Ilya Stavinsky
08/16/2010
One-sided understanding of the concept of "relativity of energy"
The reason for misunderstanding of the source of free energy does not lie in the upper levels of physics but in its fundamental concept of "Energy". Of course energy can not emerge from nothing, there is always a source of origination and the law of conservation of energy must always be maintained.
The fact is, as all physicists know, energy is a relative concept. Until now, this relativity grappled in quantitative determinations. For example, the potential energy of a body with mass M at the same time can be zero with respect to the place where it is and can be significantly greater than zero with respect to the lower places, etc. .. The same can be said of its kinetic energy, i.e. in relation to what frame of reference, we measure its speed, so it is at one and the same time can be 0 or significantly greater than zero. This logic of reasoning is valid and extends to the charge. We can talk about the energy of definite charge that its potential energy is greater, less or equal to zero, depending on the static field in which we have put this charge. The modern definition of energy is confined by this understanding.
But this relative definition of energy is not exhausted. In addition to this relative quantitative characterization of energy in the reference systems there is its relative characteristic in relation to the qualitative reference systems, which produces the same magical effect on the amount of energy as well as quantitative characteristics.
The energy of uncharged and charged body
For example, let us take the uncharged body M, which is in the reference frame K, in a gravitational field of the Earth - has the potential and kinetic energy. And put the body in the frame of reference C, which is a electrostatic field. The question arises: whether our body has this energy with respect to this electrostatic field? The answer is very simple, no. Electrostatic field recognizes only the energy of the charge. Regardless of the speed of any flying uncharged body, and at what height it would not be in the system C, the last does not react on the uncharged body. This energy of the body to the electrostatic field does not exist and therefore this energy of the body is equal to zero.
Let's take a charge of a certain size and place it in a electrostatic field C. The charge has a certain potential energy in this field, but if the charge is moved in a reference system K, then in this system the potential energy of our charge will lose it's meaning, i.e. mathematically, it will be zero.
Let's consider a charged body in free fall. During the fall of the body it has the potential and kinetic energy. This total energy during the fall of the body is kept constant. This expresses the conservation of energy. But on the other hand the charge of the body acquires acceleration. Hence, by our logic and the charge has kinetic energy. But in the frame M this energy of the charge is zero, because the gravitational field recognizes only the mass, which can have energy. For system K the existence of the charge is nothing, and therefore it does not spend "a gram" of its energy on the formation of the kinetic energy of the charge. With the latest regulation physicists agree: "The force acting on them (charges) is zero," (Dmitry Levkov, physical forum of the Moscow State University).
And, if you place a sufficiently large charge on a falling body, the kinetic energy of the charge can be many times greater than the total energy of a falling body. If for the gravitational field the kinetic energy of the charge is zero, then for the electrostatic field it represents quite certain value. Because the electrostatic field recognizes the energy only of a charge and not the mass that carries it. Therefore, in the electrostatic field C the total energy of the mass-body is equal to zero, but the kinetic energy of the charge is recognized by the field C and becomes much greater than zero. It follows that in a gravitational field K we get the kinetic energy of the charge, without spending any energy of mass-body and the field. And how this is consistent with conservation of energy?
But we find a similar picture, when a charged particle acquires a kinetic energy due to the electrostatic field C. The energy of the electrostatic field is spent only on the formation of the kinetic energy of the charge. But in this case and the mass of the particle receives kinetic energy, but the latter for the electrostatic field does not exist and therefore this kinetic energy of the mass for the field C is zero. Another words the electrostatic field does not spend "a gram" of its energy on the formation of the kinetic energy of the mass of the charged particle. If you move the mass of a charged particle or a charged body in the frame of reference K, then there we find that the mass of the charged body has the potential and kinetic energy, on formation of which the electrostatic field didn't spend any energy. As for the kinetic energy of the charge it becomes zero.
Conclusion
Thus we have shown
1. that the energy of the body (charged and uncharged) may appear or may disappear completely, depending not only on the quantitative values of the reference system, but also on the qualitative difference between frames of reference, for example, the gravitational field and static field. Thus gravitational energy only recognizes mass of the body , and electrostatic field - charge of the body.
