Friday February 25, 2005
Reverend Michael N. Cooney Vicar, Central Macomb Vicariate St. Peter Catholic Church 98 New Street MT. Clemens, Michigan 48043-5664
Dear Reverend Cooney,
The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of the growing unrest of an apparent majority of the parishioners at St. Rene Goupil Catholic Church, Sterling Heights, Michigan. As officers of the Parish Pastoral Council and Chairpersons of its 5 Commissions we have been inundated with complaints and concerns from a multitude of parishioners regarding many of the changes dictated by our new Pastor, Fr. Koehler immediately after his arrival on February 1, 2005.
We have received an overwhelming number of calls, emails, and letters and we have also been petitioned in person by an unusually large and diverse group of parishioners expressing a wide range of emotions including, but not limited to; "Hurt", "Appalled", "Disillusioned", "Confused", "Outraged", "Frustrated", and even outright "Anger".
The fact that all of these emotions and corresponding calls for action could manifest over such a short time in so many normally joyful and God loving people is at the very least troubling to us. All of this growing unrest is being directly attributed to actions taken by Fr. Koehler in just the first 21 days of his administration of our faith community. Frankly, we find it very disheartening since we had all prayed for a unifying spiritual leader.
The following compilation summarizes some of the grievances and potential consequences of the actions taken by Fr. Koehler, as related to us by concerned parishioners, as well as, a sampling of the remedies proposed by some of the same persons.
We submit the compilation and the accompanying letters and emails, detailing additional objections and concerns, for your consideration. We ask for your timely intervention in this matter so as to help us preserve the traditions and values of our Parish as passed on to us by Monsignor Martin, Bishop Harrington, and Reverend Schweihofer.
As you read the letters and emails you will no doubt quickly realize the deep pride and affection the parishioners of St. Renes have for "our" church, our God, and each other. It is our heartfelt desire that the peace we have shared for so many years be returned to our Parish family by whatever means necessary as quickly as possible.
We thank you for your time and guidance in this matter.
Respectfully,
St. Rene Goupil Parish Pastoral Council Officers and Commission Chairpersons
CC: Cardinal Adam Maida Bishop Boyea Fr. Koehler The following information has been compiled and summarized from letter, emails, and conversations with concerned parishioners from St. Rene Goupil:
GRIEVANCES: Resignations and Terminations All of the following have been implicitly or explicitly attributed to Fr. Koehler; - Resignation of Deacon ....................................................... December, 2004 - Resignation of Sister ......................................................... February 7, 2005 - Resignation of Business Manager..................................... February 17, 2005 - Termination of Pastoral Minister....................................... February 21, 2005 - Termination of Director Religious Education (DRE)...........February 21, 2005 - Resignation of Education Commission Chairperson............February 23, 2005 - Resignation of RCIA................................................ ........... February, 2005
POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES: Resignations and Terminations
GRIEVANCES: Financial Matters -
POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES: Financial Matters
GRIEVANCES: Miscellaneous Fr. Koehler; - Forbade the playing of the piano or the synthesizer during mass, then agreed to allow one song to be performed on the synthesizer. (Fr. Koehler advised the Parish Pastoral Council at the February 14, 2005 meeting that it was against church doctrine to celebrate mass with "synthetic" music. Which, if true, we have a problem because the church organ qualifies as a synthesizer.) - Refused to meet with the Choir about their concerns over many of the changes he has made other than on a one-on-one basis - Does not accept email at all - Does not accept voicemail at all - Does not return phone calls - Does not return mail - Is frequently unreachable by the Parish staff - Advised the Parish Pastoral Council at February 14, 2005 meeting that;
POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES: Miscellaneous Matters
PROPOSED REMEDIES:
Date: 3/8/2005 To: All St. Rene Goupil Parishioners, From: St. Rene Council
I received a copy of Reverend Cooney's letter to Cardinal Maida today regarding the controversy that currently exists within St. Rene. With Reverend Cooney's permission I am sharing his letter with all of you, so that you may know both Reverend Cooney's role in this matter and his message to the Cardinal regarding all concerned parties. We are all appreciative of everything Reverend Cooney has done to facilitate a peaceful solution.
Reverend Cooney has advised me that he expects to receive a reply from the Cardinal by Friday of this week and that he will share the Cardinal's decision with me promptly. Correspondingly, I will also communicate the Cardinal's decision and any other relevant information to all interested persons immediately.
Until then, I urge you all to continue to pray for the Cardinal as he considers this weighty matter. Sincerely,
St. Peter Church 98 New Street Mount Clemens. MI48043 (586) 468-4578 Fax (586) 468-3199
Cardinal
Adam J. Maida March 1 2005
Dear Cardinal Maida, I hope this letter finds you in good health and great form. As you know we have a situation at St. Rene Goupil Parish in Sterling Heights. I have become involved in my role as vicar. I am writing this letter to you asking for guidance and direction. The role of vicar is primarily one of communicator. I have tried to do this but I am now at a state where I need to know how you want me to continue my involvement in this very painful situation. I am also writing this letter to you because your name and that of Bishop Boyea has been invoked as the persons who gave Fr. Steve Koehler specific directions on what was to be done when he arrived at St. Rene Parish.
