posted 19 Apr 2009 17:35 by Thang Ngo
[
updated 19 Apr 2009 17:36
]
The rich TV and music execs just want to get richer...
SMH Online, 20 April 2009
Wearing bandanas and waving Jolly Roger flags, hundreds of
supporters of file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay demonstrated on
Saturday against a Swedish court's conviction of the Internet
site's organisers.
The Stockholm district court on Friday sentenced Gottfrid
Svartholm Warg, Peter Sunde, Fredrik Neij and Carl Lundstrom to one
year in prison each for helping millions of Pirate Bay users commit
copyright violations of movies, music and computer games.
The court also ordered them to pay 30 million kronor ($5
million) in damages to international entertainment companies,
including Warner Bros, Sony Music Entertainment, EMI and Columbia
Pictures.
The entertainment industry applauded the move, calling it a
landmark decision protecting the rights of those whose livelihood
depend on creative activity.
All four defendants have vowed to appeal the verdict.
The rallies against "judicial murder" occurred in Stockholm,
Goteborg, Karlstad and Lund and were organised by The Pirate Party.
The political party, which supports free file-sharing for
noncommercial use, said its membership rose by more than 20 percent
to about 20,000 after the court announced its verdict.
Police spokeswoman Birgitta Nilsen said at least 500 mostly
young people were protesting in Stockholm alone, many supporting
the Pirate Bay defendants by wearing bandanas and carrying skull
and crossbones flags.
The Pirate Party does not have any formal ties to The Pirate
Bay, but has expressed its support of the site on several
occasions.
Party Chairman and founder Rickard Falkvinge received loud
cheers as he addressed the black-clad crowd at the Medborgarplatsen
square in downtown Stockholm, demanding that the defendants to be
freed from the charges.
"The establishment and the politicians have declared war against
our whole generation," he said, calling on "file-sharing for the
people".
The Pirate Bay doesn't host copyright-protected material, but
directs users to content through so-called torrent files. It has an
estimated 22 million users worldwide. |
posted 1 Apr 2009 04:03 by Thang Ngo
Asher Moses SMH Online, 1 April 2009
The Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, has begun
distancing himself from his controversial internet censorship
policy in what one internet industry engineer has dubbed "the great
walkback of 2009".
Senator Conroy has long said his policy would introduce
compulsory ISP-level filters of the Australian Communications and
Media Authority's blacklist of prohibited websites. But last night,
he said the mandatory filters would be restricted to content that
has been "refused classification" (RC).
When the ACMA blacklist was leaked last month, it caused great
controversy, partly because it included a slew of R18+ and X18+
sites, including regular gay and straight pornography and other
legal content.
But on SBS' Insight program last night, Senator Conroy
said "it's mandatory refused classification, and then parents - if
the trial says that it is possible to go down this path ... have
the option to block other material".
This about-turn has done little to assuage the concerns of
online rights groups, the Federal Opposition and the internet
industry, as the RC category includes not just child pornography
but anti-abortion sites, fetish sites and sites containing
pro-euthanasia material such as The Peaceful Pill Handbook
by Dr Philip Nitschke.
Sites added
to the blacklist in error were also classified as RC, such as
one containing PG-rated photographs by Bill Henson.
And the websites of several Australian businesses - such as
those of a Queensland dentist - were classified RC and blacklisted
after they were hacked by, as Senator Conroy described, "the
Russian mob". They were on the blacklist even though they changed
hosting providers and cleaned up their sites several years ago.
"The guidelines are so broad that RC can't help but hoover up
political speech even if only as collateral damage," said Internode
network engineer Mark Newton, describing Senator Conroy's comments
last night as "the great walkback of 2009".
Senator Conroy conceded many of the decisions regarding what
sites appeared on the blacklist were made by "faceless
bureaucrats". He said he was working to build in "further
safeguards", but would not abolish the policy because some sites
were found to be put on the blacklist in error.
"I don't think Senator Conroy really even knows what his own
policy in relation to filtering is. It seems to change on an almost
daily basis; it is vague and contradictory and there is little
public confidence in his ability to implement it," said Opposition
communications spokesman Nick Minchin.
"RC can apply to a range of different subjects, not just
sexually explicit, but also the controversial, which under Labor's
proposal would all be filtered."
Colin Jacobs, spokesman for the online users' lobby group
Electronic Frontiers Australia, said he was pleased the Government
was "distancing themselves from the current flawed blacklist, which
as we have seen is chock full of legal and harmless sites".
