating and evaluating Waldorf education. FAILURE: To survive or not, to teach or not.
ADVICE FOR PARENTS: For parents considering sending kids to a Waldorf school. CLUES: Detailed pointers on evaluating a Waldorf school. THE WORLD OF WALDORF: Reverence, wonder, and the aftereffects of straining for them. OUR BRUSH WITH RUDOLF STEINER: One family's story. [external link]
SLAPS: Steiner’s views on classroom discipline. THE GOOD (?) PARTS: Some positive elements, but also some worrisome reports. WHO GETS HURT: An inquiry into the “success” of Waldorf schooling. HUMOURESQUE: The “temperaments” as conceived and acted upon in Waldorf schools. NON-WALDORF WALDORFS: Can a Waldorf school cleanse itself? CURRICULUM: An overview of the standard Waldorf curriculum. OH MY WORD: English classes and history classes in a typical Waldorf school. THE GODS: The central mythology in many Waldorf schools: Norse myths. MAGICAL ARTS: The Waldorf curriculum: the arts, and festivals. ANTHRO CHRISTMAS ICONOGRAPHY: Symbols. [external link] OH MY STARS: The Waldorf curriculum: Astronomy. THE PLANETS: Steiner on our solar system or "our universe." THINKING CAP: The irrational modes of “thought” fostered at Waldorf schools. THE ANCIENTS: At Waldorf schools, ignorance is often taken as wisdom. STEINER'S “SCIENCE”: The antiscientific nature of Waldorf education. LESSON BOOKS: Class reports as created by students at many Waldorf schools. IS ANTHROPOSOPHY SCIENCE?: No. [external link] FACULTY MEETINGS: A behind-the-scenes look at Waldorf education. ACADEMIC STANDARDS AT WALDORF: Examining a problem that began with the first Waldorf School. FOUNDATIONS: Exploring the fundamentals of Waldorf schooling. UNDERPINNINGS: Further explorations. BASEMENT: Still further explorations. RANKINGS: Anthroposophical value judgments. SAY WHAT?: Selected, revealing quotations; includes "Anthroposophy in Waldorf". STEINER’S BILE: Perhaps the worst statements Steiner ever made. STEINER STATIC: Nonsense in the air. WISE WORDS: Additional revealing quotations; includes "Last Words" and "Reading Steiner". STEINER’S RACISM: The racial teachings deep in Anthroposophy that surface sometimes at Waldorfs. ATLANTIS AND THE ARYANS: Two fundamental legends embraced by Steiner. SYMPATHIZERS?: Allegations and denials. THE RACIAL TEACHINGS OF RUDOLF STEINER: From SkepticReport. [external link] EVOLUTION, ANYONE?: Steiner’s strange version, tied to his racial teachings. WHITE GUYS: Anthroposophical racism, recapped. NOAH: Steiner vs. the Bible. IS ANTHROPOSOPHY A RELIGION?: Examining the central denial made by Steiner’s followers. WAS HE CHRISTIAN?: A comparison of Steiner's teachings with Christ's. GNOSIS: Anthroposophy and hidden knowledge. ROSY CROSS: Anthroposophy and Rosicrucianism. GOD: Steiner's strange ideas about the Lord. GODDESS: The Earth Goddess; and the Theory of Everything: Anthropo-Sophia. SERVING THE GODS: What Waldorf faculties aim for. PRAYERS: About those "morning verses". FAITH: The religion of Anthroposophy in the classroom. BEAT: Turning students into disciples. CHOOSING: Why choose Anthroposophy when there are so many alternatives? INSIDE SCOOP: Occult initiation in Anthroposophy. EVERYTHING: An examination of Steiner’s central text. PREHISTORY 101: Steiner’s extraordinary, sci-fi-like narrative of human evolution. The tale of our ancient past and our distant future, as told by Steiner. It continues in: LOVE AND THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN: Steiner promoted love, sort of. DOUBLE TROUBLE: Steiner’s occult conspiracy theories. THE WHITE LODGE: Back-room maneuvers. STEINER’S BLUNDERS: Steiner unconsciously making a fool of himself, over and over. STEINER’S QUACKERY: No laughing matter: Steiner’s quack medicine. WHAT WE ARE: Human nature as conceived by Steiner and acted upon in Waldorf schools. THE CENTER: Macrocosms, microcosms, and fallacies. NEUTERED NATURE: The Waldorf view of the natural world. OVERHEAD: Bizarre ideas about the universe: Vulcan, the Zodiac, Mars, etc. MORE OVERHEAD: More of the same: planets, Moon, and Sun. FANTASY FLIGHTS: Waldorf escapism. STEINER’S ILLOGIC: The quality of Steiner’s thoughts. BIODYNAMICS: Quack agriculture: astrology and magic. TOP TEN JOKES: Some of Steiner’s silliest statements (on topics such as gnomes). WHAT A GUY: Seeing Steiner through his followers’ eyes; includes brief chronology of Steiner's life. GURU: Steiner through his followers' eyes. STEINER AND THE WARLORD: Steiner’s embrace of an architect of destruction. THE GOOD WARS: America, Germany, and Waldorf. VIOLENCE: Surprising violence in Steiner's kindly vision. BAD: And badder, and baddest. RUDOLF STEINER (1861-1925): A skeptical view. [external link] ENEMIES: Steiner and his followers, beleaguered. STEINER'S SPECIFIC: What he prescribed, and — perhaps — why. SUMMING UP: A look back. TRUTH: Mystical thinking, realistic