© 2010 Marilyne Stains and Hannah Sevian The SAMM survey is a 15-min, open-ended survey that evaluates students' implicit assumptions about the structure of solute and solvent substances in a gas solution, the origin of motion of the gaseous solute particles, and their trajectories. Permission and Directions: Science educators who wish to use
the Structure And Motion of Matter (SAMM) survey © 2010 by Marilyne Stains and Hannah Sevian, for research and teaching have permission to do so if they
acknowledge the authors, cite the references below, and comply with the fair use
of this copyrighted and registered work. This permission extends to the user manual for the scoring scheme and the programmed ExcelÒ scoring scheme. In any use of the SAMM, its versions,
and its translations to other languages (see below), permission is contingent
upon acknowledgement of the SAMM authors and citation of the following references
which provide information on the SAMM administration, scoring, reliability,
validity, and findings related to its administration. If you are using the SAMM survey, please fill the form below with your name, contact information and description of how you will use the survey. This information will be used as a diagnostic of the usefulness of the survey to the science education community and it only be accessed and retained by the following two authors Marilyne Stains and Hannah Sevian. We would also appreciate any feedback users may have about any of the materials provided here. You can write your feedback in the second form below. Access to Materials: The SAMM survey, associated scoring scheme, and the user manual for the scoring scheme can be found at the bottom of this webpage. References:
Acknowledgments: This paper is based on work supported by the
National Science Foundation (NSF), while one of the authors (HS) was working at
the Foundation. This work was also supported, in part, by NSF award EHR-0412390. Any opinions,
findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. |