But Jacobs was not convinced that a new "RC only" list would be
a big improvement.
"Swapping one secret list for another doesn't mean that fewer
mistakes will occur or that everything on the new list will be
uncontroversial," he said.
"Not all RC material is illegal, so we'd probably still see
euthanasia sites and the like on the list."
Others sites confirmed by ACMA as being included on the
blacklist include a YouTube clip showing an excerpt from a horror
movie and an astrology website.
ACMA said the horror movie clip was added because it is
classified as R18+ but "not subject to a restricted access system
that prevents access by children".
"At the time of investigation, access to the YouTube content
required only a declaration of an age of 18 years or older which
was not verified by evidence of proof of age," ACMA spokesman
Donald Robertson said.
On the astrology website, ACMA said it was blacklisted because,
at the time it was being investigated, it had been defaced with "an
image which depicted an adult female posed naked and implicitly
defecating on herself".
This image has since been removed and ACMA said it was in the
process of removing the astrology site from the blacklist.
ACMA conceded innocent sites could be blacklisted if they are
defaced with content not usually associated with the site.
Robertson acknowledged this material was often only visible for a
short period before being removed by the site owner.
"To deal with the transient nature of online content, ACMA
undertakes regular reviews of the list of URLs notified to filter
makers to remove those which no longer lead to prohibited content,"
he said.
|
posted 26 Mar 2009 14:09 by Thang Ngo
Asher Moses, SMH Online March 26, 2009
A link containing Bill Henson's artistic photographs of young boys has been added to the communications regulator's blacklist, again calling into question claims by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy that his internet filtering plan would block only the worst of the worst sites.
The images appear on a "male beauty" blog that contains several nude male images. However, the only link to the site found on the blacklist is one containing just five Bill Henson photographs. The boys are clothed in all of the images except for one, which shows a naked boy, but no genitalia are pictured.
The link was added to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) blacklist despite the Classification Board last year clearing Henson's work for general release.
Sites featured on the list were only revealed this month after a leaked version was published on the Wikileaks website.
While the list of "prohibited" material does not have a significant impact on most internet users today, links contained on it will be blocked for everyone if Conroy proceeds with his mandatory internet filtering plan.
Henson's spokeswoman Sue Cato declined to comment, as did ACMA and Conroy.
Colin Jacobs, spokesman for online users lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said: "With an abortion site, the Peaceful Pill Handbook and Bill Henson photos all now revealed to be on the blacklist, claims that the list only includes the 'worst of the worst' of the web are sounding like those over-emphatic defences of Guantanamo Bay."
Jacobs said EFA was "pretty unenthusiastic" about a censorship system "where we have no choice but to take such assertions at face value".
Greens Senator Scott Ludlam said: "It's a classic example of that scope creep. They say it's about the worst of the worst but before you know it it's expanding to cover other kinds of material."
The Classification Board said it had received 10 applications to classify works by Henson. It found the images of children were not sexualised, "mild in viewing impact and justified by context". This is despite some of the images depicting a naked female with "breast nudity".
Henson's images sparked a political storm last year following an uproar on talkback radio, which led to police seizing 32 of Henson's photographs from Sydney's Roslyn Oxley9 gallery.
At the time, the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, declared the pictures "absolutely revolting". But the case against Henson eventually collapsed, with the Director of Public Prosecutions advising NSW Police that any prosecution of Henson would be unlikely to succeed.
Conroy initially called into question the veracity of the leaked blacklist but yesterday said the latest leaked version, dated March 18, "seemed to be close" to ACMA's current blacklist.
"It is completely untrue that the leaked blacklist contains political content. This is a list which contains sites that promote incest, rape, child pornography and child abuse," he said.
However, alongside child porn, bestiality, rape and extreme violence sites, the leaked list also includes a slew of online poker and gambling sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even the sites of a Queensland dentist, a school canteen consultancy and an animal carer.
"If in the future the Prime Minister finds a controversial artwork 'revolting' or an online game too violent, do you trust him to resist pushing the 'ban it' button? He could then go on talk radio and say something was being done," Jacobs said.
The Opposition communications spokesman, Nick Minchin, said he had not seen the blacklisted link with the Henson images but the revelations raised "further questions about how Senator Conroy will compile any blacklist and how this will be vulnerable to 'creeping' based on the political will of the day".