thinking. OUR EXPERIENCE: A mother's report and advice. THE WALDORF SCANDAL: Describing the near-collapse of the Waldorf school I attended. MY SAD, SAD STORY: Deprogramming myself after Waldorf. YOURS TRULY: Who the heck am I? HORROR: Doom and deliverance. BEES: One more surprise, repeated. ATOMS: The emptiness of Anthroposophy. SO?: Can you trust me? LINKS: Where to go for further information. INDEX: Alphabetized index for this site, with definitions — a mini-encyclopedia. SUPPLEMENTS: Additional quotations and commentary: ILLUSTRATIONS: Some of the illustrations used on this site are summarized on these pages: wet-on-wet: talismanic Waldorf paintings other paintings: but still in a characteristic Waldorf style drawings: characteristic Waldorf colored-pencil work Rudolf Steiner: three portraits alma mater: the Waldorf School of Adelphi College (later University) mine: mea culpa ◊◊◊◊ ◊ While I take Steiner seriously, I often laugh at his doctrines. Much of what he taught is preposterous. But be forewarned: Some of his doctrines are quite hateful and thus not at all laughable. And the harm Steiner's educational doctrines can inflict on innocent young children is serious indeed.
◊◊◊◊ Please excuse any typos at this site. I hope they are few and insignificant. I’ll correct them all when I find them. ◊◊◊◊
A QUESTION OF QUOTES When quoting Steiner, I often omit extraneous and repetitive phrases, which I replace with ellipsis marks. I take care, however, not to alter Steiner’s meaning. The best way to check up on me is to consult the texts from which I quote. I always provide citations. Here is an example. In my long essay "Unenlightened" I use the following quotation to show that Steiner differentiated between the soul and the spirt: “The soul must not be impelled, through the body, to lusts and passions ... The spirit, however, must not stand as a slave-driver over the soul, dominating it with laws and commandments....” [Rudolf Steiner, KNOWLEDGE OF THE HIGHER WORLDS AND ITS ATTAINMENT (Anthroposophic Press, 1944), p. 96.] The following a more complete version of the same passage, in which I include all words I previously omitted, and for context I include the sentences that appear immediately before and after the passage: “The body must be so ennobled and purified that its organs are impelled to nothing that is not in the service of the soul and spirit. The soul must not be impelled, through the body, to lusts and passions which are antagonistic to pure and noble thought. The spirit, however, must not stand as a slave-driver over the soul, dominating it with laws and commandments; the soul must rather learn to follow these laws and duties out of its own free inclination. The student must not feel duty to be an oppressive power to which he unwillingly submits, but rather something which he performs out of love.” Remember that my purpose was to establish that Steiner differentiates between the soul and the spirit. Including the additional sentences and phrases does not alter that differentiation; it merely makes the quotation longer while raising extraneous issues. That Steiner speaks of love, for instance, may be to his credit, but it does not change the distinction between spirit and soul. Thus, the original form of the quotation is accurate and more to the point. The issue of context is complex. The passage I’ve quoted comes from within a long paragraph. The only way to absolutely avoid taking such passages out of context would be to reprint entire paragraphs or perhaps entire chapters. But clearly that would be impractical and — in some cases — illegal, due to copyright laws. The test you should apply is whether a quotation would mean something fundamentally different if taken within a larger context. In this instance, neither the omission of some words nor the absence of the larger context alters the point at issue, which is that Steiner distinguished between spirit and soul. A final note on this topic. In omitting phrases and sentences, I may seem to be ducking some issues. You can check me on this, as well. I can’t deal with every issue simultaneously, but I do not intentionally ignore any subjects that are important to an understanding of Waldorf education or Anthroposophy. Thus, I deal with Steinerian “love” in the such essays as “Underpinnings” and “Was He Christian?” Similarly, I deal with Steiner’s conception of thought (a subject introduced by the phrase “pure and noble thought”) in various essays including “Thinking Cap” and “Steiner’s ‘Science’”. For a discussion of Steiner’s doctrines about the human constitution (“the body must be so ennobled and purified that its organs...”), see “Steiner’s Quackery” and “What We’re Made Of”. For more on Steiner’s conception of freedom (which boils down to voluntary acceptance of laws and commandments) see “Nutshell” and “Steiner Static”. — Roger Rawlings |
