Here is a transcript of an email from Yorkhill & Kelvingrove Community Council to Cllr Matheson (one of Ward 10 Cllrs) who seems to have kept a very low profile on the whole issue and which follows on from
.
Fwd: Letter Regarding Overnewton Recreation Centre
antony ownsworth [...]
Sent: 27 January 2010 12:04
To: gordon.matheson@councillors.glasgow.gov.uk
Cc: nina.baker@councillors.glasgow.gov.uk; Braat, Philip [Philip.Braat@glasgow.gov.uk]; Mackay, Craig [Craig.Mackay@glasgow.gov.uk]; [...]
Dear Gordon
You will recall when we met on Friday you said you would look at this matter from whether the recommendation was based on ROBUST information.
The attached revision to the repairs schedule is highly questionable.
I would be obliged if you could arrange for me to have a copy of the report on this matter with a detailed make up of the costing. I would also like to receive details of expenditure on maitenance in each of the years C&SG have been running the Overnewton cetre, albeit this can follow when youreceive this information.
As a first order appraisal of the figures quoted in the attached e-mail, I suspect they will not hold up to forensic examination, and you are aware of my background.
Not withstanding all of this, I believe the closure proposal for closure is immeasurably flawed and whilst you said you were not of a mind to to adopt your own backyard approach,as the recommendation from C&SG appears to be less than robust ,we are now in a situation where as one four elected Council Members for Ward 10, I on behalf of our community seek your support to oppose the proposed closure.
I can confirm having received a letter from Baillie Liz Cameron in which she states that Councillor Bratt is working with the Friends of Overnewton (FoO) and others to consider alternative management structures. I can confirm this is totally incorrect and that FoO have replied to Baiilie Cameron to confirm at the meeting on 14thJanuary all parties asked Councillor Bratt to persue the retention of the centre as none of the groups attending were of a mind to become involved with his proposals ( which were unsolicited).
As an observation C&SG was set up to run places like Overnewton, Obtain funds for development?, yet we are now by implication being told they cannot achieve this, but maybe the users can be more successful using another model--I think it is the problem for the Administration of Glasgow City Council to sort out.
I am happy to engage in further discussion as you think appropriate, either this side of Thursday's Council meeting or recognising your schedule thereafter. I am in London Mon/Tues but I have slots latter in the week.
Regards
Tony