2. that the kinetic energy of the charge can occur during its movement in the system K for free and that the kinetic and potential energy of the mass of the charged body can occur for free in a static field C. But the first assertion is not only a feature of free fall body. We can go down to Earth and move with acceleration the charged body, based on Newton's second law. And in this case, we get gratuitous kinetic energy of the charge, because the force acting on the body is directly proportional to the force and inversely proportional to the mass, i.e., F = ma, , and the charge in this movement gets free ride.
3. With a simple transfer of a charged or uncharged body from one frame to another, we can get energy or lose it completely. Consequently, the law of conservation of energy has a relative value.
4. We say that if the velocity of mass, say 100 tons, of the body approaches the speed of light, then .... Think of this expression. Can we accelerate the mass of the body to this speed in a gravitational field? Of course not, but that speed is easy to obtain for a charged mass of the body in a electrostatic field with one condition, if the body is in a state of weightlessness, or, in other words, in a state of the field-body. This means that the body must have sufficient charge in order for the force of static field to balance it's weight. In this case, any size of a body, can be easily accelerated like the elementary charge. This charged body can pick up speed in the thousands and tens of thousands of kilometers per second, because it's speed does not depend on the mass of the body and depends only on the magnitude of its charge and energy of the electrostatic field in which it is located.
Independence of Energy Formation in the Gravitational and Electrostatic field Let's take two bodies A and B and consider two cases.
The body A does not have the electrical charge.
Assume for simplicity that body A moves uniformly on the Earth along a platform on which stands our observer (body B), with a speed of 60 km / hour.
(For us, no matter how the body moves on the ground or above the ground. But it is important at the expense of what energy it moves. Suppose that it is moving by its own engine (car or a jet engine, etc.).. Taking into account the friction, the forces balanced.
Earth at the same time surrounded by fields: gravitational, electrostatic, etc. .. (constrain yourself by the two fields). It means the motion of our body A occurs simultaneously in these fields. But the whole point is that we ignore the electrostatic field (we do not notice it) because it does not respond to a neutral mass of the body A, and to the gravitational field we are so accustomed to, that we don't mention it. But we know that the gravitational field interacts with the mass of body A, so the latter has a weight, and we must make an external force (engine, the action of another body) to make it move. For this reason, our body A is moving in the gravitational field of Earth. But we keep silent about this fact.
If the body A does not have electrical charge , then this issue of the energy of the body A exhausted. It is simple and understandable from the standpoint of classical mechanics, and without a gravitational field in which the movement of our body takes place.
I. Now assume the same conditions when body A in motion, but it has the electrical charge.
For this reason, let's put an induction coil close to the charge of the body A with its ends connected to the electrical bulb. The same bulbs we place along the entire length of our platform on which there is the observer ( body B). And we assume that body A is very close located from these bulbs during its motion.
1. A charged body begins to move uniformly along the platform and at the same time in relation of the gravitational and static field of the Earth.
2. So, as we established earlier, the body A moves in a gravitational field, because it has weight and moves by external force, the engine, with speed of 60 km / hour. But this field is indifferent to the charged mass of the body A. Does this charge on the moving body A exist or does not exist, for the gravitational field is quite immaterial.
3. Since the body A is moving at the same time in the Earth's electrostatic field, the later does not interact with the mass of the body A. The electrostatic field is indifferent to the mass of body A . For it, this mass does not exist. But the electrostatic field recognizes the charge of the body A, their interaction takes place, resulting in the formation of a constant magnetic field around the moving charge. It takes some energy to create this magnetic field. Since the magnetic field around the charge is constant, then it does not form EMF of the solenoid near the charge and therefore the light on the body of A is not lit.
4.The question arises: Where did the energy for the formation of a permanent magnetic field around the charge come from? The answer is very simple. If our charge is in rest relatively to electrostatic field of the Earth, there is no interaction between them and therefore there is no magnetic field around the charge. But if our charge begins to move uniformly with respect to the static field of the Earth, the magnetic field arises. Consequently, the cause of the magnetic field around a charge of A is the movement of this charge in the relation of the electrostatic field of the Earth. Therefore, the later spends it's energy on the creation of the magnetic field, for this reason, the body A did not spent nothing of its energy or the one of gravitational field of the Earth, where the charged body A moves. From this we can draw only one conclusion: when a charged body is in motion in a gravitational field the independent creation of the energy in the electrostatic field takes place, which may exceed the size of the total energy of the body in a gravitational field if the body A has a large enough charge.