Yesterday, Conroy said public concern about the possibility of the blacklist "creeping" to include legal content was justified, but stopped short of guaranteeing the Government would be able to prevent it.
The Government plans to expand the blacklist to up to 10,000 sites and has said it plans to incorporate sites found on international blacklists. |
posted 23 Mar 2009 01:43 by Thang Ngo
This fed gov trial/censorship is just stupid! Why don't they just give up?! Asher Moses SMH Online, March 23, 2009 Australia's third largest internet provider, iiNet, has
withdrawn from the Government's internet censorship trials, saying
it could not "reconcile participation in the trial with our
corporate social responsibility".
The move comes after the anonymous whistleblower site Wikileaks
last
week published a leaked copy of the secret Australian
Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) blacklist of prohibited
websites, which forms the backbone of the Government's censorship
policy.
Far from containing just "illegal material" such as child
pornography, the list of prohibited websites includes a wealth of
legal material such as regular gay and straight porn sites, YouTube
links, online poker sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites and
even the sites of a
Queensland dentist, a school canteen consultancy and an animal
carer.
The Government's mandatory internet censorship plan, which is
already being trialled by a number of small ISPs, will block sites
contained on the ACMA blacklist for all Australians.
"We are not able to reconcile participation in the trial with
our corporate social responsibility, our customer service
objectives and our public position on censorship," iiNet managing
director Michael Malone said.
"It became increasingly clear that the trial was not simply
about restricting child pornography or other such illegal material,
but a much wider range of issues including what the Government
simply describes as 'unwanted material' without an explanation of
what that includes."
Betty Peters, 78, a retired nurse educator from Melbourne whose
pro-euthanasia YouTube videos were included on the blacklist, said
she was "outraged" at the Government's big brother attitude to
Australian senior citizens.
"We do not need a 40-year-old senator like [Communications
Minister] Stephen Conroy deciding for us what is good and bad. I am
appalled that our free country has come to this," said Peters, who
does volunteer work for euthanasia organisation Exit
International.
Senator Conroy and ACMA initially tried to discredit Wikileaks
by saying the leaked blacklist was about double the size of ACMA's
list. However, they admitted that both lists shared "some common
URLs".
Wikileaks said the disparity was due to the fact that the leaked
list was from August last year and contained a number of older URLs
that had since been removed by ACMA.
It quickly followed up by leaking a second version of the
blacklist, dated March 18 this year, that is approximately the same
size as the ACMA list and contains many of the same seemingly
innocuous websites. The renegade site also published instructions
on how people can verify that the leaked list is legitimate.
The list was obtained by Wikileaks from internet filtering
software that parents can opt to install on their computers. ACMA
provides its list of prohibited sites to these software developers
for inclusion in their products.
Wikileaks was offline over the weekend and continues to be
inaccessible, with a message on the site saying that it is
"currently overloaded by readers". It plans to deploy additional
resources to resolve the issue and is calling for people to help
out with donations.
Last week's leak of the ACMA blacklist reignited concerns that
the internet filtering proposal could have unintended consequences
for innocent businesses.
Experts warned that Australian businesses could be added to the
list in error, with little recourse. They would then be associated
with child porn peddlers and sexual violence sites.
"Any person or corporation that would be identifiable on the
list would potentially be deemed by the general public ... either a
child molester or at least in the same category as child
molesters," said University of Sydney associate professor Bjorn
Landfeldt.
"In effect, this could be interpreted by some as a government
sanctioned hate list."
|
posted 11 Mar 2009 21:56 by Thang Ngo
[
updated 11 Mar 2009 21:59
]
Daily Telegraph online, 12 March 2008
IT'S enough to turn you off your lunch.
Two Kentucky Fried Chicken outlets in Sydney's south have been given a record fine of $73,125 after they were discovered with disgusting layers of grease and dirt where food was prepared and hadn't been cleaned for months.
The two restaurants in Miranda and Hurstville West were convicted of 11 charges of breaches of food hygiene laws after a Food Authority investigation.
At Miranda KFC store inspectors found grease, food and debris on kitchen equipment as well as dirty food storage and preparation areas, walls, ceilings and floors.
At the Hurstville West store inspectors found evidence of pests and extensive cleanliness problems in the food preparation area.
Complaints from customers triggered the investigation between May 2007 and February 2008.
Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald said the court took the view that this was not a minor or isolated incident.
