Here is a brief description of the research that I carried out during my PhD at UPenn. Although most of the chapters are published, I still continue doing long-term (>14 years) demographic census at the fieldsite in the Great Basin desert (Utah, US). Because size plays an
crucial role in the determination of individual plant fitness, we will not achieve a full understanding of
plant demography until the overlooked possibility for
individual plants to decrease in size, plant shrinkage, is integrated in the
field. My work investigates the anatomical structures and physiological mechanisms that result in internally regulated size declines, as well as the frequency, contribution to the demographic
dynamics and potential evolutionary adaptations of plant shrinkage across taxa, growth forms and habitats. In order to address this question,
I am undertaking a multi-disciplinary approach that includes histological work, physiological
experiments, long-term field demographic censuses involving the effects of
climate change, and a phylogenetic-based literature survey of demographic data. My doctoral research is composed of five areas of ecological knowledge:
2- Distribution of belowground resources: Because higher plants are extremely modular organisms, shrinkage in them may be the result of the reduction in the number of modules. Consequently, a mechanism that may explain
plant shrinkage is the internal regulation of these modules in a way that could
facilitate their elimination without compromising whole plant survival.
Up until recently, it had been commonly assumed that resources taken up by
individual roots were redistributed to the whole plant, but this integrative view has been juxtaposed in
the last decades with strong evidence of hydraulic
sectoriality, i.e. preferential transport of resources from
specific roots to specific shoots. My work with Cryptantha flava reveals for the first time functional, developmental hydraulic sectoriality in a desert chamaephyte (Salguero-Gomez & Casper, in review). Additional work with other aridland chamaephyte (Salguero-Gomez, unpublished) suggests that hydraulic sectoriality may be adaptive and I suggest that the ability to become internally sectored, a phenomenon that is very frequent among aridland woody species, may have allowed herbaceous perennials to find their niche in cold deserts. 3- Within-plant dynamics: rosette demography The hypothesized advantages of being hydraulically sectored (see above) are (i) to be able to lower mortality risk of the entire plant by localizing stress and avoiding disease spread, (ii) consequentially lengthening longevity, and (iii) slowing down/escaping senescence , as well as (iv) to increase the overall plant efficiency at resource uptake by sacrificing modules whose roots are not obtaining enough resources, thus (v) allowing for costly functions with a clear impact on the population, such as reproduction. All this advantages are of tremendous importance for the demography of a sectored species, but to date they are only hypotheses. This section of my doctoral work is set to address whether being sectored is truly advantageous in individuals of C. flava. Since adults of C. flava are hydraulically sectored for their lateral roots, but hydraulically integrated for their only tap root (Salguero-Gomez & Casper, in review), the theory described above would predict that the dead of a module (Fig. 9) within an individual should result in an increase in survival probability and reproductive output (thus fitness) of the remaining modules. To test this hypotheses I have been following all the rosettes (~50 on average per individual) for over 200 adults of C. flava since 2006. I am currently analyzing the data and will soon be able to give you an answer!!
4- Among-plant dynamics: individual demography Demography is based at the interface of conservation biology and evolution because it allows for the estimation of invasiveness rates and extinction risks, for the determination of the life cycle stages that most affect demographic dynamics (elasticity analyses), and for the exploration of processes that are most strongly under selection (sensitivity analyses). Scientists have paid much attention to the structural and hydraulic factors that control and limit maximum plant size (e.g. work by Enquist, Niklas, Reicht, etc). However, the ability of plants to decrease in size, a frequent yet overlooked phenomenon has passed by under the radar of plant ecologists and evolutionists. The impacts of shrinkage, however, are predictably important because size is the strongest predictor of population- and individual-based fitness. I am studying the demographic dynamics of a natural population of C. flava in the Great Basin Desert, in Utah. The goal of this project is to understand how increases in precipitation at the end of the growing season, as predicted by regional climatic models, will affect the viability of this population, and what role plant shrinkage will play in tracking environmental stochasticity. To this end, I have been following +3000 individuals from 2005 to 2010, in May and August, and supplying 4.5 cm of rainfall to some plots every August. I am currently constructing integral projection models (IPMs)... and thus will be able to give you an answer very soon!! 5- Comparative demography: Projection matrix models are powerful tools to study the effects of size
on the dynamic of species populations. A size-based matrix model classifies
individuals in a population according to discrete ranges of size,
and describes for each class the average probability of survival, probabilities
of change in size (growth or shrinkage), and the reproductive contributions to
the population. Due to the wide range of ecological and evolutionary questions that the
matrix approach has allowed to address (e.g. determination of exploitation
regimes that are sustainable for natural populations, or whether
or not plants age) matrix data for over 600 plants species has
been published (Salguero-Gomez, unpublished). This vast amount of information has no precedent in demography,
and is now allowing for further exploration of even broader ecological
questions. An example is the comparison of biological processes such as growth,
stasis and reproduction both intra- and inter-specifically. Surprisingly,
shrinkage, one of the processes that can be described by these matrices when it
occurs, has never been examined in comparative demographic studies. Questions such as which species are able to shrink, and in what habitat
(desert, tropical forest, temperate forest, etc) is shrinkage more frequent
and/or demographically important can, in principle, be addressed with this
large amount of matrix demographic information. However, because evolution is a
branching process, all biological traits – demographic ones included – are
related by common ancestry, and therefore the use of statistical
analyses that assume data independence are not suitable here. An appropriate
way to analyze these data is the use of PICs (Phylogenetic Independent Contrast
analyses) because they account for phylogenetic relationships. I have shown that previous assumptions used in comparative demography (lumping shrinkage with stasis, or shrinkage with growth) are not mathematically/biologically sound (Salguero-Gomez & Casper J Ecol 2010). Drawing from a subset of my database, in this case with 80 herbaceous perennial species, I have pointed out that species whose individuals show shrinkage (=retrogression probabilities in projection matrix >0) have greater resilience, and through loop analyses, I have also demonstrated that the ability of plants to grow and shrink, an important plastic trait, is positively correlated with lifespan. |


