- The "most scholarly" information ever produced about the Money/Currency industry because it is the simple truth and explains the solution to all issues and problems in the Money/Currency industry once and for all. 

- Incorrect statement: 'Gold should be Money'. Correct statement (and foundational principle): 'Anything (including Gold) a producer and consumer VOLUNTARILY agree upon to be Money should be Money'. 

- If you don't abstract-out 'sinful human nature' (criminal human action) then GOLD MONEY DECAYS AT 3% PER YEAR (25% in 10 years). To prevent this a special 'paint-coating' of UNRESTRICTED COMPETITION must be applied to the gold money.

 

- Crux of the issue: A Worldwide Organized Criminal Gang orders the puppet State ("the Government")  to engage in Evil using Guns and Violence to Prevent Competition in the Money/Currency industry. 

 

1. Who should run the CLOTHES business? (Hint: There is no need for a CLOTHES Czar).    

2. What should CLOTHES be made of?

3. How much CLOTHES should there be in the world?

4. How many CLOTHES companies should exist in the USA?

    0?...1?...2?...12?...120?...1,200?...1,216?...12,000?...120,000?...What number? 

5. How much should it cost to buy or lease CLOTHES?

6. Would the following be the sign of State Communism: Constitution - Article one, Section eight, Clause five: The Congress shall have Power...... To weave CLOTHES, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign CLOTHES, and fix the Standard of Weights and Sizes?

7. Should it be legal for a Merchant that could only obtain 100 Top-Grain leather coats in inventory to contract with 700 customers (600 too many) to sell to or lease to them one each of the same Top-Grain leather coats and then to fulfill the contract by delivering to each of those 700 customers a coat made of standard 0.950 millimeter thick garbage bag plastic, and moreover to then trade away to others the real 100 Top-Grain leather coats for the Merchants own personal benefit?

 

- Your unalienable rights are derived from God; therefore The State ("The Government") cannot grant the "right" to start (and most certainly does not have the "right" to illegally and criminally close down) a money/currency business; if The State had a function it would be to only protect your rights. Money/Currency competition reins in the sinful nature of human beings and forces honest business practices. Borrowers need less money to accomplish the same goals, real interest rates are lower for borrower, and real wages increase for workers. Lenders have more secure borrowers  resulting in less defaults, receive higher real interest income, and purchasing power of money/currency asset increases.

- It is forbidden in infiltrated libertarian circles to promote full Laissez-Faire. Only allowed is: everything be Laissez-Faire EXCEPT FOR THE MONEY/CURRENCY INDUSTRY. How can this be called real Capitalism?

"Give me control [ exclusive monopoly ] of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."  Mayer Amschel Rothschild [ Mayer Amschel Bauer ] (1744 - 1812), Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe."

- A non mono-poly money/currency industry would instead be called a many-opoly or a multi-opoly or a

 poly-opoly.

 

- The Money/Currency industry needs to be governed (a verb, not a noun)  more and better but NOT through The State. If The State had run (governed) the clothing business for the last 200 years, then all clothes would be made of burlap, available only in the color brown (analogous to money made available only in paper), and people would wonder who would make and sell clothes if you suggested that The State ("The Government") get out of the clothing business.     

 

- To oppose the Hegelian Dialectic thesis-antithesis-synthesis manipulation of the Pharisee Zionist named Milton Friedman (he co-wrote the bestselling book "Free to Choose") I will call this essay

"Free to Produce . . . Money".   

 

- If you take 20 minutes of your time to read, understand and believe the Truth in this essay you will be smarter than a first-year student who has studied Monetary Economics for 100 hours AND you will be smarter than 5,000 university-trained Monetary Economics PhD's all put together who have each studied full-time for 20 years. This means that you (a layperson adult, a teenager, a child or even a toddler if you read it to him) would be one million times smarter than any one of the 5,000 PhD's on the topic of Monetary Economics, and that is the power of The Truth over lies and deception.

 

 

                          *** Free to PRODUCE Money: Private AND COMPETITIVE Currencies ***

 

The above headline is false. It is NOT true. That would be State communism which everyone knows is disasterous economically. That headline was to shock people into the truth by using irony. After that headline was read most people would get angry at me for promoting communism or statism. How dare I suggest that The State be involved in  commerce. OK, the same is true of the money/currency industry. There is no good practical, moral or religious reason for the State to own and/or control the money/currency industry. The food, clothing, shelter and money/currency industries are too important for the State to assume ownership and/or control.

A lot of people will say words to the effect of: "We need to abolish the private control of credit and bring it under government control, with no interest charged." But here is what the correct economic liberty view is:
Imagine a clothing industry in your country run by a single private corporation which was granted a government enFORCED monopoly. This is an example of fascism (private ownership and State control).There are always all kinds of inefficiencies and corruption in this setup.

Now imagine a solution proposed for this clothing industry which is for the government to run the clothing system. This is an example of State communism (State ownership and State control). There are also all kinds of inefficiencies and corruption in this setup. The correct solution for all the problems in the clothing industry would be to have economic liberty. In other words competition amongst many suppliers, freedom of entry into the business and freedom by customers to choose and trade with any supplier.

Again, having one private corporation with a state granted monopoly over an industry, enFORCED by state gunpower is NOT a free-enterprise system. That is fascism.

So also, just apply the above logic to the "currency" industry (credit is just a derivative of a currency) and that's that - you have your solution to the 1001 issues and controversies in the money/currency industry. The correct solution for all the problems in the currency industry would be to have economic liberty. In other words competition amongst many currency suppliers, freedom of entry into the currency business and freedom by customers to choose and trade with any currency supplier.

In fact currency inflation would be eliminated and the prices of all goods and services would FALL each year by the rate of productivity increase, say 3% a year on average (get your calculators out and see how inexpensive a new car would cost now compared to say... the year you were born in).

And don't believe statist university propaganda that a free market in currencies was tried 150 years ago and it didn't  work. Don't believe your commie, government-intellectual professor. The free market HAS worked 9,999 times/industries in a row and it would work here also. If the State previously did a poor job of catching and prosecuting for currency fraud or counterfeiting then that is an indictment of the inefficiency of the State's police and is just an argument for government to get out of the police business also.

The only function of the State in the above scenarios would be to recieve a 911 call from a business saying that a robber had just stolen clothes or a criminal had just passed counterfeit currency, and would you please catch and arrest them.

Was Milton Friedman a Socialist ?

 

The very first thing I look for in a person's ideas to determine if they are a true libertarian is to see if they believe in a privatized and competitivized market in the Money/Currency industry. This means there could be zero, or one, or two, or ten, or one-hundred, or one-thousand, or even ten-thousand separate private companies in the currency business in the USA - whatever number the free-market of consumers and producers voluntarily trading says there should be. The free-market determines the number of clothes manufacturing companies in the USA and the free-market can determine the correct number of currency companies in the USA.  

Milton Friedman does not seem to have been one of these people which makes him a believer in forced communism or fascism for the Money/Currency industry. It's interesting to note that his office was at Stanford which is associated with the mind-control and mass brainwashing Tavistock Institute. 

Now, I should give him a break here because he secretly probably did believe in a free market for the Money/Currency industry, but knew that too much said articulately would result in a JFK style public execution or just simply being shunned by the media and every other institution that the financial elite control. Or very likely die in the now common  and over-used small plane crash (a la John Kennedy junior ).

 

Unrelated topic, but also see:  The Earth is NOT Moving, by Bernard Brauer - HERE