``This case is a textbook example of how consumers play a vital role in helping police food safety standards. Complaints are taken seriously and acted on swiftly,'' Mr Mcdonald said.
|
posted 6 Mar 2009 02:06 by Thang Ngo
Asher Moses SMH Online, March 6, 2009
RailCorp is trying to stop four more software developers selling
cheap "apps" so Sydney commuters can check train times on their
iPhones and other mobiles.
The legal threats have been made even though RailCorp offers no
equivalent service to commuters.
And that has provoked NSW Premier Nathan Rees to Twitter into
the debate.
After yesterday's
revelations that the maker of the $2.49 iPhone application
Transit Sydney had been threatened by RailCorp, several other train
schedule software makers have come forward to complain they have
also been threatened with copyright infringement suits.
RailCorp admits threatening four mobile developers but says
that's because the applications were providing "out-of-date"
timetables.
The applications use timetable information sourced from the
CityRail website but if CityRail updates those timetables, the
developer must send out a new version of software for it to remain
up-to-date.
It is likely that RailCorp does not want to rely on developers
to do this, however, it is refusing to say when its own official
version will be released, leaving commuters high and dry.
Dan Stevenson, an avid mobile user, referred the issue to NSW
Premier Nathan Rees over Twitter, noting that RailCorp's Victorian
and Western Australian equivalents had no problem with software
makers using their timetables.
Rees, or one of his minders, tweeted back, saying: "Thanks for
the link - i'll look into it."
Intellectual property lawyer Trevor Choy said even though
RailCorp was a public service, copyright law was "biased" in favour
of the Government and did not make any distinction between
information that should be a public service (like train timetables)
and private information.
"Government agencies are supposed to use their powers wisely,
but here they are behaving exactly like a private company
preventing a competitor from launching a 'competing product'," said
Choy.
Nick Maher, who developed TrainView - supporting all
Java-enabled mobile phones - in 2007 and TripView for the iPhone
in October last year, has had to stop selling both applications
after threats from RailCorp.
Maher said RailCorp invited him to a meeting in 2007 to discuss
the possibility of it licensing TrainView, but "nothing actually
came of that".
"At the time I asked them if they had any problem with me using
the data and they said they were OK with it," he said.
"I continued to sell it for a couple of years and just recently
I contacted them to let them know I had a new version for the
iPhone and they said they'd changed their stance with regards to
copyright and that they weren't giving any permission for people to
use their timetable data in third-party apps."
The developers of another iPhone app, Metro Sydney, suffered the
same fate and were forced to remove the train timetable feature
recently after threats from RailCorp. The software now includes
just bus and ferry timetables.
One of the first train scheduling apps, for pocket PCs using the
Palm operating system, was broken after RailCorp modified its
website to prevent the software from scraping its timetable
information.
RailCorp, whose chief executive is Rob Mason, had earlier
threatened the developer with legal action but he refused to stop
distributing the software, saying he had written permission from
RailCorp to use the information.
"RailCorp has contacted about four developers requesting them to
remove from sale mobile applications that breach RailCorp's
copyright over its timetables because these applications were
providing out-of-date timetables that had the potential to confuse
and mislead our customers," a RailCorp spokeswoman said.
"Copyright in all CityRail timetables is owned by RailCorp. Any
unlicensed republication of the timetables represents a breach of
this copyright. We have not pursued any legal action to date."
"I think it's a shame," said Maher.
"I think there are some really good apps out there and I think
that it'd be good to open up the data and let the developers
compete. That way they'll probably come up with better products
than what RailCorp could do by themselves."
Meanwhile, Thales announced this week that it had been awarded a
contract to provide Sydney Ferries with software allowing commuters
to access real-time ferry information "on the wharf, on vessels,
over the internet, on mobile phones and PDAs".
The service is scheduled for full implementation by the middle
of next year.
"Customers will be able to see what time a ferry is expected to
arrive or depart, as well as its location on the harbour," Thales
said in a statement.
|
posted 27 Feb 2009 17:10 by Thang Ngo
Web censorship plan heads towards a dead end
Asher Moses, SMH Online February 26, 2009The Government's plan to introduce mandatory internet censorship
has effectively been scuttled, following an independent senator's
decision to join the Greens and Opposition in blocking any
legislation required to get the scheme started.