5. With the passage of our charged body A along the track observer, i.e. along each solenoid bulbs on it, the charge will generate a constant magnetic field. For this reason the lights on the platform will not lit.
II. Let's consider the case when a charged body A moves with acceleration.
All that we have overseen under the uniform motion of a charged body, remains in force except for one things. Under accelerated motion of the charged body A in a gravitational field, around the charge will be generated alternating magnetic field. Therefore, the light on the body A will be lit during motion. And on the platform, each bulb will blink when the body A will pass near them .
III. In classical electrodynamics, physicists understood that the cause of electromagnetic waves is the excitation of a medium. They assumed the existence of the ether, whose existence was disproved by the experiments of Michelson , Fizeau etc. .. Therefore, this idea hung in the air. But they were on the right track: excitation of medium is really going on, but this medium is not the Ether but the electrostatic field of a planet or star, and so on.
And at that moment Einstein came in with his theory of Relativity, who killed one of the fundamental laws of nature: the independence of energy formation in the gravitational and static field. According to his theory of "rectilinearly moving electric charge creates electric and magnetic fields, but for a rectilinearly moving observer, it only creates an electric field."
Think about what he says, that the magnetic field for one frame of reference exists but for the other not. But the field - is one of the basic qualities of matter, along with the mass. How can it happen that the matter exists in one frame of reference and does not exist in the other. Thus he completely distorted the concept of "relativity" .
Electrostatic field of the Earth and Free Energy
My previous conclusion that under the mechanical motion of a charged body A (or under its free fall in a gravitational field) the energy of the charge is spent on the creation of a magnetic field (constant or variable) around charged body A - is erroneous, because this energy is spent by the electrostatic field of the Earth. Let us examine this issue in more detail.
Until now, physicists say that, The work force of the electrostatic field when you move the charge from one point of the field to another , does not depend on the shape of the trajectory and is determined only by the position of a start and end points and the magnitude of the charge.
But when we move the charge, around it there is a constant or variable magnetic field, depending on how we move this charge evenly or with acceleration. Therefore, to the energy which is spent by the electrostatic field on the movement of our charge in it, is added more energy going on the formation of a magnetic field around our charge.
Just as the gravitational field expends its energies on the movement of the body in it, and the electrostatic field expends its energies on the movement of a charge and the formation of the magnetic field surrounding the charge. Let's take another more obvious example. The ship is in calm water, and from a shore a rope attached to a motor, starts to pull our ship. In this case, the motor spends its energy not only on the movement of the ship on the water but also to create waves around it.
With the accelerated motion of the charge in the electrostatic field of the Earth a perturbation of the latter takes place, i.e. a variable static field is created , resulting in the creation of an alternating magnetic field around the charge. The vibration of the alternating magnetic field perturbs the electrostatic field, i.e. E. creates a variable electrostatic field, to which it transmits its energy. This process is repeated. It forms an electromagnetic wave and with it, and the electromagnetic field.
If we return to our example, freely falling charged body A in a gravitational field, it becomes now clear how the energy of an alternating magnetic field around the body of A is formed. This energy comes from the electrostatic field of the Earth and the free falling charged body does not give "a gram" of its energy on formation of this magnetic field. But what about the law of conservation of energy in these conditions? Very simply, if we take into account that we are dealing with two sources of energy: the gravitational field and the electrostatic field of the Earth. Gravitational field has spent its energy on the fall of the body, and the electrostatic field has spent its energy on the formation of the electromagnetic field around the falling charged body. In essence, our confusion with the magnetic energy surrounding the falling charged body came to life because we have limited ourselves by conditionally closed system, which includes only one source of energy, Earth's gravitational field. But if we extend the limit of our relatively closed system, i.e. include an additional source of energy, the electrostatic field of the Earth, and recalculate the formation of energy according to the new conditions, then the energy conservation law remains valid in relation to each source of energy.
From the above, now it is not difficult to understand how the additional energy in the generators of the free energy Tesla, Chas Campbell and Kapanadze, Testatika etc. - came into existence.. This free energy is obtained from the electrostatic field of the Earth, with an accelerated motion of the charges in it.
 <a target="_blank"
|