As of this date I have spoken with or personally met with our previous Deacon, our previous Sister the pastoral associate, the parish business manager, our previous Pastoral Minister and our Director of Religious Education. All of these people have left their positions either by choice or by termination. I have also met with Fr. Steve Koehler, Deacon John Ball, the chairperson and a representation of the Parish Council and their respective committee chairpersons. Please allow me to give you my read on this situation.
There are a number of components to this situation. The first has to do with Fr. Fred Schweihofer. Fr. Fred was a good priest who was much loved by his people. However, he was not an administrator. This fact is true throughout his pastorate at St. Rene. This created a void in the leadership of the parish. The staff filled that void the best they could. They truly tried to serve the needs of the parish. They continued or began programs that were well received by the parish. Without the direction of an ordained pastor some difficulties did arise such as lay ministers preaching at Mass, the size of the staff and the balancing of the budget. Fr. Fred's lack of administrative leadership allowed this to happen to some degree just as his support of his staff allowed some good programs to flourish.
The persons involved in Fr. Koehler's assignment and the process itself are also a component of the situation. I realize that with the shortage of priests it is often difficult if not almost impossible to fill situations as they become open. The opening at St. Rene's underlines a number of inherent problems. Fr Fred's decision left a large vacuum in a large parish. The assignment board probably would have preferred to wait until the March-April assignment process. On the other hand, they probably did not want to leave St. Rene without a resident pastor for such a long time. They did name two retired priests as administrators, Fr. Larry Jackson and Msgr. Ed Baldwin. However, these were short-term assignments for various reasons.
In the process of determining a pastor I do not know that anyone really considered the "culture" of the parish. St. Rene has always had the reputation of being a very loving, active and socially involved parish. Over the pastorates of Msgr. Martin, Bishop Harrington and Fr. Fred the parish did develop a sense of lay leadership in many areas. The history and "culture" of the parish needed to be considered in naming a long term pastor. Part of this "culture" is the pain the parish is still experiencing from the departure of Fr. Fred.
There seemingly have been some prejudgments made about the parish in a number of areas such as finance, ministry, Catholicity. These judgments were made prior to Fr. Steve's assignment. He has communicated to the parish that he really did not want to take the assignment. However, you, Cardinal, and Bishop Boyea urged him to take it. He has also said that he was given a direction to "handle the situation." This communication with the parish has caused much tension and hurt.
There is obviously a letter, e-mailing campaign going on by many of the parishioners. I have personally received and read over 100 letters and e-mails. I know many were sent to you, Bishop Boyea and Fr. Koehler. This could be seen as a campaign organized by a few. However, writing letters and e-mails is an acceptable form of communication, questioning and protest. These people who are taking part are trying to voice concerns they see as being valid. They do have a right to an answer in some way. To simply stack and overlook the correspondence would be an insult as well as a disservice to what we call "Church. "
I have become aware that there are a number of areas that need to be addressed in an administrative way. These areas include lay preaching, the size of the staff, budget priorities, salary scales, the Catholic identity of programs to name a few. It would seem to me that there are a number of ways to approach these areas. One way is to be present among the people, to discern what the problems really are and then to work on them in a pastoral process that involves time, communication, collegiality and transparency. There is another way called confrontation that would address perceived problems more quickly while risking much in terms of good will, relationships and judgments about whether or not we really mean that the laity does have a role in the Church.
One thing that has stood out from my experience of this situation is that while many of the downtown offices have been supportive of the requests of Fr. Steve such as a speedy audit from the Finance Office and professional support from the Parish Life Office no-one has gone out to meet with or listen to the parishioners at all much less with an open mind.
Cardinal, everyone is hurting in this situation as attested to by the letters, e-mails and meetings. There may be a question of the number of parishioners who are hurting but there can be no denying that there is hurt. I believe Fr. Koehler is also hurting. No priest wants to begin an assignment with tension, disagreement or outright opposition. We all want to be good pastoral priests who love and are loved by our people.
I urge you to read the attachment that I am sending to you with this letter. It came from my meeting with the parish council chairperson and the committee chairs. I believe it to be a precise presentation of questions and concerns on behalf of this group. I also think you need to read it in order to help you get a larger view of the situation.
I have told the people I have met with that the role of vicar has no power. It is only a form of communication and cohesion within a vicariate and within the Archdiocese. Ultimately the final decision is yours as Cardinal-Archbishop. I do, however, need your direction and advice on how you want me to proceed. I believe that the truth of this situation is somewhere in the middle. I also believe that each person is viewing the situation from his or her own perspective. Thank you for your kind attention to this rather long epistle with its attachment. The situation, Cardinal, does need your pastoral attention soon for the good of everyone involved.
I promised the chairman of the parish council that I would share with him my letter to you. I felt that this was the best decision in terms of openness and communication. I realize that this might raise questions with you. I will delay mailing the other copies of this letter until next week so that you will have a chance to see it before anyone else.
Love, Peace, Joy,
Fr.
Michael N. Cooney cc:
Bishop Earl Boyea, Regional Bishop |