The Opposition's communications spokesman Nick Minchin has this
week obtained independent legal advice saying that if the
Government is to pursue a mandatory filtering regime "legislation
of some sort will almost certainly be required".
Senator Nick Xenophon previously indicated he may support a
filter that blocks online gambling websites but in a phone
interview today he withdrew all support, saying "the more evidence
that's come out, the more questions there are on this".
The Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, has consistently
ignored advice from a host of technical experts saying the filters
would slow the internet, block legitimate sites, be easily bypassed
and fall short of capturing all of the nasty content available
online.
Despite this, he is pushing ahead with trials of the scheme
using six ISPs - Primus, Tech 2U, Webshield, OMNIconnect, Netforce
and Highway 1.
But even the trials have been heavily discredited, with experts
saying the lack of involvement from the three largest ISPs,
Telstra, Optus and iiNet, means the trials will not provide much
useful data on the effects of internet filtering in the
real-world.
Senator Conroy originally pitched the filters as a way to block
child porn but - as ISPs, technical experts and many web users
feared - the targets have been broadened significantly since
then.
ACMA's secret blacklist, which will form the basis of the
mandatory censorship regime, contains 1370 sites, only 674 of which
relate to depictions of children under 18. A significant portion -
506 sites - would be classified R18+ and X18+, which is legal to
view but would be blocked for everyone under the proposal.
This week Senator Conroy said there was "a very strong case for
blocking" other legal content that has been "refused
classification". According to the classification code, this
includes sites depicting drug use, crime, sex, cruelty, violence or
"revolting and abhorrent phenomena" that "offend against the
standards of morality".
And last month, ACMA added an anti-abortion website to its
blacklist because it showed photographs of what appears to be
aborted foetuses. The Government has said it was considering
expanding the blacklist to 10,000 sites and beyond.
Xenophon said instead of implementing a blanket mandatory
censorship regime the Government should instead put the money
towards educating parents on how to supervise their kids online and
tackling "pedophiles through cracking open those peer-to-peer
groups".
Technical experts have said the filters proposed by the
Government would do nothing to block child porn being transferred
on encrypted peer-to-peer networks.
"I'm very skeptical that the Government is going down the best
path on this," said Xenophon.
"I commend their intentions but I think the implementation of
this could almost be counter-productive and I think the money could
be better spent."
The policy has attracted opposition from online consumers, lobby
groups, ISPs, network administrators, some children's welfare
groups, the Opposition, the Greens, NSW Young Labor and even the
conservative Liberal senator Cory Bernardi, who famously tried to
censor the chef Gordon Ramsay's swearing on television.
This week, a national telephone poll of 1100 people, conducted
by Galaxy and commissioned by online activist group GetUp, found
that only 5 per cent of Australians want ISPs to be responsible for
protecting children online and only 4 per cent want Government to
have this responsibility.
A recent survey by Netspace of 10,000 of the ISP's customers
found 61 per cent strongly opposed mandatory internet filtering
with only 6.3 per cent strongly agreeing with the policy.
An expert report, handed to the Government last February but
kept secret until December after it was uncovered by the Herald,
concluded the proposed scheme was fundamentally flawed.
Even Labor has previously opposed ISP-level internet filtering
when the Howard Government raised it as a method for protecting
kids online.
"Unfortunately, such a short memory regarding the debate in 1999
about internet content has led the coalition to already offer
support for greater censorship by actively considering proposals
for unworkable, quick fixes that involve filtering the internet at
the ISP level," Labor Senator Kate Lundy said in 2003.
|
posted 25 Feb 2009 03:05 by Thang Ngo
So much for music download sending artists broke.. me thinks it's more likely the greedy film and music execs who are trying to protect their outrageous profit! On ya, Angus for speaking the truth! Music piracy not so bad, Sneaky sayAsher Moses, SMH Online 25th February 2009
The chief songwriter and producer of Australian dance music
group Sneaky Sound System says digital music piracy isn't a major
problem for popular artists because the vast majority of earnings
come from playing live shows.
Angus McDonald made the comments at a launch event for Nokia's
Comes With Music bundles. From next month the package will give
people unlimited free music downloads from the Nokia Music Store
for 12 or 18 months when they buy a Nokia phone.
Music industry figures attending the event hope the new
all-you-can-eat subscription model will lead to a significant drop
in music piracy. The wish is that people will have less need to go
to illegal sources if they have an unlimited subscription to a
legal service.
