Threat of Development on Morrison "Street" Persists In August of 2005, new development was proposed for a landlocked parcel in the wetlands, at 29 Morrison "Street" (a "paper street" laid out on maps but never built). Approximately 60 letters were sent by neighbors to the City expressing opposition to the construction of a single family house, which would entail paving a portion of Morrison Street and disrupting the wetland. The issue remains unresolved as the current owner, a Connecticut man, has filed a lawsuit against the former owner, claiming that he was given deceptive information about the parcel's readiness for development. Several local news stories have chronicled the possibility of development on this parcel, which would disturb the wetland. See our links page for past news coverage. Compromise Reached on Harvard Botany Lab Commercial Day Care Proposal Denied 104 Walter Development Threat Defused Before the Mayor’s announcement, the development initiative for this parcel had been by far the gravest threat to the integrity of the larger wetlands of which it is a part. That threat was the spur to widespread community alarm and formation of the Roslindale Wetlands Task Force in 2003, which in turn led to scrutiny of the other 8½ acres of the wetlands and concern over the over two dozen quasi-abandoned smaller parcels situated there. There followed the successful and continuing parallel campaign to get these small, mainly tax-foreclosed parcels under City Conservation Commission control. But the fate of the wetlands always largely hinged on the fate of the two-acre superparcel behind 104 Walter Street, and the now eclipsed plan to build a paved street and a five-structure, 10-unit condominium complex on its eastern edge. The neighborhood’s opposition rested on issues of open space, species and habitat preservation, stormwater management, red flags vis a vis the building code, and foreseeable traffic hazards. |
