17days since
Monthly Event & Meeting!

Brainy Quotes!

If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't.
 
Emerson M. Pugh
 
The brain is a wonderful organ. It starts working the moment you get up in the morning and does not stop until you get into the office. 
 
Robert Frost

UAB ANST Contact Information

Jacquie Copeland
Co-Representative
Office:
CH 230B
E-mail:  
 
Cady K. Block
Co-Representative
Office:
CH 230B
E-mail:
 
Paul Blanton, Ph.D.
Faculty Sponsor
Office:
Birmingham VAMC
E-mail:
 
Sonda Sengupta
Undergraduate Representative
E-mail:
 
 
Home‎ > ‎

Organizational Structure

UAB ANST Yearly Evaluations

Each year, UAB ANST members evaluate the organization in terms of Monthly Events and Monthly Meetings across several facets, ranging from quality to satisfaction to usefulness. This is is keeping with UAB ANST's goal to be effective and maximize campus resources in enhancing student competency and capturing student interest.
 
 
Evaluation statistics are presented below. Figures are anonymously collected and represent the average rating, based off of a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Statistics are updated yearly as new data are available:
 

 

Monthly Meetings                                           2008-2009               2009-2010               2010-2011                2011-2012                2012-2013:

Overall rating of co-representatives                    

Helpfulness of co-representatives                        5

Overall quality                                                   5

Convenience (time)                                            4.5

Convenience (location)                                       5

Usefulness of information presented                    5

Progress over the last year                                 4.75

Perceived amount of say                                    4.5 

 

Monthly Events                                             2008-2009               2009-2010               2010-2011                2011-2012                2012-2013:

Overall rating of co-representatives                      5

Overall quality                                                    5

Quality of the speakers                                       4.75

Convenience (time)                                            4.5

Convenience (location)                                        5 

Topic variety                                                     4.5

Usefulness of information presented                     5

Interesting content                                             4.75

Enhancement of knowledge                                  5