"Love all,
  Trust a few,
  Do wrong to none."
      - Shakespeare

 
  Main Topic
 
My research mainly focuses on connections between self-theory, self-perception, motivation, and well-being. I suppose that there are two paths of connections, namely, self-enhancement and self-improvement. I am working on establishing theoretical sequences as well as collecting data. My assumption is below:
 
Self-enhancement orientation
If you do not believe that you can change who you are, you are not motivated to perceive yourself accurately because there is nothing you can do about yourself. Instead, you are inclined to find ways to protect your self-image, such as self-handicapping and downward social comparison. Because these strategies are for your emotional satisfaction, rather than actualization of your potential, this orientation is expected to correlate better with subjective well-being.
 
Self-improvement orientation
If you believe that you can change who you are, you are motivated to know who you are so that you can do something about yourself. Thus, you are less likely to adopt self-protecting strategies, but instead face the problems and try to correct what is wrong and improve yourself. Because this effort leads to actualization of your potential and personal growth, this orientation is expected to correlate better with psychological well-being.
 
  
Related Topics
  • Well-Being
    • Distinction between subjective and psychological well-being
    • Investigation of divergent points between two well-being
  • Self-Esteem
    • Distinction between fragile and secure self-esteem
    • Causes and consequences of two different self-esteem
  • Self-Theory
    • Distinction between the entity and incremental theory
  • Responsibility
    • What constitutes and predicts responsibility?
    • What are the consequences of taking responsibility?