"This model certainly has the potential to be a significant new
revenue stream for our members," said Richard Mallet, director of
recorded music services at APRA/AMCOS, which collects licence fees
and royalties on behalf of the music industry.
The record labels and songwriters are the main losers from
piracy and plummeting CD sales but the artists who perform the
songs are not as badly affected as the lion's share of their
revenue comes from live shows and merchandise sales.
In fact, some groups have said piracy could be beneficial as it
allowed more people to experience their music and hence created a
larger fan base.
"From an artist's perspective ... the labels probably don't want
to hear this, but our main income stream, and certainly most of our
pleasure, comes from playing to lots and lots of people," McDonald
said.
Piracy was an issue for Sneaky Sound System but they still sold
200,000 physical copies of their self-titled debut album. McDonald
said people had a perception that music was "either very cheap or
free" but initiatives such as Comes With Music should entice more
people into legal channels, "fingers crossed".
Comes With Music bundles will be in stores from March 20.
Initially only one Nokia phone model will be available - the Nokia
5800 XpressMusic, which is the handset maker's first
touch-screen device.
Those looking for a one-year subscription to the music store
will pay $979 for the phone, while 18 months can be had for $1109.
More than 4 million songs are available and Nokia said this would
increase to 10 million in the coming months.
The subscription can be renewed only by buying a new Nokia phone
that supports Comes With Music. New models will be launched this
year including the Nokia 5130 XpressMusic, which debuts in April
and is pitched at budget-conscious consumers.
Users can download as many songs as they like and tracks do not
disappear once the subscription lapses. However, all tracks are
protected by Windows Media piracy locks so they can only be played
on the Nokia phone and one dedicated PC.
Songs can be downloaded directly to the phone or via a PC. Most
people should use the latter method as downloading directly to the
phone incurs data costs from the mobile carrier.
Gavin Parry, head of sales for Sony Music Australia, said
digital music sales only represented 20 per cent of the market and
most of those sales were generated by one dominant player, Apple's
iTunes.
With physical CD sales dropping at a faster rate than the growth
in digital sales, Parry said he was hopeful the new Comes With
Music all-you-can-eat model would arrest the shift towards illegal
download sites.
"At the end of the day, we're fighting free," he said.
|
posted 3 Feb 2009 02:02 by Thang Ngo
[
updated 3 Feb 2009 02:05
]
PRIVATE SYDNEY by Andrew Hornery
SMH Online, 3 February 2009
ON THE same day the world learned that the US swimming star
Michael Phelps had jeopardised his multimillion-dollar
sponsorship earnings after being photographed
sucking on a bong, Australia's Matthew Mitcham,
pictured, revealed he was yet to land a big sponsor - six months
after winning Beijing gold.
And while Ian Thorpe was last week forced to deny
constant rumours about his sexuality and the claims that
sponsorship dollars have kept him in the closet, Mitcham has been
completely open about being gay and will lead this year's Mardi
Gras, yet remains sponsorless. Even his fellow Beijing star
Stephanie Rice has managed to shovel millions into her bank
account despite headlines covering everything from her ill-fated
romances to her hedonistic lifestyle. The influential US gay
magazine The Advocate has Mitcham on its cover next month,
with the tagline reading: "What's a guy to do when he's got the
gold, the fame, and the man, but no big-time endorsements?"
Yesterday it was Kerri-Anne Kennerley who led the charge
for Mitcham during an interview on her morning show. "It is tough,"
Mitcham told her. "A lot of people are having a lot of trouble,
myself included . . . like I haven't signed anything yet but we are
working on things and there are some things in the works and there
are some things that are close."
K. A. K. responded: "I am a little shocked that you have not
been snapped up as quickly as I believe you should have been
because we should celebrate who and what you are - No. 1, the best,
perfect." |
posted 30 Jan 2009 16:36 by Thang Ngo
[
updated 30 Jan 2009 16:40
]
Asher Moses, Sydney Morning Herald, 30 January 2009Related: Greedy entertainment fatcats pick on iinet
One of the largest ISPs signed up to participate in Labor's
ambitious internet censorship trials has said its application has
been met with "deafening silence" from the Government, raising
questions over the workability of the proposed scheme and the
effectiveness of the trials.
The Government originally planned to trial the mandatory
internet filters before Christmas but the timetable has been pushed
back considerably and the Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy,
has still not released details of which ISPs have signed up to take
part in the trials or when they will begin.
