Navigation

Thinking Straight: Fallacies, Cognitive Biases and Propaganda

Ramón V. León

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Professional web site

Personal web site

  

Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbor caused by a perverse attachment to certain goods. It wounds the nature of man and injures human solidarity. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church

Seminar Description

 

Assessing facts and being able to arrive at correct conclusions from them is surprisingly rare, though most everybody thinks they do. To learn to do this consistently one needs to learn about fallacies, cognitive biases and propaganda. A fallacy is a plausible reasoning that fails to satisfy the conditions of a valid argument. A cognitive bias is a person's tendency to make errors in judgment based on cognitive factors. Cognitive biases induce one to commit fallacies and make one unaware that one is doing so. Propaganda is an appeal to emotions used to lead one to commit fallacies as a means of convincing one of something desired by the propagandist. Thus, cognitive biases, coming from within ourselves, and propaganda, coming from outside ourselves, both induce one to commit fallacies and thus to invalid reasoning. This seminar discusses these topics.

 

Topics

 

·         Respecting data: not being a loudmouth with an opinion

·         Statistical fallacies

·        Reasoning about uncertainty and risk

·        Logical fallacies

·        Cognitive biases or distortions

·         Judgmental heuristics and the wisdom of the unconscious

·         Behavioral economics: Kahneman and Tversky

·         Propaganda techniques

·         Myth of the rational voter

·         Rational ignorance and its antidotes

·         Neuroscience: framing and its new conception of reasoning

·         Ideology and its distortion of ethics, reason and facts

·         Cognitive dissonance

·         Characteristics of the ideologue

·         Rhetorical versus heresthetic persuasion and talk radio

·         Pragmatism guided by empathy, ethics, reason and data

·         Thinking about ethical dilemmas

·         Ideological versus pragmatist frames for taxation

·         Ideological versus pragmatist frames for health care

·         How science works: philosophy, methods and sociology

·         Common sense and data are not enough. One also needs scientific theory. Or how could the great depression have been shortened?

·         Determining what authors, articles, books and scientific papers one should trust

 

Core Seminar Web Resources

 

·         Fallacies

o        The Nizkor Project

o        Taxonomy of Fallacies

o        Critical Thinking on the Web

o        Statistical fallacies

·         Cognitive Biases

o        26 Reasons What You Think is Right is Wrong

o        List of cognitive biases in Wikipedia

·         Propaganda

o        Propaganda: Wikipedia

o        Heresthetic persuasion and talk radio

·         Statistical Thinking

o        Sound reasoning requires statistical understanding

·         Behavioral Economics

o        Behavioral Economics: Wikipedia

·         Political science and economics

o        The myth of the rational voter

o        Rational ignorance

o        The theory of rational ignorance

o        Characteristics of the Ideologue

o        List of political ideologies: Wikipedia

·         Psychology

o        Cognitive dissonance: Changing Minds  

o        Cognitive dissonance: Wikipedia

·         Ethics

o        Three step strategy for resolving ethical dilemmas

o        What is the morally right thing to do in the following cases?

o        Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making

 

Seminar Discussion Forum

 

Due Dates for Assignments

 

Meeting Time and Location

 

Mondays 4:40-5:30pm

Humanities & Social Science room 107

 

Practice Thinking: The Economic Crisis 

 

The financial crisis that we are facing is causing economic problems of historic proportions. Republicans and Democrats are blaming each other for it. This blaming is the result of the confirmation bias, that is, the tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions. In addition, they tend to blame the crisis on a single action by the other party. This is an example of the fallacy of a single cause. This is a logical fallacy of causation that occurs when it is assumed that there is one, simple cause of an outcome when in reality it has been caused by a number of only jointly sufficient causes.  This is the case for the financial crisis. In fact, your parents are likely to have been one of the causes of it, in addition, to many other contributors such as subprime mortgages, the federal reserved having keep interest rate too low for too long, collateralized debt obligation, mortgage backed securities, and credit default swaps.