Mark White, COO of iiNet, said the ISP put in its submission to
be part of the trial on December 6 and was told that the Government
would come back with more details by the middle of January, but all
it had heard was "deafening silence".
"I can't for a moment speculate what's going on but it certainly
doesn't seem to be running as a project on time and they're
certainly not communicating with the people that they need to -
that is, the ISPs that have offered to test this thing," said
White.
Senator Conroy - despite his promises before Labor was elected
that people would be able to opt out of any internet filters - has
said the first tier of the Government's censorship policy will be
compulsory for all. This would block all "illegal" and
"inappropriate" material, as determined in part by a secret
blacklist administered by the Australian Communications and Media
Authority.
A second tier would filter out content deemed harmful for
children, such as pornography, but this would be optional for
internet users.
Australia's largest ISP, Telstra, and Internode have said they
will not take part in the trials. The second-largest ISP, Optus,
will run a scaled-back trial of just the first tier, while iiNet,
the third-biggest provider, has also said it will only trial the
first tier, simply to show the Government that its scheme will not
work.
The Government said this week it had received 16 applications
from ISPs looking to take part in the trials and more details would
be available within days but the lack of participation from the
major ISPs indicates that the trial participants will be small
players with few users.
This may mean the trials will not provide much useful data as to
the effects of internet filtering in the real-world.
Cooperation from the large ISPs has been so poor that makers of
internet filtering hardware - mindful of the revenue they could
generate if the internet censorship plan goes ahead - are
petitioning small ISPs, offering to provide them with all the
equipment they need to take part in the trials.
"I know that some vendors have been approaching ISPs and saying
we're happy to support your participation in the trial and then on
that basis they put in an application," said Peter Coroneos, CEO of
the Internet Industry Association.
Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, who has long campaigned against the
censorship plan, said the delays in starting the trials indicated
the Government may have hit the wall of technical impossibility
that the industry had been warning it about for 12 months.
"Considering the intention was to launch a live trial before
Christmas, we've got a six week delay and no commitment to testing
on actual people," he said.
"This isn't a great advertisement for the workability of any
large scale scheme. The proposal has always been unpopular, now
perhaps the Government is starting to come to grips with what the
industry has been saying all along: if your policy objective is to
protect children online, this is not the way to go about it."
Ludlam posed a series of questions to the Government about the
web censorship scheme late last year and responses were received
this month.
Asked to provide evidence to support the claimed public demand
for filtered internet connections, the Government said the plan was
an election commitment.
"I don't think it's good enough to refer back to an election
promise that no one even knew existed ... they certainly didn't
campaign on it," Senator Ludlam said.
"You get a sense of the degree of public demand by the fact that
the voluntary opt-in [NetAlert] scheme [that was started by the
Howard government and provided free software filters] was so barely
subscribed that they closed it down."
The Government also admitted that any internet filters it would
introduce could be bypassed using easily available technological
tools.
And despite Senator Conroy claiming that most of the content on
the ACMA blacklist was child pornography, the Government revealed
that only 674 sites out of the 1370 sites currently listed related
to depictions of a child under 18.
506 sites would be classified R18+ and X18+, which is legal to
view in Australia but would be blocked for everyone under Labor's
mandatory censorship scheme.
The policy has attracted opposition from online consumers, lobby
groups, ISPs, network administrators, some children's welfare
groups, the Opposition, the Greens, NSW Young Labor and even the
conservative Liberal senator Cory Bernardi, who famously tried to
censor the chef Gordon Ramsay's swearing on television.
A recent survey by Netspace of 10,000 of the ISP's customers
found 61 per cent strongly opposed mandatory internet filtering
with only 6.3 per cent strongly agreeing with the policy.
An expert report, handed to the Government last February but
kept secret until December after it was uncovered by the Herald,
concluded the proposed scheme was fundamentally flawed.
It says the filters would slow the internet - as much as 87 per
cent by some measures - be easily bypassed and would not come close
to capturing all of the nasty content available online.
They would also struggle to distinguish between wanted and
unwanted content, leading to legitimate sites being blocked. Entire
user-generated content sites, such as YouTube and Wikipedia, could
be censored over a single suspect posting.
"It's definitely not going to be workable to get a very
significant reduction in access to this [unwanted] content that is
available out there - it's fundamentally just not viable," said one
of the report's authors, University of Sydney associate professor
Bjorn Landfeldt.
|
|